Rage 2 blade vs Rage hypodermic
Contributors to this thread:Equipment
From: SouthernILbowhunter
01-Sep-17
Not starting a broadhead debate...but just seeing if anyone thinks there is a performance difference in the two. Ive shot several deer with Rage, but never tried the hypodermic. Looks slimmer, maybe better penetration? Thanks
From: Bou'bound
01-Sep-17
it is slimmer and penetrates better
From: Pigsticker
01-Sep-17
P... is for penetration and it works.
From: ELKMAN
01-Sep-17
I would say they are even when it comes to penetration due to the steeper blade angle on the Hypodermic.
From: carcus
01-Sep-17
even better is the hypodermic +p
From: ELKMAN
01-Sep-17
Yes the +P is the way to go for penetration.
From: olebuck
01-Sep-17
I dont' shoot rage, but they are a good broadhead.
the new Trypan is a really nice broadhead - heavier blades and great Titanium Tip.
i would choose the Rage 125 hypo +P if It were me.
From: Prime1
01-Sep-17
Big hole. Awesome blood trail but like the one's before still a one and done.
From: Rutin buck
03-Sep-17
Switched to the hypodermic last year and they performed the same as the regular rage which I've been shooting for years
From: Cajunarcher
03-Sep-17
Hypodermics penetrate great but are the weakest rages they make. Seen 8 to 10 break at set screw on ferrule . Original rage or the rage extremes are way tougher head from my experiences
From: StickFlicker
03-Sep-17
I shot the original Rage for years, switched to the Hypodermic a few years ago. The blade retention system on the Hypodermic is MUCH better, and I've had very good luck with them. I've shot a 6 point elk, Desert Bighorn, 350 pound plus mule deer and some others with the Hypodermic, and it has performed very well on all of them.
