Contributors to this thread:
I get into this friendly arguement from time to time...and really I am still not sure who is right. I feel that instinctive shooting means that you shoot a bow with no sight or anything else for distance including knowing where the arrow tip is in relation to the intended target. If an archer shoots 3 fingers under and estimates the shot distance and uses the arrow tip (or any other mark) for reference...that is not instinctive (It is just another type of sight) If the archer just looks at the intended target (focus) and then executes the shot to the best of his/her ability...that is instinctive shooting. Am I right or wrong...or being narrow minded....too picky...or maybe just "who cares." ??
You broke down here:
“including knowing where the arrow tip is in relation to the intended target. ”
Barring a complete lack of light, it’s physically IMPOSSIBLE to not see your arrow. “Instinctive” is either A) what happens when your form is so solid and repeatable that you needn’t make conscious note of where the point of your arrow is, or B) a fashionable excuse for not being able to hit your own ass with either hand.
If you want to HIT anything, you HAVE TO KNOW where your arrow is in relationship to your target; you can check visually or you can Just Know, because you’ve done it correctly so many times that you needn’t check (though your brain will do it for you on auto-pilot). It’s not that it doesn’t happen, it’s that you don’t have to remember to think about doing it.
But if you don’t KNOW where that arrow is pointed, you don’t know where it’s going. Good luck hitting anything that way, because that’s what it’ll take.
Based on the options you provided I am in the “who cares” column. If you consistently hit what you want to you are a good shot. If you don’t you ain’t. Nothing else matters.
I check my anchor and point alignment with my target on EVERY shot... when I can. Some times, you can’t.
This was one of those times when you can’t!
Yea Gf if you are checking anchor point alignment etc etc every shot you are not an instinctive shooter
Whether it is with a sling shot, bow, handgun,shotgun or rifle an instinctive shooter is a very rare commodity. They just shoot and are very accurate They just seem to know how it all works and they execute. I've known a couple of them and it looks like magic when they shoot and often they cannot even explain what they are doing. Truly an amazing talent
this is my take on it. there are 3 basic styles 1= instinctive 2= split vision 3= gap I would consider myself a split vision shooter because I'm conchesly aware of the rough distance & although I don't conchesly aim with the arrow tip I know where it roughly needs to be in relation to the target for the given distance I'm shooting. pure instinctive shooters claim absolutely zero yardage estimation or conchense or subconscious reference of the arrow. pick your spot concentrate draw anchor concentrate release relying on mussel memory & form to keep things going straight. gap is the least appealing to me simply cause if I'm gonna estimate yards then draw hold & aim I'm just gonna put pins on it. I can understand useing this method to be competitive shooting in a certain class. but not for hunting or at least not for me
My instinct tells me to shoot but my brain checks visual references before shooting. Best way to prove 100% instinctive is to first look at target, then close both eyes and bring bow and arrow in alignment before releasing the shot. Start close to target.
“Yea Gf if you are checking anchor point alignment etc etc every shot you are not an instinctive shooter”
I don’t claim to be, because there ain’t no such thing. I don’t HAVE TO check off on everything on every shot, but I usually DO so that when I CAN’T, I don’t have to.
The pic I posted above was 30-35 yards (which is farther than “Instinctive” is supposed to even work, according to tbe guy who “invented” it) taken 30 minutes after sunset under heavy cloud cover and literally a minute or two before it started to rain. I dropped low of the 12-ring by about 3/4”, but dead center. Couldn’t see my arrow for trying, but I didn’t have to.... because I already knew where it was pointed.
That’s not “Instinct”, that’s trained proprioception.
Gf We are not even talking about the same thing. NOBODY can be taught true instinctive shooting
Carry on with whatever you were alluding to
So you’re buying into the “you’re either Born With It or you’re not” BS?
Archery is an acquired skill, just like walking, running, jumping or writing your name in the snow. You can learn well and quickly or slowly and poorly if ever. Somehow it became fashionable to learn slowly and poorly, but at least you get extra points for wearing a Fedora....
Hmmm. There sure should be more professional athletes if everything is an acquired skill.
I shoot gapstinctive like most of the other trad archers I know.
Gf. Yep. There are special people that are truly instinctive shooters
Not a learned behavior or talent
A God given talent
Like I said we are talking about two different animals.
So once again carry on with your instinctive bow shooting lore
I must be one of those “born” instinctive shooters, ‘cause with a stickbow I can’t hit my ass with both hands.....
Take a guy who says it’s instinct, and put him out past his normal practice yardage.
Ask him to shoot say 80 yards if he only practices out to 30.
See how it pans out. If he doesn’t practice and his brain doesn’t know how high his bow hand should be. He will not hit accurately.
That doesn’t mean that a guy like Ted Williams (a natural at everything he did) couldn’t do it after a dozen shots. But even Ted wouldn’t do it from “instinct”.
I knew a guy that was a phenomenal shot with a gun he could shoot asperins out the air with a .22 as good with a shotgun as if seen & be got cought up in an easy money thing & was convicted & lost his gun rights. he had never shot a bow & within a few weeks of acquiring a bow he was shooting 300s indoors. I agree that for the majority it's learned over time including my self but for a gifted few it just comes naturally
Here is how I PROVED I shot instinctive, not going to debate it because I have many times. Shoot a candle flame in total darkness, could not see the arrow, my hand or anything but the flame. Doesn't matter what anchor you use you can still shoot instinctive., did it for 31 years with a recurve . About 25 yards was my maximum accurate distance.
glunt@work nailed it gapstintive I believe others call it split vision
It only takes about 100,000 shots to become a instinctive archer. The trouble with most folks is they want to become a good shot overnight. It'll work with sights or a aiming system but not when your shooting instinctive.
When I was shooting stick, I think I was using what glunt said. I didn't set the tip of my arrow at a measured distance below the target based on shot distance but I was always aware of where it was in my peripheral vision.
This aligned my arrow in the "X" direction and the "Y" direction was pretty much instinctive. It was a feeling of "too high" or "too low" or "right there".
It helped me to start my aiming with my bow arm fully extended toward the target before starting my draw.
There is always some mechanism at play, some sort of frame of reference. Even when using "the force" to shoot archery tackle. You may not notice or can't pinpoint what that reference of aim is, but it's there...
I shoot split vision and shoot pretty good. I have several friends who shoot instinctive. They burn a hole in a spot and pull back and shoot. Most are touch and go guys, meaning they hit their anchor and no holding just let it fly. They do not use the arrow in anyway to aim but there is no doubt they see the arrow. It's physically impossible not too. Pic of one of the pure shooters I know!! Shawn
Campared to yesteryear, very few these days are capable of instinctive shooting when hunting, it takes practice. Therefore, some believe others are not capable of it. When hunting meant getting close, it was a great method of shooting and killing game. I still hunt and shoot that way, but it is dying out, just like bow and arrow hunting and the supporting culture.
I think this topic gets thrown off by the definition of instinct. I wasn’t born able to shoot my stick accurately so in that sense, it’s not ‘instinct’.
However when I shoot, regardless of what my peripheral is picking up the ONLY think I FOCUS on is where my arrow will end up. I have shot in the dark In my yard as an experiment and accuracy was less because obviously my brain has less of an image to recreate familiarity with that shot angle/distance, but was still plenty accurate.
Do you believe a 6 year old buck’s instincts are more acute than a buck fawn? Then you believe that instincts can be a learned thing based on past experience and current surroundings.
OK...thanks for all the well thought out input...good stuff !! Next question, is there any reason to shoot 3 fingers under other than to be able to look down the arrow shaft and also see the point in relation to the target (gap) ? In my experience, 3 under makes the tiller off, makes good arrow flight difficult and makes the bow shoot louder!! Agree or not? I am certainly no expert !!
I have no experience with three under.
My best grouping at 40 yards was 2" with 8 arrows. I shot at twilight with my block target in a area so dark I could barely see it. To me it was instinctive shooting even though I had a compound and sights.
3 under tiller issues are specific to each bow. I have some that do well both ways with the same nock point. Some that require a different nock point and some that just dont like 3 under.
I have shot both ways over the years. When I shoot three under I drop my anchor point down one finger so the arrow is about the same spot on my face. None of my bows were tillered for 3 under by the bowyer.
Currently shooting split.
All you guys who think you can shoot in the dark need to try this....
Use a laser pointer to project a dot onto a target INDOORS with no light source other than the laser pointer, and let someone else move that target to random distances down-range. Let us know how you do.
Candles don’t count, because they give away too much extra information.
And NO CHEATING by shining up your arrows.
Usually, I check my alignment on each shot; but not Always.
Moving targets and other quick shots don’t allow it. That’s when the ingrained alignment takes over.
That and peripheral vision.
The trouble is, most people have No Freaking Clue how this stuff works, so they relax into to self-congratulatory myth that it’s just some God-given gift because they’re SPECIAL.
Yes, some people have superior hand-eye coordination and some have that AND superior eyesight... but just because it comes easily to them doesn’t mean that it works any differently than for anyone else.
And the reason that shooting in dim light proves exactly NOTHING is that our peripheral vision is vastly more light-sensitive than our central vision. The guys who say they’re “boring a hole” in the target with their laser-sharp focus are full of CRAP because central vision is all COLOR and is dependent on a goodly amount of light.
The ONLY things you can see in dim light are those things in your peripheral vision. So in reality, shooting in low light only proves the importance of the peripheral vision that most “Instinctive” proclaimers always insist doesn’t even exist. That and the importance of having a rock-solid, perfectly repeatable anchor so that the limited info from your peripheral vision can be kept on its normal context.
And if there’s anybody here who doubts how important that is, let’s see what happens when you plug up your peep sight with mud and strip off your kisser button.
3 under offers a very favorable point-on trajectory for typical Whitetail ranges; the smaller the gap, the easier it is to align the arrow with your mark... which is why a friend of mine says I’m better from 25-40 than from 25 and in.
If you want to find out how much you like shooting 3U, just go for it. If you love the accuracy but not the noise or whatever, then maybe get your next bow tillered for 3U or (better bet, IMO) get an ILF rig and experiment with the tiller ‘til you’re happy with it. Because then you can always re-tiller for 3U if you go getting all fickle....
Most important thing, though (IMO) is to avoid taking your shots from the same distance over and over and over, because that grooves a single sight picture, which narrows your effective range to a narrow window...
GF, I'm actually against you on this but was going to use your exact scenario as an example. All of my best shots have been right at dark. I'n the jungles in Guam at black pigs. Last second, just do it. Nothing else to look at but where you want the arrow to land. But you are right. Take a lazer pointer out on a dark night and shoot at the dot. If you ain't close then you aren't instinctive. if you are truly instinctive you just shoot where you are looking. Which is why I usually sail it over their backs because I'm looking at the horns.
“All of my best shots have been right at dark. I'n the jungles in Guam at black pigs. Last second, just do it.”
Exactly. In extremely low light, your peripheral vision is many times more sensitive than your central vision. If you have that peripheral sight picture deeply ingrained in your brain and well connected to your hand-eye coordination, you can make that shot. If you were actually dependent on that “spot” that some guys claim that they can “burn into the target”, you would see exactly nothing. And that’s what you would hit.
And if you have a very consistent anchor point, every time you draw an arrow your string in hand is going to be coming straight back toward that same anchor point. It’s as if you had the rear sight of your rifle mounted on a rail such that you could slide a Ghost Ring fore and aft at will with zero lateral wobble; you likely won’t get benchrest accuracy, but you’re not going to miss wildly, either… Especially not at close range.
OK, Kodiak, I give up...
If there’s not a scientific explanation based in neuroanatomy, neurophysiology and brain science writ large, why don’t you impress us all with your explanation as to how it REALLY works??
Cuz not only can I EXPLAIN it, I can actually DO IT, as those pics of my shooting 30+ minutes after sunset will attest.
I also have a pretty good history on moving targets.
So put up or shut up.
By the way, Wayne - I’m totally with you on shooting where you’re looking and eyeball discipline. One time a doe mulie picked up a hind foot as I was releasing and I came within a smidge of splitting her hoof. Screwed up my confidence so bad that a few days later I passed up a 12-yarder on a cow Elk that had no clue I was anywhere within miles, just because I couldn’t figure out how I could’ve missed a broadside shot on that doe by over a foot.
Above all else, shooting using hand-eye coordination is a confidence game...
I don't look at anything but the spot I want to hit but I'm sure my subconscious mind is picking up everything. Just like throwing a baseball. I tried gap shooting and I couldn't do it very well.
when I first started shooting It was a compound with a plunger & flipper rest I shot with fingers & i was having trouble keeping the arrow on the rest. I tried 3 under & it solved my problem. iv tried split several times & just prefer the 3 under sight picture better. another interesting tidbit for over 25 years I shot compounds with fingers 3 under & it put my sights so low I was limited on pins & couldn't use a pin guard cause broadheads would hit it looking back I'd guess my point on was around 50yds cause that pin was only about 1" over my arrow
I've already been through this with GF once. I shoot a compound, fingers, with a Whisker Biscuit...so I cant ever see the tip of my arrow at full draw. Doesn't matter, because all I do, is focus on the spot where I want the arrow to hit, regardless of yardage. If I maintain focus through and after the shot, most of the time, the arrow will go where I want it to. This was a 62 yard group at a 3D shoot this Summer. I've shot quite a few Robin Hoods at 30 yards and under in the last couple years. So, take that info, and put me in any category you like.
Jeff, That is the ugliest and scariest target i have ever seen....it even makes you look handsome !! Hope you have been well, my friend.
Hey, EMG..... How much you wanna bet that the rest of your arrow is in line with the point, whether you can see it or not? ;)
I’ve said for years that you can learn fast and (relatively) easy by paying attention to the external cues - the arrow, shelf, anchor alignment, etc. - or you can learn slowly and painfully by pretending to ignore a whole bunch of information that’s RIGHT UNDER YOUR DAMN NOSE. You literally CANNOT NOT see all that stuff.
Point being, EVERYBODY MUST LEARN before they’re going to hit a damn thing. NOBODY gets it right the first time and is perfect from that day forward.
What I don’t understand is why some people are so committed to the delusion that it happens by Magic that they would rather be lousy shots than learn via any method other than one described 30 years ago by a guy who had zero qualifications as an archery instructor until after he wrote a book about how he shoots.... and didn’t have the sense to realize that he didn’t begin where he ended up.
But hey... Fedora. Only a devil-worshipping closet compound shooter would ever dare argue with a guy in a Fedora.
Instinctive you do not look down the arrow with three fingers under.
This thread is far more complicated than instinctive shooting is....
Fascinating thread. Earlier today, I just happened across a podcast featuring Joel Turner and his trials prior to finally killing his first bull 13 years later. There's alot that goes into being a great shooter with concentration under stress ranking atop his list. Good stuff.
For a while I shot compound and a shorter time recurve with 3 fingers under. If I was gap shooting by guessing the distance then adjusting the arrow tip accordingly then no it would not be instinctive. But if you are pulling and letting go when it feels right, that's instinctive in my world. I shot many more years split finger recurve by letting my brain figure out what I needed to do. I found it tricky to pick a spot with a quick release but that can be an art form for a few.
It’s all about repetitions... Some will need more than others, but you get there.. and in the process you figure out how far is too far.
Some guys get real good at estimating range and can gap or string-walk or crawl or whatever... I can’t do the estimation thing to save myself. As soon as I put a number on it, I’m toast.
Sometimes I have to bob my bowhand up and down and just let the release happen when my brain is out of the way for a moment...
GF, I grew up shooting a slingshot and .58 cal lead balls. I could shoot damn good once I knew my trajectory. Never looked at an arrow, just where I wanted the ball to hit. When I bought a recurve at age 11, I used the same concept to shoot my arrows. Would a sling shot qualify as “instinctive”? Man I’d love to shoot a recurve again....
Guess I’ve been shooting a while.
Can’t really explain the process, but it works. I call it instinctive but I’m sure there is more going on than just pulling back and letting go.
Been killin stuff with traditional bows for a lot of years and shooting trad bows since I could pull back a string tied off to a cedar limb. A compound is infinitely more complex and feel it would be a severe hindrance to me with all that can go wrong with one.
I really need to spend some time with Tom Clum to figure out what the heck I’m doing and how to get better...
Treeline - simple:
All you need is a vertical line down the middle of your target, and when you get to full draw, make sure that your entire arrow is lined up with that line. It can be ink, it can be a strand of yarn, it can be a strip of painters tape, or it can be a bamboo garden steak (or a junky old arrow) stuck in the ground in front of your backstop. Doesn’t matter as long as it’s a vertical line. The skinnier the better.
If you make it a habit to check off nock end, front end, & target before you loose and arrow, your groups will probably be cut in half.
Give it about three weeks, since everybody says that’s how long it takes to form a new habit, and once you start hitting that line on a regular basis, you will find that you can hit just about whatever you want without making a big to-do out of checking off on all of your marks, because you will have grooved a new circuit in your brain and you’ll do it right on autopilot.
You didn’t by any chance used to shoot a wrist rocket with the latex tubes and maybe about a 45° cant did you?
I did. With the right anchor, that put the upper tube right under my eyeball, pointed straight at the target.... Every… Single… Time.
Juuuuuuuuuuuust sayin’ .......
Pretty funny what a 10-year-old kid can figure out when there’s nobody there to tell him that there’s a rule against using whatever is right there under his nose…
Whether you are aware that you see the tip of your arrow or not, you do. I once missed a slam dunk shot at 5 yards ish and maybe 10 feet up a tree. Super low light, legal light, but on the border in the a.m. When i anchored and shot, something was off and i completely missed. I then realized that my broadhead was dark green, and in the low light, i couldn't see the tip of my arrow. My brain had no reference and therefore couldn't "instinctively " aim. IMO, just because people aren't intentionally looking, doesn't mean their mind isn't noticing.
Forget about laser pointer. String moving bell attached to target heart area. lights out. Go for the sound. You cannot see arrow or target. Let's see it filmed in night vision mode.
So, you're telling me I can somehow see my broadhead, through my Whisker biscuit??
No but you can see where your bow hand is. And it’s all locked into the brain for “instinctive” shooting.
GF, like some people have said, some people have an innate ability to just shoot. I never lined up the pouch of the slingshot under my eye. Anchored it to my mouth like a bowstring.....still do. Looked at my target between the yolks of the wristrocket. I was also a professional baseball player.....so I’d like to think I had/have something other don’t. Cnelk might be correct with his statement...... ;)
I can 'instinctively' point a finger, gun or arrow at an object. I can 'instinctively' throw a rock or ball in the general direction of that object, too. I've seen some pretty accurate 'instinctive' spitters. On the other hand, I really don't know if any of it falls under the definition of truly instinctive behaviors. Maybe the term is not accurate. I don't let terms worry me much. I believe what often passes for instinctive shooting is really nothing more than eye-hand-brain coordination (or lack of!) combined with enough practice to make it look magically instinctive. Maybe the best examples of it are the cowboy action shooters and the rapid-fire trick shotgunners shooting from the hip. To me those guys function on a much higher level of autopilot than those of us shooting a bow with the benefit of that nice long straight arrow beneath our eye(s) whether we consciously reference it or not.
“I never lined up the pouch of the slingshot under my eye. Anchored it to my mouth like a bowstring.”
So you’re saying that your mouth is not located below your eyeballs???
Dude - If you were getting paid to play baseball? You obviously have a level of hand eye coordination that 99 and 44/100% of the population does not. But I’ll bet you knew that!
On the other hand… I will bet that you didn’t start picking off small, distant targets with your slingshot on day one, now, did you?
And for that matter, I’ll bet that you’ve caught, thrown and swung at more baseballs that 99.9944% of the population.
Because as has been proven time and again, Champions are MADE, not Born.
Basically, the “Instinctive” camp is still preaching Old Testament; their world is still Flat, and they BELIEVE that it they just focus hard enough on that One Spot that they want to hit and ignore everything else, then everything else about proper, consistent form will figure itself out on its own.
The New Testament, Brain Science Edition, holds that if you work diligently at developing precisely repeatable form that works for YOUR body, you can build out a neuromotor circuit that precisely aligns your entire shooting form the same way every time, and all you have to do is settle the crosshairs one that One Spot that you are now programmed to hit.
You do it the Old Testament way, and maybe you’ll eventually start to get it right on a regular basis, but you never really know if you’ve got it right until the arrow is in the target (or not!)
Do it the New Testament way, and your body literally does not know HOW to do it wrong.
Hit it cheer
Miss it jeer
Who cares how
Treeline. Interesting your take. One thing Joel mentioned, and I'll paraphrase here, if you ask a great shooter how he/she does it, they will tell you they don't know, they just do it.
I'm pretty much there with Treeline. I sort of see the arrow in my peripheral vision (split finger, anchor in the mouth corner) and stare at a spot I want to hit. With something like dandelion heads or other small spot for focus, I'm deadly. On animals, I "project" a spot, but not sure exactly how. The arrow just ends up where I'm looking unless I misjudge the distance and shoot low under the armpit.
I do know that since I've switched to a compound with single pin, when on an animal I start the draw, the pin quickly settles, and the arrow is somehow on its way. I don't follow a "process" or conscious release. Probably somewhat due to shooting a million arrows with an automatic "draw, settle, release" rhythm for over 50 years with trad bows.
Just do it ... you can do it ... or not
GF, I rarely post and make an effort to keep it positive when I do, however your incessant need to argue and berate people gets pretty damned old. It'd be nice if you took a break. I'm pretty sure your ego won't let that happen.
Sooo.... you want me to concede the point that science is useless and agree that “instinctive” shooting is a gift that you either have... or you’re screwed and there’s not a damn thing you can do about it....
OR, I can keep on demystifying it and explaining how just about anybody can learn how to do it and challenging other Barebow shooters to get their act together and stop accepting the idea that they should be happy with 9” groups at 17.4 yards....
High-spirited, good-natured debate is enjoyable in its own right. If you don’t enjoy it, you can use the back button. There are PLENTY of threads here that I stay out of entirely.
Still waiting for Kodiak to stop hiding behind the snide remarks and explain all that I’m overlooking....
But I’m not holding my breath.....
Do not attempt to argue with an idiot. They will lower you to their level and overwhelm you with experience.
Nice to know he has some company under that rock.... You guys are pathetic.
Yes!! I am sorry i ever started this....if this was in the "classifieds"...I would "CLOSE" the thread. I spend a lot of time here in California with a large group of stakeholders in the hunt/fish world.....just about every major group you can imagine and we all support each other's causes.....in- fighting and personality differences are just not tolerated for the good of the overall effort..Hollywood, a super liberal legislature, and home to every anti group there is here in the Golden State demands we stick together...(off of soapbox)...sorry, Joe
A few practice and hunt very successfully by getting close and shooting instinctively, the rest should use sights and scopes and leave the few alone.
Gf you need to tone it down. You come across like some kind of zealot or extremest. You cant seem to tolerate anyone that doesn't agree with you. Your views are your opinions nothing more. And you know what they say about opinions.
Instinctive is just a word used to describe a particular style. I don’t understand why people get their panties in a bind over it. Call it anything you want, point and shoot, split vision, snap shooting, repetition, learned muscle memory, WHO CARES!
I shoot any and all of the above, can hit my butt with both hands, at the same time even, in just about any lighting condition, out to 20 or 25 yds, which is all I care about, fairly well. Being a hunter 1st, I have no desire to hone my skills past that range. I suck at yardage estimation, with my bifocals I can only get 1 focus point, (target) clearly, and the only thought going through my brain when I shoot is whether I’m locked into my dbl anchor point. Everything else is automatic.
NAME it whatever you want, I really don’t care.
Fred Asbell wrote a couple of books on the subject. The best ever written in my opinion. Along with the likes of Howard Hill they spell it out very clearly. Asbell certainly made me a much better shooter at an early age. Their word as good today and tomorrow as it was then. Asbell’s first book the best. Read it.
Who cares? Apparently a few people are passionate about this topic. I instinctively know better than to open a thread on this topic. I find it entertaining, even after all the threads that have beat this topic to death over on Leatherwall. I thought maybe there would be some new, or different info from the compound shooters. It's the same old dribble. I'm in the don't care what you call it club.
x2 Trax. Fred's video on instinctive shooting is also very good.
GFred's instructions are excellent. His videos and books are some of the best on the topic. Forget much of what you hear here from the internet experts, and course shooters. Do your own thing to match your body and desires, then practice and practice.
If it’s instinctive, why do you need to practice?
Because " instinctive " has always been a misnomer, I learned that 55 years ago. It is used to mean no fixed sighting reference, which only a select few who practice and are calm at the center can do with any sense of reliability.
Us traditional shooters tend to be very individualistic. We develop a style that works for our biomechanics and the way we hunt. Also the areas we hunt factor in. Compound shooters tend to center around a fairly common style due to the type of bow they use. My son uses a compound with its sights and bubble levels. My longbow is shot canted every which way depending on brush, etc. Arguing about shooting styles is fruitless and unnecessary among guys and gals who are all fiercely independent. You shoot with perfect, politically accepted form up here, good luck getting a deer, especially if you groundhunting like I do in these timberlands and brushy cutoffs.
Actually, I think eastern, whitetail only hunters are a breed unto themselves.
Ambush, you have a point there. We have to move around a lot due to deer that are roamers and are very scarce up here on the border. I just went for a mile long walk on the ridge behind my house and never cut a track. I have tracked bucks up here all day, came out 6 or 7 miles from my pickup and never cut another deer track except the one I was tracking. I tracked a big boy in 1976 for two days, shot him, and swore that I had killed the last deer in the North. This area isn’t for those accustomed to seeing deer every day or week, for that matter. Ya gotta love it. Like growing old, it ain’t for sissies. That is why those few of us that shoot trad up here shoot instinctively. You only get a split second single shot per season if you are a ground pounder. It has to be fast, real fast. The deer I shot this season was in full alert when it saw me draw. I don’t remember the shot, it just happened. Gun season ends today, we have 2 feet of snow on the high ground, the deer are migrating towards their winter yards, I have a buck tag, and it’s my turn to howl. My wife knows where to sit while I hit the hills, probably on snowshoes after this storm coming.
3 under shooters are mandated by traditional archery rules to wear pink panties.
^^^. Holy! Then fixed crawl must be G-strings!!
The technical term is "Anal Floss” , but we’re amongst friends here.
When the STAR Method is released we will all be equal and we'll all get along.
Does someone have a spare Xanax for GF?
Since the word Instinctive is such a false name for the way many of us choose to shoot, maybe in respect to our fellow archers that cannot stand the word, we should take a vote to change the word to keep the peace. Maybe “ SINGLE FOCUS SHOOTING” , or “Thoughtless” Shooting, Blurred Vision, or maybe “ 2nd degree aiming” since it’s not premeditated and we all suck at it. Any other ideas? After all, to me the MOST IMPORTANT thing is that we all get along and promote our sport whether it be target, 3D, hunting, or any other facet of archery. ????????
I shoot the way I do because it works for me. I assume others do what works for them. Matters nothing to me. If the bow is a longbow or recurve, that’s traditional to me, though I prefer a longbow, the perfect hunting weapon in my opinion.
Arguments about 'instinctive' shooting (or not) and 'traditional' archery (or not) are a social media thing. Anyone who gets knotted up over a forum opinion...contrary to their own...is way too heavily invested in worthless stock. Just shoot and smile.
Again with the "do it like me or wear panties" nonsense. Don't be such a Tradhole.
Lawdy I agree 100 percent with you. We all have our own style that works for us. As long as I’m filling my freezer with elk deer and antelope what does it matter how I shoot my recurve bow. I’m not going to say how I shoot on this post because I think each person that decides the equipment he shoots and style he chooses that works for him is good enough for me. Let’s not separate ourselves on equipment and style and just enjoy spending time in the woods with what we love to hunt with.
+2 on Lawdy's comment. I pick a spot, draw while staring at the spot, and shoot. Not sure what it's called, don't care if I am wrong or right. I just know I have fun doing it that way and it works for me.
PECO, I’m no trad hole. Just a guy that likes having laughs. Been doing the pink panty routine for years on the LW. Thought I’d liven up some on Bowsite too. Shoot what you like. Take Kevin’s Advice. Just know if you shoot three under, it’s the law you must wear pink panty’s.
WV, yeah I shoot 3 under, but prefer classic black lace. Yes I recognize you and your pink panty gig from the LW, I'm just having fun too with the "tradhole" thing, which is not mine but really like it.
yall are gonna whip this dead horse into oblivion. from the mid 90s to 2010 I did not gun hunt for deer at all & in 2000 I got really serious & committed to trad bows only I bought a used habu 60" 62@62 & started shooting & shooting & shooting & the only thing I knew was I needed a consistent anchor & I got damn good the only thing I though about was drawing the bow the same each shot & hitting my anchor. was I instinctive I'd say so had never even heard of gap or anything else I did have an old Ken beck video that I got bow setup & arrow tuning info from then a few years later I got a g ashbel book
my point is back then all I thought about was where I wanted to hit & getting to full draw and the rest was just AUTOMATIC. now thanks to the wall & bowsite I have a wealth of trad bow shooting how-to & think entirely to much about my shooting & don't shoot nearly as well as when I just shot !!!
Above and any to correct my post above
I grew up with antlerman,, you wouldnt believe the instinctive archer,,a slingshot will make you,, i knew as soon as he said slingshot,he knew...Dont think , find your groove and youll just be pulling it up and hitting your intended target... just the way it is...
perhaps times have changed or at least they have for me 20 years ago & beyond I shot all summer these days I have an offshore fishing boat & all summer if I'm not fishing I'm working on my boat & gear & next thing ya know it's Oct & I haven't practiced enough to hunt with trad gear but a few afternoons with the compound & I'm good enough now I could spend that few evenings shooting a trad bow useing gap similar to aiming the compound iv even considered pins on my ilf but that just seams wrong. I know exactly where my arrow tip needs to be on a 20yd blue face but I just don't want to hunt with a trad bow useing that method if I'm gonna conchesly aim I'm gonna use my compound. perhaps our buisyer world has led to so many variances in what is-was such a simple & effective way of shooting
I grew up with a slingshot (we called them another name in those days but politically incorrect now) and bows made of cedar limbs, hickory and then fiberglass. Pretty amazing when it all came together and you actually started hitting whatever you wanted. Didn’t call it instinctive. It was just shootin’. Had a lot of fun at the expense of the cottontails, jack rabbits, squirrels, snakes, and occasional turkey... Good times:-)
Fred Asbell's method may have worked for Fred, but many, many archers trying to emulate it have become really crappy trad shooters and developed bad habits through that technique. I tried to retrain myself to do it back when the first book came out and it totally screwed me up. None of the best trad shooters (competitive) shoot that way. Plus, in a hunting situation it generates way too much movement in most cases, vs. being on target and simply drawing straight back.
For the life of me I can't hit flying pheasants with gap, fixed crawl or string walking but I can with something that isn't because some can't do it. I'll just call it arrow flight path visualization to a target. Static or moving.
It is amazing to me that there are people who don't think instinctive shooting is real.
Politics, Religion, Abortion, Baiting..
Now we can add instinctive shooting to the hot button list!
Really good stuff. Like shooting a slingshot.... I really like some of you guys!!
30 yards, downhill shot. Bare Bow, compound/ Fingers/ Whisker biscuit. Same as Bowbender, 2 fingers split, middle finger on corner of mouth. Draw, focus on spot, release!
K. I. S. S. ;^)
EMG - I’ll see your biscuit and raise you a fist. Literally. LOL
A couple weeks back I put 8 out of 9 arrows into a group the size of the gold of a 65cm NFAA target from 70 yards. 9th shot was good for width but in the dirt. Beyond my point-on, so I had to look “through” my bowhand.
We shoot the same way; we just have different explanations for how we got there.
I agree, it will work for some, not for most. Leave it to the minority who can do it, all others should use some sort of sight aid.
I would agree with the original poster. I shoot instincive but also am aware of my gaps at say 20 and 30 and 40. If I wanted to always have to guess the yardage I’d probably put a sight on my bow and shoot a compound.
I shoot with good shooters who use all methods so whatever floats your boat I say
I just can't understand why anyone would care so much how anyone else shoots or what they call it. Maybe just go shoot your bow and get up from the keyboard awhile.
I just wish I could see a turkey as big as the one EMG shot........
Back when I was a basketball player I was a very good long distance shot. Could drain 3s from anywhere on the court, though a little streaky (normal, even in the NBA). I never thought about how I did it nor could I teach someone how. Then the JV coach at C.S.U. decided he needed to change my shooting mechanics because, well.., just because he thought it might make me more consistent. I never shot the same after that.
Same thing almost happened when I tried to relearn to shoot with the Asbell method because, well.., because he was Fred Asbell. Fortunately, archery mechanics are easier to replicate than jump shooting and I was able to go back to what worked. But whenever I see new trad shooters trying to do that raise-draw thing, which almost inevitably leads to snap shooting and short-drawing, I know where they got it and offer some gentle pointers on how to improve.
But bottom line is that no matter what technique people use, including clickers, string walking, fixed crawl, gap, peripheral gap, true instinctive, even subtle marks on the riser for aiming, a few will do it very well, some will do it serviceably, and most should go back to the compound or at least stay on the target range and not try to hunt.
Yeah, but would you be brave enough to try to kill one with an arrow? Make him mad, and that sucker will come kick your....
Soupy - I really don’t give a rip what other people call their shooting style, or how they think they shoot. What chaps my ass is all the BS about how “Some Can“ and “Others Can’t“.
That’s a load o’ CRAP.
But if you try to have a conversation about how these skills are actually acquired all of the Fred wannabes come out of the woodwork to tell you that science is a lie and they have mystical powers to which the rest of us mere mortals can only aspire.
ANYBODY can learn how to shoot barebow well, but not if they subscribe to the fake it ‘til you make it school. And I think it’s pretty stupid for people to struggle with this and shoot poorly and end up wounding animals because they think that they have to do it just like somebody who wrote a book which arguably has done a lot more harm than good.
I think G Fred would agree, he is only portraying his method to those who care to try it. There are other methods and each individual is free to choose what fits their body, style, and mind. I personally think history has proven most prefer a sighting aid of some type, what is wrong with that?
Maybe it’s the not-at-all-subtle attitude that anyone who admits to consciously referencing his arrow is somehow a lesser form of archer?
IMO, they are not a lesser form of an archer. In fact, they are the majority, and the norm. What others think, I have no idea or care.
Never really thought anyone was inferior or superior, because of the way they shoot...I don't ever think I've conveyed that "attitude". I just happen to shoot the way I do, because I've done it my whole life...it's just me. Guys like Jesse Broadwater, who can shoot lights out for 3 days straight shooting Freestyle, amaze me. Even though they are shooting dial sights/stabilizers/lenses, etc., they are like freaking machines!
Hell, I assure you, most of you guys would embarrass me, if I picked up a stickbow!
My disagreement, is with those that think "true instinctive" shooting is somehow a myth. But, call it whatever you like.
Jaq Yer on it, these Fred books screwed so many guys shooting Trad for decades. Large swath of Trad folks can not shoot that way accurately.
I hear heard this many many times by really good gap shooters who dumped that process of shooting.
Take a instinctive type process shooter. Hand him another bow and different arrows shoot a group, one group them hand to rig to a gapper see which group youd want.
Most so called Instintive shooters are gapping they just dont realize it whether they’re shooting split, three under or thumb ring.
Hoping to see GF at Trad Worlds this year in Tenn. shooting with us and guys like Bob Enlow, Joel Turner, Spanky Brooks, Rusty Horn, Kurt Stunkle, Shiloh Butts among others. Perfection is easy on the keyboard.
If by “true Instinctive” you mean getting to a place where you don’t have to think about what you’re doing in order to execute properly, of course it’s a real Thing; just like touch-typing or playing a musical instrument or driving stick.
If you mean the ability to pick up a bow got the first time and magically hit everything you look at, yeah, that’s Myth.
Birds have to learn to fly; fish have to learn to swim. Pretty much anything with a brain has to learn how to use it.
True, some folks have greater hand-eye coordination than others, but even those folks can get a lot better by learning how to put their brains to work. And everybody else can learn to shoot barebow, too. You just have to be willing to do the work.
If you do the experiment of putting the sight pin at different places of a typical peep sight (top, bottom, left, right vs, dead center of the peep opening), you'll find at just 20 yds. you'll be changing impact by a foot or even more.
This little experiment should tell us how close sight/eye alignments need to be (fractions of an inch!) for consistent accurate shooting even at relatively close range. That is problem no. 1 with instinctive/arrow tip aiming and it proves it's not entirely an coordination/talent thing but rather head/eye/arrow tip alignment problem as well as not having a rear sight at all...
Yeah I have solutions, but won't be a sponsor until next year and even then in all honesty I don't want to sell stuff...too busy...
gf. anyone can throw a ball but out of millions of kids playing baseball & football how many become professional pitcher's or quarterbacks. yes anyone can be a fair shot over time. but you speak as though every individual possesses the same hand eye coordination & mental thought process. & that is simply not true
I also agree with jaquomo iv been to a few high end trad bow shoots & there are absolutely trad bow shooters that if they any respect for the animals they hunt it they even do hunt would be much better served with something with sights on it
I think Fred's books have been a great benefit in pointing out things to consider when shooting a bow. Of course his style won't work for everyone but there are things he discusses that are helpful to pay attention to. Personally I don't follow his method but I do refer to it to see what will work for me.
I've been shooting "instinctive" since the early 1960s. Yes, for a time I and most folks I knew, tried sights on our recurve but most went back to barebow. I stare at a spot, draw and release. I absolutely see the arrow in my peripheral vision. It's impossible not to.
I'm not a great shot at all. I can hit what I want but I'm not a target shooter that can put arrow after arrow in the bullseye. It takes a lot of concentration for me to shoot and after one or two arrows my shots seem to stray.
I've been going to traditional 3d shoots for nearly 30 years and have seen that there is a significant number of traditional archers that shouldn't be hunting deer. It's not because they shoot like Fred, even if they think they do. If they did shoot like Fred they would be a better shot. Instead they may squat, do a swing draw, and in other ways think they are following Fred's way but they lack good technique. An unsteady bow arm, no consistent anchor, maybe overbowed or have poorly matched arrows, for whatever reasons they demonstrate lack of good fundamentals.
I instinctively use the MBG sight on my compound bow that I shoot with a release b/c instinctively I know I will shoot better with a release than fingers
Gotta be more to instinctive than a subconcious or peripheral reference to the arrow...because the second you start pulling the string the arrow is moving! How do you aim utilizing a point of reference that is moving? If the arrow was the key ingredient tell me at exactly what point you use it to aim...at the beginning of your shot sequence when it's 30" out front of the riser, somewhere in between, or when the tip of the arrow is pulled back to the riser. You're pretty damn good if your using the tip of the arrow while it's in motion as an aiming tool, lots of calculations going on there! The whole time you are pulling on the string you are pushing on the riser...remember elementary school where we were taught for every action there is an opposite and equal REACTION. The very second you stop pulling you have stopped pushing, can't be any other way...and once one of those two things happens, you have either released the arrow or your shot is collapsing.
I think the whole world is caught up in semantics right now, and the word "instinctive", for lack of a better term, is just one of those words some people love to hate. Me personally, I don't care HOW you hit your target, just simply that you do. If it works for you I'm happy. Call it whatever you want..
I agree with Timex, no matter how hard one tries we cannot all be good at pitching a baseball, or throwing a football. People have different physical and mental abilities. No coach can overcome these variences. Improve, yes... perfect, no.
Lots of good perspectives on this thread, shows how we all vary.
Phil, what you don't realize is that many of the guys who shoot at a very high level 3D Trad don't hunt deer with Trad bow and almost none with a selfbow. Why? Because its really freaking tough to feed a family that way. To consistanly kill big game with a Trad bow is difficult at best. You cant decide how another man choses to hunt. Yes, Trad big game has is limitations. Like someone said "a man has got to know those limitations". When a big guy (phil) here decries "a significant number of Trad shooters shouldn't be hunting deer" it smacks of an elitistism, superiority type comment that hurts all string hunting pastimes.
Swing Draw and Snap shooting has clearly hurt a ton of Trad shooters for decades. I have heard many older guys, older than myself say "i tried and tried this for many years and I never could hit crap. Then, I swithched to this. . . . . never looked back". I been shooting since 2D Phil and never saw very many Instinctive guys on the walkup line or butt when target got small remain for vey long in the shoot-down. Just a fact. For many reasons.
One example of a guy that has shot several 200' whitetails B. Worthington and won about everything a guy can win with a Trad bow. Ask him what he hunts with and most Trad guys are dumbstruck. He will tell you "a compound bow".
I dearly love shooting trad bows & nothing is more relaxing to me than shooting a few arrows & a few cold beers after a long day of work but I'm so buisy fishing during the summer that I just don't shoot then it's Oct & I grab the compound. I do believe there is an Oneida Phoenix in my future but I currently can't bring myself to spend the $ I intend to shoot one with fingers & with & without sights I'm sure some will disagree. but to me this is a good compromise between trad & compound sights & instinctive. & my shoulders will be happy with the letoff
“True, some folks have greater hand-eye coordination than others, but even those folks can get a lot better by learning how to put their brains to work.”
“you speak as though every individual possesses the same hand eye coordination & mental thought process. & that is simply not true”
I will agree with the last 5 words.
We’re talking about being able to hit a large grapefruit on the first shot about 80% to 90% of the time at something between 15 and 25 yards. Not time after time after time like a top 300 Round competitor, but first shot. And misses, when they occur, being generally quite close. Bearing in mind that a 6” circle is 2.25 times larger than a 4” circle, and we really just need to get through 2 sides of a gallon jug without puncturing the bottom.
You don’t need to be a $10 million a year talent to do that.
HH, I'm not a big guy here. Just someone that 's been out enough to see real world experiences. I sure didn't mean what I wrote to sound elitist at all. It is an observation. I've seen way too many shooters at 3D shoots that were unable to consistently hit the vitals of a deer target. And these are more social shoots, not competitions. I don't go to competitions. I just go shoot with friends to have fun.
One more thought - snap shooting was how Fed Bear shot. Many, many people my age grew up watching him and trying to emulate him. That was way before Asbell was a common name.
I learned how to shoot instinctively from G Fred's books. It works well for me. I keep my freezers full. I'm also not a top finisher in 3D competition and I'm okay with that.
Just FYI, I've never read or seen anything, from Fred Asbell, and was unaware of any other "Archery Gods" until I became a Bowsiter . Just started shooting at an early age, and never really changed my shooting style. I did pick up a DVD recommended on here a couple years ago called "Masters of the Barebow"...it's very good. Probably helped lower my 3D scores a little...but I find when I just relax, and let my body go on "autopilot", I make my best shots.
“When a big guy (phil) here decries ‘a significant number of Trad shooters shouldn't be hunting deer’ it smacks of an elitistism, superiority type comment that hurts all string hunting pastimes.”
There is nothing Elitist about saying that people who shoot poorly at realistic hunting range should reconsider their hunting plans. That’s like saying it’s “Elitist” to declare that people who can’t pass a driving test should not be allowed to drive.
Fortunately (and in some respects not) we are not regulated as a rule, and maybe it’s a bit unfair to base a judgment on what a guy can do on a 3D course, where you simply don’t have the option of passing on a shot that you don’t think that you’d be willing to take in the field, because nobody ever wounded an animal by keeping his arrow on the string, and at the end of the day, minimizing wounded animals is what really matters....
been over over 20 years ago outside of Warrenton va was a 3d range & compounds were welcomed but it was a traditional archery range. Stacy groscup (spelling) & a few other notable trad archers shot there & I have never forgot at some of the bigger shoots they had a novelty target at the end of the coarse a steel deer with a 6" circle cut out for the vitals & all day tink tink & folks would laugh but it really wasn't funny each tink was a crippled animal
Sure, did not it was. I said it sounds that when you hear it off the cuff.
The actual shot, the killing arrow does not have to be 11 ring accurate as we know.
When i hear some talk about yardage and instinctive in same breath without seeing them shoot almost without fail they are gapping but dont know it or focus mechanically as such. They are gapping however.
I strongly disagree with about everything you have ever opined on here or LW.
I started field book 5yrs ago. Two days ago i harvested the 60th Whitetail almost all with selfbow with a few vintage glass bows kills sprinkled. Im not the greatest 3D shooter but hunting , , killing was something that was in my Ungar and Native American bloodline. Was how I made a living for 25yrs as well. Not sure where anyone ever got confused? The hunter gather is and was never 100% sucessful. We do our utmost for a sucessful effecient kill. I lost a mature whitetail this year. Poor penetration, only got one lung. 5hrs on blood and another day on cold trail. nada. Hate it, but over last 10yrs taken more than a handful of ML or rifle shot deer with my bow. So, it evens out I reckon.
You go down the road of separating string hunters and pitting them against one another based on weapon lethality and your only hurting the American Hunter, American Archers.
Look at western Europe. Those folks wont let you hunt with a bow, period! Careful whose granola you piss in.
No matter what your aiming style is, it becomes instinctive after you’ve done it enough.
People do shoot with no recognition of their arrow. It’s why they shoot things outta the air. Try that tracking with a sight and it fails miserably. So, it does exist.
Anyways, repetition is the key. Repeat your draw and hold and you will shoot a stick bow well. It’s that simple.
Check out Tom Clum folks. His advice is priceless. I’m serious.
I think many who shoot " instinctive ", with no conscience referencing at shorter hunting distances, do move to a form of " gap " when shooting at longer distances.
I never shoot at game ( for the primary shot ) at distances requiring anything but picking a spot and releasing. At these short range hunting distances I do not snap shoot, but I always get to full draw even if only for a millisecond, no time to reference anything. Should I target shoot at distances beyond 30 yards, or follow up a longer shot at a wounded animal, I do switch to gap and hold at full draw a bit longer as I " reference ". I also gap on fish where water distortion throws my inner memory off and I need to hold lower than my mind tells me to.
Even though I consider myself an instinctive shooter, that is for short range hunting purposes only, less than 30 yards in my case. Anything longer, I switch to some form of gapping.
I agree that if one repeats something enough times it becomes automatic or function without thought. when I shot my very best I was to that point & I'd try to explain to folks that much like throwing a ball or frisbee or casting a lure your subconscious mind is controlling all the mechanics of the throw without any conchense thought other than where you want to hit. the difference is when shooting a bow everything is right in front of you & your eyes & it's so hard to function without thought when your looking at everything your doing. but that's what REALLY good instinctive shots are doing. some of the best practice one can do is shooting moving targets because there's no time to think. function without thought & if this is achieved along with good form. then great accuracy can be achieved
Sure Time When shooting bow your not repeating same thing eachtime unless your on the indoor line. So, when ranges change the so called instinctive guy is just guessing he can remember the trajectory of his arrow.
When I am out to kill something I am not guessing about anything. All the things that must go right to get into a position to harvest a mature animal. Location wind, shot angle, arrow clearance and after getting all these just right and your going to guess on the flight of your bladed missile into the vital.
No sir brother. That would be like taking the hard part of baking a 80th birthday cake, doing all the little things to make it a master piece and then when you light the last candle you fall in it before its presented to the lucky person.
Took a guy this year I shoot with this season hunting. Great archer but mostly he was great upon second arrow. I took to my place on opening day to deer hunt. He shot a deer. We recovered it. He told me it was his second arrow. Hmmn I said Then, couple weeks later I was called to his place to get a deer out. Made it to kill sight and saw an arrow in forest floor sticking out. I said "whats this"? He says " my first arrow". I told him "rut is coming up you going to keep spraying arrows or you gonna let me show you how to gap and you quit guessing with this old Fred G stuff"? This is a guy shooting for 40yrs.
Showed him took about 30 min and he's loving hunting and making great first shots out to 26yds. took a nice 3x3 in late Nov. He will be hard to deal with at the 3D peg now.
“No matter what your aiming style is, it becomes instinctive after you’ve done it enough.”
That’s all I’ve ever said; but the point is that it is the END POINT of the learning. You don’t put a kid in honors Calculus before he has learned how to count without using fingers and toes.
And Brain Science can explain how that learning occurs and how to shorten the learning curve.
“People do shoot with no recognition of their arrow.”
That’s the gist of it. Add the word CONSCIOUS in front of “recognition” and you will be strictly correct.
Not true. Just to put fingers on string is a thought.
Instinctive is just a memory game. In place of a mechanical process that can be measured.
It's just a poor process. Without question. When you have seen some world class shooters maybe you'll figger it out GF. Go stand on the 75m line in SD. Waych a training session. The pull the sight off and start instinctive guessing.
Even IFAA class where you have to shoot four shots at 80yds let you have a reference card! Why? cuz we're not guessing we know how far the gap is above the flag on target!
There's bow shooting and there instinctive guessing. A person's gotta figure which is gonna feed his family and hit yella. I know which one does consistently.
Pretty sure we were talking about practical hunting ranges...
Which for me ends at distances where I find myself actually thinking about what the gap oughtta be... at least beyond “it’s close, so hold low.“ LOL
Funny thing, though... it almost seems like I do better on elevation at 70 yards by guesstimate than by holding point-on at a specific mark higher up the hill.
But at that distance I’m way more interested in the windage than the elevation. I just prefer hitting the target because it saves a lot of arrows...
Also a possibility that your “Instinctive” shooters have been at this game a lot longer and know how close they can get, so they are a lot less interested in winging shots from way out. Nothing to prove about their shooting ability, so they just want to get in there and place a solid hit.
Wild-ass generalization, of course ;)
Think hes got Instinctive or what hes call that confused.
Never saw a 75m PO!
Not even with a war bow.
tdvorac I'm absolutely not disputing your experiences but I'd guess that the instinctive shooters were far more experienced hunters than the compound guys. my compound is old & shooting 150 grain broadheads I'm flat to 30 yards well my 20yd pin is 2" low at 30. so it's a no brainer dead on shot to 30
"Even though I consider myself an instinctive shooter, that is for short range hunting purposes only, less than 30 yards in my case. Anything longer, I switch to some form of gapping".
Anything 70 and over (for 3D Shoots)...I use my whisker biscuit as a reference. Some shoots have 100 yd targets, and I can't just drop an arrow where I want it out that far, without using some form of reference.
Up to 70...I just come to full draw, "burn a hole" in the intended spot, and try to make the smoothest release and follow through possible, without disrupting my focus on the spot.
My 2019 Bull was 45-ish yards...approaching the extreme limits of my comfort zone. Fortunately, the arrow entered EXACTLY where I was staring, tight behind the shoulder. I find my focus is much more intense, when shooting at live animals, vs 3D targets.
That predatory Rush can sharpen you like nothing else.... or turn you into an impotent, quivering mass of nerves.
I’ve shot enough deer that I only shoot when I’m stone cold, and let the rush come after. I just hope I can keep it together next time I get a chance at an Elk...
I look at the end of my arrow and have always considered that instinctive. From now on I will just say I’m not looking at the end of the arrow and still be considered instinctive.
Only if if your weak between ears GF.
What's enough deer? Maybe say 10 mature deer in your life.
Lots of backyard Olympians give advice and keyboard sermon's here and there. Most don't ever need a toothpick to get that deer or elk gristle out from between their teeth however.
Just look at thread at what guys consider Instinctive. NFAA should dump that class name as well because its not a method or process of which archers use to put an arrow into gold or fur.
AGAIN, Most folks weather know it or not Gap at either target or do it off a reference point at bow ( shelf or sight window). A mediocre coach or competent shooter can teach the fundamental in 30-45 min. MOST I say.
a long time ago I shot indoors at the 4h center in Front Royal va & a guy that shot there would ALWAYS shoot 300 & 40+ ×s but had not yet killed a deer with a bow said he just went to peices when deer got close. now HOW in the world could someone stand on a line elbow to elbow with 50 people watching & shoot like that & yet not be able to hit a deer at 20 yards. I'm the exact opposite I call it predator mode & even when shooting the compound with pins once the bowstring starts moving I don't do much thinking just function (predator mode)
Seems strange to me Time. Guy can repeat a shot and shoot 290's and cant put an arrow in a 1 gal bucket sized kill at 10yds?
Fear, anxiety, adrenaline paralyzes some folks. Cant return fire in a tic, the will to live just gets throw into the gutter. "The minds a terrible thing to use" I use to say to these type folks. Then, a good hard slap on their skid lid (combat helmet) would sometimes knock em out of it long enough to beat feet and draw fire. Then, there's men and women who only live in the high end of their adrenal glands. They shine in those situations but have a very hard time in relaxed settings of normal life.
From years of watching so called instinctive shooters. When, the monies on the shoot-down stake, the big miss eventually comes out or the TP monster grabs em. Which always led me to believe they shot what they called instinctive because staring at a spot and shooting at it created to much anxiety. So, this Instinctive process was a way not to focus on any spot keeping Mr TP in his cage? Basically a trajectory memorization type deal. Most can only memorize that arc well to 30-35yds and that's what you get. A decent shot to 30yds.
The minds a funny thing.
That is what I meant by stating many are not calm enough at the center for this type of hunting. I would guess close encounters and " Buck Fever" has caused many in the hunting world to search for sighting aids.
I drive a truck for a living & the tire guy that services all the trucks at work has just recently started hunting & he told me he missed a huge 10 point the other day said his heart was pounding he was shaking & honestly didn't know where the crosshairs were when the gun went off. buck fever at its finest. this is a tough dude that wrestles truck tires for a living
How tough do you have you be to wrestle something that doesn’t wrestle back???
Big mistake IMO confuse strength with Toughness.
Buck fever is a crazy thing, and it has nothing to do with the size of the antlers.
Best cure for it IMO is simply knowing that you don’t HAVE TO shoot this deer. Ever notice how easy it is to keep it together if you have a buck-only tag and a doe walks through? Nothing to it.
But you get into a mindset where OhMyGodTHISIZZITTIGottaShootRIGHTNOW!!!....
Bad Juju comes a’callin’....
But if you can stay calm; maintain your focus; stick to your dead-certain range.... then there’s nothing to get rattled over. Most people who have done a lot of shooting know when they’ve hit the x-ring before they’re even aware that the trigger has broken or that the string is loosed.
For me, I’m in that spot or I’m not. I passed up a slam-dunk shot at a cow Elk that would have been my first Elk ever, just because I wasn’t feeling that dead-sure level of confidence that I needed. Probably because I took one step past a massive Doug Fir and there she was at 12-15 yards, just as clueless about me as I had been about her just a few seconds earlier.
If I could go back and do it again, I would like to think that I could step back behind the tree and focus on the task at hand, but in the moment I realized I was still shaken up by a touch of buck fever that had hit me a few days before...
But that’s why we do this. Life Lessons.
GF, grab a truck tire on the wheel and lift it up. It won’t be so confusing to you then.
Tough is between the ears. Without it, the rest is jellyfish. Or your what you see on the sidewalks in SF.
I never suggested/meant to suggest that the guy is not as strong as they come; that’s gotta be backbreaking work.
Mental toughness has nothing to do with physical power.