Contributors to this thread:
MILITARY STRIKES UNDERWAY
Tune in to the news... US, UK, and FRANCE launched their attacks into Syria
Heavy explosions heard in the capital city. Last year we took out 20% of Syria's aircraft. This time I bet they get more.
Angela Merkel is staying home cooking (and being) a sour kraut. lol
Heavy stuff... Prayers & positive energy to our, and our coalitions, soldiers who are in harms way.
knock the hell out of 'em !!
Shots fired! Here’s to the troops in harms way....
The MSM hosts are pissed because they wanted to talk about Comey!
LOL! That's how you squash a book tour.....
Last week he wanted out of Syria now we’re in a “sustained effort?”
Anyone who uses chemical weapons should be stopped. That includes Assad and the Russians. But we’ve seen this before, we’ve tried this response before, and it clearly failed. We need a strategy, not a series of contradictory tweets.
This just in: Comey to reschedule book tour .
y f Imposter. Can you come up with a reply that isn't BULL$HIT???
just watch that tail a waggin' ..... .... Hey PutZ, situations change, and a good POTUS can make those turns on dime if needed (Obama never could do that without multiple polls to lead his way in the dark).... Trump dosnt draw red lines in the sand and not follow up like your worst POTUS Obama did
Came across this web site.... real time reports as they appear, on the map
I have made a decision.
I am done with Laura Ingraham. Let Hogg have her.
EF Hutton, I agree with you.
If at the end of this, there's enough of Assad to put on a cracker, that's too much. Bomb the hell out of them.
After looking at the map that Bowsniper provided it appears Bagdad Bob has moved to Syria.
Angela Merkel former East German with communist sympathies Rather play with Putin and the Muslims
When Obama bombed Syria for its use of chemical weapons, GOP and Fox screamed it was an impeachable offense.
Now that Trump does it, it’s heroic! And then there’s trumps own words in 2013 when Obama bombed Syria;
“What will we get for bombing Syria besides more debt and a possible long term conflict? Obama needs Congressional approval.”
I must have missed something but, what did Laura Ingram do Hutton and Shuteye? I haven't got to watch her the last several nights
hey PUTZ, Obama NEVER DID launch any air strike against Aaad/Syria for use of Chemicals on his own people... he never did support his "red line in the sand" rhetoric .... what Odipwad did was ONE YEAR AFTER the chem. attack, and only as ISSIS was building strength ... ooopsie, WRONG AGAIN !!
y f IMposter. Need more rope??? 8^)
Because he sought Congressional approval and he was DENIED. Jeffrey, lets be intellectually honest, ok? I'm sure the term "intellectually" threw you, but you can't deny history.
GOP threaten Barack Obama w/ impeachment if he didnt gain congressional approval for Syrian Strikes to which they blocked him. Denied him.
trump has now attacked Syria w/out congressional approval TWICE and the GOP with their hypocrisy sit on their hands and do nothing..
Pointing this out is factually correct. There are records of this. TO call this a lie is to be dishonest.
you are the dishonest one... Obama and Kerry were a HUGE failure in Syria, let alone the whole Mideast.... it is because of those failures Assad has his chemicals and uses them the way he does .... YOU CLAIMED Obama attacked Syria because of Chem. use .. YOU SAID THAT !!!... let me look , yep, that is what you put down.. ("When Obama bombed Syria for its use of chemical weapons"/PutZ)... YOU WERE WRONG AGAIN or you outright lied, which is it ??
I didn't like the part in Russian response saying it was an "insult" to their President. When people take stuff personally, they do stupid things.
Russian response might be to go after the rebels we support in the zone of Syria we control. Daring us to actually shoot down Russian jets and kill Russians. And Mattis will do it if pushed.... after fair warning. PaulyZ says obama bombed Syria the same way PZ ran the Marine Corps crucible. Lol
Let’s be clear. It is well documented that Paul Zeidan of Briarcliff is an idiot. A bed wetting liberal gomer.
How many times has Paul Zeidan told us Trump was weak, was scared of Putin. Only a bed wetting idiot at any point would have believed that. Now we see Trump expelling Rushkies diplomats, killing over 200 Russians in previous strikes, and now this attack with Putin’s forces on the run and Putin calling him Hitler. Paul Zeidan is nothing more than used up azz wipe. Make a note students of Briarcliff. There will be a test.
Republicans did indeed warn about strikes, that being led by Rand Paul. Bottom line is Congress is only needed to declare war, the president is Comander and Chief of the armed forces and has full authority to use that power. President Jefferson, who knew the Constitution better than any of us, did the same very thing sending our Navy in the dark of night to the Barbary coast and other adventures. Time to flush Paul Zeidan down the drain and the rest of his America hating drivel.
Godspeed our service members home, but in the meantime turn that sand into glass.
I agree with the strikes. Trump made the right decision with a coalition. You kill children with chemical weapons you deserve a tomahawk up your @#$&! Mission accomplished.
I just hope Trump sends the U.N. the bill for any and all strikes. I haven't heard exactly what we have struck, but it should be not only the chemical factories and warehouses but command and control and Syrian air force as it sits on the ground. If you're going to tear them up tear them up good and make it costly.
The strikes seem to be focused on the chemical facilities in Syria. A more reserved attack than I thought would come, but an effective one sending a clear message. The Rushkies were chased from the Syrian port of Tartus, giving us an opportunity for great surveillance of their naval ability to evacuate. The B1 bombers were not even detected by Russian installed technology, telling the fat gargoyle in North Korea his dumb azz is grass if the need arises. I don't believe we will see further chemical action from the butcher of Syria and his Rushkie supporters. Russia meanwhile is running to the U.N. to tattle on us. Our response should be to deduct the cost of this raid from future member fees.
140 missels all reportedly hit their mark, mostly the chemical weapons mfg. and suppliers.
Response was weak to non-existent. They were still shooting at the sky long after US France and UK forces left.
Um what goes up does come down. Probably on the Syrians, the drive by media will likely blame US, France and UK for civilian casualties that Syria caused do to their lack of proper targeting.
There needs to be a 4th target: Assad's house. Blow up every room but the one he is in. It got Quadaffi's attention when Reagan was president.
She argued with Sabastian against Trump launching the sttike.
She bowed down and apologized to that punk kid. I would have stayed my course, even if it meant new career. Been there done that.
Aaron Tippen You got to stand for something or you’ll fall for anything. You’ve got to be your own man, not a puppet on a string.
She reminds me of the mayor’s son on the original Red Dawn. Went got caught and swallowed the tracking bug.
"There needs to be a 4th target: Assad's house. Blow up every room but the one he is in. It got Quadaffi's attention when Reagan was president. " .. ..
... for the record, I think that was the only combat experience for the F-111 Aircraft. I remember that Reagon had to get permission to fly over Turkey.
Please, someone correct me if I am wrong.
You could be right, but I would have guessed it was the F-15E SE's that were used. Not sure of the dates. The F-111 and it's many updates (B,C,D etc) flew many missions over its long history.
With that F111 strike, it was that France would not let us use our jets stationed there or fly over... so we used British based F111's and had to fly waaaaaay around with multiple refueling to get to Libya.
Famously, one of the F111 bombs missed it's target and hit a French building (embassy?)
It was the F111 that flew the mission. I wasn't aware they flew over Turkey, I know France wouldn't allow overflight in their air space. I just assumed they went through Spain.
UN Ambassador Haley promised that Trump would not waver: “When our president draws a red line, our president enforces the red line."
"Please, someone correct me if I am wrong"
BEG will be along shortly to set you straight tonyo.
JTV you are lying or purposely leaving out facts.
List of countries Obama bombed: Somalia, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Libya, Yemen, Iraq, and SYRIA. The airstrikes were carried out with both drones and manned aircraft. This is indisputable. This is not up for debate. And when obama bombed Syria there was calls from the GOP to impeach because he didn’t get Congressional approval.
your fav IMposter, AKA atheist, paul z. : "You are LYING or purposely leaving out FACTS." Yep, pretty much described yourself again. Good job moron. 8^)))
I have worked with kids for 45 years in the classroom and coaching. When an animal gases kids to death, I don't care who retaliates, regardless of party or permission from federal leeches.
Hey PUTZ... Obama did NOT attack Syria for the chemical attacks, thus the red line in the sand comment and Assad used 'em again and OBAMA DID NOTHING !! .... he did NOTHING in retaliation about it .... your a friggin idiot... you proved it AGAIN !! ...
"In August 2012, the American journalist Chuck Todd, enquiring into Barack Obama’s “latest thinking” on the rebellion in Syria, which at the time was a year old, asked the now former president if he ever envisioned intervening militarily in Syria to ensure “the safe keeping of the chemical weapons” in Syrian president Bashar Al Assad’s arsenal. According to the Federation of American Scientists, Syria under the Al Assads had built up “one of the largest and most sophisticated chemical weapons programmes in the world”. Mr Obama answered the question with uncharacteristic unambiguity: “We have been very clear to the Assad regime”, the president said, “that a red line for us is … chemical weapons moving around or being utilised”.
Mr Al Assad did not wait long to start testing president Obama’s red line. On December 23, he dropped bombs containing a toxic gas called Agent 15 on Syrians queuing for bread in the city of Homs. **** The White House not only did not take action****, but it also issued a statement saying that reports of chemical weapons use were not “consistent” with its own assessments. ***Mr Obama’s failure to enforce his own warning clearly emboldened the Syrian regime.*** On August 21, 2013, four years ago today, Mr Al Assad rained bombs loaded with sarin gas on Syrian citizens outside Damascus. The images of suffering that emerged that day from Ghouta will long haunt humanity. They are a stain on our conscience. " ...... (and PutZ is a stain on this site)
Jeff, you have some comprehension issues, pal. Once again: when the Assad regime crossed Obama’s “red line” in 2013, Obama turned to Congress to authorize military intervention. In the month that followed, little support emerged for military action in Congress and the U.S. instead removed more than 1,300 tons of chemical agents from Syria.
However! Obama ordered drone airstrikes on Syria in 2014 as part of a military campaign against ISIS, and for retaliation for using chemical weapons.
Further Trump called out Obama for bombing Syria. Said it was a terrible decision. So which is it? Was trump right then or now?
Why Obama didn't enforce his red line in Syria - Business Insider www.businessinsider.com/obama-red-line-syria-iran-2016-8 "Aug 23, 2016 - Obama said in 2012 that his red line with the Assad regime would be the use of chemical weapons. Later that year, Assad's forces killed nearly 1,500 people in a chemical-weapons attack. But then Obama got cold feet —" and did nothing ...
Trump has now TWICE retaliated for Assads regimes use of chemicals and gas on civilians ... Obama did nothing to Assad ... it is easy to see that Trump is not to be messed with and will do what is needed even if it means changing his mind when the safety of civilians is threatened by a dictator ...... way to go Mr. Trump ..
"Former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright said Monday that she wished former President Barack Obama had taken action after setting his "red line" in Syria.
Colbert asked Albright what President Donald Trump should do and about him blaming Obama for letting things get out of hand in Syria during his tenure, Mediaite reports. Trump is weighing how to respond after Bashar al-Assad's regime reportedly unleashed another chemical weapons attack on a rebel-held Damascus suburb on Saturday.
"Barack Obama did put down a red line and I personally wished that we had followed through on that. " (Madeleine Albright)
Bombing ISIS troops hiding in Syria is not 'bombing SYRIA' (Assad and his henchmen). You big phony, Putz.
It’s obvious we (Obama administration) shouldn’t have believed Russia when they said all chemical weapons were removed. Or at the very least maybe we should have at the time required there making more was removed.
Bullshit Mountain and Zeidan Peak
Bullshit Mountain and Zeidan Peak
Paulabe certainly knows about lying. In fact if ANYONE (or "ones" in hesheit's case) knows about lying....a LOT about lying...it's Paul Zeidan. I hear they're renaming Denali yet again in his/her/it's honor to "Mt. Bullshit"!
Obama and Kerry trusted the "Russians" to make sure that all the chems were removed... that really went well, didnt it ....lol .... smh ....
On a side note, Haley 2024. She's an incredible woman
Yup Jeff.....about as well as relying on the words of Paulabe.
THE WHITE HOUSE Office of the Press Secretary FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE April 13, 2018 United States Assessment of the Assad Regime’s Chemical Weapons Use
Spike Bull 's Link
Perhaps Laura Ingram and her sad anti Trump attack should be fodder for another garden , but since it was mentioned , If there is no forth coming apology from Ingram , who by the way was one of my favorite reporters, she will not get the small benefit of my familys audiance again. Gorka slapped her hard but not nearly hard enough and the looks on the rest of the panel , except for the Obamanite colonel, told the real story. Outright shock at her silly rant and her complete misinterpretation of real events and reasoning behind them.
God bless, Steve
Well it looks like Trump and Co. picked some good targets.
I will give Ingraham a pass on this one. She got pretty beat up over the Hogg incident and also it is pretty damn hard to put yourself out there on national TV every night and continue to be absolutely correct every time.
I still like Laura and will watch her... every one has their opinions .. look at those on here ... Hogg had proven himself to be the buttwipe we all knew he was and still is... oh, BTW, he is now a nobody ... havnt heard crap from him since the first few weeks, I knew he'd drift into oblivion . ....
"On a side note, Haley 2024. She's an incredible woman"
Flag Banner Haley??
Anyway, was this a pill factory or what?
Israeli intelligence says Trump's Syria strike failed, and that it didn't take out much of anything.
... so much winning!
So Trump attacked Syria and Nikki Haley announced new sanctions on Russia...trump however, back tracked and will not implement those sanctions. He basically undercut Haley. Why?
Both Russia and Syria, however, was forewarned of the attacks, and evacuated the facilities, sufferng very little damage and the White House pats itself on the back.
Did I miss anything?
as opposed to pandering and grovelling...... it's not just winning.... it's obliterating.....
Laura Ingraham's ratings are up over 20% since Hogg the blind dumb puppet wet his panties. Hogg is just a sheep, can't really blame him for his stupidity but he could be blamed for his ignorance. Instead of looking at facts and thinking for himself he allows himself to be dragged around by the ring in his nose. It is really a pedophile type relationship liberalism is trying to have with our youth. All to serve an America hating leftist agenda. Hogg is the poster boy for blind dumb sheep.
President Trump's strike in Syria were very fulfilling. Notice how liberals whine when they can make it sound like a military attack isn't strong enough, and then they would whine when they could be sold as too strong and warlike. In reality they don't care about facts either, they are only interested in the propaganda needed to sell their tainted America hating ideology. Paul Zeidan is the poster clown for that. A blind and dumb sheep himself trying to lead other blind dumb sheep. Classic!
"Did i miss anything?" Nope, you pretty much told as many LIES on the subject, that you could. That's all you have, is LIES. 8^)))
It's the random Putz story hour, without any links for verification. Who is he quoting... Joe/Mika, RT news??
I don't think the aim was to kill hundreds of likely innocent factory workers....... which the leftists would cry about forever too..... didn't kill and break enough, broke and killed too much..... yet think there can be a "diplomatic" solution to gassing entire villages, we just haven't talked to them the right way, explained ourselves correctly.... liberalism truly is a mental illness.....
Bow sniper he's quoting business insider for his source.
Well considering that trump was calling for our troops to leave “very soon” , then in the next breath ordering tomahawks? Yeah ,it’s the liberals with the issues. Ok. Also consider, poor Nikki Haley says additional Tussian sanctions will be put into effect ASAP. Cue trump the next day saying he was “uncomfortable” with implementing sanctions. But sure, he’s very tough on Russia. He warned them before the Bombing so they can move whatever assets they had in the area and soldiers. But sure. It’s liberals at fault.
"It's liberals at fault", BINGO!. Well atheist, i see your stupid a$$ is back on the Russia band wagon. You are bouncing off the walls, trying to stir as much $hit as possible. What a moron. Lets see. Bout time for you to go back to the porn star. 8^)))