Carbon Express Arrows
Weinstein - the Mt. Everest of hypocracy
Community
Contributors to this thread:
Pat Lefemine 06-Oct-17
JTV 06-Oct-17
NvaGvUp 06-Oct-17
Mad dog 06-Oct-17
Mad dog 06-Oct-17
NvaGvUp 06-Oct-17
Whitey 06-Oct-17
Woods Walker 06-Oct-17
NvaGvUp 06-Oct-17
Woods Walker 06-Oct-17
TD 07-Oct-17
Solo 07-Oct-17
Atheist 08-Oct-17
elkmtngear 09-Oct-17
bad karma 09-Oct-17
Shuteye 09-Oct-17
'Ike' (Phone) 09-Oct-17
Mike in CT 09-Oct-17
Mad dog 09-Oct-17
Atheist 09-Oct-17
Atheist 09-Oct-17
NvaGvUp 09-Oct-17
Atheist 09-Oct-17
NvaGvUp 09-Oct-17
JLS 09-Oct-17
Atheist 09-Oct-17
NvaGvUp 09-Oct-17
Bentstick81 09-Oct-17
Irishman 10-Oct-17
Thumper 10-Oct-17
Hunting5555 11-Oct-17
Pat Lefemine 11-Oct-17
'Ike' (Phone) 11-Oct-17
Hunting5555 11-Oct-17
JTV 11-Oct-17
Coyote 65 11-Oct-17
JTV 11-Oct-17
Tonybear61 11-Oct-17
Woods Walker 11-Oct-17
TD 12-Oct-17
slade 12-Oct-17
Sixby 12-Oct-17
Feedjake 12-Oct-17
tonyo6302 12-Oct-17
Gray Ghost 12-Oct-17
Shuteye 12-Oct-17
Spike Bull 12-Oct-17
bad karma 12-Oct-17
Atheist 12-Oct-17
slade 12-Oct-17
slade 12-Oct-17
slade 12-Oct-17
slade 12-Oct-17
'Ike' (Phone) 12-Oct-17
DL 12-Oct-17
slade 12-Oct-17
Pat Lefemine 12-Oct-17
'Ike' (Phone) 12-Oct-17
Lucas 12-Oct-17
Bentstick81 13-Oct-17
Whitey 13-Oct-17
JTV 13-Oct-17
Mad dog 14-Oct-17
Spike Bull 14-Oct-17
DL 15-Oct-17
K Cummings 15-Oct-17
JTV 15-Oct-17
tonyo6302 15-Oct-17
K Cummings 15-Oct-17
JTV 15-Oct-17
tonyo6302 15-Oct-17
K Cummings 15-Oct-17
Pat Lefemine 15-Oct-17
K Cummings 15-Oct-17
Shuteye 15-Oct-17
JTV 15-Oct-17
tonyo6302 15-Oct-17
JTV 15-Oct-17
NvaGvUp 15-Oct-17
From: Pat Lefemine
06-Oct-17
Shocking. A Hollywood studio mogul and massive democratic donor exposed for serial sexual harassment and all we hear from the media and Hollywood are crickets? Jimmy Kimmel, where are you? Hillary, speak to us? Michelle Obama, you praised him at the White House, where is your statement? And Lisa Bloom, the attorney who represents virtually every woman with a harassment complaint including O'Reilly, why are you representing this man as his counsel? Don't you detest powerful men who trade influence for sexual favors?

I'm so confused?

From: JTV
06-Oct-17
Dont be confused.... this is what the Dems do... they cover for each other....they will not come out against one of their own ...

From: NvaGvUp
06-Oct-17
Hillary, Bill and dozens of the many other leftists who have taken BIG BUCKS from Weinstein over the years, yet who claim to be feminists and strong supporters of women, had to have known about this for years!

Yet because he was on their team, they all ignored it, even though they all seemed to know of it, just at they ignored Bubba's and Teddy Kennedy's philandering and sexual assaults on women, often using the power of their offices to do so.

From: Mad dog
06-Oct-17
Waiting for the LIBS to defend this. Loved the pic.of Ashley Judd w her.head on Harv's shoulder. Can't have it both ways girl...LAUGHABLE. M.d.

From: Mad dog
06-Oct-17
Trump BAD. Bush.BAD..NIXON & REAGAN BAD...Sexual predators Harvey W , Billy Clinton...angels...md

From: NvaGvUp
06-Oct-17
JFK, Bobby, Teddy, Bubba and a very long list of other Dems were serial sexual predators who over and over and over again USED women as sexual toys.

Yet the left loves them all and worships them because they were supposedly great on women's issues.

Go figure!

I guess that's true as long as killing women (Mary Jo Kopechne), you were hoping to have sex with then leaving them to drown while you called your attorney raping them (Juanita Broaddrick), or getting blow jobs from lowly interns (Monica Lewinsky) when you were the most powerful man in the world comprises 'being great on women's issues' is what you consider as being pro-feminist.

From: Whitey
06-Oct-17
Not surprised at all. The mayor of Seattle raped and molested multiple underage boys. He stayed mayor for months the Libs didn’t care until the 5th accuser came forward. $100 says he gets a job with some liberal donor.

From: Woods Walker
06-Oct-17
"Loved the pic.of Ashley Judd w her.head on Harv's shoulder."

Yes....she's a "NASTY" woman, don't you know!

From: NvaGvUp
06-Oct-17
"I'm so confused? "

It's plain and simple.

Lisa Bloom is a Whore.

Not a whore for sex, but a whore for money.

Just like her mother.

From: Woods Walker
06-Oct-17
And Hillary is a whore for POWER. She's a MUCH bigger whore than Monica ever was on her worst day. All Monica wanted was some attention from the Head Horndog. Hillary sold her and her daughter's dignity just to be on Bill's coattails because that's the ONLY way she could have become Senator, acquire VAST wealth, and run for POTUS.

A whore indeed!!!

From: TD
07-Oct-17
Well, she wasn't going to sleep her way to the top........

From: Solo
07-Oct-17
As we speak, the NY Times and other far-left comrades in the 4th branch of government, are busy trying to help the democratic socialists of amerika save face by willfully instigating an emergency campaign to get all leftist politicians to return Weinstein contributions ASAP.

Isn't that sweet of them? Buncha azzcaverns......

From: Atheist
08-Oct-17
Weinstein was fired from his own company. He'll be a pariah as he should be. Trump? The guy that walked in on 18 year olds and bragged about kissing married women and grabbing pu#*y's? He's a hero to most of you! Now what's that about hypocrisy again?

From: elkmtngear
09-Oct-17
Once again, I'll make this simple for the libtards...there are WORDS, and there are ACTIONS. Locker room talk is not actionable. Paying off women for sexual favors is certainly actionable.

Where did all the Trump accusers go after the election? Funny how they disappeared into the wind (sort of like Russia).

I know it hurts your feelings when people say ugly things. But, those are WORDS. Get it?

From: bad karma
09-Oct-17
Atheist is just unhappy that a thread about a liberal wanker isn't about him.

From: Shuteye
09-Oct-17
I bet Atheist has a pussy hat.

09-Oct-17
I like watching all the Hollywood libs, try and figure a way out of it...LMAO

From: Mike in CT
09-Oct-17
It can't be said enough; there's something tragicomic about anyone who would rail against hypocrisy while posting under a record number of false registrations......

Lex,

If he doesn't he should......

From: Mad dog
09-Oct-17
Whatsa matter God-denier? Gettin hot in here???....ha ha ha...can you hear OZZY'S best satanic laugh? Trump may have been a bit caddish and Frat boyish and is imperfect like us all, but YOUR side has rapists, sexual assaulters, child molesters, murderers, traitors. Hollywood is on the run and this is HILARIOUS....the gift that Keeps on giving!! The matriarch, Meryl Streep is SWEARING...."we didn't ALL know about Harvey!" Ok..Babe..whatever helps you'll assuage the guilt.....Mad Dog

From: Atheist
09-Oct-17
1) it was the liberal media that exposed Weinstein. The NY Times broke the story. 2) the right wing media covered for predator trump. 3) where was the right wing outrage when Ailes and O'Reilly harassed a number of women and paid them settlements? Point? You can't stand being a hypocrite. I understand.

From: Atheist
09-Oct-17
3). Weinstein was a frequent guest of trump at mar a lago and trump towers, NYC and they frequented the same parties. Birds of a feather?

From: NvaGvUp
09-Oct-17
Just compare the media outrage over Bill O'Reilly with the media's total silence on the Harvey Weinstein thing, then tell me there is no media bias!

From: Atheist
09-Oct-17
Nva, your reading comprehension is slipping. Notice above where I mentioned that it was The NY Times that broke the story. And the 'liberal media' that caused him to be outed then fired. Right wingers worked overtime trying to justify O'reillys actions. Even here. Most likely by you.

From: NvaGvUp
09-Oct-17
Sybil,

Note where we all also noted the NYT story!

Yet where else have you seen this story from the msm, you worthless POS?

From: JLS
09-Oct-17
CNN.

From: Atheist
09-Oct-17
FYI. Just this weekend I've seen it plastered on 3 newspapers, CNN, local news stations, politico, huff post and a slew of others. Stop it nva, you're embarrassing yourself.

From: NvaGvUp
09-Oct-17
Embarrasing yourself would be posting under forty-something false registrations, then lying repetitively, which is what you've done.

Or at least it would for someone who had even a shred of integrity, which you do not.

From: Bentstick81
09-Oct-17
CNN, NY Times, atheist times. You all are the same. So full of it, it's coming out your ears.

From: Irishman
10-Oct-17
Weinstein is a piece of crap, and the Hollywood liberals should be denouncing him, and so should the Hollywood conservatives - there are a few of them too. However, if you think this is the Mt Everest of hypocrisy, then you must have missed the whole Tim Murphy story. I'm embarrassed that the guy has an Irish name.

From: Thumper
10-Oct-17
WE need to make sure the liberals give the money back, and that's going to hurt. I doubt many will, LWL's just do not give, they take.

From: Hunting5555
11-Oct-17
Everybody has known about him for years. Last night FOX News played a clip of an awards show back in 2013. The male presenter of a female actress award made the comment "These 5 women no longer have to look attractive for Weinstein." The laughter from the crowd was VERY reserved and VERY awkward.....

From: Pat Lefemine
11-Oct-17

Pat Lefemine's Link
The latest is an actual tape of Weinstein trying to lure a teenage actress into his room. He admitted grabbing her breast the day before. The tape and story was brought to NBC news and they declined it.

If this doesn't lay bear the cabal between the left wing media, Hollywood and democratic elites nothing will.

11-Oct-17
It gets better, now Affleck and Kimmel have been called out! I love it, Hollywood imploding, about time...Lib pucks!

Ben Affleck apologized to actress Hilarie Burton for groping her during an appearance on "TRL" in 2003.

Old Clip Resurfaces of Kimmel Having Women Guess What’s In His Pants: Maybe ‘Put Your Mouth On It’

From: Hunting5555
11-Oct-17
Some are saying there are a lot more revelations to come. They are also saying that someone is behind this and that it is "return fire"..... IDK, Just telling you what I heard.....

From: JTV
11-Oct-17
I hope these liberal turds in Hwood burn, payback is a bitch ....

From: Coyote 65
11-Oct-17
Surprised he is not claiming anti-Semitism ala BLM.

Terry

From: JTV
11-Oct-17

JTV's Link
The FBI/DOJ will now be after him ... see link

From: Tonybear61
11-Oct-17
No different than Meryl Streep's and the rest of Hollyweird's good buddy Roman Polansky hiding in a country with no extradition to US as he is guilty of raping women by using drugs and alcohol..

From: Woods Walker
11-Oct-17
Here's Hollywood CELEBRATING the CHILD RAPIST Roman Polanski in 2003. This scumbag raped a THIRTEEN YEAR OLD GIRL when he was 43. He gave her quaaludes and alcohol and then raped her. These people have no soul, no conscience, no morals. They are literally sh*t. Weinstein fits right in with them. Modern day carnies.

Where I came from if someone like Polanski came back he would NOT be celebrated like some kind of hero. They'd probably find his remains in a gully somewhere....if the coyotes and crows left anything.

From: TD
12-Oct-17
That shining bastion of social justice the NYT..... had the story on Weinstein in 2004 by a reporter named Sharon Waxman. They buried it.

From: slade
12-Oct-17
by PAM KEY11 Oct 20171,776 Wednesday on MSNBC’s “Andrea Mitchell Reports,” while discussing Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein’s ever-expanding sexual harassment allegations, NBC’s Megyn Kelly said one of her “main takeaways from 2016” was that we as women had “a long way to go.”

Kelly said, “One of my main takeaways from 2016, everything that happened in that campaign, is that we as women have a long way to go, a long way to go. And this is further evidence of that — you know, it’s like how many of these do we have to go through before industries become introspective? Why did the press have to break this? Why wasn’t it someone at the Weinstein Company?”

“If they didn’t know, why didn’t they know?” she continued. “How many more do we have to go through? How many women is it happening to right now until we can affect a real sea change? We might be at the beginning of that, but I don’t think we’re even close to the middle.”

From: Sixby
12-Oct-17
Why is the FBI and Justice Dept getting into this and spending our tax payer money on it? Make Cali prosecute him.

God bless, Steve

12-Oct-17
Harvey gets popped. He loses his company and is investigated. Lindsey Lohan is the only one supporting him at this point. Trump gets exposed as a sexual predator and y'all voted for him for President. I would say that both situations are disgusting and that the hypocrisy is on the folks that support Trump to this day and Lindsey Lohan.

Megan Kelly nailed it on this one. Woman are dealing with a lot of pigs, and we have a long way to go with regards to entitled rich men using their power to use and abuse women.

From: Feedjake
12-Oct-17
Some men are pigs, yes. But no one here knows women who would shamelessly climb the ladder of success and fortune by "grasping" the sexual "rungs" on the ladder?! The bottom line is some men are immoral pigs and some women are perfectly happy to use that tendency if it benefits themselves.

From: tonyo6302
12-Oct-17
"Trump gets exposed as a sexual predator and y'all voted for him for President. " .. ..

We used KPC's critical thinking. The alternative to Trump was much much worse.

;^)

From: Gray Ghost
12-Oct-17
I don't think either side of the isle has a patent on "pigs". It is amusing watching you guys try to make it so, however.

Matt

From: Shuteye
12-Oct-17

Shuteye's embedded Photo
Shuteye's embedded Photo
Yep, Kelly nailed it or got nailed.

12-Oct-17
Oh, MeAgain is tough, she probably just sucked it up and moved on.

Right on Feedjake!

From: bad karma
12-Oct-17
Of course, when you're a partisan fool, the term "grabbed women by the pussy" is considered evidence of sexual harassment. Yet, "grabbed him by the balls" is a figure of speech. Those without anything but partisan blinders and no capacity for rational thought will jump to conclusions without actual evidence.

Perhaps a month without weed might clear one's brain. In this case, highly unlikely.

From: Atheist
12-Oct-17
I love how Most of the right thinks that liberals are going to defend Harvey Weinstein simply because he is a liberal himself. That's not how it works. When an American does something wrong, we hold them accountable. You should do the same for trump. He said himself that he grabs them by the youknowwhat. Those are his words. He was seen walking into dressing rooms with young girls to see what 'the talent looks like'. Those are his words. A sexual assault is a sexual assault.

From: slade
12-Oct-17
Like this atheist?

Deadline, Variety, Hollywood Reporter Circle Wagons to Protect ‘Buttman’ Ben Affleck

Good faith searches reveal that, as of this writing, nowhere on the home page of either Variety, Deadline, or the Hollywood Reporter will you find a headline with the words “Ben” or “Affleck.” How is this possible in a news cycle where Hollywood’s Batman is being dubbed “Buttman” due to a whole new round of groping allegations? On Wednesday, after Affleck apologized to actress Hilarie Burton for a groping incident in 2003, another groping allegation surfaced, this one from 2014, this one from make-up artist Annamarie Tendler, who wrote: “I would also love to get an apology from Ben Affleck who grabbed my ass at a Golden Globes party in 2014.” She added more details:

Annamarie Tendler ? @amtendler Replying to @amtendler He walked by me, cupped my butt and pressed his finger into my crack. Follow Annamarie Tendler ?@amtendler I guess he tried to play it like he was politely moving me out of the way and oops touched my butt instead of my lower back? 1:23 PM - Oct 11, 2017 38 38 Replies 618 618 Retweets 2,295 2,295 likes

This allegation resulted in television writer Jen Stacy accusing Affleck of groping a number of women that night: “I was also at this party and *multiple* friends had this same exact experience[.]”

And thus the nickname “Buttman” was born.

Important point: These allegations surround the year 2014, that was only three years ago…

So why would the same Hollywood new outlets that are breathlessly covering every detail of the Harvey Weinstein sex scandal, circle the wagons to protect Affleck?

The answer is quite simple: Harvey Weinstein’s time has passed. The 65 year-old is reportedly in serious financial trouble, has not had a hit in nearly five years, and has not won anyone an Oscar in that same amount of time.

Harvey Weinstein is no longer useful to anyone, so scores are being settled. If he was still useful, his predations would be allowed to continue unchallenged.

Moreover, outlets like Deadline, Variety and The Hollywood Reporter will not make any advertising money from Weinstein. Oscar season is Black Friday to these outlets. Weinstein no longer fills these coffers.

The same is not true for Affleck.

Not only is two-time Oscar-winner Affleck one of the hottest directors around, he is Hollywood’s freakin’ BATMAN — he is the tentpole holding up a tentpole, the Warner Brothers’ Justice League franchise, and what is probably a $250 million to $300 million investment that will hit thousands of screens in less than five weeks.

Does anyone believe Warners is not leaning hard on these entertainment news outlets to cover up these allegations, is not using all that Justice League advertising money as both carrot and stick?

And let us never forget that Affleck is a leftwinger, a lifelong Democrat. And when you think “correctly” there is nothing you cannot do, nothing our media will not cover up. Just ask Ted Kennedy and Bill Clinton.

Bottom line: the same mentality that allowed Harvey Weinstein to get away with what he did for three decades, is still alive, kicking and protecting Buttman.

From: slade
12-Oct-17
or this

Weinstein Board Knew About Harvey’s Payoffs In 2015

From: slade
12-Oct-17
or this

Twitter Suspends Rose McGowan, Actress At Center of Weinstein Scandal

From: slade
12-Oct-17
or this

NBC News passed on a story by contributor Ronan Farrow that it allegedly possessed in August about three separate rape allegations against Harvey Weinstein that eventually appeared in the New Yorker Tuesday, according to a report.

12-Oct-17
But, but Slade that's not fair....Lol

From: DL
12-Oct-17
Malia Obama interned for Weinstein when she was 18. How is it that the former president had no clue?

From: slade
12-Oct-17
Had no Clue? When did that racist community organizer ever have a clue?

From: Pat Lefemine
12-Oct-17
Over and under he moved on Obama's kid?

12-Oct-17
Pat...Lol

From: Lucas
12-Oct-17
While I don't think he would have much to fear from Barry, I doubt he would have crossed Michelle

From: Bentstick81
13-Oct-17
Boy, THE ATHEIST TIMES quit reporting. You got quiet in a hurry atheist. Every time you come on here, flapping your gums, you get burnt. Typical of a dem.

13-Oct-17
bill cosby #2.

From: Whitey
13-Oct-17
Pat based on the Iran deal I’m thinking Obama got bent over by Harvey so his kid was probably safe.

From: JTV
13-Oct-17
there are even more of these actors/Moguls being outed.. ... and Jane Fonda says she knew about Weinstein, and kept quiet ...

From: Mad dog
14-Oct-17
Hanoi Jane??? Well, Ill be!! Mad Dog

14-Oct-17
She claimed to only find out a year ago! Gotta be bullshit! She grew up in Hollywood and must have known forever.

Weinstein is only the tip of the iceberg. With a little luck we will find out all about the perversion and how it is directly linked to Hilliary and the swamp.

From: DL
15-Oct-17

DL's embedded Photo
DL's embedded Photo

From: K Cummings
15-Oct-17
"We used KPC's critical thinking. The alternative to Trump was much much worse."

Good for you Tonyo.

It warms my heart knowing that I'm making a difference.

:)

KPC

From: JTV
15-Oct-17
the birds are circling ...

From: tonyo6302
15-Oct-17
LOL !

From: K Cummings
15-Oct-17
"the birds are circling ... "

As is often the case around rotting carcasses.

It's nature.

:)

KPC

From: JTV
15-Oct-17

JTV's embedded Photo
JTV's embedded Photo
KPC on the left...GG on the right...... ;0)

From: tonyo6302
15-Oct-17
Damn, JTV, then who is underneath catching $h!t ? ;^)

From: K Cummings
15-Oct-17

K Cummings's embedded Photo
K Cummings's embedded Photo
"KPC on the left...GG on the right......"

....and JTV...

...no, I can't. It's just too easy.

KPC

From: Pat Lefemine
15-Oct-17
SNL has a couple of skits on Weinstein. How brave of them - now that he's dead and everyone is piling on. Too bad they were a week late - like everyone else in the MSM.

From: K Cummings
15-Oct-17
"Too bad they were a week late - like everyone else in the MSM."

Better late than never. Surely the vagina costume protests will start soon?

KPC

From: Shuteye
15-Oct-17
I expect to see Hillary an Bill wearing their pussy hats.

From: JTV
15-Oct-17
Tonyo, we are, the peons ....the Vultures are the oversee'ers with all the supposed wit they vomit out .. but yet, they are the ones crapin' all over them selves (its what vultures do) ..

From: tonyo6302
15-Oct-17
. . . but I was told I am a rube . . . .

.. ..

.. ..

. . . . is a rube higher on the totem pole than a peon?

;^) LOL !

From: JTV
15-Oct-17
you stepped up a notch in life ...

From: NvaGvUp
15-Oct-17
It seems Weinstein's employment contract with his OWN COMPANY allowed for him to be guilty of sexual misconduct as often as he wanted as long as he paid a 'fine' to the company.

UFB!

From COTR:

"Harvey Weinstein’s Contract With The Weinstein Company Basically Allowed For Sexual Harassment

Hannah Bleau (Red Dawn), October 12, 2017

I cannot believe this is real, but it totally, unequivocally is.

According to a report from TMZ, Harvey Weinstein’s company may have fired him ILLEGALLY. As it turns out, they had a contract which stated that he could be sued for sexual harassment REPEATEDLY as long as he covered the costs.

TMZ is privy to Weinstein’s 2015 employment contract, which says if he gets sued for sexual harassment or any other “misconduct” that results in a settlement or judgment against TWC, all Weinstein has to do is pay what the company’s out, along with a fine, and he’s in the clear.

Again. This was in an ACTUAL CONTRACT.

According to the contract, if Weinstein “treated someone improperly in violation of the company’s Code of Conduct,” he must reimburse TWC for settlements or judgments. Additionally, “You [Weinstein] will pay the company liquidated damages of $250,000 for the first such instance, $500,000 for the second such instance, $750,000 for the third such instance, and $1,000,000 for each additional instance.” The contract says as long as Weinstein pays, it constitutes a “cure” for the misconduct and no further action can be taken. Translation — Weinstein could be sued over and over and as long as he wrote a check, he keeps his job.

In other words, Harvey Weinstein could win in a lawsuit against his OWN COMPANY. According to the contract, the Board of Directors could fire the perv if he was “indicted or convicted of a crime,” but as TMZ notes, “that doesn’t apply here.”

There’s another provision … he can be fired for “the perpetuation by you [Weinstein] of a material fraud against the company.”

The question … where’s the fraud?

Lance Maerov, the board member who negotiated Weinstein’s 2015 contract, said in an interview — and we’ve confirmed — the Board knew Weinstein had settled prior lawsuits brought by various women, but they “assumed” it was to cover up consensual affairs. The Board’s assumption does not constitute fraud on Weinstein’s part. And here’s the kicker. Even if Weinstein had committed fraud by not fully informing the Board of Directors, the contract says before he can be fired he has a right to mediation and if that doesn’t work, he’s entitled to arbitration. He got neither. He was summarily fired, and sources connected with Weinstein tell TMZ he was never given a specific reason.

A source connected with TWC tells TMZ, the company had a right to fire Weinstein if he didn’t notify the Board of Directors of settlements. We’re told there have been no settlements since the contract was signed, so it would seem this clause does not apply.

This is insane. The Weinstein Company knew about his pervy behavior all along. It was so expected it was placed in a contract."

  • Sitka Gear