Sitka Gear
Wisconsin Tells Stein To Go Pound Sand
Community
Contributors to this thread:
NvaGvUp 29-Nov-16
mn_archer 29-Nov-16
Shuteye 29-Nov-16
mn_archer 29-Nov-16
Thumper 30-Nov-16
gflight 02-Dec-16
Anony Mouse 02-Dec-16
Anony Mouse 02-Dec-16
NvaGvUp 02-Dec-16
Fulldraw1972 02-Dec-16
From: NvaGvUp
29-Nov-16
"Jill Stein Sues Wisconsin for Refusing Full Hand Recount of Election

by WARNER TODD HUSTON, 29 Nov 2016,

When she filed her challenge to Wisconsin’s election results, failed Green Party candidate Jill Stein apparently assumed that the recount of votes would be done by hand. But state officials decided that counties will not be forced to undertake a hand recount of ballots. Now Stein is suing the state to force a hand recount.

State officials reported that the recount effort will begin on December 1 in a race against time to meet the December 12 deadline to confirm the state’s vote tally for electors to be eligible for inclusion in the final Electoral College vote.

Officials also said that no recount will occur at all unless Stein pays the $3.5 million recount fee ahead of that time, the Journal Sentinel reports.

The Wisconsin Election Commission reported on November 25 that Stein had successfully filed her challenge to the results.

But instead of a full recount by hand, officials decided a machine recount will suffice and county officials will not be required to count by hand — though they can if they wish to do so. This means that instead of inspecting and counting each vote by hand, the optical readouts will simply be re-fed through the machines for a recount to be tallied mechanically.

Wisconsin Elections Commission chairman Mark Thomsen, a Democrat (bold edit mine), cited the 2011 hand recount that changed a mere 300 votes out of 1.5 million as the basis for his ruling that machine recounting was sufficient to satisfy Stein’s recount petition.

Thomsen said he doubted that any recount would close the more than 22,000 vote gap Hillary would need to overtake and beat current state winner and President-elect Donald J. Trump.

The six-member commission Thomsen heads is equally split between Democrats and Republicans and voted unanimously to proceed with a machine recount. (bold edit mine)

Wisconsin’s voting machines are not connected to the Internet so it is highly unlikely that any hacking of the Badger State’s vote could have occurred, according to the Election Commission

Stein, though, has proclaimed the machine-based recount a violation of her petition. Consequently, the former presidential candidate who won less than 2 percent of the national vote filed a suit in Dane County, Wisconsin, to force a hand recount.

“We must recount the votes so we can build trust in our election system,” the Green Party candidate said in a statement.

Stein has reportedly raised over $7 million for the recounts she wants to foster in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan, but the source of that money has remained unexplained."

From: mn_archer
29-Nov-16
That's interesting. There are some VERY liberal counties in WI and I can easily see them saying they will hand count just to hold the process up. The area around Madison is about as liberal as it gets.

Hillary won 14 counties and 6 of those are surrounding Madison.

From: Shuteye
29-Nov-16
If it is held up those delegates can't vote in December. Trump would still win. She is trying to get enough delegates out of the picture that Trump doesn't have 270 in December.

From: mn_archer
29-Nov-16
But like Mouse said, if they cant be certified they would reduce the number needed to win I believe. He is the next POTUS, there is no way around it. Can you imagine the shitstorm if they were able to somehow reverse it and get her to 270. (obviously I know that isn't going to happen)

We would be talking borderline civil war possibilities.

From: Thumper
30-Nov-16
Stein won 2% ov the vote, this allowed Trump to win three swing states. I bet that hurt....lol

From: gflight
02-Dec-16
Michigan attorney general files lawsuit to halt recount....

From: Anony Mouse
02-Dec-16
Spike...on news today in MI. A recount would cost Ingham county several millions of dollars that would have to come from county programs or a tax increase. Ingham not on board even though Hillary did win there.

From: Anony Mouse
02-Dec-16

Clinton supporters doing the recount...

From: NvaGvUp
02-Dec-16
Jack,

You crack me up!

From: Fulldraw1972
02-Dec-16

Fulldraw1972's embedded Photo
Fulldraw1972's embedded Photo

  • Sitka Gear