Moultrie Mobile
Shot Placement Opinion
Elk
Contributors to this thread:
Ambush 15-Sep-24
HDE 15-Sep-24
WhattheFOC 15-Sep-24
Darrell 15-Sep-24
elkmtngear 15-Sep-24
sawtooth 15-Sep-24
Scoot 15-Sep-24
Cazador 15-Sep-24
Groundhunter 15-Sep-24
shade mt 15-Sep-24
Ambush 15-Sep-24
midwest 15-Sep-24
butcherboy 15-Sep-24
butcherboy 15-Sep-24
butcherboy 15-Sep-24
butcherboy 15-Sep-24
Will 16-Sep-24
WhattheFOC 16-Sep-24
butcherboy 16-Sep-24
Corax_latrans 17-Sep-24
2WildBill 17-Sep-24
Michael 17-Sep-24
ahunter76 17-Sep-24
Cazador 17-Sep-24
Skeeter 1 17-Sep-24
Skeeter 1 17-Sep-24
Cazador 17-Sep-24
WhattheFOC 17-Sep-24
Corax_latrans 17-Sep-24
Scoot 18-Sep-24
Corax_latrans 18-Sep-24
Michael 18-Sep-24
Supernaut 18-Sep-24
Corax_latrans 18-Sep-24
Corax_latrans 18-Sep-24
Corax_latrans 18-Sep-24
From: Ambush
15-Sep-24
How does shot placement from a tree stand or other steep angle differ from level ground placement? Or is it different at all? This is in regards only to above or below your level ground shot placement, nothing to do with quartering.

From: HDE
15-Sep-24
Don't shoot for the middle. If you do, you may miss the offset lung.

From: WhattheFOC
15-Sep-24

WhattheFOC's embedded Photo
WhattheFOC's embedded Photo
For sure it’s different. Think in 3D - if you plan on getting both lungs from a steep angle, that means hitting the near lung high and the far lung low. This shot requires a higher entry than if you had been shooting on the level. At some point the shot angle can be so high that you cant get both lungs.

I try to envision a tennis ball sized target sitting on top of the heart- I shoot at that. We all know where to aim to hit that ball on a perfect broadside shot, but the path to the ball could go thru the backstrap or the guts, depending on the angle.

I shot one last week that went in high in front of the shoulder - right thru the boiler room

From: Darrell
15-Sep-24
Like HDE said, I always think about the exit and decide on the entrance from there. I have a nack for hitting the offside ball of the shoulder. Sucks for exit holes on elk, but usually makes for short blood trails and I've seen several fall in sight. Crazy that after getting hit like that they will stop and look back when hearing a hard cow in heat call. :)

From: elkmtngear
15-Sep-24

elkmtngear's embedded Photo
elkmtngear's embedded Photo
elkmtngear's embedded Photo
elkmtngear's embedded Photo
Nice shooting Trevor. Did the same thing from a treestand on a bull in 2014, very steep downward shot. Entry and exit wounds above

From: sawtooth
15-Sep-24
Yes it is different, but very dependent on how high and how close you are.

From: Scoot
15-Sep-24
Yup- all about the angle and how steep it is. Steep downward- aim higher. Steep upward- aim lower. It's really that simple!

From: Cazador
15-Sep-24
I can tell you from experience if you hit them high from above and only get top of one lung, and hit the other, you can look forward to a long day.

You wouldn’t believe the track jobs we had this year in camp. If I wasn’t t there I wouldn’t have believed it. Found one, which was a miricale, other was found by the birds. Both double lung hits, both went over 1/2 mile logged on OnX for the non believers.

I lied and shot another with a slick trick vipertrick. Went about 75 yds down in sight, one red spot on a tree. If from a tree stand, I strive to hit them solid both lungs, and will either back the tree up for a different angle, or ensure I hit them mid body. One lung elk are a mess.

Other two were shot with expandibles.

From: Groundhunter
15-Sep-24
First of all, shot 2 from tree stand. No need to sit high, poor shot angle, I prefer 8 to 11 feet. Cover, wind and movement, will get the job done

From: shade mt
15-Sep-24
little higher entrance for steep shot angle.

i Kinda came a full circle though.....started out mostly hunting off the ground because all that was available was Bakers or homemade stands.

Then i kinda went through a "gotta be in a tree" mentality, dealt with shot angle.

now i'm swinging back to hunting much lower on average, staying in the cover, rather than climb above it, (unless there is none).

Last year i hunted off the ground 50% of the time....killed my buck with a longbow in a tree probably only 10' off the ground.....Shot placement not an issue.

watched him go down.

From: Ambush
15-Sep-24
I’m guessing most people are aiming for the heart on a level shot. Are you still aiming for the heart on a relatively steep angle? Or are you more focused on getting both lungs.?

From: midwest
15-Sep-24
Double lungs for me...bigger target, more room for error, less mess. Aiming for 1/3rd the way up from a treestand is higher than 1/3rd up from the ground but it's still 1/3rd up from your line of sight and a safe bet for a quick death. IMO

From: butcherboy
15-Sep-24

butcherboy's embedded Photo
Entry
butcherboy's embedded Photo
Entry

From: butcherboy
15-Sep-24

butcherboy's embedded Photo
Exit
butcherboy's embedded Photo
Exit

From: butcherboy
15-Sep-24

butcherboy's embedded Photo
Shoulder blade on entrance
butcherboy's embedded Photo
Shoulder blade on entrance

From: butcherboy
15-Sep-24
She was 16 yds on a steep angle from a tree stand. Probably closer due to the angle. Shot a young bull in 2017 from the same tree, same spring. Exactly the same shot but not quite as steep since the bull was a little bit further away. Both were high lung on entrance and mid lung on exit. Bull went 20 yds and fell over. The cow this year went 30 before she fell.

From: Will
16-Sep-24
My theory is that you always aim for the exit. Generally, if you can do that, the arrow will have to go through a lot of good stuff to find said exit. This works well on sort of flat or downward-angled shots. It would work on upward-angled shots, too, but I'll admit it makes my brain hurt thinking about that angle for some reason. You Western folks who may have that opportunity—good on you!

From: WhattheFOC
16-Sep-24
Butcherboy - good pictures. This is why I always want an exit hole - especially when hunting from a tree. A huge mechanical entry, high on the animal doesn’t create much blood on the ground.

From: butcherboy
16-Sep-24
Yes sir, and thanks. I’m not a mechanical fan, never have been. I prefer fixed 3 blade broadheads. Shot this cow with a 100 grain exodus swept. After going through the shoulder blade and ribs there wasn’t a single thing wrong with the broadhead. Just need to clean it up and retouch the blades a little and it’s good to go.

17-Sep-24

Corax_latrans's embedded Photo
Rough sketch; figure somewhere behind shoulders… heart takes up more space farther forward…
Corax_latrans's embedded Photo
Rough sketch; figure somewhere behind shoulders… heart takes up more space farther forward…
Pretty much as WTFOC said.

Figure the dotted line is the X-ring (or better yet, X-sphere) but anything that enters below the spinal column and exits above the sternum will get you both lungs.

Ahead of or behind the heart, those very steep angles keep to the periphery of the lungs, and that’s not great unless you clip a major vessel or two at/close to the mid-line.

So I don’t like too steep an angle — BTDT — so I don’t like to be real high.

From: 2WildBill
17-Sep-24
I watch for the hump on the spine created by the front shoulderblade cartilage and want to stay behind that. The sound of the release triggers the animal dropdown and the shoulder blade rotates with the lower portion moving forward and the top rotating to the rear.

If the animal is facing/bodily angled uphill, the innards hang to the rear and if downhill they move forward.

I practice straight down shots by standing on my picnic table and shooting a 3D animal part laying on the ground. Pick your spot and hit it. How you manage the lower limb is very important. My preference on a straight down is with the bottom limb between my legs. At about fifteen yards I can place the lower limb outside my legs on the bow side. My stand has no rail to contend with, more like a fixed hang on stand. I shoot a 60" recurve and I'm 5'7".

I tried the Wensel Woodsman for years but went back to a two blade because I wasn't getting many bottom of body exit holes. Most of my 3 blade kills were dropping within sight, but the one's I had to track were less colorfull, with only the spray from the top wound throwing out blood.

After the shot, mark the last place you could see the animal with a compass bearing from the tree. As you might know, the appearance of your surroundings changes dramatically between what you see from your stand and what you see on the ground.

From: Michael
17-Sep-24

Michael's embedded Photo
Michael's embedded Photo
Corax_Latrans picture is pretty accurate to how things went down with the buck I shot on Saturday evening.

Shot was 15 yards and I was roughly 12’ up in the tree.

Don’t have a picture of the entrance but I would say it was 2/3 the way up on the body. Entrance hole was right in the crease, so slightly quartering sway.

This is the exit hole.

From: ahunter76
17-Sep-24
Think about where it will exit & that will give you where you need to shoot, ground or elevated.

From: Cazador
17-Sep-24
The problem with these deer to elk comparisons is it’s a lot easier to go top to bottom on a deer. We had three elk shot from above this year, no exits on any of them. Blood trails were very tough on two. The other was pretty much down in sight.

From: Skeeter 1
17-Sep-24

From: Skeeter 1
17-Sep-24
I have been bow hunting for many years. As I am retired and getting older I am considering trying to aim at the neck of the deer to hopefully drop it in its tracks. I hunt in a pretty dense area and am tired going to retrieve a deer in the evening at dark. My stand is easily assessable with a four wheeler . I feel the best shot is where the neck meets the body. Any advice would be appreciated

From: Cazador
17-Sep-24

Cazador's embedded Photo
Cazador's embedded Photo
One fixed (vipertrick) and two mechanicals, ( spitfire and zevr).

The spitfire hit went through the vertebrae (where back straps reside) but never made it out. Really lucky on that one.

Here is the fixed head that didn’t get out. Angled a bit, but down in 60-70 yds but nada blood wise. That is the fletch broke off 2 inches below vanes hole is deceiving. Arrow end up in front of hip.

The zevr was nothing short of horrible.

From: WhattheFOC
17-Sep-24
Interesting to hear about the Sevr. On my deer this fall, I nicked the scapula (presumably the blades pivoted), then missed ribs in and out, but never broke the hide on the exit. Barely any blood on the ground. With my fixed 3 blade, I’ll guarantee it would be driven into the dirt on the far side.

17-Sep-24
“I am considering trying to aim at the neck of the deer to hopefully drop it in its tracks…. Any advice would be appreciated.”

Use a rifle.

The spine is about a 2” target on a deer. I have screwed up a neck shot with a scoped rifle (hitting just a shade low from 20’ up on a 10-15 yard shot), and that was the longest, slowest recovery of my entire career.

JMO, you’re better off staying behind the shoulder and getting the double-lung with a moderate-width, crazy-sharp, fixed COC 2-blade with a well-tuned arrow that’ll zip clean through and leave the animal standing there wondering WTF was the deal on that Jumbo horse fly.

Plenty of Trad guys have done it, and the animals just stand there (or walk off slowly) and tip over.

It’s not how fast they die. It’s how fast they run after the hit that determines how far away they crash.

JMO, but Math is on my side.

From: Scoot
18-Sep-24
Corax, not just math, but also common sense. Skeeter, planning a neck shot is not a good plan.

18-Sep-24
Math applies only to the how fast/how far part!

But common sense…. I’ve heard a lot of stories of spine shots which include the part where there’s a lot of bawling and thrashing, which is unpleasant for all concerned and (in a built-up area) may attract unwanted attention….

From: Michael
18-Sep-24
I haven’t shot a lot of elk but everyone I have shot my arrow has blown through them and I had to dig it out of the dirt. The broad head makes a difference, just like poundage being pulled, draw length as well as weight of arrow. If your set up has limitations then your shot selection has limitations. With my set up, 70 lb limbs, 31” draw, 475 grain arrow and a good COC fixed going top to bottom on an elk isn’t an issue. Stay off the spine and even the back strap to achieve success. Reference Corax’s sketch for shot placement.

WhattheFOC, I shoot SevR broad heads now days. The last 14 deer I have shot have been with a SEVR. Of the 14 deer 2 were not pass throughs (spine hits), 5 of them hit the offside shoulder but no major bone was hit. I wouldn’t say any of the blood trails were great but I did have blood trails that could be followed without searching to find blood.

From: Supernaut
18-Sep-24

Supernaut's embedded Photo
Supernaut's embedded Photo
Skeeter, I would also advise against a neck shot with a bow.

I shot this doe at about 40 yards with my 50 cal. flintlock. She was looking directly at me and I could only see her head and the white patch of her throat below her chin. That's where I aimed and that's where I hit. It's the only time I've taken a shot like that but I knew it would be a clean miss or a clean kill. She dropped on the spot and never moved. I also know that my flintlock hits a lot harder than an arrow.

18-Sep-24

Corax_latrans's embedded Photo
Corax_latrans's embedded Photo
“ I knew it would be a clean miss or a clean kill.”

That’s what I thought… right up until I tore out the major vessels on only one side of the throat. I’m not saying that I would necessarily pass up that same shot with my .54 roundballer, but I got myself pretty thoroughly humbled just by having my line of bore a little bit farther below the crosshairs than I accounted for at LW-Approved hunting range…..

Similar thing happened with my one Contraption-Killed WT, only in reverse; a smallish doe came through at very close range and while I floated the pin for an appropriately high entry, at that range the arrow struck a little higher than the pin and passed between the spinous processes just above the spinal cord, topping the off lung… See the line marked “tree” in this post….

She panicked, but fortunately for me, rather than sprinting off at Mach Schnell, she went full-on Rodeo— crow-hopping and sunfishing like the meanest bucking bronc on the PRCA — until she finally rid herself of the arrow by slamming herself down on her back, which snapped it off and allowed the two pieces to drop out.

That could’ve been a recovery job from hell, except that she offered me a follow-up shot from about 20 yards out, which I placed correctly, just under the spinal column. A few inches lower would have been fine, too, but I opened up the descending aorta and the vena cava and she just lurched forward and went down on her chin.

Anyway, just a reminder to know where your arrows hit at close range and steep angles so that you don’t have a similar mishap. I followed her blood trail all the way to where she fell (there’s no better practice than the real thing, right?) and it was not particularly difficult, but the trail on a high-exit, single lung hit sure could get thin in a hurry… And had this deer not snapped the arrow and shaken it off, I suppose she could have walked around looking like an old Steve Martin sketch for who knows how long, which is not a good deal when your landowner’s girlfriend is not favorably disposed towards hunting….

18-Sep-24

Corax_latrans's embedded Photo
Corax_latrans's embedded Photo
Game of Inches, as they say…..

18-Sep-24
And FWIW, a double-lung through the ribs wastes a lot less meat than a neck shot, unless you don’t eat neck meat anyway….

But yeah, I shot my first deer ever through both shoulders and the spinal column. Perfect placement for a DRT result, but it destroyed so much meat that I’ll never do it again….

  • Sitka Gear