slade's Link
If I were a Democrat I wouldn't vote for Hillary. JFK wouldn't make it in the Democrat Party...or the Republican Party for that matter.
It's not just hard, it's impossible to "nail" anyone when the legal entity (DOJ) tasked with carrying out the prosecution of criminals is part of the criminal cabal. It's laughable that this "no indictments, no convictions" meme gets trotted out given that the situation is analogous to taking the word of a bank robber that they only took money from "their" account and no one else's.
Yes, some people are either a)that partisan, b)that stupid or c)both.......
Comey ‘Friend’ Who Leaked FBI Memos Now Claims To Be His Attorney
This is a sign that Comey knows he’s being investigated and he’s trying to cover his communications. Problem? Comey previously testified he was not his attorney but a friend. But there’s also a conflict of interest because Richman is a witness to Comey’s leaking as well as a possible co-defendant.
Via The Federalist:
A friend of former FBI director James Comey who leaked sensitive FBI memos to The New York Times in the wake of Comey’s firing in 2017 now claims to be Comey’s personal attorney. Daniel Richman, a law professor at Columbia University, told The Federalist via phone on Tuesday afternoon that he was now personally representing Comey.
The revelation comes in the wake of news that Comey was interviewed by the special counsel’s office last year. According to The New York Times, the line of questioning from the office of special counsel Robert Mueller focused on memos that Comey wrote and later leaked after he was fired from his job by President Donald Trump. A review of FBI policies governing the handling of sensitive government documents suggests Comey violated FBI policy by leaking the memos, which were produced on government time, using government equipment, and directly related to his official government responsibilities, according to Comey’s own testimony before Congress.
SJJ's Link
Linked from IOTWReport:
Hillary’s Loss of the Presidency May Very Well Lead to the Entire Corrupt Obama Administration Being Indicted
SJJ's link...worth reading (rather long...read it at link):
Clinton–Obama Emails: The Key to Understanding Why Hillary Wasn’t Indicted (Internal links/references)
by Andrew C. McCarthy
New FBI texts highlight a motive to conceal the president’s involvement. From the first, these columns have argued that the whitewash of the Hillary Clinton–emails caper was President Barack Obama’s call — not the FBI’s, and not the Justice Department’s. (See, e.g., here, here, and here.) The decision was inevitable. Obama, using a pseudonymous email account, had repeatedly communicated with Secretary Clinton over her private, non-secure email account. These emails must have involved some classified information, given the nature of consultations between presidents and secretaries of state, the broad outlines of Obama’s own executive order defining classified intelligence (see EO 13526, section 1.4), and the fact that the Obama administration adamantly refused to disclose the Clinton–Obama emails. If classified information was mishandled, it was necessarily mishandled on both ends of these email exchanges. If Clinton had been charged, Obama’s culpable involvement would have been patent. In any prosecution of Clinton, the Clinton–Obama emails would have been in the spotlight. For the prosecution, they would be more proof of willful (or, if you prefer, grossly negligent) mishandling of intelligence. More significantly, for Clinton’s defense, they would show that Obama was complicit in Clinton’s conduct yet faced no criminal charges. That is why such an indictment of Hillary Clinton was never going to happen. The latest jaw-dropping disclosures of text messages between FBI agent Peter Strzok and his paramour, FBI lawyer Lisa Page, illustrate this point. For the moment, I want to put aside the latest controversy — the FBI’s failure to retain five months of text messages between Strzok and Page, those chattiest of star-crossed lovers. Yes, this “glitch” closes our window on a critical time in the Trump-Russia investigation: mid December 2016 through mid May 2017. That is when the bureau and Justice Department were reportedly conducting and renewing (in 90-day intervals) court-approved FISA surveillance that may well have focused on the newly sworn-in president of the United States. (Remember: The bureau’s then-director, James Comey, testified at a March 20 House Intelligence Committee hearing that the investigation was probing possible coordination between Trump’s campaign and Kremlin interference in the election.)
Trump has it within his power to make this happen – the indictments of dozens of Obama administration personnel, including Obama himself, for conspiracy and obstruction of justice.
He needs to dump Sessions and get a bloodthirsty Attorney General who stops at nothing to see that justice is served.
Continued at link.
Trump: Palestinians “disrespected us” by not meeting “our great Vice President” during Israel trip
Stop the money and maybe the Palestinians will be forced to come and actually negotiate with Israel.
Worth reading...
"The voting machines were rigged by Soros,..."
What utter BS!
Show the evidence, not that you have any!
