Bowsite.com

What a scary world you must live in Louie. How do you wake up in the morning?

In the case from JTV, to get the 95,000, they look at what the person used to get their driver's license - if it was a green card or some other non-US document, they add it to the count. This totaled 95,000 from 1996-2018 (as is the 58,000 people who are listed as having voted in that 22-23 year span). What isn't clear is have the folks become naturalized citizens since they first got their drivers license (and are therefore legally allowed to vote).

Other states have done the same calculations - I think it was CO that claimed to have found ~3900 people who had voted illegally. When they were able to get the right databases (naturalized, etc), they narrowed it down to 15. Last I heard, they hadn't prosecuted those because they were still trying to narrow down if the 15 were on national databases that were just wrong.

So, remember JTV's 58,000 claim and keep an eye on how many are eventually convicted.

Here was an interesting paragraph from one of the Colorado cases:

"Only one person in Colorado has been charged with voter fraud stemming from last year’s election: former Colorado Republican Party chairman Steven Curtis, who was also charged with one count of forgery of a government-issued document. He’s accused of signing his wife’s ballot with her name."

Apparently this type of search has been done and debunked in the past.

From the link:

"In 2012, Florida officials conducted a similar weak match with driver’s license records that indicated that as many as 180,000 non-citizens were on the state’s rolls. As in Texas, that number made for some splashy headlines, but after accounting for the fact that people may have become citizens after renewing their licenses, the number was whittled down to 2,600 cases. Even that turned out to be a drastic overstatement, as in the end just 85 voters were identified as non-citizens and removed from the rolls.

That same year, the then-director of South Carolina’s DMV used a similar “weak-match” method to claim ineligible individuals voted in previous elections. He claimed that 950 dead people had voted since they died. After a review of the records in question by South Carolina officials, it was determined that no one had cast a ballot from the grave – or had used a dead person’s identity to vote."

The investigation has shown that canvassers for Defend Oregon were collecting ballots from voters, but failed to do their duty of turning in the ballots before 8:00 PM on election night. In fact it wasn’t until the next morning that Defend Oregon field operators turned in the ballots. One of the ballots was apparently from the May 15th primary election.

Unfortunately is makes no reference as to whom the ballots belonged to.

"Audit Finds Signs of Fraud in New Mexico House Race"

But, hey, JTV... at least you got to be first and beat everyone to the forum as the thread owner for all to see. How exciting. For that brief moment, you were their hero.

KS, there's nothing about North Carolina because it's the wrong party.

Okay, guys... time for everyone to come to JTV's rescue with name calling and insults. LOL

""Okay, guys... time for everyone to come to JTV's rescue with name calling and insults. LOL""

It takes a special kind Hypocritical dumbass to spew that claptrap............

The data you requested will be forwarded to you personally, post haste, concerning the " non-Americans" and the illegal "non-Americans" who do not cross the borders everyday. The "indictments" may require a bit more time but not MUCH..O. Incredible that many "American-Americans" do vote. What in the hell is the difference?

BTW...I will come down on JTV's side everyday of the week and twice on Sundays (when liberals are all in church praying to...I don't know... A calf?)

The Rock

The Rock

The Rock

I just wish you guys would speak up about McRae Dowless and decade’s worth of Democrat campaigns using the same tactics... in North Carolina and across the country.

So your comment about “there’s nothing wrong, because it’s the wrong party” is laughably ironic.

“Vote early. Vote often.”

It’s a glib phrase. It initiates smirks and knowing looks.

It’s not tied to Conservatives, Republicans or Libertarians.

Though, if you guys set aside your false indignation that a Republican hired one of your operatives to utilize some of your tactics to improperly impact an election... maybe you could sue him for campaign copyright infringement...

However, 3 million illegal votes in the 2016 general election my a#%.

Urban Democrat strongholds? I don’t doubt for a moment that more than three million votes were “created” out of thin air.

I continue to vote, but I have to admit that it’s merely because I am stubborn and wish to flip a figurative bird at those in power here.

That symbolic act of defiance is the only value my vote has here. I have been completely, unutterably disenfranchised.

The Bernie Bros who were stunned that the DNC would put their thumb on the scale? Ha! None of them were from around here.

But Barack and Hillary are. Chicago Democrats and their tactics are the DNC. And you might as well be dealing with the Mob... and, often you are. Literally.

Gang members are recruited as political workers at election time in Chicago. And it’s been going on for a while. The Outfit came through for JFK after a dip of the beak.

So... it’s laughable to hear Democrats carry on about how some Republican hired one of their guys to do what they do all of the time.

And it’s sad too.