Spike Bull 's Link
Published 18 hours ago on Jul 13, 2018
By Patrick Howley ?
WASHINGTON – The Democratic National Committee turned down the FBI’s offer to secure their email and computer servers after the alleged Russian hack of DNC servers during the 2016 election.
Mueller’s indictment of twelve unknown Russian tech figures and their associates makes it clear that the Russians continued hacking the DNC servers until October 2016.
James Comey testified in January 2017 that the FBI offered to help the Democratic National Committee by inspecting its servers. But the Democratic National Committee refused. Instead, the DNC used a private contractor (identified in the Mueller indictment as “Company 1”) to manage server security.
Mueller admits that the DNC kept getting hacked until October 2016.
Legal experts believe that this represents a violation of the Espionage Act by the Democratic National Committee, similar to Hillary Clinton’s refusal to secure her Blackberry. The fact that the Russians hacked DNC servers after the DNC refused to allow the FBI to secure the servers is an example of gross negligence."
Thanks for the laugh though!
Which administration is currently under investigation? Which president is hiding his taxes which probably show significant Russian money? Which administration had guilty pleas, indictments and arrests?
Exactly. But thanks for playing Timmy!
Much nicer place than the fetid sewer in your world.
PutZ is completely insane and should not be allowed to visit Bowsite!
At least give us TOTs to salvage things.
Tragic, sincerely tragic.
Critical/analytical thinking skills for example. Folks who post old news and/or non-verified information to elicit reactions they are looking for, that is certainly disappointing. The fact that they cannot seem to realize they do exactly what they criticize others for, well, again...
Ignore him and his posts, and he will go away.
Trump cannot be allowed to be a "world power on his own" mostly because the word for that is King or Dictator. and we, here in America, we kind of frown upon that kind of thing. We're weird that way. And work ethic, huh? Trump plays golf every weekend. He watches hours of cable news and tweets like a man unhinged from reality.
During the campaign, Trump argued that Americans should vote for him because he would rarely leave Washington. He promised that he wouldn’t go golfing or take vacations because there was too much work to do. HOWEVER>>>>
Trump has visited golf courses at a faster clip than his three most recent predecessors. This is Donald Trump’s 131st day at a Trump golf club as President.
How you see things is kind of amazing.
Keep in mind he not only doesn't collect a pay check, but he works consistently late hours. In view of those circumstances I think you can allow a few golf outings.
Of course they completely ignore all the good Trump has done while complaining vociferously about the fact that most of that good stuff is reversals of the Obama legacy!
Why Putin May Have Delivered Evidence To Hang Hillary
There's just too much stacked up against the democrat swamp-dwellers to ignore.
Many people remember the so-called frenetic screeching of Hillary Clinton when she supposedly had a melt-down with Matt Lauer and said that if Trump got elected they’d all be ‘swinging from nooses’? Snopes, of course, called it a false rumor… but the ‘fact checking’ site did admit that Hillary threw a ‘hissy fit.’
But, what if she really did say that… could there have been any logic to her madness?
I think it’s entirely possible, given the recent Helsinki conference.
In fact, Putin’s $400 million ‘accusations’ ARE proof. He claims to know that Bill Browder funneled money to the Clinton campaign—he’s not speculating—and asserted the scheme involved members of the U.S. intelligence community, who Putin said “accompanied and guided these transactions.”
Which members… Mueller, Comey, Lynch?
Remember what happened to Julius and Ethel Rosenberg? They were executed for espionage after being convicted in part of a spy ring that delivered atomic bomb secrets to Russia. And, many people have suggested that the democrats always accuse their enemies of crimes they themselves have committed… just saying.
History records that other agents have also been sentenced to death after spying convictions, so the notion of death for traitors is not new. Isn’t it possible that Hillary knew exactly what she was saying during her supposed outburst… that she knew her’s, and other people’s, actions were enough to warrant the highest punishment?
Incidentally, I’ve wondered why so many democrats have demanded to know what went on between President Trump and Vladimir Putin while they spoke confidentially in Helsinki.
Could it be that President Donald Trump was given evidence of real treasonous collusion that took place within the highest levels of government under Obama’s reign?
I’m not saying he actually received a terabyte USB flash drive with evidence of Hillary’s perfidious villainy against America… but what if?
Personally, given the actions of certain democrats and Hillary Clinton since the election, I think it’s possible. In fact, Giuliani claimed on Monday that the White House has its own ‘counter report’ ready to release, firing back against Mueller’s witch hunt.
But, if Trump did get the evidence, why would Putin hand it over?
I think there are some specific reasons why the Russian leader just may have delivered the goods, horrifying the power-hungry democrat masters who are terrified that their cash cow—the foreign interests who are ready to pay for the United States’ military stealth secrets, Uranium, and sea ports—will go dry.
*It’s just possible that Putin, who is Russian to the core, despises Hillary Clinton, Obama, and other traitors.
*Trump is a real person… unlike the fake people in the swamp who say one thing, but do another. The strange 360 perpetrated by democrats, concerning Russia, as soon as President Trump won the election looks suspicious.. if Hillary had won, would she be touting a ‘new relationship’ with Russia like she did before?
*The insane witch hunt conducted by the leftists still in power looks a lot like a distraction for the masses and a way to tarnish Trump, without any proof.
Firstly, Putin is a nationalist, unlike Hillary, and her ilk, who are globalists. I don’t think he likes, or respects her. Of course, this is just an impression, but images of Clinton, Obama and Putin show the Russian leader appearing mostly contemptuous.
Secondly, Putin didn’t ‘accuse’ Clinton of accepting laundered money from Bill Browder… he said she did it. Even if that’s not evidence of a crime… it does show her slimy, back-handed, money-grubbing ways.
In a recent report by Philip Giraldi of The Strategic Culture Foundation, the connection is outlined excellently:
---Browder is notoriously the man behind the 2012 Magnitsky Act, which exploited Congressional willingness to demonize Russia… The Act sanctioned individual Russian officials, which Moscow has rightly seen as unwarranted interference in the operation of its judicial system.
Browder, a media favorite who self-promotes as “Putin’s enemy #1,” portrays himself as a selfless human rights advocate, but is he? He has used his fortune to threaten lawsuits for anyone who challenges his version of events, effectively silencing many critics.
He claims that his accountant Sergei Magnitsky was a crusading “lawyer” who discovered a $230 million tax-fraud scheme that involved the Browder business interest Hermitage Capital but was, in fact, engineered by corrupt Russian police officers who arrested Magnitsky and enabled his death in a Russian jail.
Many have been skeptical of the Browder narrative, suspecting that the fraud was in fact concocted by Browder and his accountant Magnitsky. A Russian court recently supported that alternative narrative, ruling in late December that Browder had deliberately bankrupted his company and engaged in tax evasion. He was sentenced to nine years prison in absentia…
On December 16th Senator Diane Feinstein of the Senate Judiciary Committee released the transcript of the testimony provided by Glenn Simpson, founder of Fusion GPS. According to James Carden, Browder was mentioned 50 times, but the repeated citations apparently did not merit inclusion in media coverage of the story by the New York Times, Washington Post and Politico.
Fusion GPS, which was involved in the research producing the Steele Dossier used to discredit Donald Trump, was also retained to provide investigative services relating to a lawsuit in New York City involving a Russian company called Prevezon.
As information provided by Browder was the basis of the lawsuit, his company and business practices while in Russia became part of the investigation. Simmons maintained that Browder proved to be somewhat evasive and his accounts of his activities were inconsistent.
He claimed never to visit the United States and not own property or do business there, all of which were untrue, to include his ownership through a shell company of a $10 million house in Aspen Colorado. He repeatedly ran away, literally, from attempts to subpoena him so he would have to testify under oath.
Per Simmons, in Russia, Browder used shell companies locally and also worldwide to avoid taxes and conceal ownership, suggesting that he was likely one of many corrupt businessmen operating in what was a wild west business environment. My question is, “Why was such a man granted credibility and allowed a free run to poison the vitally important US-Russia relationship?” The answer might be follow the money. Israel Shamir reports that Browder was a major contributor to Senator Ben Cardin of Maryland, who was the major force behind the Magnitsky Act. (emphases added)--
So, now we have the connection to Fusion, which was connected to Hillary, and another prominent democrat senator.
Hillary has said that Trump’s foreign policy is dangerous… but is it more dangerous than allowing ‘Arab spring’ to become a massive destabilization force in the Middle East during your reign as Secretary of State? Is it more dangerous than singing off, with others, on the 20 percent sale of America’s Uranium resources?
Thirdly, consider the difference between her opinions about Russia before the election (during the Uranium One sale) and now:
So, we know that Hillary has changed her tune about Russia. We know that the Obama administration gave a stand down order on the so-called Russian hacking, and we know that the Clinton foundation got donations from certain investors during the Uranium One sale (even the New York Times admits that)… so, perhaps Putin recognizes Clinton and other democrats for what they are… lying, power-hungry elitists, who have sold their souls for Mammon?
Either way… if Americans can get some hard evidence, it’s just possible that the list of traitors who were convicted (and executed) for their crimes against the United States will lengthen, and American citizens might get back the Republic our forefathers died to establish and protect.
However, if Hillary’d been elected....
You claim Trump is a Russian 'asset,' yet who was it who got paid $500,000 by Russia to give a friggin' speech?
And who was it who lobbied the US Government to sell 20% of our uranium to Russia and in return, Russia 'donated' tens of millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation?
The answers, of course, are Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton.
Wanna' keep playing?
I raised an issue you don't want to deal with because you can neither deny it nor debate it.
Just WHO won't accept the results of the election?
Pres. Trump's attorney Jay Sekulow on previously denying that the president was involved in putting out a statement on the Trump Tower meeting: "I had bad information at that time and made a mistake in my statement ... over time facts develop"
Ummm, No. Facts don't develop. People get caught lying and are forced to tell the truth.
This president lies to his own attorneys.
This is why Trump will never VOLUNTARILY testify before Mueller. No perjury trap exists for honorable/honest people!
They know that Mueller knows.
Your defense of trump is weak. His defense is weak. He lied to his own attorney. Why?
No worries. muelller knows what’s going on. If anyone’s going to drain the swamp it’s a real patriot like Bob Mueller.
YES, this is called Collusion, Conspiracy and in this case it IS a CRIME!
And your best denial or defense is to ignore the big bad man that’s reporting it?
.. .. . .. .
. .. .. ..
So where is the outrage from "your fav poster"?
I suspect he's afraid of the truth.
The fact is trump jr also lied and is probably the next indictment coming from Mueller.
Justice will prevail
Your side lost, PuZZy.
Get over it!
Person A meeting with Person B to get information on a political opponent is NOT illegal.
It's been done for decades and both sides in every country does it.
Your side LOST. Get over it!
Have you 'conveniently forgotten' that Teddy Kennedy, the constant drunk and serial womanizer told the Russians during the Eighties to work with him to stop Reagan from taking down the USSR?
What about Hillary's lie over the cause of Benghazi? Her lie had consequences. It is really tough trying to extend respect to you as just someone who disagrees. I am concluding you do not even attempt to be objective. Do you hate our country? I ask sincerely.
1). Trump literally just admitted that Jr has committed a criminal conspiracy, in saying "This was a meeting to get information on an opponent." Or did you believe the adoption story? You did!!?! Hahaha. Adorable.
2). This is a violation of 52 U.S.C. 30121, 36 U.S.C. 510 - Which states that Contributions and donations by foreign nationals (Russians) is indeed illegal.
3). Jr also told Congress that he never told his father about the meeting. Surely you don’t believe that. But regardless, it’s another lie which is another crime (lying to a Congressional investigation).
In that last tweet, trump also admitted he obstructed justice when he told his son to lie about it with a story about adoption. The story that you believed.
Oh wait, your president lied to you?!? Say it isn’t so!!
Before this is all over, trumps lies will catch up to him. All those that believed him will somehow have to come to the realization that they were had by a conman. And a lousy conman at that.
This one's for YOU!
And why would he throw his own son under the bus with that tweet?
Because trump is soulless and only looks out for himself.
But great video! I enjoyed the satire.
The bigger the lie, the more apt it is to be believed.
Who said that?
Adolf Hitler, then his Minister of Propaganda, Joseph Goebbels ran with it.
Another but related quote: "“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it"
Who said it?
Also Joseph Goebbels.
You, Paul are EXACTLY the sort of easily duped idiot who will buy this sort of stuff.
Just witness the amazingly inaccurate and false 'fake news' you willingly and eagerly swallow hook, line and sinker.
Your side lost. There is NO evidence that posts on Twitter and Facebook by some Russians pretending to be Americans changed even ONE vote.
Your side lost!
Get Over it!
Ok my turn!
Who said this?:
If I were to run, I'd run as a Republican. They're the dumbest group of voters in the country. They believe anything on Fox News. I could lie and they'd still eat it up. I bet my numbers would be terrific."
Did you guess trump? Good job! You win!
Oh wait, did he insult you with that? You don’t care? Ah! That’s why he’s your hero!!
Which is why he is an IllegitimatePresident.
"In a 1999 interview with Larry King, Trump got a little more specific about his political views. He said he was a registered Republican but described himself as a centrist. Trump also talked about running on the Reform Party ticket, according to a transcript of the appearance.
In the end, we couldn’t find any instances of Donald Trump saying that Republicans are the dumbest group of voters. We’re calling this rumor fiction."
Deal with that huh?