onX Maps
Washington DC ruling for WY wolves
Elk
Contributors to this thread:
LesWelch 03-Mar-17
wyobullshooter 03-Mar-17
Brotsky 03-Mar-17
Franzen 03-Mar-17
Glunt@work 03-Mar-17
willliamtell 03-Mar-17
LONEBULL 03-Mar-17
Grasshopper 03-Mar-17
wildwilderness 03-Mar-17
wyobullshooter 03-Mar-17
Bowboy 03-Mar-17
Treeline 03-Mar-17
Grasshopper 03-Mar-17
deadeye 03-Mar-17
Inshart 03-Mar-17
butcherboy 04-Mar-17
BULELK1 04-Mar-17
Z Barebow 04-Mar-17
earlyriser 04-Mar-17
Scar Finga 04-Mar-17
Ben 04-Mar-17
wyobullshooter 04-Mar-17
Bill in MI 04-Mar-17
Glunt@work 04-Mar-17
JLS 04-Mar-17
LesWelch 04-Mar-17
Paul@thefort 04-Mar-17
WapitiBob 04-Mar-17
IdyllwildArcher 04-Mar-17
JLS 04-Mar-17
TD 04-Mar-17
rick allison 04-Mar-17
sticksender 04-Mar-17
WV Mountaineer 04-Mar-17
ELKMAN 05-Mar-17
Glunt@work 05-Mar-17
Grasshopper 05-Mar-17
Elk4Doc 05-Mar-17
wyobullshooter 05-Mar-17
From: LesWelch
03-Mar-17

LesWelch's Link
Looks to be a Wyoming win.

03-Mar-17
Been waiting on this ruling. A good day just became a great day!

From: Brotsky
03-Mar-17
Nice to see a little common sense break out once in awhile.

From: Franzen
03-Mar-17
Well, maybe WY isn't a lost cause after all. Instead of hunting elk, I could bring out the rifle and hunt on the unlimited wolf tag.

From: Glunt@work
03-Mar-17
Sounds good. Wonder how much money we wasted having to fight this. Any reasonable person who has read Wyoming's plan would know there is no way wolves dropping below (or even to) the mandated level would be a result of the plan being followed. Thats aside from the fact that if they did drop below the minimum population they would be relisted.

From: willliamtell
03-Mar-17
There is a hell of an outbreak of common sense going around.

From: LONEBULL
03-Mar-17
SWEET !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

From: Grasshopper
03-Mar-17
Does this mean they can be shot on sight without a license in areas they defined as no wolf zones?

03-Mar-17
Maybe there is still hope for a WY moose tag in my future. With the increase in fees there it would be tough to wait it out. Hopefully there will be a reduction in wolves allowing the moose population to come back and more tags available

03-Mar-17
Grasshopper, the wolf management areas are basically limited to areas surrounding Yellowstone. Any wolves outside the management areas are classified as predators. Predators can be shot on sight...no license, no limit.

From: Bowboy
03-Mar-17
About time!

From: Treeline
03-Mar-17
Awesome, just awesome!! That is some of the best news I have heard in a while!

My last hunt in Wyoming, I saw wolves almost every day. May need to haul a-double back up there and celebrate :-)

From: Grasshopper
03-Mar-17
Lets hope guys get out and hunt in the predator zone. It can only help prevent migration into Colorado and Utah.

From: deadeye
03-Mar-17
Great news!! But the wolf tag is going up another $1 for us residents, can anyone lone me 4 quarters!

From: Inshart
03-Mar-17
Yeah, would someone please send some of that common sense to MN as well.

From: butcherboy
04-Mar-17
Good news! Now if we can get something like that here in NM for our wolf problem.......

From: BULELK1
04-Mar-17
$185.00 for a Non-ressy tag. I might have to take a week and go up to Cody! Or over to Pinedale-

Good luck, Robb

From: Z Barebow
04-Mar-17
Finally.

From: earlyriser
04-Mar-17
I'm surprised this thread doesn't have more responses yet. This is a BIG deal. Congrats on the ruling!

From: Scar Finga
04-Mar-17
Great news guys! No more three "S"!

From: Ben
04-Mar-17
Great news! I really have a lot of confidence in the people we are now getting in charge.

04-Mar-17
Scar, the new three "S"'s are "Shoot, Shoot, and Shoot some more"! ;-)

From: Bill in MI
04-Mar-17
About damn time!

From: Glunt@work
04-Mar-17
Its after March 1st which I believe means unit 12 switches from trophy to predator rules. It has a population.

From: JLS
04-Mar-17
"Great news! I really have a lot of confidence in the people we are now getting in charge. "

Ben,

You do realize that this court is comprised of judges who were appointed by previous administrations? Current leadership has/had nothing to do with the court composition. Most of these judges were appointed by Clinton, GW Bush, and Obama.

Good ruling. It will be interesting to see if this ends up in the US Supreme Court.

From: LesWelch
04-Mar-17
Definitely exciting!!

From: Paul@thefort
04-Mar-17
JLS, you can bet the pro,pro,pro wolf groups are in the planning stages right now. They will never give up to get them re-listed and off the shooting line.

From: WapitiBob
04-Mar-17
Had Wyoming not tried to be the smartest guys on the block they'd have been hunting them all along and had protection from litigation. But, litigation and controversy bring in lots of money, on both sides of the issue.

04-Mar-17
YES!

From: JLS
04-Mar-17
Paul,

I'm sure they are working on it, but I would wager a guess the high court won't take this one on.

From: TD
04-Mar-17
Pretty sure much of WY has been following it's own rules for some time now......

But this is very good news. Maybe big bears next, ya never know.....

From: rick allison
04-Mar-17
Great news! Now lets do the same for here in Wisconsin...it's out of control.

From: sticksender
04-Mar-17
Good news.

Wonder if this will have any effect on the management programs in MT or ID, where wolves are managed as big game.

04-Mar-17
Awesome news. Here's hoping the SC rejects the appeal that is sure to come. God Bless

From: ELKMAN
05-Mar-17
Like I said all along. Wyoming had it right. Now "they" can mange their own resource...

From: Glunt@work
05-Mar-17
I applaud WY. Their plan was common sense. Yes, its possible that a more politically correct plan would have been less controversal, but its quite likely the antis would have just picked the next softest target to go to court.

Just because the Feds and the antis didnt handle this whole thing right from the start doesnt mean WY should have to bend more . They had this issue thrust on them and came up with a sound, common sense plan to make sure they did whats best for WY while ensuring they comply with the Federal mandates.

The fact that wolf hunting was closed again isnt WYoming's fault. It was the antis and the court's.

From: Grasshopper
05-Mar-17
So are you saying wolves are in unit 12, and when they open it up we can go hunt predators in the snowies? I'm game! I would think winter range would be a good time to hunt, and anything we could whack we only help Colorado.

From: Elk4Doc
05-Mar-17
This is great news and it feels like the shackles on common sense predator management are being undone. Everything was so discouraging for so long and this is a huge win. Maybe hope for commonsense management in all western states. Great news for the elk in Wyoming!

05-Mar-17
"So are you saying wolves are in unit 12, and when they open it up we can go hunt predators in the snowies?"

Don't confuse Elk Area 12 with Wolf Area 12...they're a few hundred miles apart. Thankfully, there isn't an established pack in the Snowy's. Certainly a chance of one wandering through on occasion, but if you want to actually hunt wolves when they do become delisted, go to wolf area 12, not elk area 12.

ELKMAN and Glunt, I couldn't agree more. If Wyoming had agreed to the plan that Idaho and Montana did, we would always be behind the 8-Ball. Sure they have wolf hunting, but it's controlled and subject to quotas. What few are killed within the constraints of those quotas will never keep up with their reproduction.

OTOH, Wyoming will be able to not only manage, but basically eliminate wolves from gaining a stranglehold in major mountain ranges such as the Bighorns, Uinta's, southern Wyoming Range, Snowy Range, Sierra Madre's, and Laramie Range.

As some have noted, we certainly haven't won the war, but this is a HUGE step in that direction.

  • Sitka Gear