Moultrie Mobile
Kifaru vs. Barney's
Elk
Contributors to this thread:
midwest 11-Jan-15
Beendare 11-Jan-15
MeanMachine 11-Jan-15
Matt 11-Jan-15
Kevin Dill 11-Jan-15
Mule Power 11-Jan-15
Elk_Thumper 11-Jan-15
Elk_Thumper 11-Jan-15
Backpack Hunter 11-Jan-15
HANS1 11-Jan-15
midwest 11-Jan-15
flyingbrass 11-Jan-15
kota-man 11-Jan-15
Ermine 11-Jan-15
TD 12-Jan-15
Nick Muche 12-Jan-15
midwest 12-Jan-15
Mule Power 12-Jan-15
HDE 12-Jan-15
Kevin Dill 12-Jan-15
Z Barebow 12-Jan-15
Mule Power 12-Jan-15
midwest 12-Jan-15
JTreeman 12-Jan-15
Z Barebow 12-Jan-15
Branden 12-Jan-15
willliamtell 12-Jan-15
Elk_Thumper 12-Jan-15
HDE 12-Jan-15
Mule Power 12-Jan-15
Dirty D 14-Jan-15
Dirty D 14-Jan-15
Matt 14-Jan-15
Nick Muche 14-Jan-15
Ermine 16-Jan-15
midwest 16-Jan-15
bad karma 16-Jan-15
Steve H. 16-Jan-15
Kevin Dill 17-Jan-15
Dirty D 17-Jan-15
HUNT MAN 17-Jan-15
Nick Muche 17-Jan-15
Nick Muche 17-Jan-15
midwest 17-Jan-15
Nick Muche 17-Jan-15
Matt 17-Jan-15
TD 17-Jan-15
midwest 17-Jan-15
Aron@kifaru 17-Jan-15
Elk_Thumper 18-Jan-15
Kevin Dill 18-Jan-15
willliamtell 18-Jan-15
kota-man 18-Jan-15
Aron@kifaru 18-Jan-15
From: midwest
11-Jan-15
Every time I think I have my mind made up, I change it again. I was certain I was going to get a Barney's pack frame to use for hauling in a spike camp and hauling out meat, then day hunt with my Eberle X2 like I do now.

But then I go reading about these wonderful Kifaru's and thinking how nice it would be to use the dulplex or bikini frame and accessorize as needed for a do-it-all pack, although, at a much higher price.

Please help me decide which way to go. For strictly hauling a heavy load of meat, which pack frame wins out? Has anyone used both for an honest comparison?

And how is the bikini or duplex frame for day hunting?

From: Beendare
11-Jan-15
Tough to compare; Barneys is built for strength and comfort...Kifaru built with weight to utility in mind.

you can't go wrong with either. There are wayyyy more kifaru fanboys than Barneys....so you will get more comments for the Kifaru- good stuff though.

A better direct comparison to the Barneys would be the MR packs.

From: MeanMachine
11-Jan-15
I use the barneys frame and its great. You can pack 80#+ loads with it. Never used the Kifaru

From: Matt
11-Jan-15
It depends on what you define as "heavy". The folks I know who use both the Barneys for packing moose (140+ lbs) and use the Kifaru for everything else (up to 100-110 lbs). Most guys won't/can't carry the sort of weight that brings a Barney's into its own, so it is a moot point.

IMO carrying two packs backpacking is not a good trade-off. The combo you are talking about is 2# heavier than a Kifaru EMR II/duplex combination, which packs down nicely as a daypack. Think about what guys will usually do (or spend) to drop 2# versus the utility of having a seperate daypack on a backpack hunt.

From: Kevin Dill
11-Jan-15
I was exactly where you are now. I wanted a Kifaru as I thought it to be the ultimate hunting pack. It was a great pack for hunting and organized loading, but it completely underperformed (especially for the money) at carrying big nasty loads of meat, irregular cargo etc. I carried a full moose head on that Kifaru and it was the worst 3/4 mile I ever endured with a pack. My buddy's Cabela's aluminum frame far outperformed it for general rough duty in the backcountry.

I bought a Barney's and it is very simply akin to a 1-ton diesel truck for strength and utility, but comfortable as any $600 pack I ever tried. My Barney's has seen tough use and I don't ever think of changing systems now. I have the X2 Estock, but replaced it with the MR Dragonslayer for day-pack and moderate load use. I have never had a better dual-pack system for serious wilderness hunts involving animal packing and heavy load-outs.

From: Mule Power
11-Jan-15
I know people who got rid of their Kifarus. But like shoes packs have to fit the individual so that's not a mark against Kifaru. But when it comes to packing the largest of quarters which is a moose hind... Barney's is the winner and you won't see many Alaskans with a Kifaru. I think that speaks for itself. I love my Barneys.

When I first got it I couldn't wait to get a load in it and get it adjusted. So I sat on the couch and had my wife climb in. Haha I walked around bouncing up and down with her in it like it was nothing. I couldn't believe it. Everything had heard about the pack was on the money. It's a true freighter.

From: Elk_Thumper
11-Jan-15
I have owned both and candidly, I am a bit shocked Barney's gets the press its gets. I could not carry heavy loads with Barney's comfortably. Why?

Just look at the belt on the Barneys and compare it to the best made custom packs out there (i.e.: McHales) or even great high end packs like Arcteryx, Kifaru and you can see why i hated it. The belt has no too much padding (prevents from wrapping around the hips correctly) and the sewn seem/line in the middle of the belt horizontally, causes it to fold over with heavy loads as well the inside material doesn't fold well - it lumps. Simply put, hate the belt on the Barneys. The design is old and tired.

Kifaru is by far the most comfortable pack i have used. I do not think it is a competition to be honest.

Having said all of that, I know you will get pro Barneys guys and we are all right. you have to chose what works for you. But take a look at that belt a little closer and compare it to the best packs on the market. They are waaay under designed IMHO...

From: Elk_Thumper
11-Jan-15
btw, i meant "too much padding" The best belts do NOT need to be loaded with padding. Also, i belt is actually quite small from bottom to top of the belt. Height i guess you would call it. Again, the competition has larger belts to wrap more efficiently around your hips

11-Jan-15
Kifaru fits me much better than Barneys so I will choose Kifaru every single time. In addition to fit you have modularity, and if nothing else than a weight reduction. Pack fit really is very important. If you don't have a "normal", or a "flat back" you can reject the carbon blend stays and choose aluminum stays in your Kifaru pack to really dial in the fit.

From: HANS1
11-Jan-15
I have the barneys as well nothing betters for real heavy loads. Moose quarters or large brown bear hide with the heads and paws still is as heavy as it gets. Personally haven't packed anything with the more modern parks and probably won't the barneys should out last me. The barneys are designed for extreme use the Kifaru may be a better choice for the hunters more comfort and features as opposed to.barneys being a better choice for guiding.

From: midwest
11-Jan-15
The last bull I packed out, I used a Cabela's Alaskan and it was the most miserable pack out ever! I helped pack out a few other elk and deer with my old Schuh pack and it carried better than the Cabela's.

What would make the Barney's better than my Cabela's Alaskan?

From: flyingbrass
11-Jan-15
kifaru

From: kota-man
11-Jan-15
Mule power...to say "you won't see many Alaskans with a Kifaru" is a GROSS understatement. I've made three trips to AK and on all three my guides wore Kifaru. Two of those were previously Barney's users. The guys from Ak on here and on Rokslide are all Kifaru guys. The Kifaru EMR2 is a great AK pack. Many residents will tell you so.

If you are strictly a moose hunter, a Barney's is a good option for some but if you typically carry loads of 110 lbs or less, I will take a Kifaru every time. HANS1 said it pretty well...

My first Big Game pack was a Cabelas Alaskan Guide...Yuck...

From: Ermine
11-Jan-15
Kifaru

From: TD
12-Jan-15
My limit is going to be 100lbs (less if at all possible) The kifaru handles that with as much comfort as I need. The Barney pack are known as able to handle loads over that.... but I'm not. WRT awkward loads I'm not limited to a bag, the cargo panel has hauled everything I've thrown at it.

Haul, yes. likely few better at it by reputation. But I wouldn't bowhunt with a Barneys. And I'm not traveling or packing in with two packs. Makes no sense for my needs.

From: Nick Muche
12-Jan-15
"You won't see many Alaskans with a Kifaru"...

Lol

Everyone I know who hunts and appreciates a good pack up here, has one. One buddy has 9 Dalls and a pile of moose, another kills moose each year and plenty of other stuff, another the same, etc... We travel in. "Packs"....

Best bud has a Barney's. never heard a man piss and moan more than when we threw 100lbs on it two days in a row via dead goats... Lol

He's getting a Kifaru.

You won't see many Alaskans with a Kifaru. Lol. Just how many ya seen there mule? Ha

From: midwest
12-Jan-15
You guys are costing me a lot of money. lol

From: Mule Power
12-Jan-15
I guess not as many as you Nick. And the ones I'm referring to are the ones that I've communicated back and forth with about one thing really and that is packing moose. Not only guys who live up there like you but ones who hunt it regularly like Kevin and others over on the Alaska Outdoors Directory.

Like I said I have never strapped on a Kifaru either so I can't give a comparison. But I do know guys who hated them which gets back to the point I made above.... different strokes for different folks. It comes down to fit. I love Danner boots and they make a great product. But the just don't fit me. Too narrow.

That's why pack threads are like boot threads. The answers always go back and forth... Ford, Chevy, Ford, Chevy. Just curious, have you packed a serious load with a Barneys? And if so your thoughts on that? My wife goes 130 lbs and she said the Barney's was the smoothest ride of any packs I've ever made her climb into. haha

I like Kevin's analogy: Like a 1 ton diesel truck. If you were looking for a parking spot at Wal Mart or trying to fit in a downtown parking garage you'd hate it. But if you used it for what it was made to do there would be no better choice.

From: HDE
12-Jan-15
All anyone should do is talk about the experience with the pack, or packs they have, and talk about the reasons why they own what they own. Dismissing someone's viewpoint is nonsensical at best.

There are reasons why I did not invest in a Kifaru, and I cannot comment on a Barney's.

From: Kevin Dill
12-Jan-15
Ways I've used my Barney's Freighter: Packing out bulky loads of moose meat. Packing in loads of firewood and driftwood. Carrying larger totes and containers across a river toward a campsite. Attaching and carrying treestands into backcountry locations. Carrying loaded large duffels. Carrying moose head & antlers. This last one is the real killer. A pack like Kifaru or MR simply doesn't have the rigid frame and tie-off points combined in order to secure the head/rack. Any moose head will be a challenge to carry on any pack, but the Kifaru MMR I owned allowed far too much swaying and give in the load. My hunting partner was there to watch it all, and he knows how nearly impossible it was for me to manage the load. I also like the fact that, after all the bloody hauling is over, I can tie my frame to a limb and toss it in the river for a day to soak.

BTW, I'm a Kifaru fan and know Patrick Smith enough to call him a friend. His packs are simply superb for 90% of hunting. I know I'm outside the normal lines in my usage and admit that. I want the absolute total rigidity of welded aluminum. I also want a thickly-padded belt and shoulder straps. I've carried heavy loads of meat all day for 2 straight days and the Barney's pads provided plenty of cushion to my hips, clavicles and shoulders. The Kifaru MMR I once owned used a trapezoidal lumbar pad which looked and felt great...until day two of heavy packing. That lumbar pad gave me a severe hotspot from the pressure point it created with 80-100# loads.

I don't see this as a competion. Get the pack which is most likely to do what you want. If you choose the wrong one (for you) it's not a disaster. I didn't die, lose anything or develop diabetes from getting it wrong with any pack. Just bring it home, sell it and get another. It's all a learning experience anyway, right?

From: Z Barebow
12-Jan-15
I don't know if I will save you any money Nick.

As I mulled this over, I decided I wasn't going to find a "all purpose" pack which excelled at all aspects (Daypack, backpacking and meat hauler). I am not packing in 2 packs either. How did I reconcile? Think about how you hunt.

I went with a backpack that could be compact and work as a day/hunting pack. If you kill something, you want to be able to pack a load out. In your scenario, you would hike back to your camp to pick up meat hauler. You are assuming that you're camp is directly between kill site and truck. What if you kill closer to the vehicle? You are now left with having to fetch your meat hauler from spike camp.

Why not have meat hauler at the truck? Use your hunting pack to haul out first load, as it might be the most efficient way to get first load out. Dump the day/backpack, grab the hauler and get to work.

Choose whatever hauler you want. (Barney's, Kelty, etc) If you buy a Barney's, you know for sure it will handle more than your body. As mentioned, it is a brute designed to handle brutal loads. Buy once, cry once.

My day hunting pack needs to be able to handle first meat load. (I settled on Kifaru-Siwash) But that pack is no longer made. I am too fiscally conservative to hop on the latest greatest. No regrets.

From: Mule Power
12-Jan-15
I said Alaskans Nick.. not Wisconsin immigrants. Just kidding brother. lol Couldn't resist.

There's no question you and I are built different. You're a lean machine. I'm built more like a fire plug, short and stout. I'm sure our preference in packs will differ.

From: midwest
12-Jan-15
Dang, Z! Now you want me to buy both??? lol

From: JTreeman
12-Jan-15
The Barneys frame isn't really that much $ (relatively speaking), so I could see buying both! Especially for a big roller like Midwest! I don't own a Barneys, but am ordering a Kifaru this week. I see them as very different animals. For a hunting pack I think the Kifaru is hands down better. For large load hauling the Barneys probably puts up a good fight.

As some have pointed out have the frame in the truck, and hunt with the Kifaru. The problem I see with that is when I go to AK I would have a hard time taking both, yeah, airlines kinda limit you ;) so maybe for a resident it would work well to have both, but a traveling hunter picking only one I would go with the more versatile (Kifaru). I'm sure the Kifaru will haul more than I can anyways. --Jim

From: Z Barebow
12-Jan-15
I told you I wasn't necessarily going to save you money!

From: Branden
12-Jan-15
I have used Kifaru and the Barney's. When it comes to hauling a load I always use the Barney's. For me personally the difference in comfort while hauling a heavy load is night and day.

From: willliamtell
12-Jan-15
I backpack hunt and find myself usually carrying 70+ lb. My Mystery Ranch is a heck of a pack, up to the 100 lbs I hauled last year that was about my limit. It doesn't take 100 lbs to expose the limitations of a lightweight,loosey-goosey frame and pack - 50 lbs on sketchy terrain will. I want compression straps and tiedowns so I can get that load tight. If that means my pack is a little heavier so be it. Kifaru seems like a fine, minimalist pack, but I can tell there's no way it will cinch down like mine.

Bottom line, there is no pack that will do everything well.

From: Elk_Thumper
12-Jan-15
One thing i have noticed on this site and others. I see guys trading in barney's for Kifaru. I do not see the other way around.

I certainly understand why folks love the Barneys, but i don't see many folks that have used both, trading in the Kifaru for the Barneys..

just my observation...

From: HDE
12-Jan-15
Wonder how many other packs they tried before making the switch?

From: Mule Power
12-Jan-15
Elk... I think one reason for trading may be that they want a pack they can use as a day pack too. Something to use on a daily basis. You know... so they don't have to drive the 1 ton diesel to work every day.

From: Dirty D
14-Jan-15

Dirty D's embedded Photo
Dirty D's embedded Photo
Unfortunately I own both… or luckily depending on how you look at it.

Barney’s – Pro’s • Super solid hauls big loads with no problems. • Lash about anything to the frame and really crank down without fear of tearing a fabric component. Cons • Can’t easily be used as a day pack. At least for me the hard frame is no Bueno for creeping through the timber.

Kiraru – Pro’s • American made. • Once you bite the bullet and purchase the frame, adding a different bag doesn’t seem nearly as bad. • Hauls really as much as I can handle. I seldom go much over 100-110 lbs. and it handles this weight pretty decently. • I can hunt with the bag cinched down. Cons • Damn expensive, I hate to tell people how much my pack cost. But you get what you pay for hate gear that breaks when needed most.

The problem with your plan is your using two packs for the same purpose, if I understand correctly (you end up carrying your Eberle X2 in with you?) If you go Kifaru, one pack does it all. I bought my Barney’s pretty much thinking what you’re thinking. But for my needs the Kifaru really serves both worlds well. Now the Barney comes along for when I talk some sucker into helping me pack meat, or if I am that sucker that gets talked into helping somebody else! Ha.

Hope this helps.

From: Dirty D
14-Jan-15

Dirty D's embedded Photo
Dirty D's embedded Photo
Another side-by-side...

From: Matt
14-Jan-15
One thought on the comment above about people selling Kifarus: the company has come out with a lot of new products in recent years and many folks have been selling older packs to buy new (there are a lot of equipment whores out there - you know who you are ;-). The question isn't in regards to people selling Kifarus per se, the question is what they are replacing them with? My bet is a lot are just trading up to a new Kifaru model and not to other pack manufacturers.

From: Nick Muche
14-Jan-15
Agree 100% with Matt. I've sold two Kifarus, only to get a newer model that I felt would fit my needs better. Many others do the same.

The difference between a Kifaru and a Barney's is night and day.

From: Ermine
16-Jan-15
Matt is spot on.

From: midwest
16-Jan-15
Dirty D, If you had a bag of elk meat ready to pack out and you could choose either pack at that time to haul it out, which one would you grab?

From: bad karma
16-Jan-15
Everything on a Kifaru pack adjusts. I own three, and no other brands since getting my first in 1998. They are that good.

Because they are adjustable, no matter how hard I try, it takes me a trip or two with weight to get the darn thing adjusted right. And once I do, they work well. Packed out bone-in elk quarters from a massive cow last year in my Late Season. No issues whatsoever, nor hot spots. I've also packed out half an elk in a Longhunter more than once. (Average cow elk)

I have no experience with Barney's packs. And Patrick Smith is a good friend as well as an occasional hunting buddy. But if the packs weren't as good as they are, I would not be writing about them. Kifaru packs are very, very, good for hunting, and packing out game.

From: Steve H.
16-Jan-15
Barneys would be worthless where I hunt goats, you'd be hung up all the time and never make it into goat country.

Open country with low brush should be good to go.

My Kifaru is made for crawling thru brush into goat country.

From: Kevin Dill
17-Jan-15
If Kifaru sold their backpacks based on the type of terrain Steve H hunts goat in...they would add a helmet and crash-pad into the deal.

/8^)

From: Dirty D
17-Jan-15
Midwest - either one and I honestly wouldn’t really notice much difference.

I will add I am loving my Kifaru now that I’m over the sticker shock and I should also add last fall was the first season hunting with the Kifaru so while it’s got some fairly solid field time (sheep, goat and elk hunts), it’s still fairly new to me.

The one thing I did notice when packing with the Barney’s, I’d still need to have a dry bag along for the ride with water, snacks, headlamp, etc. (whatever items you’d typically keep on you in the woods, in case plans change). That’s where having the versatility of the bag comes in handy, maybe rain clouds are threatening and you want to throw in rain gear. With the pack frame it is possible to end up lashing a lot of gear to the pack, which may be a PITA if you don’t have a quick and easy system.

From: HUNT MAN
17-Jan-15

HUNT MAN's embedded Photo
HUNT MAN's embedded Photo
I have never used a Barneys, but i have used alot of meat hauler packs and hunting packs trying to find the PERFECT pack. My Kifaru has fit the bill. It took a year to get it riding the way i like it. Only negative is it is noisy for creeping in the elk woods. But it will compress down to nothing and then carry half an elk in one trip. This year we killed two bulls 6.4 air miles from the truck. After two trip at 100 pounds each i knew i had found my pack. HUNT

From: Nick Muche
17-Jan-15

Nick Muche's embedded Photo
Nick Muche's embedded Photo
4 goat quarters and a spike camp, no problem for the duplex...

From: Nick Muche
17-Jan-15

Nick Muche's embedded Photo
Nick Muche's embedded Photo
Goat hide, scrap meat bag and spike camp... Trust me, it was as miserable for me to watch him as this picture looks. No matter what we did we couldn't get his bag nice and tight so that he could safely go down the chute.

From: midwest
17-Jan-15
Okay, last question...24 in. or 26 in. I'm 5' 10"

From: Nick Muche
17-Jan-15
26!!

From: Matt
17-Jan-15
I am just short of 5'10" and run the 24" frames. It depends more on your torso length than height.

From: TD
17-Jan-15
24 IMO has more huntability (is that a word?) 26 will likely haul better, better angle on the lifters, etc.

I'm a bit vertically challenged, but honestly the 24 even has it's moments. Not just hanging up in brush and trees, even belly crawling it's tough to lift your head and look up very much without hitting the pack. Mine is the duplex, I've heard the bikini is even worse as it has a solid bar across the top rather than the softer cord/handle on the duplex. I would imagine the 26 was worse. The 24 hauls as much or more that I want and is better as a carry on for travel as well.

I'd say call Arron and ask him... but he tried to sell me on the 26... =D Again, the 26 does probably haul better.

Got my frame used (military model MMR). Added stuff over time, most of it used as well. If you aren't in a hurry there are some good used equipment out there and save some money. But if you're a high roller like Jim said dive right on in..... =D

From: midwest
17-Jan-15
High roller my a$$! I'm so poor I can't even pay attention!

From: Aron@kifaru
17-Jan-15

Aron@kifaru's embedded Photo
Aron@kifaru's embedded Photo
I try not to get on these much, but I got several PM's on this one, so here goes.

As far as the comment about a Kifaru not compressing down as small as a MR pack: that would be incorrect. I have use both MR and Kifaru extensively and still have MR packs in my possession. All of the larger Kifaru packs that are now offered will compress flat for day hunting.

On the subject of heavy hauling between the two, that would be personal preference, I work for Kifraru, so keep that in mind, but I'm also very good friends with Kevin and Bob up at the store. We send each other business all the time, as some guys just like a Kifaru better for hauling and others like a Barney's.

That's not to say one person is RIGHT or the other is WORNG, but more what works for each person.

I'm not sure who mentioned that you won't find many Alaskans using a Kifaru, well, I oversee all sales and we sell a fews hundred each year to the great state of Alaska and several of those are two guides.

Another thing I noticed was Kevin Dill talking about his pack not fitting. I have no doubt he's telling the truth, but you also need to keep in mind the we offer SEVERAL different stay/bend options for the frame and we also offer different thicknesses of lumbar pads. We still have guys call in with the same issue Kevin had before, but all that tells us is we will need to swap him out stays to get a different bend for his body type. So short story long, there's very few people we can't fit if you give us the chance.

So if I were you I would give me a call and Kevin up at Bob's as well. Let us talk you through each system and then you choose from there.

I noticed you asked about the Bikini or Duplex as well......Duplex for sure, and as other have mentioned, I would get a 26" Duplex.

This year I packed out 4 moose in the NWT, 1 in Idaho and 1 in Colorado. All of this was done with the same Duplex frame and I wouldn't change that for anything.

Here's my # 720-937-1418 and you can call anytime.

From: Elk_Thumper
18-Jan-15
as many of has said in this thread, this is a very personal choice, but Nick's picture shows exactly what I tried to describe in my post above and why i hated the barney's. The belt is the downfall of the Barnyes pack (IMO)

It is simply a single pice, over padded belt. That picture gives me nightmares of trying to get heavy loads of meat out of the back country with it riding on my a$$. I was wishing i had a j-Lo booty the entire time.

Boy, I will never do that again....

From: Kevin Dill
18-Jan-15
Thanks Aron.

From: willliamtell
18-Jan-15
One thing I'm noticing on the Kifarus is not too many lash downs or webbing clips up high (they do weigh something. If I'm carrying serious weight, I want to get it up, forward, and lashed tight as a bug's behind. I don't want my trophy's antler tips almost dragging on the ground. With the Barney's (or my Mystery) there are enough tiedowns so theres on problem keeping the load up high and lashed however I want it.

From: kota-man
18-Jan-15
You can pretty much put the tie downs/clips wherever you want them on a Kifaru. High, low, on the lid, on the bottom of the pack, or anywhere In between, take your pick. I don't know of a pack that is more versatile or has more lashing options.

Kifaru also sells a handy lash kit that works anywhere on the pack and with their new K clips you can lash stuff anywhere!

From: Aron@kifaru
18-Jan-15
Williamtell,

What pack are you referring to? I have 6 connection points on the upper 3rd of all my packs (more than on my MR).

Don't want to start and argument, but I want to make sure we are looking at the same thing.

  • Sitka Gear