Sitka Gear
Score this bull
Elk
Contributors to this thread:
cnelk 11-Jun-16
cnelk 11-Jun-16
cnelk 11-Jun-16
Quinn @work 11-Jun-16
cnelk 11-Jun-16
Matt 11-Jun-16
jrb(CO) 11-Jun-16
DarrylDunsloppy 11-Jun-16
cmbbulldog 11-Jun-16
Brun 11-Jun-16
Jaquomo 11-Jun-16
WapitiBob 11-Jun-16
Quinn @work 11-Jun-16
wyobullshooter 12-Jun-16
AZBUGLER 12-Jun-16
Jaquomo 12-Jun-16
TD 12-Jun-16
ridgefire1 12-Jun-16
HUNT MAN 12-Jun-16
IdyllwildArcher 12-Jun-16
LUNG$HOT 12-Jun-16
Mark B 12-Jun-16
BULELK1 12-Jun-16
RTJ1980 12-Jun-16
Doubleforky 12-Jun-16
IdyllwildArcher 12-Jun-16
Corn bore 12-Jun-16
KJC 12-Jun-16
t-roy 12-Jun-16
Bowboy 12-Jun-16
Chasin Bugles 12-Jun-16
wkochevar 12-Jun-16
cnelk 12-Jun-16
ElkNut1 12-Jun-16
loopmtz 12-Jun-16
HUNT MAN 12-Jun-16
brianhood 12-Jun-16
Kodiak 12-Jun-16
Elkman52 12-Jun-16
deerslayer 12-Jun-16
LUNG$HOT 12-Jun-16
Ron Niziolek 12-Jun-16
Stoney 12-Jun-16
bowbender77 12-Jun-16
huntnmuleys 12-Jun-16
bulldancer 12-Jun-16
SteveB 12-Jun-16
PTaft 12-Jun-16
Geno 12-Jun-16
WV Mountaineer 12-Jun-16
Garbo 12-Jun-16
sticksender 12-Jun-16
bigeasygator 12-Jun-16
Rob in VT 12-Jun-16
INDBowhunter2 12-Jun-16
Bigdan 12-Jun-16
BowCrossSkin 12-Jun-16
ohiohunter 12-Jun-16
Heat 12-Jun-16
Labby 12-Jun-16
Inshart 12-Jun-16
cnelk 12-Jun-16
Straight Shooter 12-Jun-16
bb 12-Jun-16
Kurt 12-Jun-16
Jaquomo 12-Jun-16
HDE 12-Jun-16
Cazador 12-Jun-16
Rambo 13-Jun-16
cnelk 13-Jun-16
LINK 13-Jun-16
LINK 13-Jun-16
Brun 13-Jun-16
Kodiak 13-Jun-16
Kurt 13-Jun-16
Jaquomo 13-Jun-16
HDE 13-Jun-16
Jaquomo 13-Jun-16
cnelk 13-Jun-16
cnelk 13-Jun-16
sticksender 13-Jun-16
Jaquomo 13-Jun-16
Brun 13-Jun-16
WV Mountaineer 13-Jun-16
Matt 13-Jun-16
cnelk 13-Jun-16
Jaquomo 13-Jun-16
cnelk 13-Jun-16
From: cnelk
11-Jun-16

cnelk's embedded Photo
cnelk's embedded Photo
Down in Alamosa CO this weekend visiting my daughter and we came across this dead head.

Put a tape on the rack and will post the gross score in a couple days.

What's your gross score guess?

From: cnelk
11-Jun-16

cnelk's embedded Photo
cnelk's embedded Photo
Side view

From: cnelk
11-Jun-16

cnelk's embedded Photo
cnelk's embedded Photo
Another

From: Quinn @work
11-Jun-16
282 3/8"

From: cnelk
11-Jun-16
A couple buddies know the score so let's see what everyone else thinks

From: Matt
11-Jun-16
285"

From: jrb(CO)
11-Jun-16
280"

11-Jun-16
Shooter and 1/8"

From: cmbbulldog
11-Jun-16
I was going to say 280 or so as well.

From: Brun
11-Jun-16
286"

From: Jaquomo
11-Jun-16
290. What do we win?

From: WapitiBob
11-Jun-16
Looks like one of those Internet "I saw a 320 class bull" kind of bulls.

From: Quinn @work
11-Jun-16
Actually with the last pic I'll change my guess to 275 7/8". Should be +\- 1".

12-Jun-16
291 5/8

From: AZBUGLER
12-Jun-16
Long main beams. I'm gonna go with 315.

From: Jaquomo
12-Jun-16
LOL WapitiBob! I was thinking the same thing.

From: TD
12-Jun-16
Hard to tell.... what's the distance between your ears????

=D

A guess from what must be cell phone pics =D.... GROSS he could be in the 290s.

From: ridgefire1
12-Jun-16
323

From: HUNT MAN
12-Jun-16
273 gross

12-Jun-16
278 gross

From: LUNG$HOT
12-Jun-16
278 gross

From: Mark B
12-Jun-16
319 gross

From: BULELK1
12-Jun-16
288

cool find----

Good luck, Robb

From: RTJ1980
12-Jun-16
272 gross

From: Doubleforky
12-Jun-16
284

12-Jun-16
Great. Now I have to split the prize money with Lung$hot.

From: Corn bore
12-Jun-16
292

From: KJC
12-Jun-16
290"

From: t-roy
12-Jun-16
301 6/8s''

gross!

From: Bowboy
12-Jun-16
294 4/8.

12-Jun-16
295"

From: wkochevar
12-Jun-16
310-315"

From: cnelk
12-Jun-16
Well there is a range of 50 inches from low to high guesses now

The longest main beam on this rack is 45 5/8"

From: ElkNut1
12-Jun-16
292" gross!

ElkNut1

From: loopmtz
12-Jun-16
323 1/8

From: HUNT MAN
12-Jun-16
273 gross

From: brianhood
12-Jun-16
276

From: Kodiak
12-Jun-16
280" gross was my first thought.

From: Elkman52
12-Jun-16
310 gross

From: deerslayer
12-Jun-16
296"

From: LUNG$HOT
12-Jun-16
Hahaha we must have been posting at the same time Idyll. I'd say the 3rds is where he loses it. I'll change my guess to 278 8/16. Then later we can start a thread on reducing fractions:~)

From: Ron Niziolek
12-Jun-16
306 gross.

From: Stoney
12-Jun-16
291 4/8

From: bowbender77
12-Jun-16
288"

From: huntnmuleys
12-Jun-16
I'd say he grosses right at 300....

From: bulldancer
12-Jun-16

304" gross

From: SteveB
12-Jun-16
270ish

From: PTaft
12-Jun-16
290"

From: Geno
12-Jun-16
293

12-Jun-16
300 'ish. God Bless

From: Garbo
12-Jun-16
312 gross.

From: sticksender
12-Jun-16
289-1/8

From: bigeasygator
12-Jun-16
284-3/8

From: Rob in VT
12-Jun-16
275" gross

12-Jun-16
Mid 270ish.

From: Bigdan
12-Jun-16
291

From: BowCrossSkin
12-Jun-16
282

From: ohiohunter
12-Jun-16
287

Good looking bull, I'd drop the hammer. Decent rack on what looks like a younger still edible bull.

From: Heat
12-Jun-16
277 4/8

From: Labby
12-Jun-16
307 gross

From: Inshart
12-Jun-16
295

From: cnelk
12-Jun-16
The other main beam is 43 4/8"

Tip to tip spread is 46"

12-Jun-16
Nice bull but definitely under 300.

DJ

From: bb
12-Jun-16
305

From: Kurt
12-Jun-16
Gross about 301" and net about 296"

From: Jaquomo
12-Jun-16
Now that you posted the beam length and spread, I'm raising my bid to 302 gross.

From: HDE
12-Jun-16
Unless you put a tape to it, how can you get accurate on anything with an eigth measurement?

286 5/8 might as well be 287 which might as well be 290...

From: Cazador
12-Jun-16
250-260

From: Rambo
13-Jun-16
278

From: cnelk
13-Jun-16

cnelk's embedded Photo
cnelk's embedded Photo
For What It's Worth

From: LINK
13-Jun-16
272

From: LINK
13-Jun-16
Guess I barely missed the buzzer.

From: Brun
13-Jun-16
Looks like I'm the closest on gross score at 286. Where do I pick up my Govennor's Tag. That was the prize wasn't it?

From: Kodiak
13-Jun-16
I did well. I guessed 280 gross so I'm happy.

From: Kurt
13-Jun-16
Question for those that are official scorers.......if the tip to tip spread is 46" on the main beams, wouldn't the inside spread be virtually the same, not 35-7/8"? But of course that would make the spread greater than the main beam length so the official inside spread would be the length of the shortest main beam or 43-1/2" in this case?

As another note, the greatest spread should be equal to or slightly greater than 46" as shown as the tip to tip spread?

From: Jaquomo
13-Jun-16
Just, I'm not an official scorer but play one on the Bowsite. You are correct. The beams extend all the way to the tip.

From: HDE
13-Jun-16
"b/c in 2nd grade they taught us to round up"

Isn't that what everyone does, embellish? Afterall, we're all so much cooler online, right?

From: Jaquomo
13-Jun-16
I have two bulls officially scored where the widest "main beam" measurement was at the inside of the very end of the tips.

So on this bull the spread credit would be 43 4/8. That would make his gross score 293 4/8 if I'm doing the fractions right in my head.

From: cnelk
13-Jun-16

cnelk's embedded Photo
cnelk's embedded Photo
A: NUMBER OF POINTS ON EACH ANTLER To be counted a point, the projection must be at least one inch long, with the length exceeding width at one inch or more of length. All points measured from tip of point to nearest edge of beam as illustrated in Figure A. Beam tip is counted as a point, but not measured as a point.

B: TIP TO TIP SPREAD The tip to tip spread is measured between the tips of the main beams. See Figure B.

C: GREATEST SPREAD The greatest spread is measured between perpendiculars at a right angle to the center line of the skull at the widest part, whether across main beams or points. See Figure B.

D: INSIDE SPREAD OF MAIN BEAMS The inside spread of main beams is measured at a right angle to the center line of the skull at the widest point between main beams. See Figure B. Your Spread Credit will be automatically calculated.

From: cnelk
13-Jun-16

cnelk's Link
More info here - see link

From: sticksender
13-Jun-16
If the widest point between the main beams is the tips of the beams, that's the inside spread. The measurer wouldn't be 'inflating the score', just complying with the rules established by B&C. He can't randomly pick a spot to measure the inside spread. He locates the widest point between the main beams, measured perpendicular to the center-line of the skull, as cited above. Sometimes that location is the beam tips.

But I believe this to be the main reason for the provision limiting the spread credit to no more than the length of the longer main beam. In that way, the oddball buck or bull with abnormally outward-flaring main beams may get some credit for this feature, but not excessive credit that is drastically out of proportion to the overall scale of the rack.

From: Jaquomo
13-Jun-16
No artificial inflation involved - the main beam is considered to be from the burr to the end of the tip. That's the rules. When the beam length is measured that's where the cable goes, and the inside spread measurement is taken at the widest point along that line.

Otherwise, it would have to be defined as between "the thirds" or between the "fourths" or whatever. The beam is the beam.

That's true whether elk, deer, whatever.

From: Brun
13-Jun-16
I think you guys are right about the tips being the widest point here, but as cnelk is the official scorer for this contest I still want my Governor's Tag.

13-Jun-16
285 6/8 green.

278 2/8 net.

That's my guess and I'm sticking to it. :^)

From: Matt
13-Jun-16
"Question for those that are official scorers.......if the tip to tip spread is 46" on the main beams, wouldn't the inside spread be virtually the same, not 35-7/8"?"

Like many things in life, the correct answer is "it depends". For this bull, I would think the inside spread would be taken at the tips of the main beam.

Having said that, P&Y has a convention that bulls with antlers that flare at the tips can have the inside spread measured at another point. It isn't as simple as saying the widest point = the IS spread.

A friend of mine shot a great bull that netted in the high 380's based on the instructions in the score sheet but was measured in the 360's by a P&Y measurer who invoked this rule. The IS spread was somewhat arbitrarily measured between the 4ths, which resulted in the net scoring dropping by close to 18" if memory serves.

Shortly after this happened, there was an article in the P&Y magazine describing the rationale for this divergence from the standard methodology.

From: cnelk
13-Jun-16
Thanks for all the replies everyone. It was fun. And for sure that what looks good can definitely be deceiving. But still a good bull, at least in my 'Book' whick is called the Spoon & Crockpot scoring system

Brun, I never received your donation $$$ for the governor's tag so your tag not validated

From: Jaquomo
13-Jun-16
Matt, I remember that, and it was something about a deviation in the beam with an unnatural "flare" outside of the arc of the beam.

There are little nuances in the scoring methodology, for sure. On my big nontypical muley it took an extremely experienced senior member-scorer 30 minutes and several phone calls to figure out what constituted the true main beam where it had a little fork at the tip.

cnelk works for our local public school system, so his math should be suspect anyway! ;-)

From: cnelk
13-Jun-16
Lou, did you miss that part on top of the score sheet that says 'UNOFFICIAL'?

Thats me :)

  • Sitka Gear