onX Maps
Time Has Come Today
Contributors to this thread:
slade 06-Dec-17
Bowfreak 06-Dec-17
Shuteye 06-Dec-17
Spike Bull 06-Dec-17
Pete In Fairbanks 06-Dec-17
K Cummings 06-Dec-17
Stalker 06-Dec-17
Woods Walker 06-Dec-17
Spike Bull 06-Dec-17
Spike Bull 06-Dec-17
JTV 06-Dec-17
Woods Walker 06-Dec-17
JTV 06-Dec-17
DL 06-Dec-17
Spike Bull 06-Dec-17
From: slade

From: Bowfreak
When it is all said and done, the Democrats will wish this Russia probe never happened.

From: Shuteye
I have been saying for months that Sarah Carter deserves an award. She is a real investigative reporter and she will not say anything without the facts. She has contacts like you wouldn't believe. She works with John Soloman and they are a great team. John is also a real investigative reporter.

Thank GOD for them and the few like them! I pray the drip, drip, drip never stops and true justice is done because our national cesspool is completely clogged with floaters.

I'm thinking Bowfreak is spot on. Hope so anyway!

From: K Cummings
"When it is all said and done, the Democrats will wish this Russia probe never happened."

I hope you are correct. Liberals have a long history of not being able to see the "unintended consequences" of what they do. Hopefully this is one of those times.


From: Stalker
^ Me too!

From: Woods Walker
Spike: You didn't have to get quite that descriptive!!! Very true maybe, but....YUCK!!!


Spike Bull 's Link
Oh, sorry! I didnt mean to hurt your budding snowflake feewings!!


How about this:

"Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical left and Islamic terrorism.

“There's always conflicting recollections of facts,” FBI Director Comey said.

It was a year ago and Comey was explaining why Hillary’s close aide, Cheryl Mills, not only received an immunity agreement in exchange for turning over her laptop, but a pass on lying to the FBI.

The FBI Director claimed that Mills had to receive immunity because the laptop might be protected by attorney-client privilege. Mills, like Hillary Clinton, had worked as a lawyer. But they were both government officials working for the State Department. Hillary wasn’t Mills’ client. The government was.

Comey and his people knew the law. They chose to ignore it to protect a key Hillary aide from rolling over. Mills was the woman Hillary would send in to clean up her dirty laundry. Mills had taken point on the email server cover-up. If anyone knew where the bodies were buried, she did. Instead not only did she get an immunity agreement, but the FBI also agreed to destroy the computers after the search.

Mills had told the FBI that she didn’t know about Hillary’s email server. But the FBI had notes and emails proving that Mills was lying. And when Comey was asked about it, he came out with, “There's always conflicting recollections of facts.”

No doubt.

That is what the lawyer of the woman who had been caught lying to the FBI might have been expected to argue. But there were no charges, instead the FBI Director was presenting her defense.

George Papadopoulos and Michael Flynn were charged with lying to investigators. But lying to investigators isn’t a crime when you’re Hillary Clinton.

Or one of her associates.

Hillary Clinton had told the FBI that she had no idea that the “C” stood for confidential. Instead of laughing in her face or arresting her, the FBI boss testified personally to her truthfulness.

Hillary Clinton, Mills and Huma Abedin made what appear to be false statements to the FBI.

Had Mills been working for Trump, the same number would have been run on Mills as on Flynn and Papadopoulos. But the men interviewing Mills didn’t want her to sing. They wanted her to keep quiet.

Mills and Abedin were interviewed by the FBI's Peter Strzok and the DOJ's David Laufman. Strzok was exchanging pro-Hillary and anti-Trump messages in an extramarital affair with a woman working for FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe. McCabe’s wife had received a sizable amount of money from a Clinton ally. Laufman, whose counterintelligence section was heading the investigation, is an Obama donor.

Mills’ lie made it more urgent to hand her an immunity agreement on any pretext. The immunity agreement wasn’t leverage for her testimony. It was leverage to keep her from testifying. The obstruction of justice was coming from the inside.

Strzok received input on the Comey letter exonerating Clinton. The Mills interview killed two birds with one stone. A key Hillary aide got immunity and the evidence would be destroyed.

This wasn’t an interview. It was a cover-up.

It’s why Comey sounded like Mills’ lawyer. And why so many Clinton associates got immunity agreements. Why the FBI agreed to destroy evidence. Why there were no recordings of Hillary’s testimony. And why lying to the FBI wasn’t a crime when it came to Hillary and her aides.

But the double standard kicked in when the Clinton cover-up crew went after Trump.

While Mills received an immunity agreement based on an imaginary attorney-client privilege that didn’t exist, Manafort was denied attorney-client privilege with his actual attorney."

The rest of the story:

"The double standard isn’t surprising when you look at who was doing the interviewing.

Strzok and Laufman had also interviewed Hillary. No recordings were made of the session. But Comey testified that it’s a “crime to lie to us”.

Not for the Clintons and their associates.

Hillary had told her interviewers that she hadn’t received training on handling classified information, but she signed a document testifying that she had. Hillary claimed that she hadn’t carried a second phone, but an aide, Justin Cooper, who made the server possible, testified that indeed she did.

Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills told the same lie.

These are the kinds of misstep that Team Mueller would have used to hang a Trump associate. But Comey testified that Hillary Clinton did not lie.

And that meant he was lying.

Not only did Clinton’s people lie to the FBI. But the head of the FBI had lied for them.

The fix had been in all along.

Comey had drafted his letter exonerating Clinton before the interviews even took place. Strzok had been copied on the next email. His contribution had included changing the description of Clinton's actions from "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless." Strzok is now in the spotlight because Team Mueller’s stonewalling of the reasons for his removal have been exposed.

Strzok, a Hillary partisan, had given his favorite politician a pass and signed the document opening the Russia investigation. The Steele dossier, provided by a Russian intelligence operative and paid for by the Clinton campaign, was funneled through to Strzok’s team. And Strzok had interviewed Flynn.

Team Mueller resisted discussing Strzok. Alongside the constant leaks to favored media outlets like the Washington Post, Mueller’s people have worked to maintain a monopoly on information.

Judge Beryl Howell, an Obama appointee, a friend of Loretta Lynch, Obama's DOJ boss, and of Andrew Weissmann, Mueller’s deputy, decided to seal the Papadopolous case. Howell also decided that Manafort isn’t entitled to attorney-client privilege. These actions took place at the behest of Weissmann. The latter had sent an email praising Sally Yates, the disgraced former acting Attorney General, for refusing to stand by the law on the Trump travel ban.

Weissmann, like the rest of Team Mueller, wasn’t there to get at the truth, but to stop President Trump. The Mueller deputy is one of two Obama donors on the team. There are also five Clinton donors. One of whom had represented the Clinton Foundation. Another had represented Justin Cooper, the Clinton adviser, who helped run Hillary's email server and claimed to have destroyed some of Hillary’s devices.

It’s hard to imagine how this investigation could have been any more partisan or tainted.

The endgame for this is to go after President Trump on obstruction of justice. But you can’t obstruct a justice that was already obstructed. Both the Clinton and Trump investigations were tainted by blatant partisanship. While the Clinton investigation did everything possible to protect her and her aides, regardless of the evidence, the Trump investigation did everything possible to destroy him and his associates without producing a single charge relevant to the actual investigation.

The Clintons and their allies have obstructed justice. And it’s time for a real investigation."

From: JTV
the Sawmp is deep with in the FBI ... Ive been following Sarah Carter for some time, her reporting on the Uranium one and this has been very good... she is a true investigative reporter.... CNN/MSNBC could learn a lot from her...

The FBI , Mueller, Comey, Lynch, Sztok, and the other have their clan of #NeverTrumpers who covered for Clinton... the truth is finally coming out ....

From: Woods Walker
She'd better watch her back......and I very sadly mean that.

From: JTV
Yea, same goes for that FBI informant thats going to testify ... Clintons hit men have itchy trigger fingers ... ;0)

From: DL
I’m not getting my hopes up. For years we hear of so much trash but yet these people are still ripping us off and living high. It seems all of them have crap on each other and nothing happens or they go before an over sight committee ( over sight AKA crimes, lies, ) and nothing happens. The fact that the Clintons are not in prison for decades of illegal activities proved my point. I’m hoping but knowing how slimy DC is not expecting much but a lot of chest pounding and finger shaking.

Ouch, so far you are correct, DL.

  • Sitka Gear