wvmule's Link
How does the above statement make any sense unless you believe people will not regard the law? Unreal. If the DNR says there is no biological need to reduce the buck limit they must use different parameters than other states. In the states I hunt in with more and bigger bucks they are only allowed to kill one buck. I want a lower buck limit but I am not sure most hunters in the state do. I do agree with Mr. Wilson on one thing. They simply can not afford to give up money. It is that simple. It would be interesting to see how many states kill more bucks than does besides WV if in fact that is the case. I am finding I do no know who to believe when it comes to stats. Both sides seem to have different stats to support their argument. I refuse to believe that if we were only allowed on buck we would not be able to tell on the ground. I realize this will never ever happen. Too many factors. Money, Farmers, Insurance companies etc.