Moultrie Mobile
Double Standards
Community
Contributors to this thread:
Annony Mouse 29-Sep-18
Bentstick81 29-Sep-18
HA/KS 30-Sep-18
Rocky 30-Sep-18
Annony Mouse 30-Sep-18
NvaGvUp 30-Sep-18
Annony Mouse 30-Sep-18
Woods Walker 30-Sep-18
NvaGvUp 30-Sep-18
jjs 30-Sep-18
'Ike' (Phone) 30-Sep-18
Annony Mouse 01-Oct-18
Annony Mouse 01-Oct-18
Annony Mouse 03-Oct-18
Annony Mouse 03-Oct-18
Annony Mouse 03-Oct-18
South Farm 04-Oct-18
South Farm 04-Oct-18
jjs 04-Oct-18
South Farm 05-Oct-18
DL 05-Oct-18
Woods Walker 05-Oct-18
Annony Mouse 06-Oct-18
Tonybear61 07-Oct-18
Woods Walker 07-Oct-18
Annony Mouse 07-Oct-18
Annony Mouse 08-Oct-18
Annony Mouse 09-Oct-18
Annony Mouse 10-Oct-18
From: Annony Mouse
29-Sep-18

Annony Mouse's Link
When there is actual evidence (Keith Ellison) vs. 30+ year old memories dredged up, there is an obvious disconnect in judgment.

And this... (link)

This double standard is seen daily and promoted by the media.

From: Bentstick81
29-Sep-18
That will leave a bruise. 8^))))

From: HA/KS
30-Sep-18
"Democrat Party Credo: If it’s evidence – we destroy it; if it’s female – we grope it; if it’s perversion – we promote it; if it’s law enforcement --- we condemn it; if it moves -- we tax it; and if it favor's foreigners over Americans – we vote for it."

From: Rocky
30-Sep-18
HA, Send me a copy of that Democrat Handbook of Strategy so I could beat some over their heads with it, some right here on the CF. ;-)

The Rock

From: Annony Mouse
30-Sep-18

Annony Mouse's Link
The Practice of Ritual Defamation

How values, opinions and beliefs are controlled in democratic societies.

Laird Wilcox 1990

Defamation is the destruction or attempted destruction of the reputation, status, character or standing in the community of a person or group of persons by unfair, wrongful, or malicious speech or publication. For the purposes of this essay, the central element is defamation in retaliation for the real or imagined attitudes, opinions or beliefs of the victim, with the intention of silencing or neutralizing his or her influence, and/or making an example of them so as to discourage similar independence and "insensitivity" or non-observance of taboos. It is different in nature and degree from simple criticism or disagreement in that it is aggressive, organized and skillfully applied, often by an organization or representative of a special interest group, and in that it consists of several characteristic elements.

Ritual Defamation is not ritualistic because it follows any prescribed religious or mystical doctrine, nor is it embraced in any particular document or scripture. Rather, it is ritualistic because it follows a predictable, stereotyped pattern which embraces a number of elements, as in a ritual.

The elements of a Ritual Defamation are these:

1. In a ritual defamation the victim must have violated a particular taboo in some way, usually by expressing or identifying with a forbidden attitude, opinion or belief. It is not necessary that he "do" anything about it or undertake any particular course of action, only that he engage in some form of communication or expression.

2. The method of attack in a ritual defamation is to assail the character of the victim, and never to offer more than a perfunctory challenge to the particular attitudes, opinions or beliefs expressed or implied. Character assassination is its primary tool.

3. An important rule in ritual defamation is to avoid engaging in any kind of debate over the truthfulness or reasonableness of what has been expressed, only condemn it. To debate opens the issue up for examination and discussion of its merits, and to consider the evidence that may support it, which is just what the ritual defamer is trying to avoid. The primary goal of a ritual defamation is censorship and repression.

4. The victim is often somebody in the public eye - someone who is vulnerable to public opinion - although perhaps in a very modest way. It could be a schoolteacher, writer, businessman, minor official, or merely an outspoken citizen. Visibility enhances vulnerability to ritual defamation.

5. An attempt, often successful, is made to involve others in the defamation. In the case of a public official, other public officials will be urged to denounce the offender. In the case of a student, other students will be called upon, and so on.

6. In order for a ritual defamation to be effective, the victim must be dehumanized to the extent that he becomes identical with the offending attitude, opinion or belief, and in a manner which distorts it to the point where it appears at its most extreme. For example, a victim who is defamed as a "subversive" will be identified with the worst images of subversion, such as espionage, terrorism or treason. A victim defamed as a "pervert" will be identified with the worst images of perversion, including child molestation and rape. A victim defamed as a "racist" or "anti-Semitic" will be identified with the worst images of racism or anti-Semitism, such as lynchings or gas chambers.

7. Also to be successful, a ritual defamation must bring pressure and humiliation on the victim from every quarter, including family and friends. If the victim has school children, they may be taunted and ridiculed as a consequence of adverse publicity. If they are employed, they may be fired from their job. If the victim belongs to clubs or associations, other members may be urged to expel them.

8. Any explanation the victim may offer, including the claim of being misunderstood, is considered irrelevant. To claim truth as a defense for a politically incorrect value, opinion or belief is interpreted as defiance and only compounds the problem. Ritual defamation is often not necessarily an issue of being wrong or incorrect but rather of "insensitivity" and failing to observe social taboos.

An interesting aspect of ritual defamation as a practice is its universality. It is not specific to any value, opinion or belief or to any group or subculture. It may be used for or against any political, ethnic, national or religious group. It may, for example, by anti-Semites against Jews, or by Jews against anti-Semites; by rightists against leftists or by leftists against rightists, and so on.

The power of ritual defamation lies entirely in its capacity to intimidate and terrorize. It embraces some elements of primitive superstitious belief, as in a "curse" or "hex." It plays into the subconscious fear most people have of being abandoned or rejected by the tribe or by society and being cut off from social and psychological support systems.

The weakness of ritual defamation lies in its tendency toward overkill and in its obvious maliciousness. Occasionally a ritual defamation will fail because of poor planning and failure to correctly judge the vulnerability of the victim or because its viciousness inadvertently generates sympathy.

It’s important to recognize and identify the patterns of a ritual defamation. Like all propaganda and disinformation campaigns it is accomplished primarily through the manipulation of words and symbols. It is not used to persuade, but to punish. Although it may have cognitive elements, its thrust is primarily emotional. Ritual Defamation is used to hurt, to intimidate, to destroy, and to persecute, and to avoid the dialogue, debate and discussion upon which a free society depends. On those grounds it must be opposed no matter who tries to justify its use.

From: NvaGvUp
30-Sep-18
Too bad for O'Rourke that in addition to the police report, there are witnesses who will testify that he did indeed try to flee the scene.

From: Annony Mouse
30-Sep-18

From: Woods Walker
30-Sep-18
....and in just six feet of water.....

I hope that bastard is getting a good scorching.

From: NvaGvUp
30-Sep-18
And according to the coroner's report, she was alive for two HOURS after Teddy the drunk drove off the bridge.

What did he do first?

He called his lawyer and then it was TWELVE HOURS later before he reported the event.

Yet for the Dems. he was their hero, esp. because he was so 'awesome' on defending women.

I swear, you cannot make this stuff up!

From: jjs
30-Sep-18
Nuts & Sluts- simply accuse the person you want to destroy of being crazy or a sexual deviant. Works so well on conservatives candidates or voters is because, on average, conservatives have a stronger 'disgust circuit' than liberals or libertarians. This technique works real well for the liberals over the years and it is being deployed in the SCOTUS hearings and along in local elections. As stated in pass the liberals have no moral standards that they will not eat their own but the conservatives will devour their own very quickly.

30-Sep-18
Nothing will change though....Dem’s will be Dem’s!

From: Annony Mouse
01-Oct-18

Annony Mouse's Link
Democrats support funding for sexually abusing young boys...reality, not a repressed memory.

From: Annony Mouse
01-Oct-18

Annony Mouse's Link
The ULTIMATE double standard when it comes to accusation of assault on a female:

"Outside" Attorney Hired by Democrat Party: The Allegations Against Keith Ellison Cannot Be Sustained Without Videotape and Evidence Beyond His Ex-Girlfriend's Claims

Well! Color me surprised.

The AP reports the "outside attorney" concludes:

"An allegation standing alone is not necessarily sufficient to conclude that conduct occurred, particularly where the accusing party declines to produce supporting evidence that she herself asserts exists," Ellingstad wrote.

You mean like therapist's notes, for example?

#BelieveAllWomen

From: Annony Mouse
03-Oct-18
California Democrat Signed Document Claiming Maryland As Residence; Campaign Calls It ‘Honest Mistake’

He doesn’t know where he lives.

Via Fresno Bee:

TJ Cox “made an honest mistake” when he marked a second home in Maryland as his principal residence, the Fresno Democrat’s campaign said Tuesday.

Spokesmen for the campaign last week claimed the principal residence declaration was the result of an error by the state. The campaign then characterized it as Cox’s mistake after The Bee provided it with a notarized public document showing Cox had initialed and signed a section saying the home was his primary residence.

Cox, a Democrat who owns several businesses in the central San Joaquin Valley, is running against Rep. David Valadao, R-Hanford, for California’s 21st Congressional District seat.

The Bee previously reported that Cox owned a three-bedroom, four-bathroom house in Bethesda, Maryland – a Washington, D.C., suburb – and claimed the nearly $1 million home as a principal residence. Cox also claimed a Fresno home as his principal residence, and federal tax laws do not allow an individual to claim more than one.

Campaign spokesman Phillip Vander Klay said Tuesday that, after The Bee brought the issue to his attention, Cox contacted the state of Maryland and Montgomery County, where his home is located, to change his residency status. He also is willing to refund the $692 tax credit he received from the county as a result of the error, Vander Klay added.

State property records show the home is no longer classified as Cox’s principal residence.

When asked why Cox did not notice the error in 2017, when he collected the tax credit, Vander Klay said: “It was an honest mistake that he filled out the principal residence not knowing the legal definitions. His family was living there.”

Keep reading…(more at link)

From: Annony Mouse
03-Oct-18
Then there is this...

Kent State Cancels West Side Story After Fury That Whites Were Cast In Lead Roles

Yet the social justice warriors cheered on the all black cast of Hamilton.

Via Daily Mail:

A student production of West Side Story at Kent State University has been cancelled after uproar that white students had been cast to play Latino characters.

Latino students who auditioned for roles playing members of the ‘Sharks’, a Puerto Rican street gang in the musical, were outraged after the three leading roles all went to non-Latino students...

From: Annony Mouse
03-Oct-18
Ah...our youthful history is so important when it comes to the Kavenaugh nomination to SCOTUS, but when it comes to the Presidency...the proREgressive Democrats get a pass:

Obama Admits Heavy Drinking, Drug Problems As An 'Adolescent' In Rare Video Footage

The ultimate Democrap standard of youthful behavior.

From: South Farm
04-Oct-18
"That will leave a bruise."

Are you kidding?!? This is Minnesota we're talking about...Ellison's words and actions are a badge of honor and he's a shoe-in to win. We love our scumbags here! You've never seen a more blind voting constituency than we got here..

From: South Farm
04-Oct-18
Wellstone, Ventura, Franken, Dayton, first somali rep, first transgender mpls. counsel member, for example. Ellison's in, mark my words.

From: jjs
04-Oct-18
South Farm, the Twins need you to hit it out of the park. Twin Cities is the San Fransisco of the mid-west, had an eye opener when doing a short rent on 7th St. St.Paul after living in Wi. country for 20+ yrs, thought I needed a passport.

From: South Farm
05-Oct-18
Trust me, I'll get on base, but I got a whole bunch of inepts in the lineup that'll probably strand me!

From: DL
05-Oct-18

DL's embedded Photo
DL's embedded Photo
Double Standard indeed

From: Woods Walker
05-Oct-18
LOL! More affirmative action, huh? Because of his race he can't be held to the same standards as white people? Talk about racist!!

From: Annony Mouse
06-Oct-18
Foreign interference in elections: COLLUSION?

Obama’s State Dept and USAID Help Funnel Tax Dollars To Soros Group In Albania

Judicial Watch has uncovered documents showing that $9 million in tax payer money was funneled to a George Soros organization to influence the political process in Albania.

It appears that embassy officials in Tirana directed top officials of The Open Society Foundation on how to apply for US grant money to support “grassroots democracy” and “anti-corruption” efforts.

Judicial Watch alleges that the money wasn’t used as intended and instead went to support socialists in Albania, “That included working with the country’s socialist government to push for highly controversial judicial “reform.”

more at link

From: Tonybear61
07-Oct-18
Did Obama, Ellison, Koblechar, Walz or Smith ever hold a red Solo cup at a beer party??? If they did they should be toast, right?

We held lots of them in the late 70s early 80s, outdoor parties wouldn't be the same without a magic marker, binder or clothespin so you could tell its yours. They used to sell for $5-10 a cup so you could make as many trips to the keg as you wanted. even had a class mate sell one to the cop, no wait!! Everyone scattered as he was in uniform, funny as hell to hear everyone splashing through the swamp.. See guys this is why I told you to wear rubber boots and don't go that way if the cops show up.

From: Woods Walker
07-Oct-18
I grew up in suburban New Jersey in the 50's and 60's. At that time the drinking age was 21, but New York was 18, and Staten Island was about 12 miles away, so Friday and Saturday nights everyone headed for, "The Island".

From: Annony Mouse
07-Oct-18

From: Annony Mouse
08-Oct-18
CNN White House correspondent Kaitlan Collins ‘regrets’ tweeting anti-gay slurs in college

But what the hey...that was while she was in college. Now that she is woke, all is excused. Right, CNN?

From: Annony Mouse
09-Oct-18

Annony Mouse's Link
Women Never Lie About Rape? Jane Roe of Roe v. Wade LIED ABOUT HER RAPE

From: Annony Mouse
10-Oct-18
From Moonbattery:

Sexually Harassed by Christine Blasey Ford

This alarming allegation of sexual harassment by Christine Blasey Ford is backed up by every bit as much corroboration as Ford herself provided for her own accusations before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Warning; this testimony is R-rated and disturbing enough to cause PTSD and erectile dysfunction:

  • Sitka Gear