Rage 2 blade vs Rage hypodermicContributors to this thread:
Rutin buck 03-Sep-17
Not starting a broadhead debate...but just seeing if anyone thinks there is a performance difference in the two. Ive shot several deer with Rage, but never tried the hypodermic. Looks slimmer, maybe better penetration? Thanks
it is slimmer and penetrates better
P... is for penetration and it works.
I would say they are even when it comes to penetration due to the steeper blade angle on the Hypodermic.
even better is the hypodermic +p
Yes the +P is the way to go for penetration.
I dont' shoot rage, but they are a good broadhead.
the new Trypan is a really nice broadhead - heavier blades and great Titanium Tip.
i would choose the Rage 125 hypo +P if It were me.
Big hole. Awesome blood trail but like the one's before still a one and done.
From: Rutin buck
Switched to the hypodermic last year and they performed the same as the regular rage which I've been shooting for years
Hypodermics penetrate great but are the weakest rages they make. Seen 8 to 10 break at set screw on ferrule . Original rage or the rage extremes are way tougher head from my experiences
I shot the original Rage for years, switched to the Hypodermic a few years ago. The blade retention system on the Hypodermic is MUCH better, and I've had very good luck with them. I've shot a 6 point elk, Desert Bighorn, 350 pound plus mule deer and some others with the Hypodermic, and it has performed very well on all of them.