can Trump beat the replacement?
General Topic
Contributors to this thread:
4nolz@work 11-Feb-24
stealthycat 11-Feb-24
HDE 11-Feb-24
huntforever 11-Feb-24
DanaC 11-Feb-24
spike78 11-Feb-24
Jaquomo 11-Feb-24
Builder07 11-Feb-24
DanaC 11-Feb-24
boo711 11-Feb-24
Nyati 11-Feb-24
Recurve Man 11-Feb-24
Glunt@work 11-Feb-24
fdp 11-Feb-24
4nolz@work 11-Feb-24
Stix 11-Feb-24
HDE 11-Feb-24
Aspen Ghost 11-Feb-24
IdyllwildArcher 11-Feb-24
Landshark Launcher 11-Feb-24
Matt 11-Feb-24
sundowner 11-Feb-24
boo711 11-Feb-24
sundowner 11-Feb-24
Timex? 11-Feb-24
ahunter55 11-Feb-24
Recurve Man 11-Feb-24
LBshooter 11-Feb-24
Matt 12-Feb-24
boo711 12-Feb-24
sundowner 12-Feb-24
MichaelArnette 12-Feb-24
Matt 12-Feb-24
4nolz@work 12-Feb-24
4nolz@work 12-Feb-24
sticksender 12-Feb-24
Builder07 12-Feb-24
BowSniper 12-Feb-24
sundowner 12-Feb-24
Matt 12-Feb-24
BowSniper 12-Feb-24
4nolz@work 12-Feb-24
Will 12-Feb-24
BowSniper 12-Feb-24
Mike Turner 12-Feb-24
IdyllwildArcher 12-Feb-24
DanaC 12-Feb-24
sundowner 12-Feb-24
slade 12-Feb-24
DanaC 13-Feb-24
KsRancher 13-Feb-24
BowSniper 13-Feb-24
KsRancher 13-Feb-24
KsRancher 13-Feb-24
BowSniper 13-Feb-24
spike78 13-Feb-24
RutnStrut 13-Feb-24
Mint 13-Feb-24
Builder07 13-Feb-24
BowSniper 14-Feb-24
Will 14-Feb-24
BowSniper 14-Feb-24
MichaelArnette 14-Feb-24
IdyllwildArcher 14-Feb-24
MichaelArnette 14-Feb-24
spike78 14-Feb-24
IdyllwildArcher 14-Feb-24
MichaelArnette 14-Feb-24
BowSniper 14-Feb-24
spike78 14-Feb-24
sundowner 14-Feb-24
IdyllwildArcher 14-Feb-24
IdyllwildArcher 14-Feb-24
spike78 15-Feb-24
Will 15-Feb-24
Olde style 16-Feb-24
Hunts_with_stick 17-Feb-24
From: 4nolz@work
11-Feb-24
Im not worried about Kamala but she'll have challengers unless its a coupe at the convention.Im not as confident Trump can beat whoever it is-right now people are horrified at Bidens condition but if they get a viable option the undecideds may not pick Trump.

From: stealthycat
11-Feb-24
its crazy to think that 8-9 months from election a political party can put in place someone that can win a Presidential election

but Democrats / liberal voters are THAT et

I believe if Democrats put Taylor Swift on the ballots, she'd get 90 million votes just on party line voters and 15 million votes from her fans

sad isn't it ?

From: HDE
11-Feb-24
The best strategy the dems can do right now is to throw their weight behind a "moderate" candidate (if there is such a thing anymore) for the sole purpose of damage control. They full well know they've made an absolute mess of things and what they "planned" isn't going so well for them...

From: huntforever
11-Feb-24
Good thing Taylor Swift doesn't turn 35 until December of 2024! Yes, it is a sad place we our in. The powers that be have done a fantastic job of divide and conquer. 95% of the population will be blind sided by massive inflation and wealth destruction once they finish destroying the US dollar. My bet is they will blame it on the East (BRICS) and start WW3 to distract everyone while they pic up the pieces and move on to the next currency system with most of the wealth. Wash, rinse, and repeat! Very unfortunate that most don't realize all that is going on is just a distraction on multiple fronts so people don't see the truth.

11-Feb-24
all depends on who it is.

if joe is forced out...its going to be by people behind the scenes who are probably way to the left of even him. if its a moderate of any kind...the leftists will stay home. the democrats are in a predicament of their own making.

at the end of the day...trump is the devil we know...and by comparison things werent so bad under him.

From: DanaC
11-Feb-24

DanaC's embedded Photo
DanaC's embedded Photo
Kamala has the same chance as Pence - zero.

"by comparison things werent so bad under (Trump)"

Unfortunately his second term, should it come about, will be an utter disaster. Pettiness on a scale not seen in modern history.

From: spike78
11-Feb-24
Huntforever nailed it

From: Jaquomo
11-Feb-24
TDS on a scale not seen in modern history.

From: Builder07
11-Feb-24
90 million votes more than enough to beat anyone

11-Feb-24
"Unfortunately his second term, should it come about, will be an utter disaster. Pettiness on a scale not seen in modern history."

right. because he did all those other things that people like you predicted he would do in his first term...like appoint liberal sc justices...tank the economy...and start ww3...just to name 3 of 271,358 other things that never happened.

From: DanaC
11-Feb-24
Pretty much promised to destroy NATO.

From: boo711
11-Feb-24
I think getting rid of NATO or getting the US out of it is a big task for Trump. He wanted out before. I hate to think of the stuff Trump has been cooking up for his next term. I’m sure he has some doozies. I just hope Republicans still have control of the house at the end of the election. Don’t think they will take back control of the senate

From: Nyati
11-Feb-24
I don’t think Trump really wants to get out of NATO. He does want NATO countries to pay their NATO obligations.

Why should a country that’s already 34 trillion in debt be paying billions to protect countries that won’t even pay to protect themselves?

From: Recurve Man
11-Feb-24
I’d bet the farm Trump will be running against Michael Obama. Whoever ends up running against Trump doesn’t stand a chance of winning legitimately. We all know how that goes though.

Now all you election gurus can blast me about what I’ve said. You’ll never change my mind. We’ll see how many states shut down their tallying and have to hand count all the so called mail in ballots. Who by really knows how this election will turn out. I’m guessing 100% sham no matter who wins it. There’s a chance we won’t know who wins until December. Write it down and we’ll see this weekend bread brought back after the results.

Shane

11-Feb-24
"I don’t think Trump really wants to get out of NATO. He does want NATO countries to pay their NATO obligations."

i agree. threatening to pick up your ball and go home only works when they think you just might do it.

...the art of the deal :)

From: Glunt@work
11-Feb-24
The candidate will matter but not like it would on the GOP side. The Republican strategy prioritizes ideas and candidates. The Dems prioritize getting a higher vote tally. They are similar but different.

From: fdp
11-Feb-24
"who ever runs against Trump doesn't have a chance of winning legitimately"....absolutely delusional.

11-Feb-24
I think it’s a mistake to keep beating up Biden. the Republicans should just leave him alone. Everybody knows what he is. He’s been that way for 40 years. the Republicans are digging their own grave. the Dems will replace Biden with Mr. smiles and hair, Marxist Newsome.

the country is not paying attention and they will be fooled by a Gavin Newsome type without even digging into how his policies are ruining California.

so with a couple smiles and promises he will be the next president because he gets to say everything Biden did. He had nothing to do with?

“Independents” Are normally one issue voters and easily swayed.

So IMHO if Biden is pulled it gives the leftists a clean slate. Trump will lose.

From: 4nolz@work
11-Feb-24
I agree AS.The Republicans are doing their dirty work for them and will be seen as bullies on an old man.

From: Stix
11-Feb-24
When you sign into a treaty or agreement to join NATO, you are agreeing to spend 2% of your GDP on defense. If not, your not in NATO. Dont count on th US to expend it's money and precious lives to defend you if you dont want to defend yourself

From: HDE
11-Feb-24
"Trump will lose."

Many people said that about obama as well. Never speak in absolutes when it comes to a power struggle election...

From: Aspen Ghost
11-Feb-24
This would be the best opportunity in a long time for a third party candidate. Might not win but would sure shake things up.

11-Feb-24
I'm bad at foretelling the future, but I think there's a few people that the Dems could put in place that could beat Trump, including Michelle Obama amongst a couple others. I think Gavin Newsome, while maybe top of the Dem's list, would not be top of the electable list, but maybe I just feel that way because he's such a sleaze ball and I can't stand him.

The last election was 100% about an alternative to Trump when it came to nominating Biden. If the Dems can put someone up against Trump that most of their base and independent women can vote for, then they can win.

If they put out a super-woke leftist, then independents wont come out to vote and some will switch back to Trump.

11-Feb-24

Landshark  Launcher's embedded Photo
Landshark  Launcher's embedded Photo
I didn't know she had a twin brother. I bet on BIG Mike.

From: Matt
11-Feb-24
“If the Dems can put someone up against Trump that most of their base and independent women can vote for, then they can win.”

That is my sense. As much as the U.S. has seen 3 years of Biden to base their decision on, they also have the same for Trump and the Republican Party. My sense of the dems put up a credible woman, they will pull enough voters who are disgusted with Trump and some Republican women would “cross the aisle” to vote for a woman and for reproductive “rights”.

From: sundowner
11-Feb-24
"Pretty much promised to destroy NATO."

I hope so, or at least force other NATO members to pay for their own defense.

The UN is what needs to be kicked off of our shores and abandoned.

From: boo711
11-Feb-24
@ Matt. I have a bunch of women in my family, nieces, aunts, sisters who will not vote Republican if they want to do away with abortion. Trump has lost probably 20 votes in my family. I think abortion will be a huge issue come election time and it could be the downfall of the Republicans come November

From: sundowner
11-Feb-24
" I have a bunch of women in my family, nieces, aunts, sisters who will not vote Republican if they want to do away with abortion."

Why do all your female family members want to kill their babies?

From: Timex?
11-Feb-24
Hard to separate the issue into two aspects,,,,,,but I honestly don't think anyone "wants" to kill a baby......think it's more about not having their choices involving their own body controlled by the government.

And especially by a bunch of rynos that should be fired for the pitiful job they've been doing lately

From: ahunter55
11-Feb-24
I watched Trump speak at the California Republican GOP today. They guy was non stop talking about everything California (an more). Mentioned many people & never a misstep or a "pause" to think.. Our country is wrong in letting Biden run our country (Not). He is inept for what ever reason. Only in Politics does someone like this keep their job. Trump made some funnies today & a couple were about his "hair". Imagine that.. I say those who think Biden is it, you are wrong, plain & simple.

From: Recurve Man
11-Feb-24
Boo sorry to hear your family’s so lost.

Shane

From: LBshooter
11-Feb-24
Well if joenis unable and the African American VP doesn’t get the nod then doesn’t that make the democrats racialists? Oh yea we knew that the whole time lol Dems had the gift from the special prosecutor but screwed it up this week defending joes ability , what idiots . Plus it’s too late for someone less to get in the ballots, there are deadlines .

From: Matt
12-Feb-24
“Why do all your female family members want to kill their babies?”

The same reason people who support 2nd amendment rights want to kill everyone they meet.

12-Feb-24
Matt, your analogy is not congruent. There are millions of abortion per year.

How many pro gun advocates are involved in murdering people.

From: boo711
12-Feb-24
My family members don’t want to have abortions. But they want to have the right to do what they want would their body. I can respect that. My point was I think this will be a huge issue come November. Just like it was a big issue in 22 midterms and was one of the reasons there wasn’t the big red wave

From: sundowner
12-Feb-24
"But they want to have the right to do what they want would their body."

Oh. I see. They want the right to kill their unborn babies if they choose to.

I wonder where that right would stop....at birth perhaps? Would a short trip thru the birth canal save a human being's life, or would the right to choose to kill extend beyond that event......say....to a human child born with crossed eyes or some other minor defect that required, in the judgment of parents or doctors, the death penalty?

12-Feb-24
The democrats will 100 percent replace Biden by September. I’d put money on it. In doing so they will bypass the primary election, which is something they’ve done the last 3 elections. If I was a democrat I’d be pissed at the DNC hand picking candidates

I think if they do replace Biden and Harris there is a strong chance for a democratic win. At some level I’m ok with that because the economic disaster propped up with inflation is likely to implode and will be blamed on the next president. I think this administrations policies need to finish unraveling for true reform and to open people’s eyes

12-Feb-24
There are a few moderate Democrat governors that I think most people could get behind at this point. because everything is so off the rails.

Biden is the only candidate that Trump can beat so if I had to put money down I would say we Republicans are screwed

and better focus on the house and Senate

From: Matt
12-Feb-24
“Matt, your analogy is not congruent. There are millions of abortion per year.”

You missed the point. People can feel strongly about defending rights and privileges, even if they do not want to partake in them themselves.

I know many people past their child-bearing years who don’t agree with a bunch of old white men dictating what women can and cannot do with their bodies.

Not to mention the hypocrisy of deny abortions while actively working against the social safety nets that may be needed if women are denied abortions.

But the bigger issue is that Republican pandering to a minority of their base and then rubbing it in the face of the opposition when they eke out political wins may continue to cost them elections as it did during the most recent mid-terms.

From: 4nolz@work
12-Feb-24
Single issue voters will never change their mind.The SCOTUS (described as GOP) did not make abortion they just made it a States Rights issue like it should have always been

From: 4nolz@work
12-Feb-24
Single issue voters will never change their mind.The SCOTUS (described as GOP) did not make abortion illegal they just made it a States Rights issue like it should have always been.

From: sticksender
12-Feb-24

sticksender's embedded Photo
sticksender's embedded Photo
I've been wearing the hoodie version.

From: Builder07
12-Feb-24
Abortion and social issues are on the bottom of every poll out there by many polling Orgs.

From: BowSniper
12-Feb-24
Women already have control of their bodies. They decide when to have sex, they know how to get pregnant and they know how to avoid it. They can even take a morning-after pill if they screw up all the previous steps....

I just don't understand why they choose to make a baby, and then choose to kill it.

*note - some Democrat "women" are biological men, where none of the above applies

From: sundowner
12-Feb-24
^ Well said BowSniper! ^

From: Matt
12-Feb-24
"Women already have control of their bodies. They decide when to have sex, they know how to get pregnant and they know how to avoid it. They can even take a morning-after pill if they screw up all the previous steps.... I just don't understand why they choose to make a baby, and then choose to kill it."

I don't understand why some people care so much about something that has no affect on them, and yet here we are.

Your response glosses over state laws which prohibit abortion in cases of rape or incest (where women do not have control over their own bodies), in cases where fetuses have genetic conditions that make them non-viable, that a Texas judge issued an ineffective order revoking the FDA approval of the morning after pill (which still has not been resolved), or state laws under which physicians can be held liable for performing court-approved abortions.

But I guess forcing a woman to carry a fetus to term that is destined to die shortly after birth helps you sleep better at night.

From: BowSniper
12-Feb-24
Matt - I'll give you every abortion for rape and incest, and every abortion for a non-viable damaged baby that would not survive out of the womb as legal forever.

And you give up the other 97% of abortions for sheer laziness and convenience. Deal????

From: 4nolz@work
12-Feb-24
I've never been as sickened as watching the Hilary and the NY lawmakers stand and cheer for POST BIRTH abortions

12-Feb-24
"I don't understand why some people care so much about something that has no affect on them, and yet here we are."

some people see their opposition to abortion as protecting the most vulnerable among us. should whether or not something affects us personally really matter?

i will never abuse my children...should i care if my neighbor is abusing his?

i doubt im ever going to be raped...should i care about whether its legal or not?

i doubt im never going to overdose on drugs...should i care about those that do?

im dont have any desire to own an AR15...should I care about whether they are legal or not?

in a civilized society...shouldnt everyone be concerned about things that affect society in general?

From: Will
12-Feb-24
Before another abortion law is passed, I want to see mandatory vasectomies for boys prior to high school, which can be reversed only once legally married. NOT before.

This will solve almost all abortions, straight up preventing them from happening.

However, since - once implemented - the ONLY abortions which occur will be due to medical conditions impacting the mother, nonviable fetus, or rapists who somehow slipped through the system, we can allow required medical interventions - be they abortion or not, as needed. Because in this case, the only ones left to be done are NEEDED.

Problem solved.

If not, then I want to see every single person complaining about this issue stand up to defend social support programs like food stamps and other "welfare" related funding, as well as education funding, school lunch/breakfast, community centers and youth programs, etc. I'm left to assume you also believe environmental protections are important as they reduce risk to embryo's and help protect living humans. If you believe every embryo should be born, no matter what, then I'm left to assume you are a strong supporter of those programs. That's great if you are. (No sarcasm in that part of this comment) Because it means you care about humans a lot, which is super!

From: BowSniper
12-Feb-24
Better yet.... require sterilization for everyone collecting welfare and food stamps. If people can't afford to take care of themselves, they certainly can't afford another mouth to feed.

And you might be surprised how many voluntary abortions magically go away.....

12-Feb-24
"Before another abortion law is passed, I want to see mandatory vasectomies for boys prior to high school, which can be reversed only once legally married. NOT before. This will solve almost all abortions, straight up preventing them from happening

gosh...if only we had a means to prevent unwanted pregnancy...that is cheap...effective...and readily available.

maybe someday...

From: Mike Turner
12-Feb-24
This is a done deal, The libtards will replace Biden with Michele Obama. This flows in with the last three years: puppeteers Barrack and Soros. He will make a perfect first lady and she obviously has the only set of balls in the family. While I say this with humor, The joke is on the American people...... another stolen election is coming.....

12-Feb-24
Unfortunately, vasectomy reversals are not nearly 100% effective. Sign your son up though, and I'm right behind you.

From: DanaC
12-Feb-24
" gosh...if only we had a means to prevent unwanted pregnancy...that is cheap...effective...and readily available. "

You mean like some sort of pill or implant? That's some science fiction stuff right there. And anyway, the antiabortion people will scream bloody murder if they have to provide cheap medical solutions to those nasty people who have sex and enjoy it.

From: sundowner
12-Feb-24
"the antiabortion people will scream bloody murder if they have to provide cheap medical solutions to those nasty people who have sex and enjoy it."

Isn't that called birth control pills? And even "morning after" pills?

From: slade
12-Feb-24

13-Feb-24
"you mean like some sort of pill or implant? That's some science fiction stuff right there. And anyway, the antiabortion people will scream bloody murder if they have to provide cheap medical solutions to those nasty people who have sex and enjoy it."

actually...i was thinking more along the lines of maybe a pill the girl could take to prevent ovulation...and maybe some sort of thin membrane the guy could wear on his unit in order to prevent his sperm from reaching her egg.

youre right though...thats some pretty science fictiony stuff...but as long as were dreaming...if we ever had such things...and we made them readily available to everyone who wants them... for very low or no cost...we could eliminate the need for the vast majority of abortions.

yeah...youre right...humans will probably be living on mars before anything like that is available.

From: DanaC
13-Feb-24
No, Ricky, we will be living on Mars before the tight asses agree to fund cheap birth control.

From: KsRancher
13-Feb-24
Yes we live in the best place on earth. But this country could be so much better. I look at abortion just like the border and probably most things our politicians deal with. The Democrat's wants a free for all when it comes to the abortion and the border. The Republicans want a zero. How hard would it be to sit down and find the workable middle ground and actually get something done to make things better. I would hope that 2/3 of the people in each party would think like that. But after seeing comments on here from some pretty hard Republicans I am guessing it's 2/3 of each party want it the other way. I am guessing I am the minority in the republican party. Just like someone like me thats a democrat would be the minority

13-Feb-24
"No, Ricky, we will be living on Mars before the tight asses agree to fund cheap birth control."

apparently youre already are living on mars.

bc is already cheap...if not free (at least to the person taking it).

medicaid covers it...obamacare plans cover it...planned parenthood will give it away...title x clinics will give it away...many health departments will give it away....college health centers give it away...many private organizations will give it away...etc...etc...etc.

if a person wants it...its available...they just dont bother.

surely...if a person has the wherewithal to get an abortion...the have the wherewithal to get birth control.

13-Feb-24
"The Republicans want a zero."

not this republican...both in terms of abortion and the border.

From: BowSniper
13-Feb-24
Do taxpayers really need to fund birth control so that people with zero discipline and morals (and self control) can screw like wild animals without consequence??

Heck, do taxpayers really need to fund gastric band surgery so that fat people can stop stuffing their faces until they explode?????

Same - Same

From: KsRancher
13-Feb-24
I have no problem helping to fund birth control.

From: KsRancher
13-Feb-24
But a big problem helping to fund wieght loss surgery. I don't see those issues even being remotely the same

From: BowSniper
13-Feb-24
Exactly the same issue really.... any personal failures will all boil down to a lack of willpower and self control.

From: spike78
13-Feb-24
I guess you guys would also agree to fund places where addicts can go and shoot up with a nurse available. Oh wait never mind already there.

13-Feb-24
” But a big problem helping to fund wieght loss surgery. I don't see those issues even being remotely the same.”

to the extent that they are both self inflicted, I see the connection.

the notion that the only alternative to unwanted pregnancies is to have an abortion (or bariatric surgery for obesity) is just plain ignorant…among other things.

From: RutnStrut
13-Feb-24
Highly unlikely there will be a replacement. Sleepy Joe would have to willingly bow out. When it comes to Trump he has too much ego for that. Plus his family and handlers aren't ready to retire that gravy train.

From: Mint
13-Feb-24
Who do the Dems have to run that isn't a bigger disaster then Biden? RFK, Williamson and Stein are going to pick up a lot of dem votes just like when a libertarian runs and spoils it for the Republicans.

From: Builder07
13-Feb-24
Dem's only have one or two that run in the middle of the socialist party.

Manchin and HRC. Both have tons of baggage.

From: BowSniper
14-Feb-24
If we only had Ross Perot in his prime....!!!

14-Feb-24
"If we only had Ross Perot in his prime....!!!"

if he ran as a third party candidate...no thanks.

From: Will
14-Feb-24
Ricky and I agree - no third party folks please. Just step aside and let the only party's with a shot have at it.

Somewhere above RFK was noted. I think he appeals more to R's at this point. I literally know zero D's (and I'm confident I interact with more D's than almost anyone on this page ha ha ha!) who like the guy, most are repulsed. The only folks I know (evenly loosely in the "friend of a friend on Facebook" sorta way) who seem to talk with any positivity about the guy are the deepest MAGA folks I know. My vibe on that dude, is that he will snag some votes from DJT and JB and is a moot point - though annoying.

The green party folks will get there 1-2% I'd suspect, but other than that, I think this will be a pretty straight forward election.

From: BowSniper
14-Feb-24
The wildcard to that might be the Dems arresting Trump or somehow taking him off the ballot. Nikki Haley and the big globalist donors are sticking around as if they expect this might happen.

But if that's the case, tens of millions of Trump voters will refuse to be forced into the Haley globalist camp, and will instead go where???

14-Feb-24
Will I think you are right on RFK, I’ve been very surprised by the democratic opinion on him. They discount him completely at this point. To me this makes very little sense

14-Feb-24
RFK is a nut-job. As a medical professional, I will never get behind someone like him. I would vote for Trump or Biden before I'd vote for RFK.

I look at him the same way I look at Marjorie Taylor Greene with her Jewish Space Lazers. Anyone who endorses outlandish conspiracy theories, IMO, is very dangerous as POTUS.

There is a thing called "Paranoid Personality Disorder."

14-Feb-24
I’m a medical professional, I don’t think he’s a nut job. I think he’s right on so far

From: spike78
14-Feb-24
I’m not a medical professional and honestly I think RFK is by far more honest than any Democrat. Hell he even admits drug use and I deeply respect honesty. He’s concerned about vaccines and we all damn well should be. The government has the balls to say vaccines are safe before even being implemented!! I’m sorry but I’m of the camp that says with all the Autistic and mentally retarded people out there along with insane amounts of people dying from cancer that whatever the Ef we are doing is not safe as nature never intended so much mortality. RFK also isn’t a war monger which gets high praises for me.

14-Feb-24
He has said that childhood vaccinations have created a "holocaust" of autism (disproven by just about every nation's health dept, original author of that hoax is in prison for forging data), that 5G towers are being placed to control us by the govt, and while the COVID vaccine rollout should have been voluntary, it did save the lives of many of the people most vulnerable to COVID, namely, the old and fat. His COVID vaccine comments are out there in far left/right field, pick your poison.

He is a conspiracy theorist. He reminds me of the typical marijuana-smoking conspiracy-theorist that so pervades our culture today, believing the whacky ahead of the sane explanation by default.

He's a nut-job.

14-Feb-24
He never said that about 5G, childhood vaccination schedules have caused countless injuries and deaths, not limited to autism. Ironically, the vaccine manufactures are not liable for injury which is unprecedented. This is the main issue that RFK is pointing out.

You may say that the vaccine saved countless people, but the data gets muddy, I treat patients with all of the comorbidities, and I don’t know a single person who died from Covid, I had two patients die within two weeks of getting the JJ vaccine, both in their 50s. We will never know the damage because it was never reported.

Also, let’s face at the military industrial complex that our country has is no longer a conspiracy. We have seven decades of unnecessary wars to prove it…and a dead president JFK

From: BowSniper
14-Feb-24
RFK may not be 100% accurate with his vaccine stance.... but I'd say he is far more right than wrong

And he has the courage to oppose biological men competing in women's sports

From: spike78
14-Feb-24
Idyll then please explain to us what causes autism and mental retardation as although I’m not a medical professional it only takes common sense to know nature did NOT intend it that way so it must be something man made. So what you’re saying is BIG PHARMA with all the billions of dollars debunked it well no shit they did. Man you guys live under a rock. And Idyll don’t forget that your liberals legalized marijuana simply for the tax dollars. One day you will all wake up and realize how gullible you all are. Can’t fix stupid that’s for sure.

From: sundowner
14-Feb-24
"And he has the courage to oppose biological men competing in women's sports"

I agree, but look at the state of affairs when we have been brought down to thinking it takes courage to simply oppose biological men competing in women's sports! Truly sad!

14-Feb-24
Michael, the evidence does not support your position.

And I had 3 people die from COVID in just 2021 in just my 12 bed hospital in a community of 3500 people. That means absolutely nothing. We don't make opinions based on our personal experiences. That's not how medicine works and you know it. If you think it doesn't kill people, you're ignoring the evidence. That's all I"m going to say about it.

The guy is an anti-vaxxer and a conspiracy theorist.

I also have seen two kids die of Hib meningitis in my time up here because of anti-vax parents and two more kids that almost did.

14-Feb-24
spike, I'm going to spell this out for you very simply and then I'm leaving it at that:

If you take 1000 kids and give them vaccines as recommended by the American College of Pediatricians and then 1000 kids and don't give them any vaccines, both groups develop autism at the same rates and this has been verified and reproduced in over a dozen countries. Childhood vaccines do not cause Autism. Period.

From: spike78
15-Feb-24
I don’t believe RFK ever said that vaxxes cause autism from what I read he has a suspicion and said there have been no studies if I remember correctly. If this is the case then I think since he has autistic kids there is nothing “nutcase” about him wanting answers. He said flat out he is not anti vax he just wants more studies done. He also does not trust Big Pharma and that belief is not also being a conspiracy theorist or nutcase that has to do with cutting corners to make billions in profit and that is not a conspiracy theory.

From: Will
15-Feb-24
Spike, if you think there are no studies looking at that question, you are doing what grifting con artists like RFK want you to do. Assume that he's correct because he seems sincere and tells a good story... His hope is that people will buy subscriptions to his services and whatnot.

There have been a zillion (mild overestimation) studies showing the safety and efficacy of the vaccines RFK says he wants more research on. He has sold his same - literally - BS for over 20 years. WAY before COVID he was known as a total antivax crank who sold pseudoscience to make a buck. And that's what he still does.

16-Feb-24
I think you all are watching the wrong hand waving.If I was part of the 1% I would bring as many as I can into the cities and then when the big BOOM comes I could declare marshal law and change everything you know , including elections under the disguise of (we are here to help you).Then that will be the beginning of getting rid of the deplorables ( the other 99% ) by many terrible means -poison foods,vaccines,rampant foreign diseases,tight living conditions,etc.All the people you are concerned about are part of the 99# they just don’t realize it yet.It has already started you may what to read the UN 2030 agenda - they mean it.The only good thing in the end is even the 1% will get theirs.There is no place to run or hide - it is written -God will win in the end,evil is just running amuck at the moment.

17-Feb-24
The liberals will never let trump win. They will parade Michael in and next thing you know, 90mm votes. Of course the polls will have to stop counting at midnight, but I digress.

  • Sitka Gear