Contributors to this thread:
40 Year Sentence for Sexting Teen
Solo 's Link
Anthony "Carlos Danger" Weiner is headed to prison for
....uh, OOOOPS..!!! That was all of the 'other guys'. Let me correct that figure.
Let's make that a wee little 1.75 years for sexting, and even much further than that.........outright propositioning a very young 15-year old girl to have illicit sex with his old married a$$.
Clearly, 'The Weiner' must have 'hung' with the Clinton's long enough to catch a break from Lady Justice.
Of course, his fellow 3rd world leftists in America will distance themselves from him, and thereby continue to blatantly fool themselves into believing they're making the most of this crisis.
Forgot to include these puppies in my post.
He should have been in Hollyweird. Then he'd be a frickin' hero.
He got more time than the deserter that got off even though six soldiers died trying to find him.
Good point Shut. That's disgusting.
Weiner is a poster child for the LWL's, normal behavior.
Colorado is a tough state for criminal sentencing. A first degree sexual assault is 16-48 years, while sexual assault on a child by a person in a position of trust is 10-32 years. In both cases, the sentence carries a mandatory minimum sentence, the lower number listed above. Federal sentencing tends to be tough, and must be within the guidelines.
The internet luring of a child would not carry as severe a penalty. Nobody's getting 40 years for sexting.
Lets not gloss over the fact a congressman from Alabama in his 30s, initiated a sexual relationship with a 14 year old girl. 4 more have now surfaced with the same accusations.
Let's not gloss over the fact that these allegations have not been proven, and conveniently come as an election is pending.
If you want to believe every allegation, you are a damn fool. I've seen several dozen completely false allegations in my career, including many that were demonstrably false after the forensic investigation.
But bk, the it was REPORTED on TV and the internet, so therefore it MUST be true......as long as it's Republicans.......
"Let's not gloss over the fact that these allegations have not been proven, and conveniently come as an election is pending."
If these allegations are true, I will be the first to call for his removal.
However, it wasn't that long ago that there were multiple allegations of sexual misconduct, just prior to another election, and mysteriously they all just faded away.
If he's innocent, I hope he fights back hard. If he's guilty, I hope he fries.
The big problem is HOW do you determine if they're true of not? This alleged incident is supposed to have occurred 40 years ago, and the man has no other "track record" of anything similar either occurring or even being alleged. We also know that Democrats and their media butt buddies have NO scruples or integrity and will do whatever it takes to destroy an opponent whether it's true or not.
That's the despicable part of accusations like these WW. The accused is put in a position of having to prove himself innocent instead of the other way around.
Wouldn't it have been lovely if Democrats and liberals would have managed a fraction of the outrage they are showing at Judge Moore, when allegations of sexual misconduct surfaced about Bill Clinton?
Because when democrats do it, it's seen as a résumé enhancer.
One of those "accusers" also worked for Clinton ... this all sounds more and more like a set up... the Dems play dirty and this is on page 3 of their hand book ....
Annony Mouse's Link
"sounds" like a set up? Moore has been running and in politics for FORTY YEARS and they suddenly launch this accusation 3 weeks before an election where he's ahead of the Democrat? If this doesn't have the trappings of all out bullsh*t I don't know what does!
WW...not to mention some of his more publicized judicial decisions.
While not completely related to this thread, the link shows how Dems deal with Dems. Compare that with how the GoP deals with salacious accusations of the distant past.