10 wolves released, not just 5
Small Game
Contributors to this thread:
COLORADO - Today, Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) experts completed capture work in Oregon, finishing their work in the state. As a result of the CPW team’s work in Oregon, the agency released a total of 10 gray wolves onto state-owned public land in Summit and Grand counties, continuing the agency’s efforts to create a permanent, self-sustaining gray wolf population in Colorado. This total completes the agreement with Oregon for the December 2023 - March 2024 capture season to provide up to 10 wolves to Colorado. No further releases are planned this calendar year.
Number and description of reintroduced wolves: Name Sex Age Class Weight Color Pack 2302-OR F Yearling 68 lb Black Five Points 2303-OR M Yearling 76 lb Gray Five Points 2304-OR F Yearling 76 lb Gray Noregaard 2305-OR M Yearling 93 lb Gray Noregaard 2306-OR F Yearling 66 lb Gray Noregaard 2307-OR M Adult 108 lb Black Wenaha 2308-OR F Yearling 74 lb Gray Noregaard 2309-OR M Adult 104 lb Gray Wenaha 2310-OR F Yearling 71 lb Gray Desolation 2312-OR F Yearling 76 lb Gray No Pack Note: All wolves captured, collared, and released in Colorado will use the same naming convention: The first two numbers (23) will indicate the year the animal was captured. The second set of numbers informs biologists of the wolf’s gender (males will have odd numbers, females will have even) and the order in which it was collared. *The “OR” suffix indicates the wolves came from Oregon.
Colorado Parks and Wildlife biologists were careful to select yearling and adult wolves that are mature enough to hunt prey on their own. Wolves are typically born in April of each year, and a wolf that was born in April of 2022 would be almost 20 months old now. That animal is called a yearling. That animal is capable of hunting on its own. Yearlings were candidates for translocation and the majority of the animals CPW translocated were yearlings (previously termed “juvenile”).
A press release was shared documenting the first five animals reintroduced in the state. The remaining release events were not widely shared to help protect the safety and security of the wolves, CPW staff, and the locations of endangered species. These remaining releases occurred on state-owned lands in Grand and Summit counties.
Probably 2o released. Stand by for updates.
And hopefully headed to Wyoming
So 6 yearling females, 2 yearling males and 2 adult males. Am I correct that yearling females will not go into heat this winter?
them weights should really improve in the coming year!
courtesy of Colorado Big Game Smorgasbord!
Google Search: Wolves begin mating when they are 2 to 3 years old, sometimes establishing lifelong mates. In some larger packs, more than one adult female may breed and produce pups. Wolves usually rear their pups in dens for the first six weeks
Aspen Ghost's Link
Looking at the numbering system used for the wolves makes me wonder if they accidentally killed a wolf. The numbers of the released wolves are 2302, 2303, 2304, 2305, 2306, 2307, 2308, 2309, 2310 and 2312. The 23 designates wolves released in 2023. The second two digits is the wolf # but uses odd numbers for males and even numbers for females. What happened to wolf 2301? The numbers were reported in the attached link.
wolf 2301 was found that it's testicles had not descended into the scrotum so it was sent to Portland.
Wouldn't be surprised if one died during capture or transport. I know when they started bringing moose in they lost a few. One was dropped while dangling under a chopper after capture. The Division guy said it was like a 1000 pound watermelon when it hit.
He also said the first time he used a tranq gun was on a cow elk that he accidently hit in the vitals and the dart double lunged her.
Anyone know which state the remainder of wolves are coming from? Is Oregon only doing ten or is that just a (right now number)?
The bottom line, the range of the wolf is expanding in the lower 48. Killing a few is irrelevant in the big picture.
No other state will agree to sell wolves to CO, so it will have to be OR. The funny thing will be when some of these vermin cross into WY and the CO governor's husband's wife asks permission to try to bring them back....
"I know when they started bringing moose in they lost a few. One was dropped while dangling under a chopper after capture. The Division guy said it was like a 1000 pound watermelon when it hit."
That happened on my friends ranch. They were actually taking moose from their place to transplant them to other areas.
Waiting for the citiots that voted for this to make a human chain barrier at the Colorado/Wyoming border in an attempt to turn the cuddly wolves back south.
Anybody know which state land in Summit County?
I am surprised that Minnesota, Michigan or Wisconsin won't help. Lots of wolf lovers around these parts and getting worse.
Though some contacts, I know the areas of release. They were released in areas adjacent to federal land that rancher's lease to graze livestock. Since they have a 10j designation allowing rancers to use lethal force to protect life and lifestock, it's almost like they are setting them up to fail. Also noteworthy was the packs they came from in Oregon have already been involved in livestock predation.
Aluminum Rain, It would almost have to be Blue River SWA. Not many other state land options in Summit County.
Actually there are alot of areas not listed as SWA's or STL's that are owned by the state. These were chosen as release sites due to their obscurity from general public and within small distances to critical habitat.
Just perusing ON-X will reveal many owners as state of Colorado within large tracts of public land.
There are even tracts of private land that the state holds easements to access the stateholdings, whereby only state agents can access these so-called indemnity lands. I do know BHA is leading an effort to have the state grant access to hunters/anglers to these lands (no need to flame me on BHA, just providing useful info). Not sure how this will play out,since they were not bought with CPW or GOCO funds.
So were they not welcome to release on the federal lands. Or was that not legal.
I can't answer that with any certainty, but releasing them onto federal lands requires a lead effort by USFWS, with their policies and federal requirements. In otherwords, when it was done in Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, it was done on fed lands, under recommendation from USFWS with the expectation that the feds would administer management plans that included hunting, etc. And the releases would be done in areas, numbers, and times determined by fed biologists, with consultation from the state agencies. In fact those sate agencies were against the federal release of wolves and challenged it in court but lost.
Since this was a state mandated effort, with specific rules directed by a ballot initiative, and the fact that the feds never recommended release in Colorado, it had to be done soley under state regs, dates, and areas. The USFWS was just used as a consulting agency.
That's the was it was explained to me by a state biologist. That's my recollection of the conversation.
It was done bass ackwards in Colorado compared to the other releases, because the residents of those other states would never approve such a brainless thing like a wolf introduction.
Had this been done in a different political era, the USFWS would have either not approved a release in Colorado or challenged it in Court
Releasing on private land exempts the state from many EIS requirements, even if it's on a 10 foot square chunk of private and the vermin immediately move onto federal or other land. Shell game. That's what the recent request for an injunction was all about, and the judge denied it.
I can't help but picture two nerds in a dark room, each of them sweating as they watch multiple green dots on their 50" plasma (paid for by hunters dollars) steadily tracking to the north………
Nerd #1 says “um …like…. Denver…. we have a problem here.” The nerd then looks to his right at his counterpart from Boulder, then at the red push button phone (paid for by hunters dollars) to the side of him. With heart pounding, trembling, he reluctantly says to nerd #2 (whose face is heavily pierced) “get me the governor”.........
Nerd #2 picks the phone up, punches in the ultra secure password into the phone #fckttrump24 (tones for each button pushed slowly) and lets the phone connect........ A voice on the line says "authentication code please" Julian says '#fcktrump24, #fcktrump24'...... "Connecting"......
Seconds pass...... the nerd hears shuffling on the other end of the line. It sounds like screaming between two men, they're arguing. "Hello" the man says...... “Um.....is this Mr. Pollis?"......... 'No, this is his wife, who is this?'......... "Hello sir" and like nails down a chalkboard the conversation stops......... 'Sir!!!!!!!!!! don't you ever say sir to me again, who is this?'.......... "This is Julian, one of the first responders for the 2024 wolf introduction hotline vetted by Gov Pollis.".........
Nerd #2 then hears more screaming between two men......... 'I told you to hire a woman, you hired a guy? Where were you those two nights when I tried calling'......... Seconds pass...... Marlon says, "Julian what's the problem?' Ma'am, I just wanted to inform you that all the wolves we released this week are heading straight to Wyoming, and there is nothing we can do!"............
Julian then pulls the phone away from his ear as the best 4 letter word in the English language (starts with an "F" and ends with a "K") is repeated over, and over again......
'Julian' "yes sir, I mean ma'am" 'dial 911 right now, I will activate the National Guard, and have choppers inbound with soldiers equipped with night vision assemble along the northern border to keep our wolves safe (paid for by hunters dollars).......Julian says "Awesome sir, secure just like our southern border".......... 'no son, much better, we have wolves on the line, not votes'
Jaquomo is spot on. In reality, the state could have successfully challenged this initiative based on the lack of an EIS as the feds were required to do, but extreme political pressure from the top (governor) kept them in-line with him and his male spouse's ideals.
An interesting book (actually there is a second) is Wolfer by Carter Niemeyer. Carter was a life long trapper who ended up working for state and federal agencies and became the key figure in the original re-introduction of wolves from Canada to Utah and Yellowstone National Park in the mid-1990s. At the time he was recognized as the most knowledgeable person on wolves. He was not a pencil pusher or bureaucrat. He retired from the US Fish and Wildlife Services where he was the wolf recovery coordinator for Idaho. I don't have an agenda or an opinion here. I'm just pointing out an interesting book to read regardless of your viewpoint.
Chad, that was excellent!
We do not want or need these wolves here in Wyoming if they do make it across the border hope fully they meet there demise like a couple other wolves did.... Imagine the Colorado governor and his wife will be upset.. Rumor has it the last time it happened it caused sum hurt feelings...
Hang on, there will be wolf lovers sneaking them in and releasing. Years back when Oregon said there were wolves in the north east suddenly there were wolves in the western mountains. That was reported by a hunter here that saw the tracks. Ca had a wolf family in the northern part of the state. Within a few years there are wolves are clear down east of Bakersfield. One was hit by a car there and picked up by Fish and Wildlife. I got that information from a biologist.
A gov't agency would lie? I don't believe it. Your tax dollars at work!
Bowboy's Link
Here’s an article of the cost of managing CO wolves. I bet not one dollar came from any animal right group.
A rancher in Moffat county reported seeing a CPW helicopter trying to herd a group of four wolves back toward the south yesterday. He didn't know if they were our new ones, or ones that wandered down recently.
I have a feeling the debacle is just starting, especially with the growing network of wolf watchers reporting into the FB group, and the knowledge that some of these wolves came from livestock-killing packs in OR.
Not far off from the “fictional story”‘above. Nuts the cost involved.
If you had the DNR wolf people in WI counting, 5 can turn to a real 30 in no time.
I don't have Facebook but want to keep up on this wolf things. Are you guys getting your info from personal friends or seeing it online somewhere
Rusty, go to the CPW website and sigh up of E-News. Also on that page is a link to the Wolf Introduction. There are a few Colorado rural news papers that carry similar news and stories. Paul
Colorado Wolf Tracker FB group now has more than 2,500 members, and seems like most are from ranch country where the wolves were dumped. Lots of people in that area trying to keep tabs on them through sightings reported to this group.
Will do Paul. I am assuming it won't have any of the updates like Jaq posted above. I am after the unfiltered info.
You won't get any "unfiltered" info from any CPW sources. Everything coming from them is carefully filtered and manipulated with PC-speak.
Jaq. Can you post a link to the FB? I will look at it on my wife's Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/groups/306944548990889
This a story books are made of Lewis
Oh the Stupidity….they just cost the F&G and don’t even realize it.
My hope is the people behind this release are held accountable. Hopefully their names are published somewhere….so when the lawsuits start coming they take the brunt of it.
Someones kid gets eaten…and the CO F&G is toast for their stupidity.
Look at Michigan, Wolves wayyyy over the proposed level and wrecking their game populations. The idiots that refer to ‘ Wolf Control’ are idiots. They opened Pandoras box and it will be exremely difficult and very expensive to reign wolves in. ….money there G&F depts don’t have.
KB's Link
Thanks for the read KB. Pretty telling when someone has to delete and hide a lot of what they wrote.
Oh Jaq and the 1st Gentlemen have quite the discussions! Lol
Beendare, CPW had no choice. They repeatedly declined the demands by the wolfies, so they put it on the ballot and the people of Denver and Boulder spoke. Everyone knows who was behind it, who funded it (California money), and the lawsuits have already been filed and denied. The law doesn't allow lethal control. We are screwed.
The rancher in Walden, who has been the guy at the center of having wolf issues, asked CPW if they would remove the male that's a repeat issue with livestock and working dogs. They declined. Apparently double digit attacks isn't enough
Looks like they are headed north. If the Intel keeps up with them maybe they will be able to greet them at the border.