Sitka Mountain Gear
Judicial Watch strikes again!
Community
Contributors to this thread:
Stalker 03-Dec-17
JTV 03-Dec-17
Ryan from Boone 03-Dec-17
Rocky 03-Dec-17
freeglee 03-Dec-17
Ryan from Boone 03-Dec-17
Woods Walker 03-Dec-17
Woods Walker 03-Dec-17
Atheist 03-Dec-17
Paul 03-Dec-17
HDE 03-Dec-17
Shuteye 03-Dec-17
Annony Mouse 03-Dec-17
Woods Walker 03-Dec-17
JTV 03-Dec-17
JTV 03-Dec-17
Stalker 04-Dec-17
Atheist 04-Dec-17
Stalker 04-Dec-17
Stalker 04-Dec-17
JTV 04-Dec-17
Bentstick81 04-Dec-17
Thumper 05-Dec-17
Atheist 05-Dec-17
Atheist 05-Dec-17
Bentstick81 05-Dec-17
Atheist 05-Dec-17
Bentstick81 05-Dec-17
MT in MO 05-Dec-17
JTV 05-Dec-17
Atheist 05-Dec-17
Stalker 05-Dec-17
bad karma 05-Dec-17
NvaGvUp 05-Dec-17
bad karma 05-Dec-17
JTV 05-Dec-17
Spike Bull 05-Dec-17
Stalker 05-Dec-17
slade 05-Dec-17
Woods Walker 05-Dec-17
bad karma 05-Dec-17
Annony Mouse 05-Dec-17
Shuteye 05-Dec-17
Shuteye 05-Dec-17
Woods Walker 05-Dec-17
Solo 05-Dec-17
Woods Walker 05-Dec-17
Solo 05-Dec-17
Woods Walker 05-Dec-17
Woods Walker 05-Dec-17
From: Stalker
03-Dec-17
Tom Finton president of Judicial Watch says he has finally received files from the FBI on the tarmac meeting that they said they never had. After being stonewalled and told there was nothing there Finton went to the DOJ and received information revealing that the FBI indeed did have files on the tarmac meeting between attorney general Lorretta Lynch and Bill Clinton husband of the woman under federal investigation. In these documents it reveals the only thing the FBI was concerned about was cover up. No one questioned the meeting itself!

Not long after the meeting the investigation turned into a matter which Comey finally dismissed! This is something that isnt going away. Thanks Tom Finton and Judicial watch!

From: JTV
03-Dec-17

JTV's Link
Wouldnt this fit in with the FBI agent that was vehemently anti-Trump that led the Clinton Email probe and helped close it ..... the swamp is deep, very deep ...see link

03-Dec-17
In the past 24 hours, Trump has attacked: -The FBI -The DOJ -The free press

...but please, tell us more about how Black athletes are "unpatriotic" for engaging in peaceful protest.

From: Rocky
03-Dec-17
..."athletes black, white or otherwise". Truthfully ANYONE engaging in dishonoring our flag should, as they said in South Philly years ago, " have their heads busted open". I adhere to that same patriotic street logic today concerning the flag. Don't blame me. I was born with the anger gene or somehow developed it to survive and became the next act after the B.S. talking was over. There. I told you.

The Rock

From: freeglee
03-Dec-17
Good Luck with That Ryan!!! You are asking a Compldx question from a group of Neanderthal supporters of slaughter assault and racism!!! Let me know how it works out with that!!!!

03-Dec-17
So attacking our honorable FBI is not unpatriotic? Attacking the 1st amendment right to a free press is not unpatriotic? you're baffling, the rock.

From: Woods Walker
03-Dec-17
LMAO!!! You must be LeftyDopeDealer's biggest customer!

From: Woods Walker
03-Dec-17

From: Atheist
03-Dec-17

From: Paul
03-Dec-17
Fregay anti don’t you Two have to hand wash your panties in luck warm water tonight

From: HDE
03-Dec-17
Patriotism means you uphold the law of the land, defend it, and honor liberty. It means you believe that all men govern themselves according to the law of the land.

It isn't supporting paid crybabies dishonoring the symbol of that patriotism or have leanings toward those who wish to distrupt it for what it is.

You just can't make everything a 1st Amendment issue. If you think you can, you do not understand what the 1st Amendment is...

From: Shuteye
03-Dec-17
I don't think they should say drain the swamp. Swamps are good in my opinion and I do some of my best hunting in swamps. They should drain the sewer.

From: Annony Mouse
03-Dec-17
Lex... cesspool.

Both the FBI and DOJ we're corrupted by the Obama administration as they were turned into political weapons used against those who opposed the obamunistic agenda.

From: Woods Walker
03-Dec-17
And don't forget the IRS.

From: JTV
03-Dec-17
there are those within the FBI and the DOJ that are just as crooked as some of those they claim to pursue ... they hide behind the Government and the power they yield ....

"Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely" ..... Great men are almost always bad men, even when they exercise influence and not authority, still more when you superadd the tendency or the certainty of corruption by authority.

From: JTV
03-Dec-17

JTV's Link
another slap to the FBI and boonie ... as Slade stated above ... see link

From: Stalker
04-Dec-17
" So attacking our honorable FBI is not unpatriotic?"

No one is attacking honorable agents, only those partisan politically motivated ones! You know the ones who were trying to cover up for Clinton!

" Simply put, the FBI appears to be fully complicit in a cover-up that attempted to influence a presidential election for a favored candidate...Hillary Clinton." from the article

From: Atheist
04-Dec-17
This is a deliberate attempt by trump to undermine major portions of our democracy. Start w the media. In case they report. Anything negative about me. Fake news. Then move on to Congressman that dot support me. They’re fake patriots. Next the FBI and DOJ just in case they find illegal stuff on me. And you rubes are buying it,hook line and sinker.

From: Stalker
04-Dec-17
"This is a deliberate attempt by Trump to undermine major portions of our democracy."

What do you not understand about Tom Finton and Judicial watch? This is about uncovering crimes from a previous administration and has nothing to do with Trump.

From: Stalker
04-Dec-17

From: JTV
04-Dec-17
'theist, you consistently prove with every post your one ignorant SOB.... I think at times how can he/she/it surpass itself with the stupidity you post, then you post again and BAM, .... there it is .... more ignorant than the last .... smh ....

From: Bentstick81
04-Dec-17
atheist, You are a FRAUD.

From: Thumper
05-Dec-17
Drain the swamp, only other president who did this was Eisenhower.

The socialist left is being dismantled.

From: Atheist
05-Dec-17
Eisenhower was a smart republican.

From: Atheist
05-Dec-17

From: Bentstick81
05-Dec-17
atheist. You are a FRAUD. Nice to see you whining and crying this morning. 8^)

From: Atheist
05-Dec-17
Praising our last great republican is whining? You’re a sad little man bent. But good morning to you and try to cheer up mate! Things are getting better!

From: Bentstick81
05-Dec-17
atheist. You are FRAUD.

From: MT in MO
05-Dec-17
Eisenhower's take on 90% tax rates may have made sense back in 1950's. At that time the USA stood as the largest and most powerful economic power in the world. WWII was not that far in the past and much of Europe and Asia were still rebuilding. (Hell, I was in London for the first time back in 1984-85 and there were still spots there that still had not been rebuilt from the German bombings).

There was not any infrastructure in China or other Asian nations or even Mexico that would have been capable of producing the goods that were being manufactured in the USA at the time.

There was no global competition to speak of when compared to today's markets.

Now we must compete with the world. Companies are not by their nature patriotic. Generally speaking, they go where they can make the most money.

In a capitalist country, the gov't attempts to influence the actions of corporations via tax laws and other rules concerned with how those companies conduct business.

This is not to say that some companies do have management that are pro USA and can be patriotic, but generally speaking, a company's primary mission is to make money.

From: JTV
05-Dec-17

JTV's Link
and yet, another DEMOCRAT on Mueller's team is outed as being a Trump basher.... it is easy to see the bias here, as much as what CNN/MSNBC or Ross displayed(s)

From: Atheist
05-Dec-17
Hey JTV, notice how Mueller nips it in the bud and gets rid of the questionable individuals? It’s called responsible investigating. Mueller is nothing short of honorable, responsible and hes coming for the swamp.

From: Stalker
05-Dec-17
He knew who these guys were before the investigation. To even think otherwise would be incredibly stupid! Wouldn't you agree Athiest?

From: bad karma
05-Dec-17
If Bowsite were to get rid of questionable individuals, Atheist would get the death penalty.

From: NvaGvUp
05-Dec-17
"This is a deliberate attempt by Trump to undermine major portions of our democracy."

Trump doesn't need any help in undermining the media. The media is doing an A++ job of doing that all by themselves.

From: bad karma
05-Dec-17
Only an uninformed fool thinks this is a democracy. We have a constitutional republic. There is a huge difference.

From: JTV
05-Dec-17
Here is a read that may, may enlighten you 'theist to why this whole witch hunt is so wrong, using those who like YOU have a devote hatred for Trump ...

How is it possible that Hillary Clinton escaped criminal indictment for mishandling classified documents despite incriminating evidence that she violated the Espionage Act?

Why did Donald Trump become the target of a criminal investigation for allegedly conspiring with Russia to influence the presidential election despite no evidence that he ever did so?

The answer, it seems, comes down to one person who played a vital role in both cases: Peter Strzok, deputy director of counterintelligence at the FBI.

Strzok was exchanging politically charged texts with an FBI lawyer that denigrated Trump and lauded Clinton at the same time he was leading the bureau’s criminal investigation of Clinton. He is also the one who changed the critical wording of then-FBI Director James Comey’s description of Clinton’s handling of classified material that resulted in no charges being brought against her.

Then, Strzok reportedly signed the document launching the 2016 investigation into Russia’s meddling in the election and whether the Trump campaign played any role. After leading the FBI’s probe into Trump, he then joined Robert Mueller’s special counsel team as an integral investigator.

Thus, it appears that one man with a strident political agenda accomplished his twin goals of clearing Clinton and accusing Trump, evidence be damned.

And then he was caught.

The Strzok Bust and Cover-up

The Department of Justice inspector general, Michael Horowitz, discovered the electronic texts Strzok exchanged with his lover, FBI lawyer Lisa Page. The messages were so politically incendiary and so threatened the integrity of Mueller’s investigation that Strzok was quietly canned over the summer from the special counsel team, where he was a pivotal participant.

The Trump-Russia investigation is now awash in illegitimacy. Did Mueller or anyone else notify Congress that both the Trump investigation --and the Clinton case before it-- were corrupted? Of course not. This was covered up. Mueller surely knew that if the truth were revealed, it would further discredit a Trump-Russia probe that had already taken on the stench of dead fish.

The House Intelligence Committee could smell it and knew something was amiss. It demanded answers. But the Justice Department and the FBI refused to respond or otherwise produce relevant documents that the committee subpoenaed. They are still stonewalling many of Congress’s valid requests and should now face contempt charges.

Importantly, all of the anti-Trump and pro-Clinton messages should be made public. Americans should decide for themselves whether our system of justice has been compromised by unscrupulous influences.

Just how rife with political prejudice and corrupt motives is the special counsel’s investigation?

Instead of choosing prosecutors who could be neutral, fair and objective, Mueller stacked his staff with Democratic donors. Apparently, he conducted little or no vetting of both prosecutors and investigators. How else does one explain the presence of Strzok and Lisa Page on the investigative team?

It appears that Mueller selected people of a particular political persuasion without discerning review or scrutiny. We were supposed to simply trust Mueller’s judgment, notwithstanding his own disqualifying conflict of interest under the special counsel statute that demanded his recusal.

The Trump-Russia investigation is now awash in illegitimacy. Mueller and those who work for him have squandered all credibility. It is imperative that the special counsel be dismissed, the current staff fired, and a new counsel appointed to re-evaluate the evidence objectively.

Every member of Mueller’s hand-picked staff must now be examined. The special counsel has proven he cannot be trusted with his assembled team of partisans. Do not expect Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein to make these changes. He, too, should be removed in his capacity as Mueller’s supervisor. As both a witness and prosecutor, Rosenstein has his own conspicuous and disabling conflict of interest. Yet he has refused to step aside. Attorney General Jeff Sessions is duty-bound to remove both Mueller and Rosenstein.

Are There Other Emails?

Given what we know about the composition of the special counsel team, there may well be others who harbor a blatant political bias and have expressed their animus toward Trump in emails or texts. The computer accounts of the entire staff need to be examined by Congress and the DOJ Inspector General. Failing that, news organizations should file a request under the Freedom of Information Act.

The examination should begin with Andrew Weissmann, who has close ties to Hui Chen, whom he hired at the Justice Department and with whom he worked at the U.S. Attorney’s office for the Eastern District of New York. Documents show the DOJ approved a salary for her position of $711,800 for two years of work, which is more than the attorney general earns.

Chen resigned in June of this year, stating that she could no longer work in the administration of a president who had violated the Constitution and engaged in treasonous conduct. According to The Hill, she “posted tweets or retweeted articles that were considered critical of Trump.”

View image on Twitter View image on Twitter Hui Chen @HuiChenEthics Lunch time outside the White House. 11:55 AM - May 10, 2017 24 24 Replies 15 15 Retweets 72 72 likes Twitter Ads info and privacy But before her departure, Chen attended a “March for Truth” rally and proudly posted on Twitter a photograph of herself outside the White House wearing an orange “Resist” jacket. She posted another photo of the Trump International Hotel with the words “Pay Trump Bribery Here” superimposed over the entrance.

Chen’s favored hashtag is “TrumpRussiaCoverUp,” and she has blanketed her Twitter account with virulent denunciations of the president. Hundreds of them.

Since Chen made little secret of her views while at Justice, it is reasonable to ask whether she expressed them to Weissmann, the person to whom she reported. If so, how did he respond? Like Strzok, did Weissmann write anti-Trump messages to his friend and colleague, Hui Chen, or others?

Every member of Mueller’s hand-picked staff must now be examined. The special counsel has proven he cannot be trusted with his assembled team of partisans.

The Sham Investigation of Clinton

It never made sense that Hillary Clinton escaped criminal prosecution for mishandling classified documents.

The Espionage Act makes it a crime to mishandle classified documents “through gross negligence” (18 USC 793-f). With 110 emails on Clinton’s private server that were classified at the time they were sent or received, only illogical legal gymnastics driven by corruption could clear her.

Enter Strzok. It turns out, he is the person who altered former Director Comey's early draft describing Clinton’s actions as criminal under the law. But later, the words “grossly negligent” were crossed out and the language “extremely careless” was substituted. Although the two terms are synonymous, the former terminology is specifically stated in the statute while the latter is not.

It appears that Strzok, and perhaps Comey, knew Clinton violated the law but subsequently resolved to conjure a way to exonerate her by editing the language so that it seemed less culpable and more innocuous. Were these machinations driven by Strzok’s political agenda? Did he despise Trump so much that he devised a scheme to clear Clinton so that a criminal indictment would not impede her assent to the presidency?

Strzok, Comey and others who may have been involved must be put under oath to answer these vital questions.

In the meantime, the Department of Justice must now, belatedly, reopen the Clinton email case and re-examine fairly and impartially all of the evidence to determine whether criminal charges against her should be sought. The statute of limitations has not expired.

Sadly, the FBI is no longer the respected premier law enforcement agency in America. People like Strzok have politicized the bureau, discredited its work and done immeasurable damage. So, too, have Comey and Mueller.

President Trump is right –the FBI’s “reputation is in tatters,” and the Clinton probe was “phony and dishonest.”

Gregg Jarrett joined FOX News Channel (FNC) in 2002 and is based in New York. He currently serves as legal analyst and offers commentary across both FNC and FOX Business Network (FBN).

05-Dec-17
"...the FBI’s “reputation is in tatters,” and the Clinton probe was “phony and dishonest.”"

ABSOLUTE TRUTH!!

From: Stalker
05-Dec-17
JTV I think he is still trying to wrap his little brain around this one!

From: slade
05-Dec-17

From: Woods Walker
05-Dec-17
"Only an uninformed fool thinks this is a democracy. We have a constitutional republic. There is a huge difference."

Watch it there bk, you're talking about the Democrat base now! These are the same uninformed fools who still think they were able to keep their doctor and health plan that Obama promised, not to mention saving $2400 a year.

From: bad karma
05-Dec-17
Good point. What am I thinking? Is there a lobotomy required before you can be a democrat nowadays

From: Annony Mouse
05-Dec-17

Annony Mouse's Link
Even the WSJ thinks that Mueller has compromised himself. It is probably time to investigate the investigator.

From: Shuteye
05-Dec-17
More e mails and texts are coming out, tonight I think. They are supposed to really put the kaboz on Mueller and company. The lame stream media don't even mention it but they will be forced to report on it pretty soon.

From: Shuteye
05-Dec-17
Sara Carter said tonight that there will be information coming out by the end of the week that will just about destroy Mueller. She said the whole report from DOJ will be out in January. She said that over 20 leakers will be named. Greg Garrett says it looks like obstruction of justice charges can be filed against Comey. Electronic records show Peter Strzok, who led the investigation of Hillary Clinton's private email server as the No. 2 official in the counterintelligence division, changed Comey's earlier draft language describing Clinton's actions as "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless," the sources said. Grossly negligent is a felony.

From: Woods Walker
05-Dec-17
If this is true, then we are on the brink of a breakdown of our government. I just hope and pray that we can work through this and that we still have some sane, patriotic Americans in charge in DC who can begin fixing this. If not, then we are toast.

We already let certain classes of people not only get away with IGNORING which laws of ours laws they wish, but in fact get rewarded for it. Combine that with certain political types not even being investigated for obvious FELONIES they've committed and it doesn't take a genius to see that our "rule of law" is a friggin' joke.

From: Solo
05-Dec-17
Many of us suspected the Obama Administration gangsters were doing potentially irreparable harm in the shadows throughout his time in office. Well, we're now witnessing some of those filthy rotten dealings coming to the surface.

Not only has he infiltrated our law enforcement and intelligence communities with anti-American operatives, but he also stacked the courts & legal system with anti-constitutional, vicious leftist judges & officials to plague our legal system for years to come.

He really knew what he was doing when it came to carrying out his efforts to 'fundamentally change America' as we know it. He even warned us way back before he was elected, and many of us saw this coming then. And I suspect we ain't seen nothing yet...

From: Woods Walker
05-Dec-17
I agree with you. The worst of what Obama's done to us is yet to come. His promise to fundamentally change America is the ONLY damn thing that affirmative action son of a bitch ever said that wasn't a lie.

From: Solo
05-Dec-17
Yep. And the lies and dirty dishonest dealings kicked in from there to accomplish his (their) objectives. It's no mystery how they always managed to have judges ruling in their favor every step of the way, until those cases got to the SCOTUS. Then their favored rulings were overturned every time.....

From: Woods Walker
05-Dec-17
Thank God for GORSUCH! I would happily vote AGAIN for Trump for no other reason than that.

From: Woods Walker
05-Dec-17

Woods Walker's embedded Photo
Woods Walker's embedded Photo

  • Sitka Gear