Does anyone think this was not the intention from the start? To appoint a special counsel in order to delay any resulting tax evasion charges or bribery charges and avoid answering questions "because it's an ongoing investigation ".
What an obvious lying crook Garland is! How do these lowlife trash-out-of-hell evil son's get to the highest levels of our government? Thank God Garland was not allowed to have a lifetime seat on the US Supreme Court. If McConnell dies without another act in the Senate, avoiding giving Garland 's nomination a hearing is enough to at least partially offset the damage he has otherwise brought on our nation.
The Attorney General has no obligation to share information about an ongoing investigation with Congress. And especially in a publicly televised hearing.
And many, including many on Bowsite, take a knee to that same corrupt government with awe and reverence in hopes of keeping what few petty possessions they have. 2nd homes in the mountains, hunting properties, stuff...
We damn sure dodged a bullet with him and the Supreme Court.
Garland reminds me of the perfect crime family attorney
And the "crock" is the inference that a lot of people on here bow down to the government. Folks behave differently to different stimuli. Take you for instance and your post. Kind of goofy actually.
Because someone doesn't start some type of dumb political thread 2 or 3 times a week, or rant and rave and call people names doesn't mean they are bowing down to anyone or anything at all. It's just your perception, which is fine.
And, that being the case, there are times when I enjoy contributing to the entertainment. :)
The lead bullsh**ers are all looking at their next jobs, not the one they hold.
Useless event for sure
When the entire system is corrupted, we all lose. I suppose its a “Birds of a feather….” Scenario as the Democrats have some absolute idiots in key positions; Rachel Levine, Sam Brinnel, the interior and energy secretaries…and the Transportation sec Buttigeig.
The stupidity of these people is beyond belief…..and the Dem defenders are clueless. Did you see Buttigegs latest, He wants to limit semi trucks to the exact same speed. Talk about a total lack of understanding the industry you are in charge of ( and its across the board with the Biden admin) Get ready for more traffic jams when trucks get stuck side by side and can’t pass each other.
lets not forget...some here think a vote for this admin was a vote "for the constitution."
i guess well see which candidate is overwhelmingly endorsed by law enforcement in 2024.
Take a look at any democrat run 3rd world shit hole city in the US, and get back to me. Some of you have such a ****ed up moral compass it resembles a circle.
PS: 91 charges. Ninety- fucking one. But, but, but Hunter!
But, but, but….Trump.
only in the mind of a Trump deranged liberal TB1
I don’t recall trump ever supporting the defunding of the police, or joining Harris in contributing money to bail out rioters that looted and burned cities. As I recall he tried to persuade Pelosi to bring in extra security for J6, which she pompously declined. He even tried to build “the wall” to keep out the rash of illegal aliens that are rife with criminal activities. You ignore china joes potential criminal dealings, then complain that the guy you hate is the biggest criminal in politics. You’re blinded by vigilante justice, while the real criminals run amok. Your disillusioned outrage holds as much water as a bag made of cheese cloth!
Maybe they're referring to the constitution of Venezuela? In that case they would be accurate.
Wow! You're living in the democrat disaster that is Massachusetts and you want to complain about how much cops make? Truth be known, those policemen are most likely WORTH more than your mayor and governor.
Just pointing out where a lot of money budgeted for 'law enforcement' actually *goes*.
I bet the the $31 mil that rut mentioned has some law enforcement funds in it
Luckily, TB1, being the conservative waiting for the right candidate to vote for, you put nobody in Mass. gov that allows all this no police policies. Your hands and conscious is clear
I voted for Republicans last time out, when they *bothered* to run a candidate for a particular office. Meanwhile Richie Neal runs un-opposed time and again. The GOP can't sell an *idea* here. (But libertarian-leaning independents are the problem, right?)
i thought you were smarter than that...apparently i gave you too much credit. youre confusing "law and order" with "lawfare."
BB1, if you weren't so bent on taking cheap shots at every never-Trumper (like me!) you might hear what we actually stand *for*. Not holding my breath...
I certainly don't come on here to engage anyone on things that are not going to change anything and the efforts just become a chest pounding event. I pretty much know if you and the 81 million others that voted for this shit show were so smart, you and they would have never voted for the feeble one.
Well it's Friday and I know you will be around all weekend but I'm heading out for our SEND MORE to NEW YORK that begins this afternoon. It's a Dove hunt for 100 people that the proceeds all go to renting more Busses to send more illegals to the Big Apple
Should be an awesome weekend for a really good cause.
TB1 have a typing good weekend
We’re listening. I know it isn’t equal justice under the law. So what DO you stand for?
Ricky The Cabel Guy's Link
Dallas mayor leaves Democratic Party, switches to GOP: 'American cities need Republicans'"
"The mayor of one of the largest cities in the U.S. announced in a Friday op-ed that he is leaving the Democratic Party and becoming a Republican.
In a Wall Street Journal op-ed with the headline "America’s Cities Need Republicans, and I’m Becoming One," Dallas Mayor Eric Johnson explains that he is leaving the Democratic Party because "the future of America’s great urban centers depends on the willingness of the nation’s mayors to champion law and order and practice fiscal conservatism."
"Our cities desperately need the genuine commitment to these principles (as opposed to the inconsistent, poll-driven commitment of many Democrats) that has long been a defining characteristic of the GOP," Johnson wrote. "
no...id proclaim that a jury found him not guilty of 89 of the 91 charges...and id look at the ones he was found guilty of and make my decision about whether or not they were worth getting my shorts in a bunch over.
I have no doubt he will be found guilty of something given the jurisdictions and jury pools. the only thing that will matter is what happens on appeal.
theres a reason why they say “show me the man and I’ll find you the crime”
How utterly stupid does one have to be to fall for this?
It's embarrassing the crap coming out of Bidens mouth....and there are still people defending him- unbelievable. What's worse is that many of these defenders are teachers and prof's instilling their prejudice into our schoolchildren.
Paste the Twitter link with Video of this week at the Mexican border if you want to know the truth; https://twitter.com/BillMelugin_/status/1704535232970457439?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1704547438780936304%7Ctwgr%5E8f1ab770ab15a92550f10e1775cc674e577e88f9%7Ctwcon%5Es3_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.zerohedge.com%2Fpolitical%2Ftexas-declares-invasion-10000-illegals-cross-southern-border-weeks
The Washington Examiner reported:
A third IRS official confirmed that Delaware U.S. Attorney David Weiss faced roadblocks when attempting to bring charges against Hunter Biden, contradicting denials issued Wednesday by Attorney General Merrick Garland.
IRS Director of Field Operations Michael Batdorf told the House Ways and Means Committee in a closed-door interview on Sept. 12 that he felt “frustrated” by the refusal of the Justice Department to approve tax charges that IRS agents viewed as well-supported by evidence, according to a transcript of the interview obtained by the Washington Examiner.
He also said the IRS removed agent Gary Shapley, a whistleblower, from the Hunter Biden case at the direction of Weiss despite having done nothing wrong.
And there is plenty of evidence to the contrary, yet, that doesn’t seem to interest you, or the trump haters in the Democratic Party, in the least. In the same way you have convicted trump in your own mind, you disregard potential wrong doing of the remaining “crooks”. ( like Nancy Pelosi) Until you prove that the DOJ is truly “unbiased”, your one sided opinion, and “delight” is baseless. Not ONCE have you expressed genuine concern of any other swamp creatures/crooks/liars ( like Adam Schiff) being involved in duping the American people…including you. That in itself tells a lot about your true concerns as to what this country is dealing with when it comes to the people in power. Your silence speaks volumes as to what you really care about when it comes to us common folks and our well being.
I know you don’t understand, but I stand by my opinion. I also know plenty of others that do as well. I’ll give you credit for standing your ground, but I know you aren’t as blind as you portray yourself to be.
Change the subject, but is Pelosi being investigated?
"Until you prove that the DOJ is truly “unbiased”, your one sided opinion, and “delight” is baseless. "
Can't see the connection here. They're indicting a Senator, a Democrat, but somehow anybody must 'prove' the DOJ is 'unbiased'? Sure, many *within* the dept. are biased. Who hired them?
"Not ONCE have you expressed genuine concern of any other swamp creatures/crooks/liars ( like Adam Schiff) being involved in duping the American people…including you. That in itself tells a lot about your true concerns as to what this country is dealing with when it comes to the people in power. Your silence speaks volumes as to what you really care about when it comes to us common folks and our well being. "
Sorry, I didn't realize that I have to monitor and speak about about every chicken-crap politician YOU have in your sights. As for 'us common folks and our well-being', does it not occur that living where I do puts me in other battles? Like our state's bleeping HR4420? Like the RMV being told NOT to share data with federal immigration LE? Like corruption in (pick any of a dozen state offices) ? Sorry I'm not 'politically correct' by your lofty standards.