If all you get is a bunch of night time deer pics, that doesn't help you much.
At least in my experience, mulies only visit water at night and I think hunting water on public ground is pointless.
My strategy is to intercept deer in the AM on their way to cover so I put my cameras on well used paths going in to cover from feeding areas and this is also where I hunt. I have had the best success at actually getting usable data this way.
You can put cameras in feeding areas, like on a producing oak, to see what's in the area, but catching a mature buck in a feeding area during day time (archery season) is pretty ambitious if you ask me unless it's during the rut.
Once the rut starts, your data from January-July is kinda worthless as the bucks move and are now following does. This is when I will put a camera on a producing oak and hope to see bucks on does, but it's so hit and miss it's almost not worth it because they can be on a doe for one day then breed her and be a mile away.
I use them mostly for the attempt and patterning a buck in archery season (difficult, but if you can find one, the camera will help. If there's no bucks after a couple weeks, move the camera). And then as the rut approaches, I'm patterning the does a bit more. One of my favorite approaches is to put a tree stand on a pine that's next to a producing oak that the does are hitting and sit it through the rut. This season, I almost got the big mature buck in my area that I've been after the past 2 yrs (all pics during dark) but he saw me draw.
The area had several producing oaks, but one in particular, they hit everyday. I don't know if this tree's acorns tasted better or what, but they made a B-line for it everyday. I ended up shooting a forky out of this stand.
Unless you have one of those cameras you can check with your phone and have cell reception where you hunt, this can end up being a lot of work.