The Valkyrie is consistent in point of impact so I don't believe the gun is at fault. When the scope was on the Ruger, it was sighted to be dead on at 100 and did a fantastic job. I even took the scope off the 224, put it back on the 223 and it checked out. When I put it back on the 224, same thing.
The scope is a Nikon Prostaff 5 3.5-14 X 40 BDC and the ammo is 90 Grain Federal Matchking.
Any ideas on what is going on? I don't want to put the high rise mount on the Valkyrie. One daughter getting married in 2 weeks and the other in a month and wife probably wouldn't approve of a new scope quite yet. ;)
To simplify field adjustments, Nikon has integrated this feature into all new PROSTAFF 5 riflescopes. Just sight-in as usual, then lift the spring-loaded adjustment knob, rotate to your “zero”, and reengage. Field adjustments are now as simple as dialing-in your subsequent ranges."
is there a chance that, switching from rifle to rifle, this feature is hindering setting your zero? never heard of a scope that wasnt damaged ending up that far off at 50yd
That's if I had one of those AR type things! ;-)
Here's my thinking:
When a scope is mounted on any rifle, the line of sight though the scope is a small distance above the axis of the barrel, usually 1.5 - 3 inches, depending on the height of the mounts, front lens diameter, etc. When fired, the flight path of the bullet is below this line of sight, but moving higher relative to the line of sight through the scope, resulting in the bullet's path and line of sight converging (usually at around 25 yards), after which, the bullet impacts above the line of sight for a distance until drop brings it back in line with the line of site through the scope (the sighted in distance). If for some reason the axis of the barrel and line of site of the scope are diverging, the rifle would hit low at every distance. The error would be small at close range, but get progressively worse at longer distances.
That explanation might be more confusing than I intended it to be. It would be easier to explain with a diagram.
Out of curiosity, have you shot it at 25 yards? The impact point will be below the line of site as it should be, but if the barrel is "out of line", the difference will be greater than the distance between the bore axis and scope axis at the muzzle.
Out of curiosity, have you shot it at 25 yards?
Shuteye - I forgot about the lift and turn on this scope. I hadn't had it off the other gun in 3 years or so. I'll have to hunt up the manual (or go online duh) and investigate it further. It being off that far at 50 really had me puzzled also.
Thanks for the suggestions. I have to leave the house Monday for 3 weeks of trainings and weddings in 3 states. I'll be home for 8 hours sometime during that time so there is no fooling with it until after all that. Unless I can get close enough to ready to sneak off tomorrow afternoon.
They make angled rails/mounts that allow more "up" adjustment. Make sure you don't have something like that on backwards.
I also tried to reset the turret which seemed to allow a little more play but not much. I mounted it on the Ruger lower in case there was something messed up with the stock or the lower I put together.
Once I did all that I went forth and shot. I backed up to 10 yards and it shot high by a bunch, backed up to 35 (all I can get behind the house), still as high as it was low yesterday. Swap lowers, point of impact the same as with the other lower. I roughed sighted it in but to really get it fine tuned will have to wait a few weeks due to trainings and weddings.
Now, what actually was wrong? I don't know. Any one of those things or a combination of them could have been the problem.. I wasn't very scientific in my experimentation. ;) Anyway, thanks to everyone for your input, it was very helpful. I'm looking forward to playing with this gun and poking holes in things.