Carbon Express Arrows
HPA Update
Community
Contributors to this thread:
Anony Mouse 10-Sep-17
Spike Bull 11-Sep-17
Anony Mouse 14-Sep-17
JTV 14-Sep-17
MK111 14-Sep-17
Anony Mouse 14-Sep-17
Spike Bull 15-Sep-17
Glunt@work 15-Sep-17
Glunt@work 15-Sep-17
Anony Mouse 19-Sep-17
Spike Bull 23-Sep-17
Spike Bull 23-Sep-17
From: Anony Mouse
10-Sep-17
Hearing Protection Act Inserted Into H.R.3668

Introduced by Congressman Jeff Duncan (R, SC) on September 1st, H.R.3668 is a bill titled the “Sportsmen’s Heritage And Recreational Enhancement Act.” Or the “SHARE Act,” for short. Similar to how we saw the HPA tacked onto a natural resources bill in June, it has been added to the SHARE Act as well. Though, in this case, it’s a very good fit on a bill geared towards fishing, hunting, target shooting, transportation of arms and ammunition, preservation of public lands for these activities, and more.

In fact, in the “in more” category we would see the elimination of many restrictions on “armor piercing” ammunition and a significant loosening of the “sporting purposes” requirement for importation of certain firearms, plus reduction or elimination of other importation, transportation, and temporary transfer (private party loans) restrictions.

On the HPA side, the TL:DR version appears to be: treatment of silencers as standard, non-NFA firearms and the mandatory destruction of all existing registration records. Whether you purchased a silencer from a dealer and registered via a Form 4 or made one yourself and registered on a Form 1, the .gov must destroy all silencer registration should this bill pass. Additionally, it provides some Federal preemption to State laws:

…a law of a State or a political subdivision of a State that imposes a tax, other than a generally applicable sales or use tax, on making, transferring, using, possessing, or transporting a firearm silencer in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, or imposes a marking, recordkeeping or registration requirement with respect to such a firearm silencer, shall have no force or effect.

So a State cannot charge a unique tax on silencers or require registration of them, but it doesn’t seem like this would override a State’s ability to outlaw silencer ownership entirely. At least initially, as we have The Second Amendment for that and, should this bill go into law, I’m sure court cases would be filed immediately. An outright ban on silencers, once they’re legally standard firearms, would be highly unlikely to pass the 2A sniff test. Well, maybe in the “9th Circus Court of Schlemiels.”

Each time “The Hearing Protection Act” or “HPA” is introduced it seems to change in various ways, getting simpler or more complicated or removing some aspects (e.g. refund of the $200 tax for people who paid it in the last year or so) and adding others (e.g. destruction of existing registration data). So, to understand all of what H.R.3668 would mean if it went into law, the entire text of the bill is HERE.

11-Sep-17
It is most likely that passage will be a good thing regardless of some of these details.

From: Anony Mouse
14-Sep-17
House Natural Resources Committee Passes Bill with SHARE Silencer Reform Attached

Supporters of suppressor law reform have been cobbling together a bill that can make it through a famously fractious and lethargic Congress the same way that Hadrian built his wall…brick by brick.

As we reported earlier, the Sportsmen’s Heritage And Recreational Enhancement or SHARE Act, sponsored by South Carolina’s Jeff Duncan (above), was attached to a larger Natural Resources Committee bill. That larger bill included a number of other the widely supported hunting- and fishing-related measures and it passed the House committee yesterday on a largely party-line 22-13 vote.

As freebeacon.com notes,

The bill includes a number of gun reforms that gun-rights and hunting activists have been pursuing for years. Silencer deregulation, further protections for interstate transport of firearms, further protections on the importation of firearms and ammunition, further protections on certain firearms and ammunition from reclassification in order to make them illegal, and increased access to federal public lands for hunting and fishing are all included in the bill.

Next step: a vote by the full House. No word as to when that may happen. The bill would then move on to the Senate, where it may or may not win some — any — Democratic support. Blue Dog Democrats, where are you when we need you?

From: JTV
14-Sep-17
Suppressors are legal here, but you still have the federal tax and background check as one would for a full auto firearm ... smh ...

From: MK111
14-Sep-17
The new bill will do away with the tax and waiting time. Still have to go through a FFL Dealer and background check. I have no problem with that. Can't find it but if someone would get a suppressor under the new guidelines then decide to sell it would the next transfer have to go through a FFL Dealer and a background check? If it did I still wouldn't have a problem.

From: Anony Mouse
14-Sep-17
Suppressors would be handled the same as firearm purchases. ATF records of those who have in the past purchased suppressors with stamps would be deleted. Transfer would be the same as any firearm purchase. State laws regarding suppressors would still apply, which means that non-2A friendly states could still prohibit/over regulate.

15-Sep-17
On paper. The fact is that the ATF has made an effort to track and register all gun sales in a data base which will continue to exist no matter what the law says. I say that silencers and even training will be monitored and recorded no matter what the law says. The only way this actually works is if there is no NICS check or any other governmental approval is employed. Having said that, anything is better than what we have now.

From: Glunt@work
15-Sep-17
Good news is that if its treated like a firearm we will be able to make our own and avoid any red tape. Just like AR receivers, there will likely be "80%" versions that can be bought with no regulation and finished up by the user. Suppressors are pretty simple.

From: Glunt@work
15-Sep-17
By "good news" I really mean the best of the bad news. Suppressors should not be regulated anymore than a scope, replacement grips, or a new gun case. They are just an accessory to something the Government shouldn't be regulating anyway.

From: Anony Mouse
19-Sep-17

Anony Mouse's Link
Slight digression: for you muzzle loaders, it appears there is a non-NFA suppressed black powder rifle:

New from SilencerCo: a 50-state legal suppressed rifle! Furthermore, there’s no NFA wait time or tax and, in most cases, the Maxim 50 muzzleloader can be ordered online here and shipped right to your door. More info and photos from SilencerCo follow:

For the first time since the National Firearms Act (NFA) was created in 1934, civilians can enjoy suppressed shooting in all 50 states with SilencerCo’s latest innovation: the integrally suppressed Maxim 50 muzzleloader. In addition, this product can be purchased right now on the web with no regulation (no 4473, no $200 tax stamp, no photographs, and no fingerprints) and be shipped immediately to the customer with few exceptions.

Continued at link with videos.

23-Sep-17

Spike Bull 's Link
The Marines are looking for integrated silencers. This could open up some new gear for us!

23-Sep-17

Spike Bull 's Link
Silenced an entire battalion.

  • Sitka Gear