Contributors to this thread:
"I would indict Hillary Clinton"
where was this guy when we needed him .. if he's going to be a strong AG and not a weasel like Sessions was, why not leave him in there ..
There may very well have been people that died directly because of her unlawful use of personal email instead of official (and entered in record) email channels. Leftists of course could give a rip.
And that's not even going into destruction and tampering of evidence.
Bottom line...... at best (not assuming criminal cover up) their balls shriveled up at the thought of indicting a Presidential candidate, much less the presumed winner of said election.
Nothing will ever happen to Hillary because we no longer have the rule of law in America. Someone being able to do what she did and suffer NO repercussions from it make that reality glaringly obvious. The ruling class uses ANY means necessary to keep control, and they will continue to do so as long as we let them.
For crying out loud. The GOP is in charge of the DOJ. If they were going to indict, then do it! They’re in charge of the Senate and had the House. So appoint a special prosecutor and investigate as if the last 50 investigations produced anything.
Indicting someone is easy. But yet the GOP led DOJ has done nothing. Why do you think that is?
The USA already indicted her when they handed her a "sorry, loser" in Nov 2016.
"as if the last 50 investigations produced anything." Well people that were going to testify against hillary either came dead mysteriously or pleaded the fifth. If they actually HAD to testify against her, and the others didn't die mysteriously, hillary would be behind bars. Only idiots like you would think anything differently.
He's temporary. I expect him to be replaced by a female.
yea, Judge Jeanine Pirro .. ;0)
She testified for 11 hours under oath. Willingly and without subpoena.
Would trump do that? We all know that answer already.