16 POINT DOE
Contributors to this thread:Wisconsin
From: Tweed
23-Nov-16
Tweed's Link
Has anyone seen this? Crazy....
From: Crusader dad
23-Nov-16
I don't do Facebook so it won't let me see. Can you screenshot a pic of it?
From: Tweed
23-Nov-16
I'll email it to you
From: Tweed
23-Nov-16
Rack
Rack
No outdoor plumbing
No outdoor plumbing
Tried to capture shots of the video but not the best quality.
From: Jeff in MN
24-Nov-16
Jeff in MN's Link
8 point doe shot near Green Bay.
From: awh302
25-Nov-16
I don't know if anyone knows the answer but will these does try to breed other does? Will bucks breed them? Can they even have babies? Just a little curious.
From: stp2
25-Nov-16
Interesting thought awh032, can you all imagine what you would have thought if you were bowhunting in september and saw 2 fawn nursing from one of these antlered deer?
From: Tweed
28-Nov-16
Imagine the reaction of the buck that smells her coming into heat, crashes through some bushes and sees what appears to be a buck. What takes over- his nose that tells his hormones to breed or his eyes that tell his hormones to fight?
From: orionsbrother
30-Nov-16
Did they use some funky lens for the picture of that Green Bay doe or is that guy in the picture a little guy? That looks bigger than a 180lb liveweight deer.
From: Jeff in MN
02-Dec-16
Whatever trick they used I want to know what it is before the next buck I shoot that has ground shrinkage.
From: orionsbrother
02-Dec-16
No doubt, Jeff. Look at the second pic from the link, where the deer is laying out...180lb liveweight? Is that guy 4'7"?
I'm gonna use that lens and have my kids hold my fish for pictures from now on.
From: Jeff in MN
02-Dec-16
I think the difference between the two pics is the camera person laid on the ground and gut up close on the pic where the deer looks so big. At first I thought the 'big deer' pic was just and enlargement of the same picture. But if you look close at where the right side antler is in relation to his vest/arm/shoulder they are different.
I suppose by doing that the ratio of distance from the camera to the deer versus to the shooter increased significantly.
From: stp2
02-Dec-16
It looks bloated because of the wait to field dress it in order to get the photos/ proof-of-doe documentation.
From: Crusader dad
03-Dec-16
Quick question. You still have to use your buck tag right?
From: Tweed
03-Dec-16
A buck is a male so I would so no but its not exactly anterless either..... Free deer to clean up the gene pool?
From: Crusader dad
03-Dec-16
Our liscenses say antlered or antlerless. Not male or female. If I shot the deer thinking it was a buck I'd be happy with, I'd happily use my buck tag. Just not sure if you get the free pass or not. I'd also happily take the free pass so I could go after something that has some balls. I know that is selfish of me and I'd be happy with one buck a year but I wouldn't turn down the legal chance at another one.
From: Jeff in MN
04-Dec-16
Yup, an antlered deer is one with at least one antler that is 3 or more inches long. There are plenty of bucks that get recorded as antlerless but not many doe that get registered as antlered like this one did.
