Sitka Mountain Gear
Have Another Beer, Fauxahontas
Community
Contributors to this thread:
NvaGvUp 27-Jan-19
JTV 27-Jan-19
Dale06 27-Jan-19
WV Mountaineer 27-Jan-19
NvaGvUp 27-Jan-19
NvaGvUp 27-Jan-19
Tonybear61 27-Jan-19
IdyllwildArcher 27-Jan-19
BIG BEAR 27-Jan-19
Tiger eye 27-Jan-19
NvaGvUp 27-Jan-19
TT-Pi 27-Jan-19
NvaGvUp 27-Jan-19
Owl 27-Jan-19
HDE 27-Jan-19
HedgeHunter 27-Jan-19
Glunt@work 27-Jan-19
NvaGvUp 27-Jan-19
HedgeHunter 27-Jan-19
Annony Mouse 05-Feb-19
IdyllwildArcher 05-Feb-19
gflight 05-Feb-19
HDE 05-Feb-19
Woods Walker 05-Feb-19
NvaGvUp 06-Feb-19
dallsheepstkr 06-Feb-19
IdyllwildArcher 06-Feb-19
NvaGvUp 06-Feb-19
IdyllwildArcher 06-Feb-19
70lbdraw 06-Feb-19
Annony Mouse 06-Feb-19
NvaGvUp 07-Feb-19
slade 07-Feb-19
one-eye 07-Feb-19
scentman 07-Feb-19
JTV 07-Feb-19
K Cummings 07-Feb-19
TT-Pi 07-Feb-19
IdyllwildArcher 07-Feb-19
IdyllwildArcher 07-Feb-19
70lbdraw 07-Feb-19
spike78 07-Feb-19
Annony Mouse 07-Feb-19
From: NvaGvUp
27-Jan-19
Washington Redskins owner Daniel Snyder has purchased a luxury yacht for $100,000,000 and The Faux Squaw is outraged.

She took to Twitter to attack Snyder for spending $100,000,000 on a yacht when, according to her, the money could have been spent by the government to help pay off student loan debt:

"This billionaire NFL owner just paid $100M for a "superyacht" with its own iMax theater. I'm pretty sure he can pay my new #UltraMillionaireTax to help the millions of yacht-less Americans struggling with student loan debt."

Hey, Liz! It's none of your damned business how Snyder spends his money.

NONE!

It is, however, rather ironic that you whine about student loan debt, which largely exists because of the high cost of a college education. Yet YOU were paid over $421,000/year by Harvard for teaching ONE freaking class!

So go have another beer, you big phony!

From: JTV
27-Jan-19
in 3-2-1 PutZ will be here to tell us all how we should spend our money .....

From: Dale06
27-Jan-19
Good for Snyder. Lots of people gained or will gain from that expenditure, from manufacturers of the boat and equipment, to suppliers of fuel, maintenance, food, etc. Reminds me of the joke that Snyder finally caved and will get rid of the obnoxious name Washington Redskins. From here forward, his football team will be called The Redskins.

27-Jan-19
^^^^^I like it!^^^^^

Hypocrisy knows no bounds in liberal policy.

From: NvaGvUp
27-Jan-19
Dale,

Right on!

Iron workers, iron ore miners, steel mill workers, plumbers, lathers, carpenters, electricians, etc. etc., etc. all benefit from building this yacht.

Even if the broker who put this all together were to get 10% (it won't be that much), the government would spend three-four times that much just to administer Warren's bill.

So not only would the overhead be multiple times higher for such a government-run bailout, her proposed bill would deny the hundreds and hundreds men and women who build that yacht $90,000,000 in wages. It would also have a multiplier effect on all of the folks who provide the goods and services those workers would spend that $90,000,000 on.

Then there's this:

If you took out a student loan, IT IS NOT SOMEONE ELSE'S RESPONSIBILITY TO PAY OFF THAT LOAN.

IT'S YOUR RESPONSIBILITY!!!!!!!

From: NvaGvUp
27-Jan-19
She was paid $421,000/year and she got the job because she was a Cherokee, right?

OK, so actually, she is, at most, 1/1024 Cherokee or more likely of some other Native American heritage.

Most Americans are.

So, let's do the math:

If she got $421,000 for being 1/1024 Indian, she would have been paid $421,000 x 1024 = $431,104,000/year had she been a full-blooded Cherokee (or at least of some other Indian blood).

Right, Liz?

No wonder she's angry!

From: Tonybear61
27-Jan-19
She is just pissed or jealous cause she will never step foot on that yacht.

I remember many years ago when a University professor and CFO of a local HVAC company invited a bunch of us Community college classmates out for a Halloween shindig. Nice place out in a gated community, worth mega millions. During tours everyone at a much lower wage bracket was impressed. Nice folks. One of my colleagues upon completing the tour (she was cute as a button) stated, "..really nice place you have here, kinda out in sticks though ain't it??"" Classic as the martial arts training we all were involved in transcended all age, wage and racial brackets.. We also had some fun on another guys $ multi-million house boat , nice guy, not arrogant, made his own way through life and his wealth. Nobody's business how he spent his money and who got invited on the boat. The thing these folks had in common was wealth, working for it and of course bowhuntng...

27-Jan-19
This sort of class warfare is the kind of things that starts civil wars. It's unfortunate that politicians are literally talking trash on individuals who've been successful in life, irrespective of how much they think they should be taxed.

From: BIG BEAR
27-Jan-19
You rich guys should pay for a hunt for me......:-)

From: Tiger eye
27-Jan-19
Maybe she should ask George Soros to fork out some of his most favorite dollars

From: NvaGvUp
27-Jan-19
"You rich guys should pay for a hunt for me......:-) "

That would be only 'fair!'

Right, Paul Zeidan, Fauxahontas, AOC?

From: TT-Pi
27-Jan-19
It's not easy to be from Ma. I'll just read and enjoy. Thank you.

Regarding Taxes from the super-rich. Go ahead and ask, some may say yes. Force it by law and most will just go away. You would think we all know that by now.

From: NvaGvUp
27-Jan-19
But, but, but...….

Our economic genius here, aka 'Paul Zeidan,' says the actual and supportable data we posted here showing we'd be killing the Golden Goose if the policies he advocates for were implemented is 'irrelevant.'

NO, I am NOT making this up!

He really IS that stupid.

Go help us all!

From: Owl
27-Jan-19
$100,000,000 yacht puts a lot of people to work and generates a lot of tax revenue vertically through it's construction (any potential sales tax notwithstanding). And, in Danny's defense, if I owned the 'Skins, I'd head out to sea, too.

From: HDE
27-Jan-19
$100,000,000 used to help pay for student loans? What an idiot.

Harvard professor? Hardly, unless the students at Harvard are getting ripped off and should ask for a refund...

From: HedgeHunter
27-Jan-19
She means student loans going forward not looking rearward.

In other words......

Free University Tuition for all.

Socialists will forgo that debt Give universities a dime on a dollar and restart the game.

HH~

From: Glunt@work
27-Jan-19
I don't have any student loan debt, does she just write me check I can use as I wish or how will that work? Surely people who have voluntary debt they are struggling to pay off won't get treated better than someone like me who didn't put themselves in that position?

From: NvaGvUp
27-Jan-19
"Just Pay It!"...……..

AOC, when asked where the money would come from to pay for all of the 'free $hit' she advocates for.

From: HedgeHunter
27-Jan-19
Sure. Double click and its paid, right?

HH~

From: Annony Mouse
05-Feb-19
Poor Liz.

The paper trail of her "ancestry" will be a factor in her seat in the clown car of Democrat candidates. Seems that there is further documentation that she manufactured her cultural minority status beginning in Texas when she applied to the state bar:

Elizabeth Warren Claimed to be a Native American on Her Texas Bar Application

From link:

"...early in her career, creating the paper trail that would permit her to do start advertising herself as a Person of Color..."

From the Boston Globe link above the tweet:

But as Warren undergoes increased scrutiny as a presidential candidate, additional documents could surface to keep the issue alive.

Using an open records request during a general inquiry, for example, The Post obtained Warren's registration card for the State Bar of Texas, providing a previously undisclosed example of Warren identifying as an ‘"American Indian."

Warren filled out the card by hand and signed it. Dated April 1986, it is the first document to surface showing Warren making the claim in her own handwriting. Her office didn't dispute its authenticity.

So we're to assume she started creating her very dubious paper trail -- like someone trying to pass a forged painting by creating a phony chain-of-sale provenance -- but then didn't use this in her application materials?..."

05-Feb-19
My children are 1/8 Cherokee as their great-grandfather was full-blooded Cherokee. Neither they nor we claim they are anything but "white" on any form. Even their mom, who's 1/4 Cherokee, put's "white" when asked, on forms.

From: gflight
05-Feb-19

gflight's embedded Photo
gflight's embedded Photo
Why didn't she use her White Privilege?

From: HDE
05-Feb-19
"...the clown car of Democrat candidates."

I'm sorry, that is just plain funny to say :^)

From: Woods Walker
05-Feb-19
More like a clown train!

From: NvaGvUp
06-Feb-19
gflight,

That's priceless.

Perhaps Texas should revoke her law license given she lied on her application.

06-Feb-19
She apologized to everyone so it's okay now. She should be kicked out of office for fraud. If she was Republican the Demons would be demanding she step down.

06-Feb-19
At best, that form is very disingenuous. At worst, it's a straight up lie. Even if she were 1/8 Native American, she's 7/8 white, and since she cannot even claim a great-grandparent was full-blooded Native (most people know the ancestry of their great-grandparents because their grandparents generally know their own parents pretty well...) then that means she's most likely 1/16th or less.

That claim on that form is a slap in the face to Native American pride and history, especially since she has no cultural ties to the Tribe.

From: NvaGvUp
06-Feb-19
According to the DNA results she stupidly released last year, she is, AT MOST 1/1024 Indian, which is at a minimum, what the vast majority of Americans are.

06-Feb-19
I thought it was between 1/8 and 1/1024

From: 70lbdraw
06-Feb-19
We should go back and punish her for the last 30 years of her life. I mean, that's what happens to people that mimmiced black folks 30 years ago. What's the difference ?

From: Annony Mouse
06-Feb-19
From the Actions Have Consequences (eventually) Department:

RNC Chair Asks State Bar of Texas to Discipline Elizabeth Warren for Lying about Heritage

RNC Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel has filed a grievance against Sen. Elizabeth Warren with the State Bar of Texas after it was revealed the Senator once claimed to be American Indian on her registration card.

The Hill writes that McDaniel “called that a misrepresentation and wrote to the state bar’s chief disciplinary counsel to argue the senator had failed to correct her registration card from 1986, and therefore violated the state’s requirements that applicants have ‘good moral character and fitness.'”

McDaniel wrote to the Texas Bar, “Attorney Warren is now apologizing for misrepresenting herself as an ‘American Indian’ or Native American throughout her career.”

She continued, “It has now been thirty-three (33) years since she made this representation to the Texas Bar and has never made an attempt to correct her registration card. Therefore it is clear that Attorney Warren lacked the ‘Good Moral Character’ required for admission to the Texas Bar and should be disciplined for her three (3) decades of untruthfulness.”

The Washington Post revealed yesterday that Warren listed herself as “American Indian” on her Texas Bar registration card...

From: NvaGvUp
07-Feb-19
70lb draw.

I don't equate blatant lying in hopes of advancing your career with making stupid social faux pas.

From: slade
07-Feb-19

slade's Link
Last night on Tucker Carlson’s show, the Herald’s Howie Carr laid out the process by which Warren tested out her lie (Carr appropriately calls it a “grift”) about her heritage (video below):

…we’re starting to find out the outlines of this grift. Like a small-time criminal starts with shoplifting. She starts with the cookbook, the plagiarized recipes. Now she’s files the application with the Texas bar. Nobody calls her out on it. So, she just keeps upping the ante, a year later she puts in that she’s an Indian in the law school directory. And she’s suddenly at the University of Pennsylvania and Harvard making major wampum for many moons. She’s done now. She’s announcing her candidacy on Saturday and then to seven states. She apologized nine times today in that press conversation. Four minutes, nine times she used the word apology. She has a better chance of being president of the Cherokee nation than president of the United States.

From: one-eye
07-Feb-19
Big Bear- "You rich guys should pay for a hunt for me......:-)" Ever been after Snipe? It's great fun. :)

From: scentman
07-Feb-19
Maybe sir Edmund Hillary Clinton and Fauxahontis can start their own Party... Sir Hillary can drink Chablet and Faux can drink a beer.

From: JTV
07-Feb-19

JTV's Link
https://freebeacon.com/politics/the-timeline-of-elizabeth-warrens-native-american-controversy/

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D., Mass.) will announce Saturday she's officially running for president with a speech in Lawrence, Massachusetts, but she'll do it after another week of controversy surrounding her longtime claims of Native American ancestry.

The latest blow: The Washington Post reporting Warren wrote "American Indian" as her race for her State Bar of Texas registration card in 1986. It marked the first known example of Warren making such a claim in her own handwriting. She apologized Tuesday in response to the report for identifying herself with that race, both then and when she taught law at Harvard, the University of Texas, and the University of Pennsylvania.

This followed her widely panned DNA test release in October, which was intended to offset criticisms by President Donald Trump to prove her claims of Native ancestry. She wound up having to apologize to the Cherokee Nation for "causing confusion on tribal sovereignty and tribal citizenship," according to a tribal spokeswoman.

Here's a timeline of key moments and quotes in Warren's saga of claims to Native American ancestry.

1984: Warren contributes five recipes to a "Pow Wow Chow" cookbook in Oklahoma and is identified as "Cherokee" under each of them.

April 18, 1986: Warren lists her race as "American Indian" on her State Bar of Texas registration card. She does so by writing the words out in blue ink.

1986 to 1995: Warren lists herself as a minority in the Association of American Law Schools desk book, when she taught law at the University of Texas and later the University of Pennsylvania before joining Harvard Law School in 1995. In an April 30, 2012 report in the Boston Globe, a Warren spokeswoman says she was simply "proud of her heritage."

Sept. 14, 2011: Warren announces she's running for the Democratic nomination for the U.S. Senate to challenge Republican Sen. Scott Brown.

April 27, 2012: The Boston Herald reports Harvard Law School officials touted Warren as a minority hire on their faculty because of her claim of Native American ancestry. Warren's campaign said she never authorized Harvard to make that claim.

The Herald reported "campaign aides … scrambled but failed to produce documents proving her family lineage," and they eventually said the stories of her Delaware and Cherokee Indian ancestry were passed down through family lore.

According to the Boston Globe, The Harvard Crimson in 1996 quoted a law school spokesman saying the faculty of 71 included one Native American: Warren.

May 2, 2012: Warren tells reporters that being Native American "has been a part of my story, I guess since the day I was born," and she goes on to talk about how her grandfather "had high cheekbones, like all of the Indians do." Those cheekbones were then passed on to her mother, she said.

"I have lived in a family that has talked about Native America, talked about tribes, since I’ve been a little girl," she said, according to the Washington Post. "I still have a picture on my mantle at home, and it’s a picture of my mother’s dad, a picture of my grandfather, and my Aunt Bee has walked by that picture at least a 1000 times, remarked that her father, my Pappa, had high cheekbones, like all of the Indians do, because that’s how she saw it, and your mother got those same great cheekbones, and I didn’t. And she though this was the bad deal she had gotten in life. Being Native American has been a part of my story, I guess since the day I was born, I don’t know any other way to describe it."

She added she listed herself as a minority in past professional directories "because I thought I might be invited to meetings where I might meet more people who had grown up like I had grown up."

May 15, 2012: Politico reports a 1997 Fordham Law Review piece described Warren as Harvard Law School's first "woman of color."

June 2012: A group of Cherokee women critical of Warren's claims say they try to meet with her. She dodges the group and accuses them of being paid by right-wing forces connected to Scott's Brown campaign, Indian Country Today reported.

Twila Barnes, a Cherokee genealogist, says it's an outrageous assertion.

"We are smart Native women who did this on our own, and we are plenty smart enough to figure out that Warren has been less than truthful and now doesn’t want to talk about it. She doesn’t want to give us Native women that credit, yet she calls herself a Native woman. That’s just wrong," she told Indian Country Today.

Sept. 20, 2012: Brown rips Warren during a debate for claiming to be a Native American or person of color. "As you can see, she's not," he says.

Warren says again she relied on family lore, and adds, "This is my family, this is who I am, and it’s not going to change."

Nov. 6, 2012: Warren defeats Brown by more than 7 points to become the first female U.S. Senator ever elected in Massachusetts.

April 22, 2014: Warren releases her memoir A Fighting Chance. She addresses the dust-up over her Native American claims and writes she was stunned by Republican attacks on her.

"Knowing who you are is one thing, and proving who you are is another," she wrote.

May 21, 2014: Warren joins Senate Democrats in signing a letter to NFL commissioner Roger Goodell urging the league to push the Washington Redskins to change their name.

March 21, 2016: As he gets closer to clinching the 2016 Republican presidential nomination, Trump refers to Warren as "the Indian" after she goes on a tweetstorm calling him a "loser" and a threat to the United States.

May 6, 2016: Warren slams Trump for "recycling Scott Brown's hate-filled attacks on my family."

Elizabeth Warren ? @ewarren If you think recycling Scott Brown's hate-filled attacks on my family is going to shut me up, @realDonaldTrump, think again buddy. Weak.

21K 6:44 PM - May 6, 2016 Twitter Ads info and privacy 8,163 people are talking about this May 14, 2016: Trump refers to Warren as "Pocahontas" in a New York Times interview. He's since tweeted the attack 15 times and repeatedly referred to her by the name in rallies and speeches. Most Americans think of the 1995 Disney movie when they hear the name, but the film sharply diverged from the historical record about her. Native Americans groups have expressed their view that Trump's use of the term is offensive and it's frequently called a slur in media reports.

June 9, 2016: The last Senate Democratic woman to do so, Warren endorses Hillary Clinton for the presidency.

June 28, 2016: The Washington Post Fact Checker declines to offer a rating for Trump's "Pocahontas" slams or accusations Warren lied about her heritage.

"We found that Warren’s relying on family lore rather than official documentation to make an ethnic claim raised serious concerns about Warren’s judgment," reporter Michelle Ye He Lee wrote.

Nov. 27, 2017: Trump is harshly criticized after re-upping the "Pocahontas" jab at a White House event honoring Native American veterans and code talkers.

"We have a representative in Congress who they say was here a long time ago. They call her Pocahontas," he said.

Nov. 30, 2017: Activist Rebecca Nagle pens a scathing op-ed for ThinkProgress, entitled "I am a Cherokee woman. Elizabeth Warren is not," in a rare example of an attack on a Democrat from the left-wing website.

"Warren’s misrepresentation of her heritage has major consequences for Native Americans, who have little visibility not only in politics, but in American culture at large," she wrote. "Warren’s claims of Cherokee identity make her the only representation of Cherokees that the average American will likely ever see."

Feb. 14, 2018: "Let's talk about Pocahontas:" Warren speaks to the National Congress of American Indians and discusses the discrimination Native Americans face and how Trump's "Pocahontas" attacks are hurtful. She also tells her family story again and promises to use political attacks against her as a way to "lift up" Native families.

"I’m here today to make a promise: Every time someone brings up my family’s story, I’m going to use it to lift up the story of your families and your communities," she said.

March 6, 2018: The Berkshire Eagle, a Massachusetts newspaper, calls on Warren in an op-ed to take a DNA test and put the matter to rest for good.

"All the senator needs to do is spit into a tube, wait a few weeks and get her answer. No matter if the test came up negative or positive, it would constitute a plus for Warren and her political hopes," the paper wrote.

March 12, 2018: In Sunday show appearances on CNN's "State of the Union," Fox New's "Fox News Sunday," and NBC's "Meet the Press," Warren retells, using almost the exact same language each time, the story of her how her parents met and the discrimination her part-Native American mother faced.

"It's a part of me, and nobody's going to take that part of me away," she said.

July 5, 2018: At a rally in Montana, Trump imagines a debate with Warren where he tosses her a DNA test kit in the middle of it after she claims Native American heritage.

"And we will very gently take that kit, and slowly toss it, hoping it doesn't injure her arm, and we will say: I will give you a million dollars to your favorite charity, paid for by Trump, if you take the test and it shows you're an Indian," he said.

Sept. 1, 2018: The Boston Globe publishes a lengthy report concluding Warren's ethnicity claims played no role in her hirings during her legal career.

Oct. 15, 2018: Warren rolls out a slickly produced video taking direct aim at Trump's "Pocahontas" attacks. Warren narrated her upbringing in Oklahoma and how her father fell head over heels in love with his mother at first sight, but his family disapproved because she was part Native American.

The video reiterates Warren's heritage had no bearing on her hiring during her legal teaching career, and it concludes with her getting the results of a DNA test showing she had a "Native American ancestor in her pedigree," between six and 10 generations back. It could make her as little as 1/1,024th Native American.

She wonders in the video if she has been attacked regarding her heritage because some people view politics as a "bloodsport."

However, the backlash is swift, with conservatives mocking the results themselves and liberals fuming that Warren's played into Trump's hands and distracted from the midterm elections less than a month away. Others condemn her for entering the messy world of race science.

Oct. 15, 2018: Cherokee Nation secretary of state Chuck Hoskin, Jr., releases a statement slamming Warren for taking and releasing the test, calling it "useless to determine tribal citizenship."

"Using a DNA test to lay claim to any connection to the Cherokee Nation or any tribal nation, even vaguely, is inappropriate and wrong. It makes a mockery out of DNA tests and its legitimate uses while also dishonoring legitimate tribal governments and their citizens, whose ancestors are well documented and whose heritage is proven," he continued. "Senator Elizabeth Warren is undermining tribal interests with her continued claims of tribal heritage."

Oct. 21, 2018: Warren says at a Senate debate that she released the test for the benefit of public trust.

Nov. 6, 2018: Warren is easily reelected to a second term in the Senate.

Dec. 6, 2018: The New York Times reports Warren publicly stands by the test, but she also "has privately expressed concern" that she miscalculated the damage she had done to her relationships with Native Americans and activists through releasing it.

Dec. 31, 2018: Warren announces she's formed an exploratory committee to run for president in 2020.

Jan. 5, 2019: An Iowa voter scolds Warren over the DNA test during her swing through the first caucus state, asking her why she gave Trump "more fodder to be a bully." Warren didn't apologize, although she stipulated she was not a "person of color" and said she'd made the decision to "put it all out there" regarding her background after Republican criticisms dating back to 2012.

"I can’t stop Donald Trump from what he’s going to do. I can’t stop him from hurling racial insults. I don’t have the power to do that," she said.

Jan. 13, 2019: Trump mocks Warren's Instagram video where she drank a beer in her kitchen, tweeting if she "did this commercial from Bighorn or Wounded Knee instead of her kitchen, with her husband dressed in full Indian garb, it would have been a smash."

His tweet angered Native Americans given his flippant reference to Wounded Knee, the site of a massacre of American Indians by U.S. military members in 1890.

Feb. 1, 2019: Reports emerge Warren privately apologized to Cherokee Nation's principal chief Bill John Baker for releasing the DNA test.

"I told him I was sorry for furthering confusion about tribal citizenship," Warren said later. "I am also sorry for not being more mindful about this decades ago. We had a good conversation."

Feb. 5, 2019: The Washington Post reports Warren wrote "American Indian" as her race for her State Bar of Texas registration card in 1986. She apologized for identifying herself that way.

"I can’t go back," Warren told the Washington Post. "But I am sorry for furthering confusion on tribal sovereignty and tribal citizenship and harm that resulted."

NBC News reporter Geoff Bennett called it the "textbook definition of cultural appropriation."

Geoff Bennett ? @GeoffRBennett The textbook definition of cultural appropriation: "The Post obtained Warren’s registration card for the State Bar of Texas, providing a previously undisclosed example of Warren identifying as an 'American Indian.'" https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/elizabeth-warren-apologizes-for-calling-herself-native-american/2019/02/05/1627df76-2962-11e9-984d-9b8fba003e81_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.21325e97ebf1 …

44 7:35 AM - Feb 6, 2019 Twitter Ads info and privacy

Elizabeth Warren apologizes for calling herself Native American The discussion with the chief of the Cherokee Nation went beyond her controversial DNA test.

washingtonpost.com 19 people are talking about this Feb. 6, 2019: Warren tells reporters she's apologized for not being more "sensitive" about the distinction between her claims and what constitutes being in a tribe.

She suggests she identified her race as "American Indian" on other forms than the State Bar form from Texas, telling reporters in the Capitol, "During this time period, this is consistent with what I did, because it was based on my understanding from my family's stories."

The Republican National Committee urges the Texas Bar to discipline Warren for falsely representing herself.

Feb. 9, 2019: Warren will officially announce she's running for president of the United States.

From: K Cummings
07-Feb-19
This may just be a rumor but I heard that Elizabeth Warren is going to announce that she will choose Rachel Dolezal as her running mate. It will be the first all female, Native American / African American ticket in history.

KPC

From: TT-Pi
07-Feb-19
So she is saying she comes from a long line of Liars on her mother's side and prejudice people on her Fathers side? What a Proud history, thanks Mom and Dad.

07-Feb-19
I can't imagine her getting the Democratic Nomination after this. During the debates, if she's catching any steam, the 1 or 2 guys right below here will roast her with this. She's lost all credibility to reasonable people already, but they'll tear her to bits in 2020.

07-Feb-19
My mistake about the "1/8th" comment. The above report says between 6-10 generations ago. That'd mean that the most she could be would be 1/64th. Even that would mean she's at least 63/64ths white. So, again, see my post about my children who are 1/8th Cherokee.

From: 70lbdraw
07-Feb-19
"I don't equate blatant lying in hopes of advancing your career with making stupid social faux pas."

Kyle, my point was; if Warren were a Republican, the Dems would tar and feather her. Not over the fact that she lied, (Dems naturally lie on a regular basis, Warren included) but instead calling her a racist, a bigot, etc., etc., etc. They'd simply use the situation to shame her out of office. Morals don't matter when it comes to the Lefties.

From: spike78
07-Feb-19
You guys seem to forget that the dems don’t care what kind of scumbag is nominated unless you forgot about Hillary. I know all the libs here in MA would still vote for her even if she molested a child it doesn’t matter.

From: Annony Mouse
07-Feb-19
Liz is about to be shoved into the trunk of the Democrat clown car of 2020 wannabes...

Elizabeth Warren admits there may be more ‘American Indian’ documents to drop

  • Sitka Gear