onX Maps
Headline of Day, Gorbal Hockey Edition
Community
Contributors to this thread:
NvaGvUp 05-Mar-19
Annony Mouse 05-Mar-19
Woods Walker 05-Mar-19
kentuckbowhnter 06-Mar-19
NvaGvUp 06-Mar-19
NvaGvUp 06-Mar-19
gflight 06-Mar-19
NvaGvUp 06-Mar-19
KSflatlander 06-Mar-19
NvaGvUp 06-Mar-19
kentuckbowhnter 06-Mar-19
elkmtngear 06-Mar-19
KSflatlander 06-Mar-19
NvaGvUp 06-Mar-19
elkmtngear 06-Mar-19
KSflatlander 06-Mar-19
elkmtngear 06-Mar-19
NvaGvUp 06-Mar-19
slade 07-Mar-19
Woods Walker 07-Mar-19
TRnCO 07-Mar-19
Woods Walker 07-Mar-19
TD 07-Mar-19
NvaGvUp 07-Mar-19
Fivers 07-Mar-19
NvaGvUp 07-Mar-19
one-eye 07-Mar-19
Annony Mouse 17-Mar-19
Annony Mouse 17-Mar-19
HA/KS 17-Mar-19
Annony Mouse 19-Mar-19
NvaGvUp 19-Mar-19
Annony Mouse 19-Mar-19
Annony Mouse 20-Mar-19
From: NvaGvUp
05-Mar-19
From USA Today:

"March sadness: Freezing cold for 220 million Americans, another big storm to blast California"

From: Annony Mouse
05-Mar-19
Peer-reviewed study reveals majority of scientists are skeptical of ‘global warming crisis’

Without the claimed “scientific consensus” on global warming or climate change, the Green New Deal becomes just another progressive con game, but with the highest stakes ever.

Writing in Forbes, James Taylor shows that the supposed 97% “scientific consensus” on global warming is false:

Don’t look now, but maybe a scientific consensus exists concerning global warming after all. Only 36 percent of geoscientists and engineers believe that humans are creating a global warming crisis, according to a survey reported in the peer-reviewed Organization Studies. By contrast, a strong majority of the 1,077 respondents believe that nature is the primary cause of recent global warming and/or that future global warming will not be a very serious problem.

The survey results show geoscientists (also known as earth scientists) and engineers hold similar views as meteorologists. Two recent surveys of meteorologists (summarized here and here) revealed similar skepticism of alarmist global warming claims.

According to the newly published survey of geoscientists and engineers, merely 36 percent of respondents fit the “Comply with Kyoto” model. The scientists in this group “express the strong belief that climate change is happening, that it is not a normal cycle of nature, and humans are the main or central cause.”

The authors of the survey report, however, note that the overwhelming majority of scientists fall within four other models, each of which is skeptical of alarmist global warming claims.

The genesis of the 97% figure was always questionable, but now, with an actual peer-reviewed study, it is time for the junk heap.

Shhhh! Nobody tell Ocasio-Cortez:

From: Woods Walker
05-Mar-19
Man caused global climate change is the new communism. P O W E R.......nothing more.

06-Mar-19
Remember when they said Y2K was going to shut down the world. Yeah, same thing with the cow farts etc.

From: NvaGvUp
06-Mar-19
WW is correct and it's what I've been saying for over two decades.

From: NvaGvUp
06-Mar-19
It was obvious to me from the start that the Globaloney scam was just that, a scam.

The Libs had just seen the USSR blown up by it's own socialist economic policies.

The Berlin Wall was torn down and Germany was re-united for the same reason.

China moved toward a more-or-less capitalistic model for its' economy because their socialist policies had also failed while Capitialist Hong Kong was thriving.

That meant the Libs could no longer use the USSR, China and eastern Europe as their models that would enable the government to run the economy.

As such, they defaulted to the "Global Warming and we're all going to DIE" mantra which, they hoped, would allow them to run economies by entering through the back door.

They were, as always, WRONG!

From: gflight
06-Mar-19

gflight's embedded Photo
gflight's embedded Photo
Almost Spring but not yet....

From: NvaGvUp
06-Mar-19
Rain and some hard snow here today.

Fortunately, it was a bit too warm for the snow to stick on the sidewalks and driveways.

12"+ up the mountain, however!

From: KSflatlander
06-Mar-19

KSflatlander's Link
It is FAKE NEWS that there is not a scientific consensus that climate change is real and likely due to human activities...however, I'm pretty sure you guys and the right wing nut talking heads are smarter than NASA.

"Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities. In addition, most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position. The following is a partial list of these organizations, along with links to their published statements and a selection of related resources." NASA

It's fake news fellas. There is a consensus in the scientific community. You can find the outliers all day long. There will always be some PhD somewhere that disagrees. And dissent is good and healthy in the science world. Is burning fossil fuels causing climate change...nobody can be 100% sure but there is a scientific consensus. But go ahead and keep listening to Hannity and Limbaugh because they fully understand climate science. They are fake news when it comes to climate change. I guess you all do like fake news as long as it fits your narrative...I mean Hannity's narrative.

Yeah, so I guess you can add NASA to Trumps deep state conspiracy along with the FBI and CIA. It's all a big conspiracy...lol. Good grief...think for yourselves and put down the fake news.

From: NvaGvUp
06-Mar-19
Sorry to disappoint you, KSFlatlander, but the so-called 'consensus' you've bought into includes input from thousands of scientists who are in no way scientists who are even remotely qualified to weigh in on Global Warming.

Is a chemist qualified? Is a micro-biologist qualified? Is a nuclear physicist qualified? Is a biologist qualified? Is a computer scientist qualified? etc, etc, etc.

The ONLY scientists who ARE qualified are those scientists who are experts in the sciences of meteorology, weather, etc.

And as Jack noted, of THOSE scientists, the large majority do NOT agree with the algore Gorbal Hockey crap!

06-Mar-19
so i guess since cnn gave the debate questions to the clinton campaign in advance they wont be allowed to cover any of it also?

From: elkmtngear
06-Mar-19
KS,

Can you tell me how much the average Global Temp has increased over the last 140 Years?

Allow me, it's 1.4 degrees Fahrenheit, a virtual "popcorn fart" during the time of the Industrial Revolution, and overshadowed many times in the History of Man prior to that.

I know...it's a dose of common sense...the Chicken Littles hate that!

From: KSflatlander
06-Mar-19

KSflatlander's Link
Sorry Kyle...it’s fake news.

“This study compiled a list of 1,372 climate scientists, and then looked at those who are "actively publishing" in the science of climate. They categorized the scientists as either "convinced" or "unconvinced" by the evidence. The results were that 97% of actively publishing climate scientists are convinced by the evidence of anthropogenic climate change. They also found that those scientists that were unconvinced had significantly fewer publications (in any science) than those that were convinced. This suggests that the (vocal) "unconvinced" group actually has done a lot less research.“

And by the way, all those scientists you listed are infinitely more quantified than Hannity or Limbaugh. Don’t listen to them Kyle. You’re a smart guy...research the consensus issue. It’s fake news.

From: NvaGvUp
06-Mar-19
I gave up on Hannity a great many years ago and haven't listened to Rush since 2012.

Sorry to burst your bubble, but that's the facts.

From: elkmtngear
06-Mar-19
1.4 degrees...

From: KSflatlander
06-Mar-19
No Hannity or Limbaugh, I always knew you were a smart guy...lol. Ok we will agree to disagree. I really don’t want to argue about this anyway. Later Kyle.

From: elkmtngear
06-Mar-19
Liberals NEED Global warming to be real...it's all they've got (besides racism and Socialism).

From: NvaGvUp
06-Mar-19
I gave up on Hannity because I think he's a populist and a phony.

He neither knows anything about The Constitution, nor gives a hoot about The Constitution.

I love Rush because he totally gets what the FF's intents were and understands and believes in The Constitution.

I only stopped listening to him after the jackass named Obama was re-elected and only because I was spending too much time on politics and needed a break.

From: slade
07-Mar-19
I'm waiting for the dems to tax the culprit of our weather woes, the sun...........

From: Woods Walker
07-Mar-19
Oh they won't tax the sun directly. What they'll tax is us, based on the surface area of skin we have for the amount of sunlight we absorb. AOC is no doubt "reasoning" this out as we speak. I mean, Obama and the Dems already rammed what is essentially a "breathing tax" up our tail ends with his health care tax......if you are alive...."breathing"....then you must pay it. No choice, no freedom.

From: TRnCO
07-Mar-19
why did the 1372 climate scientist change the term from "global warming" to "climate change"? Might have to do with the fact that the warming isn't happening on the scale that was predicted, remember the hockey stick theory? That hasn't happened! Now with the term climate change they can blame change, any change cooler or warmer, on Us, you and me.. Such a crock....

From: Woods Walker
07-Mar-19

Woods Walker's embedded Photo
Woods Walker's embedded Photo

From: TD
07-Mar-19
But..... if you let us tax you and give us your money.... we can make it all go away....

THAT is what this is all about.

These "scientists" have been caught in lies, data manipulation, dire predictions that not only inaccurate, but wildly false.... believing in anything they say is the definition of drinking the koolaid.... Kind of like "NOW I think Putz is telling the truth!"

NASA? I thought their mission was about Muslim outreach???

From: NvaGvUp
07-Mar-19
"NASA? I thought their mission was about Muslim outreach??? "

TD for the WIN!

From: Fivers
07-Mar-19
I'm sure that the high number of solar flares had little to do with the warming, same as the currently visualized lack of solar flares will now be causing cooling over the next couple of years. They are calling for a mini ice age now, with the lack of solar flares.

From: NvaGvUp
07-Mar-19

NvaGvUp's embedded Photo
NvaGvUp's embedded Photo

From: one-eye
07-Mar-19
So Annony Mouse links a study dated 3/4/19, and KSfLatlander links to studies dated from about 2004- 2010, with only a couple of more recent surveys (American Medical Association was 2015, and they are obviously smart guys invested with superior knowledge about climate change so we should believe them), none of which is as recent as 3/4/19.

Be a critical reader of all studies no matter what the source, and don't believe everything "they" tell you.

You be the judge....

From: Annony Mouse
17-Mar-19
From: Annony Mouse
17-Mar-19
The End of the Climate Hoax is Coming

The “elite” that are in positions of power in our country have decided to make a final push on climate change before being debunked in the future. The man-hater from Hawaii Mazie Hirono stated in the past week that the Green New Deal is recognition that climate change is happening and that we should not stick our heads in the sand. She has described President Trump, and his minions know zero about the subject and that they deny the “science” behind climate change. Since the subject has gone from global cooling to global warming, to climate change, it proves that those who are pushing the globalist agenda are the ones who profit from instilling fear in the world population. Looking to move the globalist agenda forward through intimidation and indoctrination are being used to force the program on the people who look to the talking points with skepticism.

Global warming talking points are inundating the country to the point where we now have low information liberal women telling us that they are so afraid that they can not see any reason to have children. Over the last 150 years, there has been global warming. Accepted by many scientists although the reason why is in dispute. Many climatologists and others in the climate change field agree that the climate and the global warming era we are in is regulated a great deal by the sun’s activity. The solar cycles over the past 60 years have been higher than average for the 1150 year period data collection period. The period of high solar activity in the 1970-1990 period is the cause of slightly rising temperatures. In the past 19 years with the decrease of solar activity, the temperatures have stabilized. The next cycles show a lack of sunspot activity called a “solar minimum” which will lead to cooler temperatures. Any sane climatologist must admit that solar energy input is more important than driving an SUV or pick up truck. Solar activity has been and will be more of a driving force on our climate than any globalist agenda they continue to lie to the people about.

They seem to think that they and they alone, by using governments to legislate the people back to the stone age can control nature. If they are so well versed on how to control the climate, why can’t they control hurricanes, or earthquakes or any other natural events that cause such damage to the Earth?

In 1992, Democratic Senator Tim Worth said:

“We have got to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic policy and environmental policy.”

Mikhail Gorbachev in 1996 :

“The threat of environmental crisis will be the international disaster key to unlock the New World Order.”

Our own State Department in 1992 demanded a global warming treaty even if there was no scientific evidence. Globalists have turned the global warming “science” into a state-sponsored corrupt religion to be used to bludgeon the world population to subjugate the community to the agenda of global governance.

Alexandria Ocasio Cortez and the other Climate fear mongers are nothing new, it has been going on since at least the 1950s as I have written about before and will continue using false facts and bought and paid for “scientists” and “celebrities” like Bill Nye the Science guy who never has been a reliable source of facts. It has gone so far that Senator Sheldon Whitehouse has put forward legislation to attempt to use the RICO Act for organizations, companies and people with who disagree with the faulty science of climate change.

The Green New Deal which is nothing more than a socialist wish list rants on about the 97% consensus among scientists. This has been thoroughly debunked before. A peer reviewed study by Organizational Studies has shown that only 36% of geoscientists and engineers believe that human caused climate change is true. A strong majority of those involved in the study of over a thousand responses believe that nature is responsible for the climate changes. Even the Wall Street Journal has called the Green New Deal being based on faulty science. In the words from the Wall Street Journal: “A large and growing number of distinguished scientists and engineers do not agree that drastic action on global warming are needed.”

Geologist Ian Palmer : “Climate change is a natural phenomenon. It has been going on for millions of years.”

Physicist Thomas Sheahan: “The science is NOT settled at all and it would be a great disservice to children to indoctrinate them with one currently-fashionable theory.

Dr. Will Happer, Princeton University Physicist and appointed to set up the Presidential Committee on Climate Change : “You should not let yourself be deceived by those who claim you are opposing “science”. Science has been badly hurt by the global warming cult.”

UNIPCC Tom Tripp: “Despite what you may have heard in the media, there is nothing like a consensus of scientific opinion that climate change is a problem.”

35 Year Senior Research Scientist for NASA Dr.Leonard Weinstein: “Any reasonable scientific analysis must conclude that the basic theory is wrong. The Earth will always heal itself. Climate is beyond our power to control. Earth doesn’t care about governments or legislation. You can find much actual global warming in present-day observations. Climate change is a matter of geologic time, something the earth routinely does on its own.”

Nobel Prize for Physics winner Dr. Robert B. Laughlin and a Research Scientist at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory: "The jig is up. The whole thing is a fraud. Perhaps what has doomed the Climategate fraudsters the most was their brazenness in fudging the data.”

Even the Russians are waking up to the lies of climate change. The head of the geomagnetic laboratory of the Russian Academy of Sciences has said: “Hundreds of billions of dollars have been wasted with the attempt of imposing an Anthropogenic Global Warming theory that is not supported by physical world evidence. AGW has been forcefully imposed by a barrage of scare stories and indoctrination that begins in elementary school textbooks."

Research Chemist William C. Gilbert: “The dysfunctional nature of the climate sciences is nothing short of a scandal. Science is too important for our society to be misused in the way it has been done within the climate science community. The global warming establishment has actively suppressed research results presented by researchers that do not comply with the dogma of the IPCC”

Atmospheric Physicist Dr, John Reed who has worked with Australia’s Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organization: “We maintain there is no reason whatsoever to worry about man-made climate change because there is no valid evidence that such a thing is happening.”

Climate Statistics Professor Dr. Caleb Rossiter of American University and an Obama Liberal in every sense of the word is now being shunned by the Democrat Party for being a climate skeptic. Once his climate skepticism becomes news in a Wall Street Journal op-ed in May 2014, he was terminated from his fellowship at the liberal Institute for Policy Studies after 23 years. He called the Nobel given to Al Gore the worst Nobel Prize since Henry Kissinger. Al Gore, along with Obama vilified people who disagreed on climate change and took steps like those against Dr. Rossiter to ruin lives and assure that publications would not publish and disagreement with those in power. Dr. Rossiter explained that Al Gore was supported by the progressive socialists in the party because they want to move away from an industrial society to a post-industrial, non-fossil fuel, post corporate society.It has been made clear that those pushing the false science of climate change from Congress to corporations will continue to maintain a zero tolerance policy in regards to climate skeptics. They will not debate nor even recognize that there may be those who read real facts concerning climate change and have a different point of view.

So, in an effort to ignore the facts as they are Crazy Mazie has declared that it is settled and those who are too ignorant to agree have their heads in the sand. Can you explain why these scientists mentioned above and many others do not deserve to be heard? Can you explain why those scientists that are ramming through climate change are allowed to manipulate facts and figures and put forth lies that lead to debacles like the Green New Deal? It is nothing more than a progressive socialist agenda that is one further step to the totalitarian power that the socialist demand and will be destroyed and thrown on the ash heap of history like the rest of socialism.

Related articles:

http://www.intellectualconservative.com/climate-control-nazis/

http://www.intellectualconservative.com/the-global-socialist-agenda-of-the-new-green-deal/

http://www.intellectualconservative.com/the-climate-change-hoax-continues/

From: HA/KS
17-Mar-19
Russia (and maybe China) funnel millions into environmental groups to help disrupt the US economy.

From: Annony Mouse
19-Mar-19
Polar bears may have quadrupled despite claims of scaremongers like al gore/

An inconvenient truth.

Via Daily Caller:

Polar bear numbers may have quadrupled in the last 50 years, according to a new book critiquing the alarmist predictions of polar bear population collapse.

“My scientific estimates make perfect sense and they tally with what the Inuit and other Arctic residents are seeing on the ground,” Susan Crockford, a Canadian zoologist, said in a statement Tuesday on her book’s release.

Crockford’s book, “The Polar Bear Catastrophe That Never Happened,” argues that, in contrast to the dire predictions made by experts over a decade ago, polar bears are thriving. In fact, she argues polar populations may have quadrupled since the 1960s from roughly 10,000 to 40,000.

“Almost everywhere polar bears come into contact with people, they are much more common than they used to be. It’s a wonderful conservation success story,” said Crockford, who’s also an adjunct professor at the University of Victoria in British Columbia.

From: NvaGvUp
19-Mar-19
“Almost everywhere polar bears come into contact with people, they are much more common than they used to be. It’s a wonderful conservation success story,”

Well, THAT'S an "Inconvenient Truth" if there ever was one, right algore?

From: Annony Mouse
19-Mar-19
Carrie and Jason have taken photo tour groups to Churchill, Manitoba to see the polar bears for the past several years. Have plans on guiding trips to Norway to do the same. They have some awesome photos from their trips.

From: Annony Mouse
20-Mar-19

  • Sitka Gear