Sitka Gear
Michigan appeals wolf relisting
Wisconsin
Contributors to this thread:
Jeff in MN 28-Feb-15
happygolucky 28-Feb-15
Bigwoods 28-Feb-15
Naz 03-Mar-15
Geitz 03-Mar-15
happygolucky 03-Mar-15
Naz 03-Mar-15
happygolucky 04-Mar-15
RutNut@work 04-Mar-15
FullDraw2015 04-Mar-15
Naz 04-Mar-15
Steve White 05-Mar-15
FullDraw2015 05-Mar-15
From: Jeff in MN
28-Feb-15
I am signed up for news notices from the Michigan DNR and got this. I wonder when Wisconsin and Minnesota will get their act together on this.

---------------------------------------------------

The Michigan Department of Natural Resources today filed an appeal of a December 2014 federal district court ruling that returned wolves in Michigan and Wisconsin to the federal endangered species list and wolves in Minnesota to federal threatened species status.

The appeal – filed by the Michigan Attorney General in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia – asks the court to uphold the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s December 2011 decision that removed the Great Lakes Distinct Population Segment (DPS) of wolves from the federal endangered species list.

“Returning wolf management to wildlife professionals in the state of Michigan is critical to retaining a recovered, healthy, and socially-accepted wolf population in our state,” said DNR Director Keith Creagh. “Michigan residents who live with wolves deserve to have a full range of tools available to sustainably manage that population.”

Wolves in Michigan are 15 years past the population recovery goals set by the federal government. The DNR will argue against the federal district court’s ruling that wolves must recover across their historic range – which includes the lower 48 states and Mexico – before Michigan’s wolf population can be removed from the federal endangered species list.

In addition, the state will argue against the district court’s conclusion that the USFWS failed to demonstrate that Michigan’s laws and regulations adequately protect the wolf population within Michigan.

“Wolves in Michigan and the other western Great Lakes states are fully recovered from endangered species status, which is a great success story,” said DNR Wildlife Division Chief Russ Mason. “Continuing to use the Endangered Species Act to protect a recovered species not only undermines the integrity of the Act, it leaves farmers and others with no immediate recourse when their animals are being attacked and killed by wolves.”

Michigan’s wolf population numbers approximately 636 in the state’s Upper Peninsula. With the return to federal protection in December 2014, the DNR lost the authority to use a variety of wolf management methods, including lethal control, to minimize wolf conflict with humans, livestock and dogs. The change in status also suspended state authority that allowed livestock and dog owners to protect their animals from wolf depredation when wolves are in the act of attacking those animals.

The federal district court’s December 2014 decision came in response to a lawsuit filed by the Humane Society of the United States, in which the State of Michigan participated as a defendant-intervener arguing against returning the Great Lakes DPS of wolves to the endangered species list.

Michigan joins the USFWS and a number of hunting and conservation organizations in appealing the ruling.

For more information about Michigan’s wolf population and management plan, visit www.michigan.gov/wolves.

From: happygolucky
28-Feb-15
Very cool for MI. I sure hope to read the same out of WI very soon.

From: Bigwoods
28-Feb-15
We need to get this resolved and get the season back on the calendar for 2015

From: Naz
03-Mar-15

Naz 's Link
This story says Wisconsin filed a day before Michigan.

From: Geitz
03-Mar-15
I believe if this gets resolved before July, the DNR can still hold the hunt.

From: happygolucky
03-Mar-15
Now that is all very good news. Here's praying for a hunt in 2015 to give the north a fighting chance at recovery.

From: Naz
03-Mar-15
Congressional end-around will be the best way in the long run vs. continual challenges in court, winning, then losing, etc. Hopefully that will be the way this goes.

From: happygolucky
04-Mar-15
I agree there Naz. I still think the lawsuits on this will never end once they can be hunted again. I don't see the wolf lovers giving up.

From: RutNut@work
04-Mar-15
Say this took awhile to be resolved, like (god forbid) a few years. Will our PP still carry over, or will everything reset?

From: FullDraw2015
04-Mar-15
Preference points should certainly carry over. Any reason you can think of that they wouldn't?

From: Naz
04-Mar-15
Agree, I see no reason why points wouldn't carry over even if there's a year off. It's all still saved in the system. Has anyone contacted their legislators to keep the ball rolling or see where it's at/possible timetable? I have not made the time. March Madness in more ways than one right now.

From: Steve White
05-Mar-15
Just seen an article yesterday that current white house administration is for the wolf hunt. Find that one hard to believe.

Could have a hunt right now if they wanted too. WI just needs to give the feds the finger quite simply. Everyone knows several western states have them due to this.

Not the first federal laws some of these states have done this with. Guess you dont have to worry about that federal funding when you making money hand over fist in taxes. At least one so much they have to give some back!.

This will never happen with the man currently in Madison. Even if the thought was that he might. No way he will smash any toes. With his eye on the big house soon. Perhaps a little love tap is all.

Watch how fast things were to change if it started to cost people who do not contribute to the WDNR. Call it a Wolf Preservation Tax. $50 per person unless you held a valid WI hunting/fishing license in the last year. Really tweak the people and start it at 10yrs old. Since a 10yr old now that buys a license is contributing. Make then pay to sit on couch and play video games.

Attitude will change when folks have to start paying. Hunters already have to pay twice for them!!

From: FullDraw2015
05-Mar-15
It was a judge who stopped the hunts. Western states have a hunt because Congress passed a law and Obama signed it. That's the way Wisconsin, Michigan and Minnesota are trying to go now. It has nothing to do with Walker.

  • Sitka Gear