Bowsite.com

“Orange man bad!”

Bulls**t! Orange man is exposing the real Democratic Party, and they’re scared to death if him. Why anyone would be stupid enough to vote for this crap is beyond me! I tried to challenge DanaC on the hearings thread over this. Of course it’s nothing but crickets. More and more, I’m thinking these idiots are jonesing for another civil war.

They occasionally say the quiet part out loud but their actions have been screaming their plans for years.

The only thing a so-called liberal world order would do is create global tribalism, which wouldn't create anykind of a liberal empire...

They never will have it. Just like they will never have true green energy.

You had my attention right up to this point. Celebrate your ass off…f*** the commies! Don’t capitulation to their anti American stupidity! If refuse to celebrate you might as well move to another country.

It was frightening to watch then, as it is now.

What worries me the most is that when you start talking about people who don't agree with you like their your enemy. You know your talking about your neighbors and regular Americans. One thing I'm sure of is when the guns come out all those tough guys will run and hide in their bunkers.

"Independent" does not mean 'member of the 'Independent Party' - it means 'NO PARTY IS GOOD ENOUGH.'

We've been over this before. And over it again. And again. And yet again. But you keep right on using that bullsnot argument like it was a shiny new penny you just picked up. I don't even expect better of you any more.

Now go ahead and revert to labeling me as a 'Bow Libtard' or whatever cute bumper-sticker phrase you haven't trotted out in the past two weeks.

The interview on Armstrong and Getty with LA assistant DA in charge of Child Endangerment was revealing;

Gascon wants to eliminate police and prisons

He mandated no special circumstances even in violent crimes against children

Gun crimes are up 65% on his watch and violent crime is going nuts

Many catch and release criminals are back out committing violent crimes including a recent case of a released criminal shooting 2 cops in cold blood

This is the reform promised and funded by the outspoken Obama/ Soros ….and the current Democrat party platform.

Jesus Christ is our hope.

Brazil’s murder rate has gone down 34% since they initiated their new gun policy.

The new president made it easier for the average person to buy a gun. Tucker interviews the presidents son and he explains it. There will be New World order politicians head exploding when this gets out.

yeah, it's _leftist Democrats_ labeling Jewish people with Nazi emblems. Gimme a break.

We call the libs sheep...yet we keep allowing this stuff, who really are the sheep? The libs vote and promote what they want because frankly that's how they are....But what about normal conservative, people?...you know traditional family, Christian people?...we get all fumed up about what the libs are teaching our kids, and yet we keep letting them do it!!

Make no mistake, I'm not advocating violence, nor anarchy....but frankly I'm not budging either. You can spew out all the twisted nonsense you want, and I'll simply ignore you, try and force me......not gonna happen.

You want to be queer....you live your messed up life, and leave the rest of us alone, just don't expect me to say it's normal...

You want to teach all this gender confusion....you keep it in your own home...stay out of mine.

You have problems with gun violence and drive by shootings in chicago, or where ever.....you convict the crimminal, hang them whatever, but you leave the law abiding citizens alone.

You don't believe in an Almighty God?..that's your choice....you leave my faith in Him alone.

You want an electric scooter?...you go buy one, but your not getting the keys to my f-150.

In a nutshell?......you support your shining leader, praise him for the inflation and high gas prices, and low moral standards, you help him up when he falls off his bicycle.....just don't expect the rest of us to.

to be successful at selling and convincing others, you have to listen and communicate well. while attacking pro athletes and hollywierd liberals on social media was funny at times and entertaining, it wasn't increasing support for the agenda and not much different than hillary calling us deplorables.

it's safe to say tens of millions of people voted for biden, whether it was 80 million doesn't matter at this point. that's a lot of voters that have policy influence at all levels whether they win elections or not. so, the point is not just winning elections to ramrod your agenda, it's about communicating a vision and getting people on board. that's how good leaders and businesses succeed, not by creating division.

we are where we are because of bad leaders on both sides. i'm a pessimist unfortunately and not convinced a red wave in november is going to right this ship.

Stop burying your head in the sand. Gimme a break...

I understand what you are saying, but it is shy of the true nature of the problem.

No people that lost their character kept their liberties. - Lawrence W. Reed

"It is when a people forget God that tyrants forge their chains." - Patrick Henry

"Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other."- John Quincy Adams

"If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land." - 2Chronicles 7:14

The Declaration of Independence clearly states that American rights come from their Creator(God); created, endowed and entitled in context. If you don't know/want God, in the end, you lose forever and know it forever.

"for I am not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.” - Jesus

Get your head out of the clouds...

Just curious, are you giving the racist Nazi alt-right shitheads here a free pass?

Seems that way, Dana. Looks as though much of the Code of Conduct doesn’t really apply these days either.

1. No Profanity. This includes cursing, sexual innuendo, vulgar statements, racist, homophobic, transphobic, and other terms deemed offensive.

2. No Threatening, harassing, or abusive remarks.

8. Contributors who are argumentative, intolerant, confrontational, and lack respect for others will be removed. While debate is often healthy, habitual debaters and people who seek confrontation will be removed and potentially blocked from making future contributions. This is necessary to ensure a positive experience for the great majority of our visitors.

9. Anonymous Registrations are Prohibited - People who register for our services under assumed or "bogus" names will be removed.

K

So, Dana and then your post immediately breaks the profanity rule

For pointing out two clearly racist, sexist, and transphobic posts…again…K.

I was never referencing anything you said, TGBow. But apparently calling out posts that are clearly racist and sexist is enough to get yourself called racist and sexist I see.

Those terms have NO meaning anymore. Y’all sound like kindergarteners calling each other a doodyhead and yelling nah nah boo boo! It’s funny how the lefty’s are the only ones keeping these useless terms alive!

It's not just the star of David. It's the star of David emblazoned with the word "Jude" (German for Jew) that Jews were mandated to wear by the Nazis.

Reinhard Heydrich decrees that all Jews over six years of age in the Reich, Alsace, Bohemia-Moravia and the German–annexed territory of western Poland (called the Warthegau), are to wear yellow Star of David on their outer clothing in public at all times. The word "Jew" is to be inscribed inside the star in German or the local language.

During the Nazi era, German authorities reintroduced the Jewish badge as a key element of their larger plan to persecute and eventually to annihilate the Jewish population of Europe. They used the badge not only to stigmatize and humiliate Jews but also to segregate them, to watch and control their movements, and to prepare for deportation.

Ok, my turn to spell. Your identity politics aren’t working anymore! You want to accuse someone of racism? then spell out your grievance with some intelligence. You can spout the buzzwords but you don’t have a viable explanation to back your claim. I still have an original box of Aunt Jamima pancakes in my cupboard. Does that qualify me as racist? Did you support the swearing in of Katanji Jackson? You know, the justice that was appointed, by your party, strictly for the simple fact that she has ‘dark skin’?

Identity politics? This has nothing to do with identity politics. This had to do with a blatantly racist post from azelkhunter. You got pulled into it because you said the term "racism" (amongst others) has no meaning. It most certainly does. Does having Aunt Jamima in your cupboard make you racist? No, it does not. However, saying a SCOTUS justice who has a law degree from Harvard, clerked for a different SCOTUS justice, and served as a judge in a US District Court for nine years got the job "strictly for the simple fact that she has ‘dark skin’" most certainly is. And FYI, she wasn't appointed by my party.

*sigh*

In the private sector people should have the right to hire whoever they want..that's part of having a free market...I know that sounds foreign in today's society. If a black man owns a business he should have the right to hire whoever he wants to ..same goes for every other race.

It's very clear that leftist draw out the race card when they can't debate the facts. I don't tolerate racist people around me, never have, but when I see racism I call it what it is, no matter who the guilty party is.

But, if we criticize someone because of their stance and they happen to be black then that makes us a "racist".

Reading is fundamental, Shawn.

I have to laugh when i here Libtards like BEG try to hang the Racism rope around folks neck. Does it make you feel somehow superior to others.

Superior? Nope. Has to do with the fact that I think this board, and the world for that matter, would be a better place if blatant racism like azelkhunter posted or blatant sexualism like you posted wasn't given a free pass.

And it was started and used as a badge of shame. It is a badge borne of hatred and bigotry.

I'm really confused now though. Seeing that you are now extolling the virtues of Hitler's manifesto and seemingly pro-Nazi, how does that square with your personal views about Putin being justified in invading the Ukraine to squash the Nazi menace there?

And never did I say anything to the contrary. You’re either putting words in my mouth or your reading comprehension needs work. Based on the other threads, it’s likely a bit of both.

That’s called projecting. A classic characteristic of narcissists.

Please provide proof of racism on my part. China joe said flat out he would put a “black woman” on the bench. You’re going to need a scientific explanation for this one. Seriously, if you don’t teach me the error of my ways, how am I expected to change them?

Saying someone got a job based strictly (ie, solely; purely; for no other reason than) on the color of their skin and ignoring all of the qualifications that person brings to the table is racially insensitive. It is the epitome of what modern racism is. Since you asked for "science", there are plenty of papers and articles that delve into the concept of modern racism (https://dictionary.apa.org/modern-racism).

Let me ask you, if I said "The only reason Amy Coney Barrett got appointed was because she was a woman," would you view that line as sexist?

Y'all give politicians way too much credit. The notion that there is some global cabal pulling strings like a puppet master is laughable.

Democrats, Republicans, Libertarians and others have been abundantly clear in terms of what their plans and visions are, and they are codified in their party platforms.

https://democrats.org/where-we-stand/party-platform/

https://prod-static.gop.com/media/Rules_Of_The_Republican_Party.pdf?_ga=2.133346702.1693422534.1657119547-1785364529.1657119547

https://www.lp.org/platform/

And IMO, the best characterization of the political reshuffling and changing party demographics that have played out in the last few election cycles has been done by Peter Zeihan. He covers it in the first 17 or so minutes of the linked video.

Once again…prove it. Just because you say it, doesn’t make it so. Please bolster your claim by describing the remaining attributes that confirm my racist behavior.

“Modern racism”? Is that how you justify it? You call it modern?! So, It’s not like the old school racism where people were beat, burned, lynched, and shot because of the color of their skin?! “Modern racism”…not as brutal as racism used to be, but just as effective in labeling those you disagree with…?!?! Lol!

Like I said, your identity politics are the best replacement for logical and realistic explanations.

She was nominated BASED ON HER SKIN COLOR! China Joe confirmed it. Just like saying high gas prices are necessary to achieve the liberal world order.

“Let me ask you, if I said "The only reason Amy Coney Barrett got appointed was because she was a woman," would you view that line as sexist?”

No, She’s not the first woman there, and I doubt she’ll be the last.

Your hypocritical ignorance is showing again!

Given the most recent SCOTUS nominee is factually more qualified than the one rushed through before her, who cares? Seriously. The idea that because Biden said he'd select a black woman, she cant be the most qualified is epically laughable.

As someone noted in one of the last posts, Barrett was going to be a woman no matter what - her or another woman. Was there not a man Trump and McConnell could ram through at the last moment? Of course there were qualified men! Doesnt matter.

The president gets to pick, and decided one of the MANY women with high legal qualifications was what the court needed, so he selected Justice Barrett.

Biden just did the same thing.

Regardless of how you feel about one being liberal or conservative or whatever, the president gets to pick. If you have issues with KBJ on the court for how she was selected, I'm curious to hear about how much you dislike ACB on the court given her lower level of judicial experience.

There is no hypocrisy. There is nothing wrong with saying "the nominee will be a woman" as Trump did with ACB, nor is there anything wrong with saying "the nominee will be a black woman" as JB did with KJ. They were clearly under-represented demographics on the SCOTUS at the time they were nominated. What is wrong is when you imply that the only reason either of those people got the job was because of those characteristics, completely ignoring/invalidating all of the qualifications they bring to the table.

How you use words matter, and just because you think what you say isn't insensitive or hurtful to people doesn't mean that it will be perceived that way.

He came out on record a day after Ginsburg died saying his nominee would be a woman.

President Donald Trump said Saturday evening that he will choose a candidate to fill the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Supreme Court seat next week and his candidate will be a woman.

"I will be putting forth a nominee next week. It will be a woman," Trump said during a rally in Fayetteville, North Carolina.

Aaaaaand again…China Joe told the world he nominated her for her skin color!!

I’m curious how you explain away the fact that Justice Clarence Thomas, has been labeled, by the democrats as “a black white supremacist”? Does he not have any qualifying attributes, other than being a black white supremacist, to support his position on the bench?

From the link: “Former NBA player-turned-Twitter personality Rex Chapman suggested Justice Clarence Thomas is a "Black White Supremacist."

"As Clarence Thomas is signaling, they would like to get rid of contraception," Goldberg said. "Do you understand, sir? No- because you don't have to use it… you better hope that they don't come for you, Clarence, and say that you should not be married to your wife, who happens to be White, because they will move that."

So, are these politically correct statements that fit the lefty narrative, or are they just as racist as the accusations you throw around? I’m sure you have some logical defense for your hypocritical thought process??

Face it bro…under your definition of ‘racist’, you’re just as racist as the next guy!!!! Prove me wrong… I dare ya!!!!!

He said he wanted to nominate a qualified black woman. That is different than saying the only reason she was nominated is because she's black. There is a huge difference in those statements. Not sure how to make it any more apparent to you.

I’m curious how you explain away the fact that Justice Clarence Thomas, has been labeled, by the democrats as “a black white supremacist”? Does he not have any qualifying attributes, other than being a black white supremacist, to support his position on the bench?

Clarence Thomas is an incredibly qualified jurist. The people calling him a black white supremacist are delusional.

Would not have been my choice.... but if you get the confirmation votes you get the seat. Maybe even get mobs of angry protesters at your home.... or does that only happen to conservative justices??

Some posters obviously scored an A+ in sensitivity training

Absolutely hard to believe some of the liberal bowsite Here

Nor have you distinguished prejudice from racism.

The democrats scream racism so much it has lost it's meaning. Most people see it as the political tool it is.

They try to attach Republicans to racist fringe groups and call black conservatives uncle Tom.

My lifelong democrat father in law was the biggest racist I have ever known. He would say we had to elect that "n" to control the corporations.

Most people who have not been indoctrinated don't really care about race.

Kids of white supremacists often wake up so that is some positive.

However I feel sorry for many blacks that actually believe they can't accomplish stuff because they are told that by the democrats and their parents. They just give up and stay on the democrats plantation.

At some point I think affirmative action will be limited as it is much less necessary now than it once was.

The institutionalized racism there is becoming obsolete. I didn't say it wasn't necessary at one time but it is racism.

So why does the WORLD Economic Forum exist then?

It’s actually laughable that anyone doesn’t think the new Liberal World Order isn’t exactly what they are trying to achieve! The WEF puts their agenda right out in the open for everyone to see, with numerous videos online, and then when you point it out they call it a conspiracy theory and you a crazy person!

Why do political WORLD leaders travel from all over the world to meet in Switzerland for multi million dollar closed door meetings with heavy police presence and censorship of all non mainstream media. What’s the purpose of the meetings with all of these world leaders?!

And the arguing here with indoctrinated people using terms like transphobic just proves the point. It’s a made up term to divide us, and cause chaos and confusion. (They’ve successfully made the question, “Is it a man or a woman” very confusing and it’s transphobic to even ask? How stupid can you be to fall for it?! Type in, “Can a man get pregnant” into google and read the answer. It’s “Transphobic” to deny the google generated Yes answer!)

Same with all the racism arguing and no clear definition of what it even means. They’ve changed the definition of it in online dictionaries just to add to the confusion! Read the Communist Manifesto and modern Marxism and it’s goals, it all aligns with the goals of the WEF and the New Liberal World Order. Climate Alarmism is also one of it’s most powerful tools to club you into submission.

And his name is Klaus Schwab not Santa Clause or the Easter Bunny. There are lots of informative videos online where he outlines, in his own words, his Liberal World Order. One of his chosen young World leaders is my Canadian Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau and more than half of his cabinet. Those are his words, not mine.

I don’t know what the World Economic Forum is but I’m guessing it has something to do with a group of people/companies discussing the global economy. And yes, whether you want to acknowledge it or not it is a global economy.

A conclusion like that is right on par with the rest of your illogic. Aren’t you the oil market expert? Look at all your possessions and report back the percent made in the USA. What about your car/truck? Clothes? Where was your Trump hat and flag made?

“They control much of the politics around the globe, or are trying to.”

I guess they (and you) forgot about the U.S. constitution? You all create this boggy man yet Trump tries to destroy out constitutional foundation (voting) and you justify it and cheer him on. Unfreakingbelievable!

Klaus Schwab is just another person in the world with ideas…some of the dumb and some are pipe dreams. He’s been running the World Economic Forum since 1971. I guess he’s behind on his 50 year world liberal domination plan.

Good grief…your an adult. Some of you are like Scientologists. You believe other 7 billion people in the world are crazy and you’re the only sane one. Just living in a bubble of BS.

Axel- are you related to Trax? You all have to be brothers.

Mike, don’t hold your breath. I’ve asked plenty of simple questions from the left leaners here. Seems the simpler it is, the more difficult it becomes to answer. Much like Ryan just did with his reply. Dana is the same way. I’ve tried to understand them, but…I don’t know if they understand themselves?!

What my old man used to call a ‘perplexing conundrum’.

KSflatlander, Is that your official answer about WEF? Perhaps the attached screenshot will help you? BIgeasy?

Trudeau, the leader of our “Liberal Party” government also announced that by newly created law in Canada all new vehicle sales will be 100% electric by 2035. In a country where EV range is reduced by 40-50% by cold weather. Did I mention he is one of Klaus Schwab’s young global leaders?

Watch some WEF videos and you’ll see Biden right in the front row too. I’m sure it’s just a coincidence, nothing to see…

It’s seems there are many international economic and political organizations. But you right wing nuts got to have a manufactured boogie man…oh, I’m sorry…a cabal. You do understand that “cabal” means secret. Not much of a secret LMAO.

Because you can sure find them from the WEF and the actual present World leaders who are implementing those ideas, like Trudeau in Canada and in the USA by Biden despite your “Constitutional protection”.

Please provide proof (actual proof) that Trudeau or Biden have implemented anything from the WEF. I’m not talking opinions of it being implemented by by someone. I mean real proof. And be specific.

I do know one thing. These folks are not self starters. They need reliance on someone else...or gov handouts. Many are gov employees or have gov reliant jobs. They have no idea what its like to own your own business...and run it with the liberal governments making it difficult at every turn.

We provide jobs...........and they want income equality.

.

Newsflash: the most powerful people from the public and private sector have met since modern civilization has been a thing.

Newsflash: what these people discuss doesn’t change the Constitution under which our countries are run.

Also Newsflash: if you think you can get a room of people together, especially a roomful of egos, and they’re all going to agree on everything…well, you’re wrong.

Groups like the WEC are an opportunity for people to come together to talk about what is important to them, and for people to listen and learn from that and for them to do what they please with that info. It’s literally no more complicated than that.

“Cant wait to hear there excuses come Nov.”

I have a strange feeling that moderates and independents (especially women) won’t be voting right wing for a while. The dog caught the bus and it’s going to hurt. Maybe not tomorrow but it’s going to an impact in the future.

Cyber ninjas…cyber ninjas. Rah rah rah

Wondering how long till those in power on this side of the pond start dropping like flies…

Who the hell says this in their 60s.

“Yer blowin the wrong dice fella”

No thanks Shawn. I’m married

This tread definitely brought the BS right wing nuts out. Kind of like it was designed to. All the nut job stars of the Bowsite are here. You are so deep in your alt reality that delusional doesn’t touch it.

Keep looking for Bigfoot and I’m confident you will find signs of him everywhere you look in every forest…every time. But yet the physical evidence will elude you because Bigfoot isn’t real.

I know the leftist and the NeoCons keep searching for that utopia but it just doesn't seem to pan out...after 100 plus yrs to reflect back on.

I guess some people just keep hoping to make that "square wheel" function some how.

Seems like it.

Excuses? My prediction is the House and Senate swing back to the Republicans, which would be fantastic. I’m all for gridlock. Happy to keep either party from mucking things up.

The Constitution of the United States.....it's only keepers, the people. - George Washington

"We were warned by our founders about the need for eternal vigilance. Now we must confront our dereliction. Directly addressing our current plight is the first step toward righting our ship of state. The nation needs to regain the ideals at its founding- the world needs us to achieve this. Only the people can restore American ideals. Washington politicians have failed us and will continue to do so. As a republic, we were always warned about trading our liberties for security. Now We the People must assert our rightful sovereignty under the Constitution and rebalance our badly unbalanced federal government. No one can save us but ourselves." - former U.S. Senator from Oklahoma, Tom A. Coburn, M.D., from "Smashing the DC Monopoly"

So what have YOU, the posters on this thread, DONE, other than pontificate your positions and whine over yesterdays news? Restoring freedom in America means taking action. The Sons of Liberty not only informed fellow Americans of the state of their affairs, but prescribed actions that motivated more and more Americans to take up the cause of freedom for all. The nation's Constitution was formed with a last minute idea that was intended to restore the balance of power with a means for "We the People" to create and implement change without "permission" from established branches of federal government. There are many gun owners who think the Second Amendment is the only means to thwart tyrany, but that is not true. Two years before there was a Second Amendment and directly addressing the concern of a tyranical federal government, George Mason shook up the convention by telling them that they omitted a means for the people to slap down federal tyrany. " Are we so naive to believe that a tyranical federal government that takes power from the people will give it back?" The importance and awfulness of that possibility and their omission of a provision in the Constituition to correct such a situation, left them dumbstruck. The extensive period of silence after Mason spoke was noted by James Madison as he recorded the proceedings. Finally Elbridge Gerry proposed a solution in adding wording to Article V that endorsed a convention of states, when endorsed by two thirds of states, to propose new amendments and submit them to the states for ratification by three quarters of the states. A peaceful and Constitutional plan for the people to exercise a legitimate resistance to a tyranical federal government. The convention was marked by extensive debate, except for this matter, which produced none, and the vote was unanimous to include the provision for the people.

What's your plan?

This year the Convention of States project grew in number to over half the 34 states needed to call a convention. The limited convention is for three issues, term limits for federal employees (not just elected offices), stop the excessive spending with national debt creation and reign in the overreach of the federal government (such as was done by the recent Supreme Court decision limiting the EPA case with West Virginia).

This plan is in progress and needs patriotic volunteers to accomplish the goal of a restoration of America to founding principles. There are over five million supporters in all fifty states working to grow our number of grass root support from We the People. You do not have a good enough reason to disregard the least of your duty to sign the petition for your state.

https://conventionofstates.com/

If you truely believe the Constitution is the only thing protecting us, then use the provision in Article V and sign the petition which was the method included by the founders who foresaw the tyrany in our day. Actions speak louder than words.

Well bless your heart for commending me. IMHO, it speaks to me that you don't know/understand your role in our national government.

There is nothing puzzling about what I posted, either you DO something or nothing, and I am of the opinion that some of the loudest complainers are nothing more than that, pitiful individuals.

I posted an opportunity to take meaningful action in resisting national tyrany by Constitutional means, or don't you see it that way?

Have you visited the site and signed the petition?

That's an un-American attitude. Your fear betrays your lack of love for fellow Americans. "I regret that I have but only one life to give for my country" Twenty one year old Nathan Hale didn't give his life for only the strong. With your "one life", run scared is all you are prepared to DO?

"Desperation is setting in", yes, and yours is apparent.

It's really that simple.

Constitution of the Confederate States, yeah that's what happened, we know. Same Democrats, different age now.

Yes, you are scared and already out the door in flight away from the problem.

If you read my previous posts, there is a project given to us by the founders specifically for the purpose of combatting tyrany. The least you could do is sign the petition, the fight back is in propagating the cause and standing with those who intend to fight. https://conventionofstates.com/

The project is over half way to the 34 states needed to call the convention. There is a Convention of States team in every state. Are you on the team in your state? Why not?

What nitrogen thing? What Canadian law was implemented? What WEF policy involving nitrogen? What does Demark, Poland, and Sri Lanka have to do with Trudeau or Biden and the WEF?

Again be specific.

All in pursuit of the Liberal World Order championed by the World Economic Forum. It can’t get anymore straight forward than that…

"National Economic Council director Brian Deese was asked by anchor Victor Blackwell: “What do you say to those families who say, ‘Listen, we can’t afford to pay $4.85 a gallon for months, if not years. This is just not sustainable’?”

“What you heard from the president today was a clear articulation of the stakes,” Deese answered. “This is about the future of the liberal world order and we have to stand firm."

Maybe you should take your own advice and educate yourself.

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/07/future-nature-business-action-agenda-blueprint-climate-change-biodiversity-loss/

Mainstream news from 2020 forward has been treadau.

Liberals never think of the fallout from their actions. Sri Lanka is the perfect example of what was supposed to be the perfect model by 2025.

People there have a queue to walk through the president's house and see how he lived compared to how he was forcing them to live. Per Reuters....

Read more at DutchNews.nl:

They WEF is out of control, KS. They got the Donald too.

Bet you their panties were in a wad because nothing followed their blueprint...

Glad they had to sit through that speech...

That's my point, BowSniper. Posting a picture of someone in front of a WEF proves nothing. And to suggest that everyone partnering with the WEF or attending one of their meetings all think, act, and feel the same is laughable.

But aside from simply hating Trump, if there something good you can say about Biden's accomplishments thus far??

Read more at DutchNews.nl:

Collectivist-socialist governments are regressive, no better than a king/emperor/tyrant.

Here it is again:

“What you heard from the president today was a clear articulation of the stakes,” Deese answered. “This is about the future of the liberal world order and we have to stand firm."

The term liberal world order is a decades old term. It's been used by multiple Presidents, including Republicans. It is a reference to the order established on the international stage post-WWII, through the Cold War, and to the current present day, one in which the US plays a central role as the world's greatest super power.

It is based on liberal ideals like open and free trade, democratic governance, human rights, collective security (UN, NATO), international institutions (like the World Bank, WHO, IMF, WTO), and the rule of law. It is an ideological order shared and championed by most Western countries; it is currently under threat by non-Western and non-liberal countries (China, Russia) as they see their influence and power grow.

There is plenty of information out there on what the "liberal world order" is and what Deese was referencing. It has nothing to do with North American political parties, global cabals, or pushing a "green" agenda. It has everything to do with the US's role on the world stage and how we deal with those that seek to upset it.

My only addition is that it's also under threat from tribalism and nationalism. If you are reading this, you are benefiting from the liberal world order, literally your entire life has, whether you want to admit that or not. It's lead to the stability globally which has fostered innovation and development across all spectrums of life.

Conservative, does not = bad. Liberal, does not = bad. Those words dont = good either. But this seems a weird hill to battle over (the concept of their being a liberal world order of which we have been a part of since WW2 at least).

But it is certainly under threat domestically from those that think that "America First" should entail us vacating this role. Russian and China are chomping at the bit to step in.

Those that believe in Big Government Utopias are simply blinded, ignorant or decieved. We can't blame it all on Democrats or Republicans because they both are guilty of tearing down our nation, and it didn't just start 20 yrs ago.

The biggest irony is that those that are up in arms about the liberal world order are actually advocating for communism, Marxism, and socialism.

And I think if people looked at the whole Deese quote and the context around the question that was asked, they would see they are 100% talking about the liberal world order I just described.

To paraphrase, Biden was asked how long should Americans pay high gas prices. He said as long as it takes to stop Russia. Deese was referencing that response. It had nothing to do with a green agenda or animosity towards the oil industry and everything to do with how we respond to Russia.

Everything Biden and his cronies have done in the last 2 yrs has been straight out of the Marxist handbook...defunding the police, gun control,ect.

He stated before he was elected what he was going to do and yet people were dumb enough to vote for him. A true Liberal is more of a Libertarian minded individual..as far as the original meaning. The Neo Cons and Leftist have the same goal in mind, they are just of different opinions of how to get there.

The best thing the government could ever do for the US economy is to get the hell out of the private sector.

Biden wants this chaos, they want to take over the oil companies. You would have to be an idiot to not see he is determined to usher in the Marxist agenda.

I just hope the Republicans are smart enough to back somebody in the next election that's not a Republicrats/Bushite big government candidate. Assuming we still have a country.

My Dad is 93 yrs old and he told me the other day that even though there have been some things that have happened for the good in America in the last 75 yrs, he said he sees us losing our nation to Marxist tyrants. He has always been a real conservative as long as I can remember, but he said JFK wouldn't even be welcomed in the Republican party today. In his words " lot of people want something for nothing and they are willing to give up their freedom for what they think is security".

The tobacco enema was used to infuse tobacco smoke into a patient's rectum for various medical purposes, but primarily the resuscitation of drowning victims.

A rectal tube inserted into the anus was connected to a fumigator and bellows that forced the smoke into the rectum. The warmth of the smoke was thought to promote respiration.

Doubts about the credibility of tobacco enemas led to the popular phrase "blowing smoke up your ass."

If you are in the USA, you are most likely aware that this odd tool is still heavily used by the Liberal government today. It is more commonly known as the Biden Trumpet.

I guess you are just learning about who you share your sport with, 'bout time.

It is literally none of what you posted. You are conflating terms that essentially have little meaning now because of how bastardized they are. It's also hard to generate the rage, anger, and hate that too many of you display when you understand that "liberal world order" essentially equals "Western democracy." And you want to talk about deflection lol

For anyone that wants to educate themselves on the term "liberal world order," here are plenty of links.

Liberalism is a political and moral philosophy based on the rights of the individual, liberty, consent of the governed and equality before the law. Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but they generally support individual rights (including civil rights and human rights), liberal democracy, secularism, rule of law, economic and political freedom, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, private property and a market economy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberalism

In international relations, the liberal international order describes a set of global, rule-based, structured relationships based on political liberalism, economic liberalism and liberal internationalism since the late 1940s. More specifically, it entails international cooperation through multilateral institutions (like the United Nations, World Trade Organization and International Monetary Fund) and is constituted by human equality (freedom, rule of law and human rights), open markets, security cooperation, promotion of liberal democracy, and monetary cooperation. The order was established in the aftermath of World War II, led in large part by the United States. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_international_order

Vladimir Putin’s war on Ukraine has given the world’s democrats a renewed sense of unity and purpose. Galvanized by a sense of common threat and existential peril, Western democracies have imposed biting sanctions on Russia, boosted weapons and aid shipments to Ukraine, and increased military spending dramatically. This vigorous and unified response from Western democracies contrasts their muted replies to the past decade of democratic malaise, which was characterized by serious—though slow and surreptitious—authoritarian attacks. The Russian invasion may also weaken the emerging “authoritarian international” as the conflict has proved far more difficult and costly to Russia than expected. Whether the invasion marks a turning point for the liberal world order will depend in part on whether the world’s democrats can maintain solidarity through the crisis. https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/the-rebirth-of-the-liberal-world-order/

The liberal world order established in the aftermath of World War II may be coming to an end, challenged by forces both without and within. The external challenges come from the ambition of dissatisfied large and medium-size powers to overturn the existing strategic order dominated by the United States and its allies and partners. Their aim is to gain hegemony in their respective regions. China and Russia pose the greatest challenges to the world order because of their relative military, economic, and political power and their evident willingness to use it, which makes them significant players in world politics and, just as important, because the regions where they seek strategic hegemony—Asia and Europe—historically have been critical to global peace and stability. https://www.brookings.edu/research/the-twilight-of-the-liberal-world-order/

During a news conference at the close of the NATO summit on June 30 in Madrid, a reporter asked President Joe Biden “how long is it fair to expect American drivers and drivers around the world” to pay high gasoline prices due to the war in Ukraine. Biden responded, “[a]s long it takes so Russia cannot, in fact, defeat Ukraine and move beyond Ukraine.”

Brian Deese, director of the National Economic Council, appeared in an interview with CNN’s Victor Blackwell that same day.

Blackwell played a video of Biden’s comments from the NATO news conference. He asked Deese what he would say to American families who can’t afford high gasoline prices for months or even years to come if the war in Ukraine were to last as long as some experts predict. In response, Deese used the term “liberal world order.”

Deese, June 30: Well, what’s heard from the president today was a clear articulation of the stakes. This is about the future of the liberal world order and we have to stand firm. But at the same time what I’d say to that family and to Americans across the country is you have a present administration that is going to do everything in its power to blunt those price increases and bring those prices down.

Deese appeared to use the decades-old terminology to describe the international world order that was created after World War II, and the current unified effort to prevent Russia from moving beyond Ukraine. https://www.factcheck.org/2022/07/liberal-world-order-is-decades-old-term-misinterpreted-by-social-media-posts/

Some scenes in this video look a lot like the 2020 “peaceful” prostests

Sure would. But again, that's not what it is. Even members of the Trump administration are on record as supporting the order. Plenty of quotes from Patrick Shanahan on upholding the liberal world order (aka liberal international order aka rules-based international order).

"The Department is strengthening and evolving U.S. Alliances and Partnerships into a networked security architecture to uphold the international rules-based order. The Department also continues to cultivate intra-Asian security relationships capable of deterring aggression, maintaining stability, and ensuring free access to common domains."

“Perhaps the greatest long-term threat to the vital interests of states across this region comes from actors who seek to undermine, rather than uphold, the rules-based international order."

“We will not accept policies or actions that threaten or undermine the rules-based international order – an order that benefits all nations. We are committed to defending and enhancing these shared values.”

That's my point about these terms being bastardized, TG. Liberal in the term "liberal world order" shouldn't be confused with the term "liberal" applied to left-leaning political ideologues in the USA. It is in reference to liberalism and counter to the tenets of communism, socialism, authoritarianism, etc.

Today's democrats are actually authoritarian progressives who have corrupted the term liberal to sound as if they support freedom and democracy.

Listen to Trudeau Castro or the Gabbin Newslome commercial and you will understand what I'm saying.

With democrats words mean the opposite and it allows people to understand Forced restrictions on nitrogen are freedom.

?

Biden has made it us against them by actively laundering money and giving weapons to Ukraine.

His foreign policy has set us back on the world stage even more than trumps tariffs did.

No, it isn't. Again, it is a function of people conflating terms and being loose with words to the point that they have no consistent meaning. Again, the concept of the "liberal world order" (a term used for decades by both Republican and Democratic administrations) was built on the idea of classic liberalism. The concept of liberalism is centuries old, centered on the belief in freedom, equality, democracy and human rights and was the foundation on which the principle of "consent of the governed" was based. Those opposed to the liberal world order from a geopolitical perspective - namely Russia and China - are a direct threat to those ideals.

Democrats are a strange lot and love to corrupt/overuse words.

Example... Everything with the democrats nowadays is "racist" to the point it has no meaning.

They want equity not equality, social collectivism not individual liberty, and socialism not capitalism.

Quite the opposite of what I call a classical liberal...

Today, we have these big government politicians calling themselves conservatives..they want to conserve big government same as the leftist

What’s funny is that the term liberal world order has meant one thing for decades and now all of a sudden it’s something different because people don’t like the misused/misunderstood/misapplied term liberal.

The liberal world order has been the way of the world for the last 70 years. The terms liberal world order/rules based world order/liberal international order/etc all reference the same thing - the system of security, trade, and law that has established the order in the world, with the US playing the central role in these conventions. It is not gymnastics and there are ample publications/documentation/resources out there that go into great detail around the history of the term.

The United States has long talked about the “liberal international order” or the “rules-based order” (the two terms are more or less interchangeable). Academics usually think of an international order as centering on a set of institutions and rules. The key institutions of the liberal international order are NATO and the U.S.-Japan alliance, the World Trade Organization and the other open-trade institutions, and the United Nations. Since the end of the Cold War, some people have seen the liberal international order as involving other institutions and obligations, including the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), the need to reduce climate change and the nuclear nonproliferation regime. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/06/28/g-is-discussing-international-liberal-order-thats-bad-place-start-debate/

Let’s start with the “liberal” part of the liberal world order. Liberalism here does not refer to free sex, legalized marijuana or other social trends that have become part of the platform of modern liberals. Instead, it refers to the liberalism that emerged from the French Revolution. Loosely defined, these first liberals — classical liberals — believed in transparent, accountable government and free trade. They also disliked war. Some precepts of this liberalism, such as representative government, go back even further. As early as the 15th century, well before Edmund Burke hit the scene, men like Sir John Fortescue and John Seldon were extolling the virtues of English constitutionalism. The liberal world order they and others helped build was one in which self-government and all it stands for — property rights, due process of law, universal suffrage — reign supreme over the desires of autocrats and their imperial and kleptocratic tendencies. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/made-by-history/wp/2017/12/27/donald-trump-and-the-end-of-the-liberal-world-order/

Looking at the 10 pillars of communism you see the US has adopted all of them.

Reading the green new deal you understand it is literally the the 10 pillars and put government in complete control of energy, housing, education, transportation and health care.

Affirmatively Forwarding Fair Housing is literally the “elimination of town and country.” This comes right out of the communist manifesto. This is the “liberal world order” that we are facing. Try dodging it all you want its what it is.

We’ve given what? 50 billion to defend the Ukraine national sovereignty against Russia while totally undermining our own. Aren’t we using Russia to negotiate getting Iran back into a nuclear agreement o our behalf?

Name one thing Biden has done that isn’t Pro China. Name one thing this admin has done that has made the US and it’s citizens stronger, safer and more prosperous home or abroad.

We are being sold out for your sorry ass liberal world order.

As far as the “progressive agenda,” there’s a reason Bernie Sanders has never won the nomination of his party let alone the actual Presidency. There’s a reason that the Green New Deal is supported by less than half of the Democratic Party. It’s because most Democrats view the progressive agenda as ridiculous.

good grief, are you aware of the recent scotus ruling restricting the epa? do you not think the epa was/is forcing an agenda? any of the other agencies come to mind that are forcing their political agenda? how 'bout what's occurring at the southern border or with education? no agenda there? wow, you can't be serious.

This is fact

The democrat voters like those here, still vote and make excuses for them so their consent is there for these policies whether they personally support them or not.

Both parties have let government agencies write law when it's the job of the Congress. The democrats have just done better on placing radicals in these agencies and appointing them to judgeships.

Hopefully SCOTUS is going to keep fixing that problem like they did with EPA.

Hope ATF is next.

And again, this agenda is all a function of who was put in power over these institutions by the people. It is being carried out by duly elected officials which the people of this country get to decide on, not the WEF. Gflight gets it (and fingers crossed the ATF is next as well).

Is the House of Representatives not chosen by the people, Shawn? Nowhere did I say anything about a plurality or a majority of people deciding. I said their power is granted by the people, and the people elect their representatives in government, which it is here as it is in the Netherlands.

If i were you BSers i would be care listening to a chick hawk who has been wrong about on anything but ….. well everything

Name one thing, Shawn.

>;-)

Real 'democracy' is ballot questions. Remember 'Question One' when we here in Massachusetts lost the right to trap? Sportsmen got our asses handed to us.

The founders intended for the legislators to be elected by the people, that is true...but, those elected officials were suppose to be kept in check by what we call the Constitution. Key word there is..suppose to.

That's why our nation was formed as a Democratic Republic and not mob rule. If the majority agrees on legislation that contradicts the constitution.. does that mean that legislation or executive order should be law? We've had a ship load of laws and executive orders thru out the yrs that should've never happened, but it happens because we have enough gullible people on both sides of the isle.

Should i educate you here or would you like to use up some of your jobs mans hours and do it on their time.?

No need to explain anything, Shawn. Spent more than my fair share of time working in the Netherlands and understand perfectly well how their government functions. Notice you didn’t answer my question though…who elects the House of Representatives in the Netherlands?

Our government is a Constitutional Republic. The ultimate law is the Constitution. There is a project to return this government back to the limitations first established in the original Constitution. Scroll back up to my posts on July8 and you can read all about it.

https://conventionofstates.com/

What the government is following now is not the Constitution but the "courtstitution". Justices have twisted words beyond the scope and meanings to justify expanding the Federal powers over the people. Article V was used by the founders to deal with the specific threat of a tyranical federal government, two years before there was a 2nd Amemdment.

That's why the founders agreed on a Constitutional Republic and not a democracy fueled by emotions. "Influence is no government" - George Washington

We have a contract with the government which they have progressively violated over many years, and while some have attempted to stop them, apathy has been dominant.

The Constitution of the United State....its only keepers, the people. - George Washington

Therefore, just as there is no shortcut to taking game, you have to apply yourselves to restore the original Constitution and discard the "courtstitution", that is unless apathy suits you.

Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country - JFK

https://conventionofstates.com/

Oh and I almost forgot. You having multiple handles and replying to your own posts to back yourself up. Pretty pathetic on many levels.

And sorry, no. Even Trump's AG couldn't find evidence of a 'stolen election.' F* your bulls* narrative.

I vouch for Ryan as both a good decent man, and a solid hunter. I know him personally. We have broken bread together and shared drinks.

We are politically 180 apart, but I have no doubt he would defend our country.

The sentiments against liberals are understandable, your personal attacks and inflated ego have grown tiresome.

Truth is I use to have my name posted but there are some real psycho’s on here and you are one of them.. They/you live so deep in an alternate reality that they/you have lost their moral compass. As BEG put it a “bizarro world.” They (you) actually believe this twisted definition of a “liberal” put out by the right wing nut “news.” That all Americans are binary (L or R) and all liberals are bad and the enemy. Me and every liberal I know are not socialist or Marxist or communist. You/they just try to label anyone as a liberal and the enemy to justify your words and actions. I’m an American just as much as you and I believe in the Constitution and capitalism. You and many others here like to claim others are sheep. Seriously look at yourself. You were involved in the January 6 riots/insurrection with ZERO credible evidence. You took an oath to defend this country and the constitution. And I’m the sheep. Every good soldier needs an enemy right. If you don’t have one then create one.

You have accomplished a lot in your life. Try accomplishing being a good and decent person instead of a weak minded simpleton. Being good and decent is a lasting legacy.

Yes. And way more votes than Donald the spoiled child.

A lot of good decent people of all political persuasions said 'enough of this shit stain.' Yeah, maybe they held their noses, but they voted Biden in and Trump OUT. Buh-bye.

And there in lies the rub. It actually has been proven that Trump lost and our constitution backs it up. The legal challenges and recounts have proven who won and it was Brandon. Trump rallied a lot of people to vote for him but even more against him. I think the SCOTUS may have done the same thing.

Trumpers think the U.S. is divided 50/50. That’s the bubble they live in. It’s not 50/50 Trumpers vs Antifa. It’s 50/50 R vs D. And there’s a difference.

I’m a proud liberal and bowhunter. I do not support Antifa or the looney canceled culture stuff. I’m not a socialist but do support some social programs (which is socialism and has been a part of our republic for a long time). I support the constitution including the 2nd Amendment.

I voted for Biden because he is a lessor threat to our republic. Trump and radical Trumpers have validated that and continue to on a daily basis. If we work out our differences of opinion via the constitution we will be just fine. Stray from the constitution we are doomed to repeat history.

Don’t buy the BS that radicals and simpletons push here. It’s not a reflection of America or Americans. Most people are inherently good. Don’t let the radicals on either side suck you into their alternate reality on bulls#%t mountain.

.

I am not a Biden supporter. I am a supporter of America, our Constitution, and *moderate* values and issues."

If those are the best the Jewish bankers/global socialists/space lizards can do than I'll sleep comfortably after a good laugh. Conspiracy mongers have no horse sense whatsoever.

Are you Trax?

So sad.

Keep repeating that Big Conflation like a mantra. Hypnotize your silly self so you can't see any good in anyone who doesn't agree with you 100%. Living proof that the public school system sucks bigly ;-)

Like someone who starts a whole thread on the dangers of the “liberal world order,” completely misunderstands and misrepresents what it actual is, and posts anyways without a second of actual research because other ignorant talking heads have latched onto the term? Not to mention, by doing so they are literally on the side of the communists and Marxists? Yup…sheep be sheep.

Yes, when choose the opposite side of the liberal world order, you are literally choosing Russia and China and are on the side of the communists, Marxists, and autocrats of the world. So you are either too lazy to do the research and understand this, or you have and you’ve decided to perpetuate the lie anyway (likely because you heard someone else whining about the use of the term and you’d rather be angry than admit someone on “your team” is wrong). Either way, it’s not a good look. But I guess sheep be sheep.

This is literally the funniest thing I’ve ever read on Bowsite.

A constitutional process…is that what you call your participation in January 6th or the 70 court cases Trump lost over voter fraud.

It’s a Shawn Magyar bizarro world

Kind of telling that you bragged about your participation in the insurrection right after January 6th and now you don’t want to talk about. If your actions were right and justified then why are you hiding from it?

Actually he'll be remembered as a weak, puling crybaby who *wanted* to be a strong, authoritarian figure. A truly strong person would have put the fear in Putain's sorry heart. Instead he threw a childish temper tantrum when reality said 'no.'

That being said, he still poses a significant threat to this country and I'll feel safer when he's locked up. 1 room efficiency, located at 354 Hunter St, Ossining, NY 10562.

The Democratic Party has changed significantly during its more than two centuries of existence. During the 19th century the party supported or tolerated slavery, and it opposed civil rights reforms after the American Civil War in order to retain the support of Southern voters.” (https://thereaderwiki.com/en/History_of_the_Democratic_Party_(United_States))

“…every segregation law in the United States, from the 1880s to the 1950s was passed by a Democratic legislature, signed by a Democratic governor, enforced by Democratic officials, and there is not a single exception to this rule…The Democrats were the party of slavery, of segregation, of founding the Ku Klux Klan, of reviving the Ku Klux Klan, of racial terrorism, and of opposition to the civil rights movement of the 1960s. The opposition to the civil rights act of 1964, the voting rights act of 1965, the fair housing bill of 1968 came mainly from the Democratic party, and that’s a fact.” (Dinesh D’Souza, March 2019, Stanford University. https://www.wayoflife.org/reports/the_democratic_party_is_the_party_of_slavery.php)

“…the first 23 African Americans in Congress did belong to the Republican Party, due to the GOP’s support of voting rights and the Democratic Party’s embrace of white supremacy.” (https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/06/18/fact-check-democrats-republicans-and-complicated-history-race/3208378001)

“The Democrats were the party of slavery, black codes, Jim Crow, and that miserable terrorist excrescence, the Ku Klux Klan. Republicans were the party of Lincoln, Reconstruction, anti-lynching laws, and the civil rights acts of 1875, 1957, 1960, and 1964.” (https://www.nationalreview.com/2015/06/democratic-party-racist-history-mona-charen)

History of the Democratic Party TIMELINE OF DEMOCRATIC PARTY 1829 – the Democratic party is founded, on a platform of individual rights, state sovereignty, and pro-slavery. 1830 – Democratic president Andrew Jackson creates the Indian Removal Act, which forced indigenous people to leave their homeland. (Trail of Tears) “Under Jackson and the next Democratic Party president, Martin Van Buren, 70,000 Native Americans east of the Mississippi were terrorized and driven out of their lands by the military.” (https://speakoutsocialists.org/a-history-of-the-democratic-party-from-slavery-to-obama-loyal-defenders-of-capitalism) 1854 – The Republican Party is founded, on an anti-slavery platform. 1857 – In the case of Scott vs. Sandford, the court ruled that slaves aren’t citizens, they are property. The seven justices, voting in favor were Democrats, and the two, who dissented were Republicans. “As the 1850s began, the question over whether slavery should be allowed in new territories and states became the major dividing line in American politics — and the Democratic Party more and more clearly became the most important institutional supporter of slavery.” (https://www.vox.com/2014/12/8/7328755/maps-democratic-party) 1860 – Eleven slave states secede from the Union. Democrats start the civil war. 1863 – Republican President Abraham Lincoln signs the Emancipation Proclamation. 1863 – Republicans elect their first Hispanic Governor, Romualdo Pacheco, of California. 1865 – Lincoln was assassinated, his vice president, Andrew Johnson, a Democrat assumes the presidency, who is opposed to integrating the newly freed slaves. “Lincoln’s vice president, a Democrat named Andrew Johnson, assumed the presidency. But Johnson adamantly opposed Lincoln’s plan to integrate the newly freed slaves into the South’s economic and social order. Johnson and the Democratic Party were unified in their opposition to the 13th Amendment, which abolished slavery; the 14th Amendment, which gave blacks citizenship; and the 15th Amendment, which gave blacks the vote. All three passed only because of universal Republican support.”1 “President Johnson pardoned the ex-slave-owners, returned their property, and gave them political control of the South. The ex-slaveholders immediately used their regained political power, as well as their wealth and ownership of the land, to re-institute slavery in all but name. They vetoed new state constitutions which gave African Americans the right to vote.” (https://speakoutsocialists.org/a-history-of-the-democratic-party-from-slavery-to-obama-loyal-defenders-of-capitalism) 1865 – Republicans pass the 13th Amendment, which permanently outlaws slavery. 1865 – Democrats establish “Black Codes,” a state and local statute, intended to marginalize blacks and keep them in indentured servitude. Poll taxes and literacy tests prevented them from voting. 1865 – Confederate veterans found the KKK, to oppose the Republican party’s integration of blacks. Its first Grand Wizard, was a Democrat, named Nathan Bedford Forrest. 1868 – Republicans pass the 14th Amendment, giving blacks citizenship. It was opposed by the Democrats. 1868 – Republicans pass the 15th Amendment, giving blacks the right to vote. No Democrat supported it. 1868 – KKK Grand Wizard is honored at the Democratic National Convention. 1869 – Reconstruction ended, Democrats re-established white supremacy in the South with Jim Crow laws, that legalized segregation. that would take another 100 years to abolish. 1871 – Republican president Ulysses S Grant dismantles the KKK. 1872 – Republicans elect the first African American senators and representatives. 1877 – “When Reconstruction ended in 1877, Southern Democrats regained power and began passing and implementing legal restrictions such as the poll tax, literacy tests and grandfather” clauses, effectively disenfranchising much of the new African-American electorate.” (https://www2.umbc.edu/che/tahlessons/pdf/African_Americans_and_the_Democratic_Party(PrinterFriendly).pdf) 1878 – Republican senator Aaron Sargent introduces the 19th Amendment, to give women the right to vote. The Democrat-controlled Congress voted it out. 1911 – Democrat president Woodrow Wilson stuffs his cabinet with Dixicrats (powerful Southern Democrats) and set back the cause of civil rights for decades. 1918 – KKK is re-established, targeting immigrants, Jews, and Catholics, in addition to blacks. 1919 – Republican Congress passes the 19th Amendment, guaranteeing women the right to vote. Note: At democrats.org/who-we-are/our-history/ it says “Under the leadership of Democratic President Woodrow Wilson, the U.S. Constitution was amended to grant women the right to vote.” Notice how they try to take credit for what now is good, but then they worked against it. 1922 – Democrats try to keep lynching legal by creating a filibuster in the Senate. 1929 – Republican Octaviano Larrazolo becomes the first Mexican American Senator. 1929 – Republican Charles Curtis becomes the first Native American VP. 1939 – Democrat and KKK cover girl Margaret Sanger created the “Negro Project” and Planned Parenthood to cull the black population. 1954 – Republican lawmakers outlawed segregation in public school, opposed by state Democrats. Republican President Eisenhower sent in federal troops to enforce the law. 1959 – First Republican Asian Senator, Hiram Fong is elected. 1964 – President Johnson successfully runs an ad, titled “Confessions of a Republican.” Democrats learned that by accusing Republicans of racism, even without evidence, they can gain political power. Democrat Lyndon B. Johnson who became president after Kennedy’s assassination said in 1963, “I’ll have those n****s vote Democrat for the next 200 years.” and “These Negroes, they get pretty uppity these days and that’s a problem for us……….we’ve got to give them a little something, just enough to quiet them down, not enough to make a difference.” (https://timefortruth.blog/2020/09/01/the-hidden-history-of-the-democratic-party) 1964 – The Republican-controlled Congress passes the 1964 Civil Rights Act, as an extension of the Republicans’ 1957 and 1960 Civil Rights Acts. Democratic Senators filibustered the bill for a record 75 days.

Sources assets.ctfassets.net/qnesrjodfi80/6bQdKPLDjyo2s0I8c60gA2/aec7a4feb53cdd469d9c59bc3dd5cc64/swain-the_inconvenient_truth_about_the_democratic_party-transcript.pdf imdb.com/title/tt5646136/ nationalreview.com/2015/06/democratic-party-racist-history-mona-chare socialistrevolution.org/a-short-history-of-the-democratic-party speakoutsocialists.org/a-history-of-the-democratic-party-from-slavery-to-obama-loyal-defenders-of-capitalism thereaderwiki.com/en/History_of_the_Democratic_Party_(United_States) timefortruth.blog/2020/09/01/the-hidden-history-of-the-democratic-party umbc.edu/che/tahlessons/pdf/African_Americans_and_the_Democratic_Party(PrinterFriendly).pdf usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/06/18/fact-check-democrats-republicans-and-complicated-history-race/3208378001 wayoflife.org/reports/the_democratic_party_is_the_party_of_slavery.php

If we would just enforce the constitution for what it says we could avoid a whole lot of problems, just like Frederick Douglas said many years ago.

It's clear today that the government went too far like they usually do. Reverse discrimination is not the answer. I know first hand growing up in the deep south in the 60s how unfair and ridiculous Jim Crowe laws were. I saw my mother stand against racism when it wasn't popular to do so. Something was definitely needed I agree...I just think the gov went to far, 2 wrongs don't make a right.

Danac and Ks

My god could that position be more anti American at this point.

Congratulations. You Rhode scholars certainly got what you voted for

Voting with Hate vs Voting with reason got us to this point. Golf clap boys, golf clap

I don’t play golf.

Also, most Republicans of today are NOT conservatives ( holding to care principals of the constitution)...they are Facist. There are some in both parties that are not to that extreme but as a whole that describes both parties, IMO.

Either way, with Big government control, we all lose.

All my gear, and shooting, is dialed in, and I’ve found some decent rams to hunt. Just 2 more weeks….can’t wait.

Matt

I should have been born a Yankee cause I hate this weather down here in the summer

I knew it would only be a matter of days, 31 to be exact.

Carry on…

Matt

Danac and Ks

My god could that position be more anti American at this point.

Congratulations. You Rhode scholars certainly got what you voted for

Voting with Hate vs Voting with reason got us to this point. Golf clap boys, golf clap

Matt

Matt

Sounds like the GOP and Trump to me. Way past simple 'disagreement.'

The laptop is a real story of corruption. Hunter has been under investigation for quite awhile now for it to be a big nothing burger. I am not a fan of trump the man, but I do try and remain objective.

Sounds like both sides to me, that should be really obvious. Few see this and can be critical of their own party and hold them accountable. It's why we are where we are.

What report? Sources?

But, but, but Azhat and Hedge say Obama was/remains a liberal conspiracy mastermind. I'm confused!!!

You guys want to get your story straight?

I do wish we would quit referring to Marxist/ Socialist as Liberals, they are not Liberals in the true sense of the word Liberal.

Nice to see someone gets it regarding what "liberal" and "liberalism" actually means (though I wouldn't come close to characterizing Democrats as Marxist...the majority of the party are social liberals).

I guess for me, when I think of Liberal, I think of more of the Classical Liberal definition...really more Libertarian. I'm not saying all Democrats are Marxist just like all Republicans are not NeoCons. But it's clear to me the agenda on both sides of the isle as a whole. Government control, just with a little different twist on either side.

I don't think they even care about 'control' except so far as it affects their personal wealth. They *buy* the tax laws and breaks they want, by spending a small percent on 'friendly' pols on both sides of the aisle.

Yeah, the Dems may get more from Big Pharma and the GOP may get more from Big Oil, (or Big Agriculture, Big Banking, Big Armaments, Big Steel, Big Auto...) But at the end of the day BIG $$$ has far more influence than any of our voices.

Go ahead, write your congresscritter, enjoy the pretty form letter you get back. Just don't expect them to suspend the Golden Rule.

Like my Dad said not long ago, I don't think JFK would fit in either party today.

You would have us believe you are not affiliated with any cabal but you keep attacking only one party. You disappeared right after the inauguration to show up now as midterms approach. Hmm.

Our PMs the last time you told me I had been compromised but didn’t know what that meant. Me thinks you are full of crap, a peddler of influence who has been instructed to use repetitive terminology to sell your brand.

Joel is not the same name used last time. Anyone not being transparent is someone to question.

I voted for Trump but I have to honestly say that after voting for him I felt like I did after I voted for Bush the 1st time. Obama and Biden are the worst we've had in my lifetime but I don't feel like Trump was enough of a Constitutionalist. Trump did some good things but at the end of the day I think he was like most of the politicians in DC...not really concerned about what the Constitution says. He was better than Obama and Biden for sure but honestly I don't view him as a true conservative, and for me that's someone that seems to conserve the core principals of the constitution. People should have a right to say what they want, put what they choose to into their own body, not have their income extorted, ect. We have such a jumbled mess of big government machines, people getting off from criminal activity because they have money..on and on

You are being less confrontational, less trump style now. Hopefully that means your team got the message that if the good guys want to win they need the female voters. And less attacks on other minority groups, focusing on the global cabal as the enemy. It should sell better.

Why change handles?

Looks just about like a cut and paste from your last time participating here, especially the part about trump being more conservative. Too bad he wasn’t half as likable.

The unidentified bogey men that we have never heard of, well, lots of folks like conspiracy theories so whatever you’re attempting ought to work some with that one.

When someone isn’t fully transparent, I am always skeptical even if they share a tragedy. At 63, dealt with enough con-artists to just look under the hood.

This is the same type of crap that liberal, or radical leftist (same thing nowadays) politicians all over the world are pushing to club the peasants into submission. Let’s call it the New Liberal World Order so it’s not mixed up with the old Liberal World Order.

Toronto Sun

https://torontosun.com/news/national/trudeau-pushes-ahead-on-fertilizer-reduction-as-provinces-and-farmers-cry-foul

She should be removed for saying that. It's completely contrary to the oath she took. UFB.

The left take the lead though with their hypocrisy when it comes to fairness. Not to say the right doesn't do the same but the left takes the lead, IMO.

I know Democrats that don't like what their party has become...not all but most are leftist..not Liberals but Marxist Leftist types. I always thought a real conservative was someone that wanted to "conserve" liberty. If you read a lot of Frederick Douglass's writings, you can see that he got it. "The problem is not the constitution, but the interpretation of the constitution".

.

The dataset, compiled by the Natural Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) in the U.S., shows oscillating temperature changes, but very little evidence to indicate a warming trend.

In fact, the above graph clearly shows the United States to be cooler in May 2022 compared to May 2005.