Bowsite.com

Pundits, Progressives: Mueller Report ‘Explicit Invitation to Congress to Impeach the President’

This one cracks me up. next he'll be saying:

If Active Collusion Wasn’t Proven, I Think We Have ‘A Case of Passive Collusion’ , and If Passive Collusion Wasn't Proven, then We Have a Case For 'Almost Collusion', or ... or ... "I Wish There Was Collusion, ... or, or, ummm, "Confusion and Collusion" dammit "I really hate this guy, give me a minute, I'll think of something!"

The linked article lays out the ridiculous over reach of government when they can basically entrap you in a crime when you haven't committed one in the first place. I can see how that could be so abused. Fed believes you committed a crime (you didn't) and he can't prove you did, so he gets you into jail nonetheless by asking you about something embarrassing, difficult to explain, or appearing to be going in a direction that would make you think that they were asking about another phony crime and you lie or remember incorrectly and bam, you're in jail and hadn't committed a crime in the first place.

Idyll, the Trumpettes don't read well thanks for spelling it out for them....

The left is operating on a belief and use innuendo to declare Trump guilty of something...pure desperation. When it comes to crimes against the citizens of this country, they should look into a mirror.

Using their POV, Paul Zeidan is guilty of being a pedophile and drug peddler regardless of any evidence that he isn't.

By the way everyone in the 2016 election said this about him. You, who voted for him, chose to ignore it.

Prove me wrong.

So you're talking about yourself(ves) Ethan. FINALLY an honest statement from you(all).

Under which president did this actually occur if even a smidgen is true??

What? WHAT? I can't hear you. Oh wait it was Obama and he LET this happen?? It describes an unethical, dishonest, unpatriotic and immoral person. He welcomed and encouraged foreign adversaries to interfere in our elections. He lied and then lied again to cover up the original lie. He ordered others to lie for him. He pisses on justice. This phase can also be used to describe Mr. Obama and all his cronies and their attempted coup, Holder, Lynch, Hillary, Bill, Stoke, Struck , Page, key people in DOJ, FBI-like the spin so far?????

This investigation pissed away over 40 million in taxpayer money, after 2 1/2 years found a nothing burger. Grow up and go after the true criminals

Lmao!!!! This is great

Hmmm

Suppose a president directed SecDef to surround the Capitol with tanks and to arrest all opposition members of Congress, and suppose they patriotically disobey that order. As they should.

Wouldn’t that POTUS still have committed an impeachable offense?

Answer is yes. According to the law.

He is not a Lawyer and may not previously know the implications of some of his vocalizing but when it is important he does adjust his prior ideas into reasonable actions. ( allows for development of ideas , good judgement).

What the loonies want to do is hold him to the fire for having the ideas and process that he has. He is not guilty of anything that was put into action or not, for whatever reason ( good people that he chose to keep around himself or his final decision) It's the same thing. They are an extension of his Office and Actions. It's what they are paid to do.

If anyone was tried for thoughts or for weighing options we would all be in jail for those thoughts. That's all there is there, nothing more. But the loonies will claim sainthood and hold our President to an impossible standard while exempting themselves from the same.

Hypocrites and Vipers. Same old story.

Hint: There are books with statutes defining crimes. Instead of going to the latest democratic whining site, tell us what federal statutes were broken. Or admit you're making chit up again.

What alleged (real and proven) offense did the President order ? Mueller found none that could be prosecuted which is to say nothing that rises to the level of an impeachable offense . Keep in mind his prosecution approach/disposition is to paint a picture of guilt , as best he can. He admits there is nothing to prosecute.

And, the defense has not even spoken yet. They don't need to either. Cause there is no clear infraction. Your Hypothetical is nothing real.

No matter that he sought the help of foreign adversaries? No matter that he ordered his aides to lie repeatedly? No matter that he sought to fire Mueller and obstruct?

BK, you have zero respect for the rule of law and justice if you accept that report as exonerating trump. If you read that report and believe trump to be a victim or pure, you are naive at best. Maybe even ignorant. Yep. IGNORANT. You’re not alone though. I’ve met a few lawyers like that. Dishonest and ignorant.

"... The Conservative Treehouse asserts, and it's hard not to disagree, that Mueller may never testify before Congress. Because (as the invaluable Mark Levin has noted) his report is less a legal document than it is a 400-page New York Times op-ed..."