The reason is I want everyone to be 100% informed about deer farms and CWD. My foremost goal is to help protect wild deer and bowhunting as well as hunting in general for deer.
I'm 57, and at some point, whether in my lifetime or the next generation we or our children or grandchildren are going to have to face CWD and make a decision. That decision will be whether or not the deer we kill is safe to eat. Just this week the citizens of a county in NW PA are having to answer that for themselves. With the growth of deer farms and transportation I feel that question will become more frequent. That has been the history before, and short of new testing and/or treatment I don't see any reason for it to change.
While there can be debates about the ethics of high fence hunting, this is definately related, but a different question.
If CWD pops up in the area you hunt are you going to feel comfortable eating deer meat? Are you going to feel comfortable feeding it to your family. Are people that you give deer to going to continue to want it? Is The Hunters for the Hungary going to be able to continue with a risk of CWD? Do you want your deer tested, and if you do who is going to pay for it?
Is the next generation of hunters going to continue to hunt for an animal they can't eat? If they don't are states going to have to hire people to just kill deer for population control? Who is going to pay for that?
While we think of ourselves as born with hunting in our blood and that it's our heritage, the government only really thinks of us as a tool to manage animal populations, the fact that we pay for that privlege is a side benefit to the government.
As we all know hunters make up about 10% of our population, antihunters about 10%, and the nonhunting population about 80%. Whether we like it or not , that 80% really control our ability to legally hunt. A big part of that 80% being "ok" with hunting is that they are ok with killing an animal to eat. What if we don't or aren't able to safely eat the animal we kill, are they still going to be "ok" with killing an animal for sport? If history is an indication, the answer is going to be no, as seen by the outlawing of bear and mountain lion hunting outright, or severely regulating it more. That is because most people look at bear and cat hunting more of a sport than hunting for meat.
Again, that is what I am trying to do . I don't even know what I'll do if or when I will be forced to deal with it. While I don't mind killing deer to eat or give away, I don't like the idea of killing a lot of animals just to throw them away. That issue presents another question, what do you do with a deer you don't know is infected or not? Do you leave it in the woods?, do you burn it?, do you bury it?. I don't know the answer, but common sense with other potentially infectious dead animal dictates you just don't leave them lying around. Who is going to feel like killing a deer then having to dig a hole with a back-hoe to bury it?
This is a serious issue that may determine our hunting future , and our children's future as hunters. We need to do what we can to stop the expansion of deer farms or at least try and slow it down at least until we learn more about prions or reliable blood testing can be developed. This is not some scare tactic, this is the reality and we need to deal with it. Talk to your family, friends, business leaders , and House and Senate representatives to let them know your feelings and to see what their feelings are and why.
I don't profess to know the answers to all the questions, or any of them for that matter, but I do know there are tons of questions. I don't know how the hunters in our CWD containment zone is dealing with it. I do know the DNR is staffing and testing up there and it can't be cheap. What if we had 8 or 10 zones? Do we really want our DNR to fund the staffing and testing for that? Somebody has to and I bet it's not the deer farmers.
Thank You for your time
What I don't understand is your continued insistence that History will repeat itself. While I agree with that assessment 100% in all situations if things are done the same way, I point out you dismiss similar threats that pose just as big a threat to long term hunting in this state by suggesting that isn't always the case.
Anyways, I'm with you on protecting our heritage, our hunting, and the future of them both. And I believe you have pretty much summed up why you are right to feel the way you do about deer farms. God Bless
If you're busy or have a conflicting golf game you can probably arrange for them to kill it and ship you the antlers and cape if you want.
Reclaimed strips make excellent deer, bear, turkey, grouse and rabbit habitat. Hopefully, in the near future it will be great elk habitat as it has in KY.
So no, I am not against coal. What does coal have to do with deer farms anyway?
I've answered your question. In fact I think I've answered most every question, but you continue to avoid mine. For starters, what does coal have to do with deer farms?
The elk at the land between the lakes in KY came from Elk Island, Alberta which is the most disease free herd in North America.
If you thought I was being derogatory about people in the coalfields you have to have the most vivid imagination I've ever seen. I'm a product of the coalfields and sometimes joke about being from the coalfields, I'm proud of being from there.
I started this thread, so I'm signing off on it.
One last bit of news before I go.
The State of Iowa has just confirmed and reported its first case ever of CWD. It was from a deer in Allamake county, which is in the NE part of the state. It was from a buck killed during shotgun season. As a last note, Allamake is one of the top, if not the top producer of Pope and Young as well as Boone and Crokett in the state of Iowa. That is the cream of the creme as far as producing wild whitetail trophy deer. Allamake county is just across the river from Wisconsin. I wonder where it came from?