onX Maps
Hillary's Bad Day
Community
Contributors to this thread:
NvaGvUp 19-May-15
Woods Walker 19-May-15
Shuteye 19-May-15
sundowner 19-May-15
Woods Walker 19-May-15
Anony Mouse 19-May-15
Bowbender 20-May-15
sundowner 20-May-15
Anony Mouse 21-May-15
Beendare 21-May-15
Stumpkiller 22-May-15
itshot 22-May-15
leftybearfan 22-May-15
J.E.Travis1 22-May-15
J.E.Travis1 22-May-15
NvaGvUp 22-May-15
itshot 22-May-15
NvaGvUp 22-May-15
Stumpkiller 23-May-15
Woods Walker 23-May-15
From: NvaGvUp
19-May-15
The NYT seems to be full on in going after Hillary and all her lies.

From The Weekly Standard:

"The Worst Day of Hillary Clinton's Campaign So far!

MAY 19, 2015 • BY STEPHEN F. HAYES

In fact, she’s had a series of bad days since she announced her presidential bid April 12. But Monday was the worst of them.

In a bombshell report, the New York Times reported that Clinton, as secretary of state, used her private email to share private intelligence reports from noted conspiracy theorist and political hitman Sidney Blumenthal, at a time when Blumenthal was being paid by the Clinton Foundation and liberal political organizations that helped lay the groundwork for Clinton’s presidential campaign.

The emails included reports on Libya at a time when Blumenthal was seeking business in the country and included dubious information.

The Times reported that Clinton nonetheless “took Mr. Blumenthal’s advice seriously” and “continued to pass around his emails even after other senior diplomats concluded that Mr. Blumenthal’s assessments were often unreliable.”

A second story about Clinton and Libya broke the same day, this one casting further doubt on the Obama administration’s narrative about the attacks on U.S. facilities in Benghazi on September 11, 2012, and specifically on claims Clinton made about nature of those attacks and motivations of the attackers. An intelligence report prepared by the Defense Intelligence Agency and sent to Clinton and other senior administration officials on September 16, 2012, just days after the attacks, concluded that the attack “was planned ten or more days” in advance and was meant to “kill as many Americans as possible.” The report identifies al Qaeda-linked terrorists believed to have been involved in the assault.

The Obama administration crafted a public narrative that the attack had evolved from a “spontaneous” protest over a YouTube video and included a wide range of individuals. Clinton cited the video in remarks at a memorial service on September 14, 2012, for those killed in the attacks. She told members of the victims’ families that the administration would bring to justice those responsible for the video. The DIA report and several other Benghazi-related documents were released to Judicial Watch pursuant to a court order in response to a FOIA request.

The DIA report further undermines the administration’s already-tattered claims that its public case was based on intelligence assessments. Emails released in response to a previous Judicial Watch request showed that the White House had drafted a set of political talking points that sought to blame the video and not administration policy.

That the DIA report was not released as a result of any previous Benghazi investigations raises additional questions about the administration’s unwillingness to turn over documents related to the attacks and how comprehensive those previous investigations have been.

Many of the revelations that have undermined administration claims about Benghazi have come outside of the regular congressional oversight efforts, in part because of the administration’s disinclination to cooperate and in part because of the half-hearted inquiries led by the committees of jurisdiction.

Administration defenders and many in the media claimed that an additional investigation of Benghazi would be unnecessary because of these previous efforts. But these recent revelations validate the decision of House speaker John Boehner to create a select committee and make clear that there is still much more to learn. The State Department only recently turned over documents related to the State Department’s Administrative Review Board examination of Benghazi. The House Oversight Committee first requested those documents more than two years ago – on January 28, 2013. The Benghazi Select Committee is still waiting for reams of documents from the White House, the Pentagon, and the State Department.

Beyond that, of course, are questions about emails and documents that the public may never see because Hillary Clinton used private emails to circumvent the record retention requirements of the U.S. government. The committee is examining all options in its attempt to find or recover those discarded emails.

It has been nearly a month since Hillary Clinton took questions from the media. And with the growing stench of scandal it’s likely that she’ll continue to seek to avoid circumstances that might require her to provide answers. That’s a short-term solution to a long-term problem. And even a media that is ideologically sympathetic is showing signs of frustration with her games.

Hillary Clinton has more bad days ahead.:

From: Woods Walker
19-May-15

Woods Walker's embedded Photo
Woods Walker's embedded Photo
It won't matter. She's untouchable, like Obama was.

More affirmative action failures coming right up!

I wonder who they'll run after Hillary's 8 years? Bruce Jenner?

From: Shuteye
19-May-15
"In a bombshell report, the New York Times reported that Clinton, as secretary of state, used her private email to share private intelligence reports from noted conspiracy theorist and political hitman Sidney Blumenthal, at a time when Blumenthal was being paid by the Clinton Foundation and liberal political organizations that helped lay the groundwork for Clinton’s presidential campaign."

She was asked about that today and said of course she got e mails from him, he was a long time friend and yes they sent e mails to each other. That's not exactly what she said but the best I can remember.

From: sundowner
19-May-15
AND, she is telling Trey Gowdy that she will not appear before his committee but one time and one time only!!

This cackling, lying criminal beotch is dictating to the United States House of Representatives exactly what she will do and won't do!! UFB!

From: Woods Walker
19-May-15
And she'll get away with it. If that was any of us we'd be in prison for the rest of our lives and all our personal property confiscated.

This country is broken, and may very well be unfixable.

From: Anony Mouse
19-May-15

From: Bowbender
20-May-15

Bowbender's Link
Just curious how the attached link differs from the Clinton Foundation? Hint....it's a rhetorical question.

From: sundowner
20-May-15
Ahh.....the origins of Thunder Thighs!

From: Anony Mouse
21-May-15

Anony Mouse's Link
Read her emails...

From: Beendare
21-May-15
Shes dirty, dirty, dirty.....

but it won't matter to the army of Dem drones that will STILL vote for her over a republican- sickening

From: Stumpkiller
22-May-15
Link didn't work for me.

From: itshot
22-May-15
funny how emails concerning a terrorist attack on our people sent to a private account are 'unclassified' until they are found years later, now deemed 'secret' to protect the incompetence of this transparent admin

From: leftybearfan
22-May-15
Stump, don't click the supporting link (it didn't work for me either). Just cut and paste the long link at the bottom of Spike's post.

I know a lot of people from Decaturville. The description of the economic impact in the article is spot on, IMO.

From: J.E.Travis1
22-May-15
Bruce Jenner claims to be a Republican... a confused one, obviosly...but still. So, no, democrats won't vote for him...er, her...um, it....

From: J.E.Travis1
22-May-15
Bruce Jenner claims to be a Republican... a confused one, obviosly...but still. So, no, democrats won't vote for him...er, her...um, it....

From: NvaGvUp
22-May-15
itshot,

She would have used a secure, government server to protect our national security, only it wasn't, as she stated in her own words, "convenient," for her to do so.

From: itshot
22-May-15
Nva, yep

So..if you disagree with Dr Bronco Bama's politics yur a racist

if you point out Killary's blatant disregard for the law yur now a ??? what? sexist, felonyphobe, Clinterrorist, anti-treasonista, Oval-Orifice denier?

Fugg her, not literally of course

From: NvaGvUp
22-May-15
When it comes to national security, 'convenience' is not only irrelevant, it can get you 10-20 years in Leavenworth!

From: Stumpkiller
23-May-15
Leavenworth?! We can dream, but some people are just more equal than others so...

From: Woods Walker
23-May-15
This country is beyond saving. The general voting populace either doesn't give a sh*t or they're too stupid even have a clue as to what's being done to them.

What the people in Washington are doing is equivelent to the orchestra on the Titanic continuing to play as the hull drops under the waves.

  • Sitka Gear