Missouri breaks fire
General Topic
Contributors to this thread:
montnatom 02-Sep-20
montnatom 02-Sep-20
cubdrvr 02-Sep-20
cubdrvr 02-Sep-20
ROUGHCOUNTRY 03-Sep-20
montnatom 03-Sep-20
cubdrvr 03-Sep-20
Bowman 17-Sep-20
GF 17-Sep-20
Irishman 17-Sep-20
drycreek 17-Sep-20
GF 17-Sep-20
Missouribreaks 18-Sep-20
WV Mountaineer 18-Sep-20
TD 18-Sep-20
GF 18-Sep-20
TD 18-Sep-20
From: montnatom
02-Sep-20
for those traveling to the Missouri Breaks for elk season on or around highway 200 in Jordan Montana area. There is a large fire that started this afternoon and the town of Jordan is being evacuated and hwy 200 is closed between Jordan and Brockton. 50 MPH winds arent helping.

From: montnatom
02-Sep-20
https://www.facebook.com/garfieldcountydes

link for info

From: cubdrvr
02-Sep-20
Talking to my mom now who has evacuated to Jordan airport. She watched retardant drops on edge of town. Businesses lost on outskirts but she thinks the town will survive.

From: cubdrvr
02-Sep-20

cubdrvr's embedded Photo
cubdrvr's embedded Photo
Hi way 200. Obviously it’s closed.

From: ROUGHCOUNTRY
03-Sep-20
I think you meant "Brockway" and not "Brockton." Brockton is east of Poplar on the Fort Peck Indian reservation on highway 2.

From: montnatom
03-Sep-20
thanks, I live in Poplar so should know better. fires are still around but bigger issue for opening day is 92 degrees. Good think is cooler weather moving in Sunday.

From: cubdrvr
03-Sep-20
101 in Billings and 93 in Jordan for Sat. This old man is going to look for a whitetail. I have access to a walk in cooler within 3 miles for a deer but my elk permit isn’t close lol.

From: Bowman
17-Sep-20

Bowman's Link
How hard it will be for people to recover from such large-scale firemen. After the fire, only the therapy https://trustsession.com/ helped my friends. I can't imagine how many animals suffered during the fire, the forests will be restored for decades...

From: GF
17-Sep-20
Looks more like grassland in that picture above, and that should bounce right back - but will do so only to the next extent that the native plants are still there.

Vast majority of the US was fire-adapted before Europeans showed up, and all these years of fire suppression have really screwed things up.

But in the grand scheme of things...

In the amount of time that Yellowstone has had to recover from the fires of ‘88, I will have become a very old man, and those new forests in Yellowstone are still very young. We humans just don’t live long enough to appreciate Nature’s timetable.

I just hope that lives and livelihoods will be protected....

From: Irishman
17-Sep-20
GF, I have heard that argument many times, that fire suppression has screwed things up, and that we would have been better off to let fires burn. However, how does global warming figure into this? Can you really compare things to the past now that the forests are dryer, and the summers are hotter? I think we need to suppress fires as quickly as possible.

From: drycreek
17-Sep-20
Fire needs fuel. Less fuel, less long term fire damage. It’s really very elementary, prairie recovers from fire easily, mature forest with lots of litter, beetle kill, dead limbs, downed trees, etc. does not. Global warming hasn’t and can’t be proven because we have so little to compare it with. Climate change can be proven and we have no control over it. That’s my opinion, and it’s worth every penny you paid for it.

From: GF
17-Sep-20
“ Can you really compare things to the past now that the forests are dryer, and the summers are hotter? I think we need to suppress fires as quickly as possible.”

I’m going to start off here, at least, agreeing with drycreek. All that will do is kick the can down the road and set the stage for a truly massive conflagration. I don’t think that’s what we want.... Especially considering the fact that the current trends are expected to continue for quite some time, so how much worse are we willing to risk making them?

Where I’m going to disagree with drycreek, though, is on the “proof” of global warming and human activity.

1) It is easily demonstrated in a laboratory that an air sample which is artificially enriched with CO2 can absorb more heat and hold onto it longer than the same sample before the enrichment.

2) In the past few hundred years (especially), we humans have been extremely effective in extracting millions upon millions of years worth of carbon which had been stored well below the earth’s surface as hydrocarbons... And we have burned essentially all of it. And when you burn hydrocarbons, what do you get? CO2 and water. In the atmosphere. Soaking up Solar radiation, AKA heat.

3) Samples of air from pockets trapped thousands and thousands of years ago in places like Antarctica, deep under the ice, clearly demonstrate that CO2 levels in the modern day atmosphere are higher than they were at earlier times.

As if you need to know your starting balance to figure out that if you keep writing checks and make no deposits, your bank balance is going to end up lower than where you started.

I’m still waiting for a single, remotely credible answer to the question of how it is that those three very solid FACTS do not add up to the reasonable conclusion that all of our burning of fossil fuels must necessarily have contributed to rising global temperatures.

It makes about as much sense is telling a fat guy who goes out for a 4th of July run in a sauna suit that if he gets too hot, he should put on a nice, warm hat. And thicker socks.

18-Sep-20
I agree with climate change. The Missouri Breaks is a great place to find fossils such as T. Rex. I have to believe it was a much different climate back then. And yes, the climate changed with no help from humans,....... and it continues today.

Global warming due to humans ? Likely there is a human induced component, but far more is due to the natural and evolving process. We should use practical sense and science to improve what we can. Forget the socialist extremists such Greta Thunberg and Biden who blame the entire weather cycle on humans. It is not true.

18-Sep-20
Asphalt jungles do more to increase global temperatures then any carbon emission from fossil fuels or other man made influence. They do more influencing rain runoff then any other man made scenario. Plainly, people point to fossil fuel use, deforestation, carbon emissions, etc... as if it’s the culprit. Not so in my opinion. And, that’s worth more then most on this topic.

Do I think man has influenced temperatures on earth? Yes I do. But, from the studies I’ve read and professionals I’ve met working on this topic, it’s such a small influence in comparison to what most people suggest and think. Less then one degree seems to be what most of those people agree on.

From: TD
18-Sep-20
The very magnetic flux is changing on earth and changing rapidly. Dramatically some say. At a faster rate than ever seen before. North pole is moving towards Russia at an ever faster pace, some 40 kilometer per year now. Many claim at some point the actual poles will reverse, possibly verysuddenly. Evidence shows it has done so in the past, possibly several times. Magnetic energy field helps protect the earth from a great deal of radiation, which pretty much effects everything from the ozone to life itself.

I blame it on cell phones.......

From: GF
18-Sep-20
“ Less then one degree seems to be what most of those people agree on.”

OK, so let’s accept that as fact. The trouble is that things clearly ARE changing, and the change is bringing about a great deal of hardship, what with all of the fires and floods and hurricanes… So the question is, why don’t we do something about the piece of the problem that we CAN do something about?

Not talking about tanking the economy or putting a lot of people out of work; just suggesting that if we can slow this train wreck down by moving people into new jobs (preferably which pay at least as much as they are making now) and if, in the process, we could preserve the places where we all love to go to Hunt and Fish and get away from all of that asphalt… What the hell is so objectionable about that?

Personally, I don’t really care if it cuts into the big oil companies’ profits, because I’ve never received so much as a thank you note (let alone a royalty check) for any of the oil that they’ve extracted from public land, so I’d rather have a place to hunt.

It’s not as if any of these oil tycoons have invited me to hunt on their private ranches, so it’s going to have to be public land for me. I don’t owe those characters anything.

From: TD
18-Sep-20
The way the forest land has been developed, along with HOW they have been developed building homes right snuggled into all those beautiful trees and such..... the days of letting things burn and let nature be nature has changed..... to greatly understate it.

Coupled with public land logging, etc. having been shut down in many places..... we see what has happened. Good land management practices,sectional logging, etc. as with good wildlife management can help mitigate a wide range of problems, from fires to beetle kill and disease, erosion after these massive fires, etc.

Hands off management that pretends man is not a part of the environment or has no place in it is fantasy land and may as well develop a unicorn introduction plan as well. Reality and facts..... many folks across the country seem to be having a tough time dealing with them and much prefer to willfully ignore them and deal instead with wishes, feelings and fantasy.....

In nature, massive loss and destruction.....to the point of mass extinction levels....have happened all throughout history. And eons of recovery are the blink of an eye in geologic terms. Just that man's concept of "history" (and pretty much everything else) and earth's reality of history aren't even close to the same scale, not even on the same planet, so to speak.....

  • Sitka Gear