Judge Napolitano too
Community
Judge Napolitano just said what happened with the informant on the trump campaign "is standard operating procedure in intelligence gathering and criminal investigations." He echoes Shep Smith and Trey Gowdy’s remarks last night on Fox. So who else needs to say it? I imagine many trump supporters heads are exploding because the talking heads on Fox are abandoning trumps narrative. Right, the deep state check must’ve cleared in their accounts.
Cherry picking are we????? I am so glad you feel the need to use Gowdy's remarks as justification of your position.
Lets see if it continues.
The Judge is parroting what others are saying. Shep is on the wrong network. Gowdy is good....him I trust because he is the voice of reason and law who actually sees the TS material the others do not. As already noted in the media....there were at least two Agencies who sent informants or spies to probe. The timing is what will be key. The timing for the FBI looks bad. The other Agency(s) still has the jury out. Too soon to draw a conclusion.
If the agencies sent investigators to follow up on legit Russian leads (not phony dossier claims), then that sounds like normal DOJ type business. How about media coverage to clearly state they were never investigating Trump, and no one was arrested, and thus no crime commtted.
If the agencies sent informants to spy on the Trump campaign to also feed info back to Obama/Hillary and tip the scale in her favor, that would be a horrific abuse of power. Need to peel back more layers and find out who ordered the probe (the same hillary loyalists that signed the FISA wiretapping request??) and what information was reported back to HQ. Because with no arrests, this looks bad.... as if it was a probe into the political campaign of the opposing party!
The FISA warrants have to be ultra justified by judges. Judges who need to see proof that such a warrant is necessary. If we can’t trust our judges, we may as well have complete anarchy. Keep in mind. Trump was warned that people on his team were in contact w Russians. Even after saying that no one in his team had anything to do w Russians. So it makes perfect sense that the FBI would insert an informant to make sure. The fbi does it with the mob, gangsters and so on.
The problem or issue with the FISA warrant is that the fake dossier was used in part to persuade the FISA judge to issue the warrant. The FBI failed to disclose pertinent details about the fake dossier to the FISA judge. I believe that will be identified in this much touted IG report that will be coming out one of these days. If it is indeed identified in the IG report....the FBI will have some 'splainin' to do.
Who were the informants in Hillary's campaign? Did they get killed before they could testify? We all know she colluded with Russia and paid for the dossier. Wonder what happened to all those people? Surely Mueller is looking into this.
please, please, please, please... ignore this trolls posts, he has single handily brought down the quality here on CF... please, please, please!
“We all know that Hillary colluded with the Russians“ and exactly how do you know that?
The FISA warrant or not based on the dossier. That’s been debunked over and over. And testimony before Congress they were told that the FISA warrant we’re not based on the dossier.
""The FISA warrant or not based on the dossier. That’s been debunked over and over. And testimony before Congress they were told that the FISA warrant we’re not based on the dossier. ""
From yesterday.....
""........The Hillary Clinton campaign, the Democrat National Committee, and the FBI combined to pay an estimated $1 million to Steele. The Steele Dossier alleges that Carter Page met with several Russian officials. It alleges that a “well developed conspiracy of cooperation” between Trump associates and the Kremlin developed. Steele reported Trump had an outre encounter with females in Moscow, among other baseless chatter.
Former FBI Director James Comey told President-elect Trump in January 2017, and repeated later, that the dossier was “scandalous and unverified.” While former Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe told Congress that without the dossier the Bureau would not have been granted the Carter Page surveillance authority by the FISA Court.
The FBI did in fact use the “unverified” dossier to obtain a surveillance authority of Page in October 2016. In March 2017, Page was interviewed by FBI agents. On May 17, 2017, Robert Mueller was appointed Special Counsel to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 elections, by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, his friend.
As of May 28, 2018, Page has not been charged by Mueller or any U.S. Attorney......
.......In May 2018, two U.S. District Court Judges (Eastern District of Virginia and the District of Columbia) have determined Robert Mueller’s investigation appears unbridled and traveled far beyond the FISA authority.""
1) the investigation began before the introduction of a dossier.
2). The first fisa warrant was issued before the dossier.
3) carter page and Papadopoulos were the main reasons for the following fisa warrants especially after carter page said he was “an agent of the Kremlin” on a recorded message. They used evidence of Papadopolous bragging about colluding with Russia to get the FISA warrants. Again on recordings obtained by the FBI.
4). Aside from the fact that even Nunes finally admitted the FISA warrants preceded the Steele dossier, so far nothing in the dossier has been found to be incorrect.
Sorry Jeffrey. I’m going to hold you to the same standard. Prove what’s incorrect about the dossier or zip it. Otherwise your words are worthless. Be better pal. Be better.
More Imposter lies, so easily disproved. While it can be said the FBI/DOJ was investigating Paige before the Dossier was created, it is an absolute lie to claim the original FISA warrant on Paige was granted before (or without) the dirty Dossier.
What should the FBI have done after Australia told our intelligence agencies that at least one of Trump's aides bragged about knowing Russia had dirt on the DNC and Russia was releasing that dirt via Wikileaks? And that info was also obtained illegally through hacking. What should our highest law enforcement agency have done?
Imposter jumping to Australia claims now?? So you concede being WRONG about Obama shaking every hand at the Naval Academy Graduation? And WRONG about your claim that the first FISA warrant was issued before the dirty Dossier??
As to Australia: knowing Russia has dirt on the Clintons and the DNC is easy.... she illegally kept an unsecure private server handling her gov't business and classified documents! And we don't actually know if the Russians hacked into the DNC server because the server was never given to the FBI for analysis.
Even the US Office of Personnel Management was hacked in a massive data breech. And Sony pictures. Trump didn't have anything to do with those events either.
In addition, leaked CIA Vault 7 docs showed the agency keeps file code from other countries so they can make a hack 'look' like anyone they want. Hard to know who is lying these days (*other than you)
If people in Trump's campaign heard the Russians had info on the DNC, they heard it from wikileaks. Just like everyone else. At no time did Trump collude with the Russians to obtain and disseminate this info. And thus this entire investigation has been at best a YUGE waste of time, and at worst a deep state coup to overthrow the duly elected President of the United States.
If the Democrats keep up with defending the indefensible Nixon should get a pass. Eventually this is all going to come out and the three stooges, Brennan, Clapper and Comey won't be able to dodge or lie anymore.
STOP answering this idiotic crap people!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Ignore the child because he is bringing you down to his LEVEL. Laughing all the way too. Be men. Not little boys. Make a vow and stick with it!!!! Do not acknowledge him or anyone else that has proven that debate and justice is not their interest. Quit being his fool for your own sake.
Allow me to translate for WV. “ this guy is presenting tho ya we cannot collectively defend, ergo he must be quieted as soon as possible”. Good?
y f IMposter. It doesn't matter who says what. When all is said and done, you will be yelling racism, or whining about the JUSTICE that you claim to want to happen. You will not like the out come. PRICELESS!!! 8^))))
Maybe you should send this to Trey Gowdy and Napolitano. Gowdy saw the confidential documents and he’s convinced that there was no spy and that the FBI conducted itself appropriately. But sure you can keep reading that right wing junk and get your opinions there too. Mazel.
I call bs on that night of heavy drinking garbage... If an ivestigation was started by a drunk shooting his mouth off our legal system is a farce... come on am i to believe that a constitutional crisis was from a convervsation between two drunks? We are screwed if that what it comes down to... if thats all we can do after all the wars to fight for freedom, lives lost, not to mention John Kerry, Mr. Honorable, and Sen. John Mcain serving in a war and defining our country on two frign drunks shooting their mouths off at a bar stool... pitiful!
Did Mark Levin see the confidential documents concerning the whole investigation? No. Trey Gowdy, and I have no love for him at all, but he saw them, he's also a former prosecutor so he knows his way around the law. If he says the FBI acted appropriately, Id say he has more credibility than a Levin.
All this wasted money and energy on a Trump/Russia investigation starts with Joseph Mifsud.
When some people (FBI for starters) answers some questions about him the American people will have there answers.
Like i've said many times before y f IMposter, and you totally side step it every time. Watch Mark Levin and prove what he says, wrong. He will answer the stupid questions and remarks you belch on here. He will wipe you out. 8^)
What about the fact that the dnc server was not hacked but downloaded at a rate that proves it was not hacked by a foreign government? It was copied from within and the fbi did not fully investigate the impropriety, sessions is dojing the investigation...mmm?
I think a few people need to reread Comey’s testimony before making there statements.
I can see now why Gowdy would make his claims if he is relying on the justice departments word instead of looking at the documents.
Per the link he never seen any of the documents that were subpoenaed. Let alone knew what documents were subpoenaed.
Gowdy and others may have seen some TS documents but can't say that just yet. That has happened before when disclosure was sensitive to timing. I did hear a new one yesterday that may need to be considered....when Gowdy retires from the Senate he will replace Sessions and be the next AG.
