Mathews Inc.
Hmmm, Staten Island Post Removed??
Connecticut
Contributors to this thread:
Bigbuckbob 03-Jan-20
Mike in CT 03-Jan-20
Wild Bill 03-Jan-20
Will 03-Jan-20
Bigbuckbob 03-Jan-20
Dr. Williams 03-Jan-20
Bigbuckbob 03-Jan-20
Bloodtrail 03-Jan-20
Bigbuckbob 03-Jan-20
SixLomaz 03-Jan-20
Blatch 03-Jan-20
Bigbuckbob 03-Jan-20
SixLomaz 03-Jan-20
bb 04-Jan-20
Bigbuckbob 04-Jan-20
Mike in CT 04-Jan-20
SixLomaz 04-Jan-20
Bigbuckbob 04-Jan-20
SixLomaz 04-Jan-20
Bloodtrail 04-Jan-20
Notme 04-Jan-20
SixLomaz 04-Jan-20
SixLomaz 04-Jan-20
SixLomaz 04-Jan-20
SixLomaz 04-Jan-20
SixLomaz 04-Jan-20
Bloodtrail 04-Jan-20
SixLomaz 04-Jan-20
SixLomaz 04-Jan-20
Bigbuckbob 04-Jan-20
Bloodtrail 04-Jan-20
Blatch 04-Jan-20
Notme 04-Jan-20
Blatch 04-Jan-20
SixLomaz 04-Jan-20
Brian M. 04-Jan-20
TheDude 04-Jan-20
Bigbuckbob 04-Jan-20
TheDude 04-Jan-20
SixLomaz 04-Jan-20
longbeard 04-Jan-20
Bigbuckbob 04-Jan-20
Bloodtrail 04-Jan-20
Blatch 04-Jan-20
SixLomaz 04-Jan-20
SixLomaz 05-Jan-20
Jerry Leblanc 05-Jan-20
Bloodtrail 05-Jan-20
SixLomaz 05-Jan-20
Bloodtrail 05-Jan-20
Bigbuckbob 05-Jan-20
Notme 05-Jan-20
SixLomaz 05-Jan-20
From: Bigbuckbob
03-Jan-20
Why?

From: Mike in CT
03-Jan-20
Bob,

I've posted about the reasons some posts and even some threads get deleted per the editorial policy of the Bowsite; once again, a reminder that these decisions are at the discretion of the editors and are not to be questioned.

I'd say the most obvious reason was within the thread a comment was made that basically stated the intent of the thread was to get a reaction out of certain posters; when I saw that I fully expected the thread to be pulled once the editors got wind of it.

It should go without saying that there has been equal "poking the bear" with regard to certain topics the past few years and it's well past time for all responsible parties to consider the greater good and desist from such postings going forward.

Over the past few months I've seen multiple comments about posters who once were regular contributors and who have either greatly reduced their postings or have stopped posting altogether; this is a great loss, most especially for all of the new hunters who have come here seeking advice, guidance and in some cases reassurance. This used to be just the place to go for that type of aid and there's no reason it can't be again.

When we've discussed the state of CT's deer herd a common refrain has been the need to self-police; just as no one forces anyone to release an arrow no one forces anyone to post topics known to be sore spots that quickly devolve into endless argument; we can be better and we must be better.

Off of my soapbox now......

From: Wild Bill
03-Jan-20
Hear, hear, Mike

From: Will
03-Jan-20
Nicely said Mike.

From: Bigbuckbob
03-Jan-20
Ok, I know who added that comment but the thread had no profanity, no non-hunting related content and I thought was quite civil by all parties. Oh well.

From: Dr. Williams
03-Jan-20
Perhaps because it didn’t pertain to bowhunting? Though I feel deleting that was an over-reach. Discussions on the rationale behind non-traditional deer management techniques can help archers understand what is required of them to be considered for deer managers in instances like on Staten Island. Perhaps some guidance is required as to what is and what is not permissible on this site instead of seemingly innocuous posts just plain vanishing into the ethos....

From: Bigbuckbob
03-Jan-20
Doc, actually deer hunting was suggested in another article as an option on SI as recent as last year since the sterilization process was not yielding appreciable results, and it was suggested by a local politician.

I think all deer management methods are applicable to this site. I understand some on this site are tired of certain subjects, but I think spending taxpayer's money on different deer management practices can, and has, impacted us here in CT, so educating ourselves on cost and results is important.

I agree Doc. Removing a post because someone added a picture of a cartoon character stirring the pot seems a bit extreme. I find it interesting to see how this plays out on SI.

From: Bloodtrail
03-Jan-20
Actually Bob, my cartoon character post was Spot On. I just have the wherewithal to say it.....and now posts are going poof. Although I sometimes appreciate Doc for adding tid-bits here and there, I’ll speak for myself and many others......I don’t appreciate you going at Doc at any chance you get. It has added to the downfall of a great place to gather and share info on bow hunting.

From: Bigbuckbob
03-Jan-20
Bloodtrail, first of all, I had no problem with your cartoon of "stirring the pot", and that's why I said I didn't understand why the post was removed. Someone else commented that "within the thread a comment was made that basically stated the intent of the thread was to get a reaction out of certain posters"; and I was responding to that assumption. Secondly, I didn't go after Doc on the post that was removed, I went after Mayor D.DiBlasio for wasting taxpayers money on a failed program. And remember, Doc is the one who posted the link to the article stating the lack luster success of the process, not me. Lastly, if you don't like reading any thread that I, or others post, why not just ignore then instead whining about it? I've contributed on several other posts, especially those of new hunters, trying to provide some insight into this sport, or at least the way I approach it.

I've read several posts on this site where long argument ensue about guys who wound deer, guys you have the brown is down attitude, the xbow vs non-xbow crowd, deer herd densities and many others, yet I've never said the posters should stop sharing their views or that many other's (???) feel they are ruining the site.

If Pat thinks I should be removed because I'm ruining this site I'm fine with that, this is not my life,.....it's just a distraction.

I also respect Dr Williams for his knowledge, and have said so many times in the past.

From: SixLomaz
03-Jan-20
Any form of dictatorship, be it communism socialism or any other "ism" social construct, breeds censorship. Forum posting rules are not clear enough leaving room for interpretation and constant poster boundary checking. A clean forum requires clear rules enforced by mods. An explanation following the removal of a thread/post should suffice to dispel the confusion with a technical glitch and prevent repeat offending posts by promoting understanding.

In absence of a forum where one can politely and respectfully challenge the status quo, what is left is a mainstream venue where all line up to march in the same direction with synchronized thoughts. If it is so then Bowsite should clearly state it rather than letting confusion slowly brew under the surface creating tensions and further loss of valuable members. For example on the Big Game Forum there is a thread titled "David Petersen turns on bowhunters" still active today despite stirring controversy. This forum went from troll swamped threads to the other extreme where selectively any thread/post trending towards future possible trouble is squashed.

Can a more democratic process be adopted? For example let the forum members flag questionable threads/posts and when a certain flagging level (visible on the thread - likes vs dislikes) is reached then a mod should take a look and intervene. Perhaps other solutions are available instead of dealing with "disappearing" threads which reminds me of a similar situation which took place in Argentina when mothers of the disappeared dissidents took to street silently protesting. Here disappointed members go to other forums available. I sure hope the mods understand that each thread has posts that are the brainchild of the posting member. Yanking these thread/posts from forum is a traumatic experience and leads to dissatisfaction.

Most come here to brag about latest paid for trophy or push personal agendas. Others pay to advertise. Very few are left to bring knowledge, offer an example to follow for the new hunter generations. Without membership advertisement revenue diminishes. A compromise is needed to balance the needs with the wants.

From: Blatch
03-Jan-20
I'd argue that modern capitalism - another "ism" - has significantly narrowed censorship. Philosophical differences and opinions aside, I appreciate the civil discourse and banter in this forum. I further generally appreciate BBB's posts. Finally, there was absolutely no reason to strike the Staten Island thread. It's regrettable that the forum moderator(s) chose to remove it and hopefully in his/their infinite wisdom he/they restore it. So much for open dialogue on a quasi-public forum.

From: Bigbuckbob
03-Jan-20
Six, I agree that the rules seem somewhat subjective and therefore causes confusion on the boundaries and some getting upset. However, if we don't like it we have a choice,......leave.

I registered for the site and agreed to the rules. If I don't like the rules it's not my place to complain about them, I can take my ball and go home.

I think we need to put this site in perspective,...... it's just a bowsite.

From: SixLomaz
03-Jan-20
"I'd argue that modern capitalism - another "ism" - has significantly narrowed censorship."

Ouch. Fox News, NBC, Times, and all other mass media modern venues apply one form or another of censorship. In a global environment CNN in Europe has a totally different programming and views on common topics than CNN in USA for example. One would think they are looking at two different events.

From: bb
04-Jan-20
Bob, you were surprisingly civil to Doc on that previous thread in question but that hasn't been the trend. I believe that is what Bloodtrail is referencing. I for one like to hear his opinions and takes on issues.

From: Bigbuckbob
04-Jan-20
bb, and I have been civil with Doc on many thread, including this one. Can I be a complete A-hole with him, yes and I've stated so in the past; but remember it takes two to play that game. Doc also likes to "stir the pot" as much as I do, and I take ownership for my part in that game.

Like I stated previously, some people don't like threads arguing about baiting, wounding deer, xbows, herd densities, SI, Redding, broadheads, etc. Some guys on this site will find fault with anything you do (post) and since I put my comments on a public forum I have no problem with the criticism. But please, if you don't like my posts just ignore them.

I think the Staten Island sterilization program is a concern to all of us who hunt, especially since taxpayer money is paying for it AND local politicians were asking for an archery cull due to the low success rate and money spent. If the new herd count in the article posted by Doc is somewhere north of 1700+ total deer and WB states the fixed 1500+ bucks, why weren't the doe sterilized (just a couple of hundred of them) and most of the $4.1 mil taxpayer money saved?

Can deer control programs run by state officials impact us as bowhunters? It already has. That's my point. Do I want my tax dollars paying for a failed program like the SI program? No way.

From: Mike in CT
04-Jan-20
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR BOWSITE.COM, STICKBOW.COM CONFERENCES The popularity of our interactive forums necessitate a list of rules that all contributors to this forum must adhere to. These rules are to ensure respect for fellow visitors is maintained at all times and so Bowsite.com remains a valuable, friendly, and credible bowhunting resource.

Contributors to our interactive features must agree to our rules in order to post. The rules are incontestable. People found in violation of this code may have their privilege revoked. Repeat offenders may be banned from visiting our sites.

There are a number of editors who monitor this forum. While we strive for fairness and objectivity, editing is a subjective process which may sometimes seem inconsistent. We can not catch every violation and for this reason, we ask that you assist us by reporting violators. Posts that are visible do not necessarily mean that they have been reviewed by our editors and meet our criteria for acceptance.

Contributions posted here do not necessarily reflect the views of Bowsite.com, Stickbow.com, our editors, or any other entity affiliated with this site. We make no assertions to their credibility, truthfulness, or accuracy. All contributions are the responsibility of the person submitting them as stated in their registration and posting agreement. The staff of Bowsite, Stickbow and DeerBuilder reserve the right to remove any post, topic, or person for any reason we see fit.

RULES FOR CONTRIBUTORS 1. No Profanity. This includes cursing, sexual innuendo, vulgar statements, racist, homophobic, transphobic, and other terms deemed offensive. 2. Ethical Persecution is not allowed - Public submissions which criticize other hunters for what they hunt, where they hunt, or how they hunt are not allowed. 3. No threatening, harassing or abusive remarks. 4. No discussion, or challenge, to our editing policy are allowed within the conferences. 5. No topics and/or statements which could be used to reflect poorly on archery and/or bowhunting.Since the Bowsite is visited frequently by anti-hunting organizations and non-hunting individuals, we feel it is necessary to remove those topics or statements which could be used against us, or tarnish our image. While the contributors original intent (e.g. an example of "what not to do") may be good-intentioned, if it can assist in presenting poor image to the media for our sport it will be removed. 6. No Advertising - This includes both commercial, nonprofit, and classified ads. We have programs available for organizations, commercial businesses, and an extensive FREE classified ad section. Sponsors of the Bowsite and our related sites are granted permission to advertise their goods and services on our conferences. An ad is defined as any post, topic, or blatant attempt to solicit business. An individual may respond, however, to a question on how to contact a business along with responses to inquiries on products or services. Suspicious contributions will be removed at the staffs' discretion. 7. Topics must be related to the forum. No off-topic posting allowed.This means that while in the whitetail forum, only topics directly related to bowhunting whitetail deer will be allowed. For example, a question on tuning your bow posted in the bear forum is not allowed. See the forum guidelines below. 8. Contributors who are argumentative, intolerant, confrontational, and lack respect for others will be removed. While debate is often healthy, habitual debaters and people who seek confrontation will be removed and potentially blocked from making future contributions. This is necessary to ensure a positive experience for the great majority of our visitors. 9. Anonymous Registrations are Prohibited - People who register for our services under assumed or "bogus" names will be removed. 10. Libel and Slander - You are solely responsible for your comments and content posted on Bowsite.com, Stickbow.com, DeerBuilder.com and Bowhunting.TV.

There still seems to be some confusion on why the thread in question was pulled; I'll refer to a few specific sections of the above to try and make things clearer.

First and foremost we should all begin with the reality that we are all guests here; this site is 100% free to all of us so our ability to post here is a privilege, not a right. Just as we would be respectful when visiting someone's home we should treat posting here in a like fashion.

It should be obvious that the editors/moderators cut us a lot of slack on #1.

On some of the more controversial topics I'd say #3 has been challenged at least a few times. I would suspect that level of tolerance is going to get progressively less.

We've had threads pulled and then threads questioning the pulling of the original thread in direct violation of #4; it would not shock me if this thread gets pulled as that's happening again. I see the questions about this but again, the COC addresses this policy and we are guests granted the privilege of posting under these rules/guidelines.

Some of the threads that have been pulled relate directly to #5 and on some of the follow-up threads questioning the demise of the original thread I tried to subtly point to this rationale; on certain topics this really should be painfully obvious as to why this rule was put in place and why it's been enforced.

The original recent SI thread was most likely pulled as it relates to #8; in all likelihood, leaving out the comment that strongly inferred the purpose of starting the thread was to get under the skin of a few posters is why the thread got pulled. In an of itself I think the thread was fine; it was the statement of looking to provoke that was the issue. Again, this should be painfully obvious as to why this concerned the editors/moderators.

Thankfully (at least for the moment) we've been spared the barrage of violators of #9.

There will always be topics that are guaranteed to tap into opposing views; if done in the spirit of promoting healthy debate that's a good thing; some topics should be discussed, especially those that have tangible impact on us all. We can have those discussions absent obvious animus; everyone here should possess the maturity to keep it courteous and respectful while standing firm in their convictions.

Lastly, if the sport we love is to not only survive, but flourish we need a constant infusion of new blood; we will surely choke this off if we allow this site to turn into a recreation of grade-school bullying. We're better than that-way, way better.

From: SixLomaz
04-Jan-20
OJ's "if the glove does not fit then you must acquit" in reverse where anything can fit if needed. 10 sticks thrown together do not make a serious camp fire nor 10 rules make you the almighty and each member a Moses. I can tell you that on serious forums the rules of conduct are specific and detailed with lengthy instructions so there will be no shadow of a doubt when applied. A certain percentage of non-believers / non-followers is a given no matter what forum or social environment we analyze. So expect it.

Nobody likes a fist in the mouth --> "4. No discussion, or challenge, to our editing policy are allowed within the conferences." The rules should be discussed and allowed to evolve for a better forum experience thru expressed membership consensus followed by moderator / administrator analysis and decision.

Talking about moderators. We do not know their handles and their presence is at best heavily mythical. See recent troll flooding that took awhile to go away. How many on the CT forum know who the moderators are? Maybe some will have an educated guess but most have no clue.

As the rules stand today they leave room for confusion in certain areas, leading to member dissatisfaction and possible loss of advertising revenue thru membership thinning out. In conclusion we have Option 1 where we use 10 rules AND at least implement a flagging system and allow an organic evolution thru membership participation or Option 2 where more detailed rules with clear instructions are used to offer the privilege coming directly from active administrators / moderators.

From: Bigbuckbob
04-Jan-20
Mike, I actually re-read the rules after the thread was pulled, but didn't see a clear reason. However, don't mis-interrupt these comments, I AGREE with the rules and as I stated previously, "I registered for the site and agreed to the rules. If I don't like the rules it's not my place to complain about them, I can take my ball and go home."

From: SixLomaz
04-Jan-20

SixLomaz's Link
Here we are today quibbling about petty rules and wondering why bowhunting is losing mass appeal. Maybe we should read this article "Brush With Tawny Death" - a Paul Schafer adventure and ponder about bowhunters of past.

From: Bloodtrail
04-Jan-20
Six, bow hunting is growing.....or at least hunting with a bolt and Broadhead is growing. No denying that.

And if anyone wants a thread to be debate free.... then click debate free when they start it. How bout them apples.....

From: Notme
04-Jan-20

Notme's Link
"Talking about moderators. We do not know their handles and their presence is at best heavily mythical. See recent troll flooding that took awhile to go away. How many on the CT forum know who the moderators are? Maybe some will have an educated guess but most have no clue."

https://youtu.be/-8h_v_our_Q

From: SixLomaz
04-Jan-20
NOTME you are the moderator!? No, wait, we all are. Now I am confused. The message is too DEEP (pun intended).

From: SixLomaz
04-Jan-20

SixLomaz's Link
Bloodtrail: Bowhunting growing statement should be supported by facts. I cannot find data for CT DEEP licensing system but here it is from NY DEC. 2017-2018 numbers are down compared to peak 2008-2009. It includes all license types sold. Trending is down with an exception for 2013-2014.

From: SixLomaz
04-Jan-20

SixLomaz's embedded Photo
SixLomaz's embedded Photo
Here it is.

From: SixLomaz
04-Jan-20
Here is a sample forum rules policy from the Internet. See how number 2 allows for redirect and facilitates contact with moderator / administrator team? That is nice.

Forum Rules Sample

1. Above all, respect each other. While we realize that discussions may get heated, vulgar language or name calling cannot be tolerated. Masked vulgar language (ie, w*rd, rul*s, etc) is considered vulgar.

2. If a moderator removes your thread or post, contact a moderator or Administrator by PM to request the reasons, or to explain yourself. Please do not question the Moderators actions in the open forums, Moderators are only human and there may have been a misunderstanding. Threatening a moderator will not be tolerated.

3. Please use the personal message (PM) feature to contact other members or forum moderators about any issue. Do not start a thread or use a post for this kind of contact. Do not start a thread or make a post protesting a mod or admins actions (this includes protesting the banning of a member).

4. Please use good taste in your choice of avatar. Nothing sexual or of a violent nature is tolerated.

5. Please limit your signature block to 5 lines or less, and size #2 or smaller. Signatures may not contain links to websites or contact information, unless the website is owned by a banner sponsor of website. Signatures may not be used to sell or advertise products that are non website banner sponsors. This includes business Facebook links.

6. Do not use posts to correct another poster's spelling or grammar - this is rude and unnecessary. If you do not understand what they are saying, ask them to clarify.

7. Do not interrupt a thread 's content direction to bring attention to another agenda or product.

8. Minors are not allowed to post in the classifieds section due to legal restrictions. Parents may post for their minor children and are responsible for all transactions. All traders must have a birth date visible in their profile.

9. Remember that use of ALL CAPITAL LETTERS IN A POST is the same as shouting. It is best not to use all capital letters as it is difficult to read and is intrusive to readers.

10. What may not be in a post is as follows: Material that is threatening, harassing, or abusive to any party. Content that is sexual, defamatory, hateful, potentially slanderous, private message or in violation of any law is not tolerated. Knowingly posting false or misleading material will result in moderator action. NOTE: This includes Racial attacks, and racial slurs of any kind, directed at a fellow member or not. This rule also pertains to persons running for political office regardless of party affiliation.

11. Use the proper forum for your threads. Commercial threads need to be started in the manufacturer's announcement area. Bowhunting stories or hunting info need to be posted in the bowhunting forum, etc. If you are unsure about what to do or where to go, just PM a moderator or an administrator.

12. Spamming is not allowed. Spamming can be defined as using a post to promote a product or agenda. If you are not a banner sponsor you may not promote your business in anyway on the forum. As an SMR sponsor you may only sell your product in the classifieds. Threads may not be started for the purpose of adding spam material.

13. Asking for money, donations or discount codes is prohibited. Banner Sponsors may offer giveaways or have drawings, or the like with prior administrative approval. Donation requests will be removed. We realize that there are many good causes out there, but we have no way to verify the validity of such.

14. Please refer to the Rules of the Classifieds before buying, selling or trading. Specific Rules and Guidelines are posted here

15. Alters... Creating an alter for the purpose of deception is NOT allowed! The alter will be banned and the original user may also be disciplined.

16. Thread bumping is limited to 4 times per 24 hour period for all members.

17. Embedding a hidden link into a post is not allowed and will not be tolerated. This will be treated as spamming the forum.

18. Private Messages (PM's) are just that, private. Posting Private Messages on the open forum is not tolerated.

Moderator actions: A moderator may find that a thread or post has violated a rule and will either edit it or remove it. In some cases, this may be accompanied by a warning to the poster and, in extreme cases, banning of the member and his IP. Banning may be temporary or permanent depending on the offence. Appeals may be made by PM or email to administration and then a final decision will be made.

These rules are site wide. They apply equally to chat, articles, pictures, reviews, and any other section of website. If your actions warrant banning it is site wide and applies to all accounts coming from your IP address.

This site was created for you and with a little moderator help can be policed by you. Treat each post as if your 10 year old daughter was going to read it. Keep the content clean, honest, and free from sexual innuendo and foul language. Above all, respect others and they will respect you.

From: SixLomaz
04-Jan-20
So, if a member posts a clearly sexual explicit picture or message then a moderator should remove such offending post but not the whole thread, warn the member, and refresh everyone's memory about forum rules within the thread. Three warnings will buy your IP address a ban status. Pretty simple process.

From: Bloodtrail
04-Jan-20
Six. I have the numbers for the last 10 or 12 years for Archery permits at home somewhere. And they have increased a lot....only recently they have they flatlined. But by no means are they declining. You can look at the CT Deer Summaries from years past to see the growing trend.

You forgot #18 also. If you add a smiley or winky face at the end of your post, it makes your post acceptable.

And it sure would be nice to see the man behind the curtain here. :)

From: SixLomaz
04-Jan-20
Now I am probably going to get banned. I know that everywhere in life there are exceptions to the rules depending on what level you float at. On the Big Game Forum the first post of the "Should deer drives be outlawed?" thread clearly violates this website's rules 2 and 5 despite original poster's good intention and appreciation for life. I have to point out that recent threads about the two PA teenagers kicking wounded deer were pulled immediately under rule #5. Hmmm!? - indeed

"2. Ethical Persecution is not allowed - Public submissions which criticize other hunters for what they hunt, where they hunt, or how they hunt are not allowed."

"5. No topics and/or statements which could be used to reflect poorly on archery and/or bowhunting.Since the Bowsite is visited frequently by anti-hunting organizations and non-hunting individuals, we feel it is necessary to remove those topics or statements which could be used against us, or tarnish our image. While the contributors original intent (e.g. an example of "what not to do") may be good-intentioned, if it can assist in presenting poor image to the media for our sport it will be removed."

Let's keep it real Orion brothers, otherwise we look like hypocrite sheep.

From: SixLomaz
04-Jan-20
Bloodtrail: Officially sourced facts, black on white, will absolve your sins. "You can look at the CT Deer Summaries from years past to see the growing trend." only means hunters are getting better at killing deer and does not reveal bowhunting licenses number.

From: Bigbuckbob
04-Jan-20
Reading the 2018 CT Deer Harvest Report the data bears out what Six stated "only" if you're considering TOTAL deer permits. TOTAL permits increased YOY until 1992 but then remained stable until 2009. After 2009 there has been a steady decline in the TOTAL number of permits issued.

However, Bloodtrail is correct when he states that archery permits have been increasing steadily to a record high in 2017, however there was a 3.5% decrease in 2018 according to the report.

I'll guess that xbows helped boost the permit numbers in recent years up till 2018, and then when the new hunters discovered that the new bow didn't put a deer in the freezer, they backed off in 2018. I wish the report broke out the xbow additional permits as it would be interesting to see the impact.

From: Bloodtrail
04-Jan-20
Thanks BBB.

Nah nah nah nah nah, Six. :) :)

From: Blatch
04-Jan-20
There is nothing wrong with spirited debate. I read the rules, again, and virtually every thread I've read on this site violates one or more of those rules. So yes, I take issue with subjective removal of certain threads.

BTW, does Bowsite.com profit off of any advertising on this website? Most forums like this generate revenue through advertising, which in turn largely corresponds with number of users/activity.

From: Notme
04-Jan-20

Notme's Link
https://youtu.be/wmLaNf25Id0

From: Blatch
04-Jan-20
The silence is deafening.

From: SixLomaz
04-Jan-20
Exactly, either we all follow same structured rules or let's fine tune and tweak until we find common ground. Yes, this website receives advertising revenue and depend on membership level for success. It is visible right from the home page. Membership is paramount in achieving revenue. I understand there are owners, administrators and moderators, but when a website opens a forum for discussions, "my way or the highway" is not a very good model to run business.

From: Brian M.
04-Jan-20
I don't understand the secrecy of who the mods are. Every site I've visited has a list of mods for the site, and for each forum within the site. For a secret mod to delete a thread without explanation, to at least the offender, IMO is detrimental to the site. Obviously some offenses are, well, obvious, but without explanation, the offense will just be repeated. It doesn't seem to much to ask for clarification. Removing an entire thread, no one knows if their post was the reason for the removal.

I won't expect a response, apparently mods don't do that.

From: TheDude
04-Jan-20

TheDude's embedded Photo
TheDude's embedded Photo
Six, License numbers you posted are suspect.

From: Bigbuckbob
04-Jan-20
I think Six may have been referring to total deer permits, which have definitely declined.

From: TheDude
04-Jan-20
My fault... I see your other post.

From: SixLomaz
04-Jan-20
I could not find CT numbers. I used NY state DEC report.

From: longbeard
04-Jan-20
You guys are forgetting one thing: this is a privately owned site and the owner can make and enforce any rule he wants. It doesn’t matter if you agree or not.

From: Bigbuckbob
04-Jan-20
Exactly!

From: Bloodtrail
04-Jan-20
I guess we all just hit the Debate Free button and we’re safe then??

From: Blatch
04-Jan-20
I'm happy to speak my mind and help line the pockets of the bowsite owners/investors.

From: SixLomaz
04-Jan-20
Most websites out there are privately owned. Actions have consequences. In reality nobody can act risk free. Of course we all gamble a little in our lives. Tough luck disregarding membership in this competitive market. Personally I am out to buy the latest CopperFit Energy Socks for my next hunt in 2020. I hope they keep me on my feet long enough.

From: SixLomaz
05-Jan-20

SixLomaz's Link
I am done buying the socks. Have you been paying attention to Wisconsin forum? See thread linked above, similar to the one on the Big Game Forum.

05-Jan-20
The owner of this site has been doing it for a long time and knows what drives membership. We have all heard people say/write that they are tired of certain topics and negativity. When he sees topics that In his opinion violate the rules he makes a business decision to remove them. It is his sandbox and I am just happy to play in it. He has a tremendous investment in this website and should protect it the way he wants. Although we may not like a decision here and there the moderators have been very lenient. I for one will just say thanks Pat. Do what you need to do keep up this resource.

From: Bloodtrail
05-Jan-20
Six, good luck with the socks. My son has a few pairs for baseball. He doesn’t know if they work or not. But they can’t hurt.

And the post on the Big Forum got POOFED! Lmao. :)

From: SixLomaz
05-Jan-20
It was an unfortunate idea to open deer drives topic for debate. It had no business traction, zero, in attracting membership, as it only caused serious backlash. Some passionate deer drivers on the Wisconsin forum actually stated they are done on Bowsite. I did not check PA forum where they too run deer.

I wonder if there is a way to cancel membership once you sign up. I do not see it. Even if you no longer actively participate here your account then stays open to be counted for advertising purpose. That is interesting. Maybe that is the reason troll accounts are tolerated for awhile.

From: Bloodtrail
05-Jan-20
Six, Pat sells advertising/sponsorships based on traffic.....hits to the website. I don’t believe it’s weighed towards registrants (somewhat). But Unique visitors and repeat/active visitors are heavily weighed..... IE clicks - from who and how often. His post on Driving Deer did indeed increase traffic and did exactly what it was intended to do.

Let’s hope the CT site can withstand some of the downs it has seemingly gone through over the last year. :)

From: Bigbuckbob
05-Jan-20
So it sounds like Doc and I should start another debate on taxpayer deer kills vs hunting and WB?? Just kidding!

From: Notme
05-Jan-20
Red tick blue tick I tick you tick..lol

From: SixLomaz
05-Jan-20
>>> BOOM<<<

More members = more clicks. Less members = less clicks. Same goes for time spent on page. It all revolves around membership, or is not? If traffic is weighted then it must be outside traffic coming in. Once you clicked in and now you move from page to page it is another story. Me staying on this page is not as important as me coming to Bowsite.com from different IP addresses multiple times. 101 primer on measuring traffic for advertising - https://www.wikihow.com/Measure-Website-Traffic and https://www.commonplaces.com/blog/5-web-traffic-metrics-you-should-keep-your-eyes-on

Free tip: Instead of having advertising banner at the top and bottom of a page where they disappear as soon as you scroll, place them along sides and make them banners chase the scrolling function if you do not have enough ads to dynamically fill the column. Keep them on screen no matter where the user scrolls. Also, make the banners cycle based on advertiser paid fee; more fee = more advertising time. It is best to keep up with the technology and demand. This website is a gold mine exploited using archaic techniques and equipment. The revenue can be maximized as there is place for improvement.

Quote from https://www.incomediary.com/how-much-traffic-website-gets:

"The Final Word

Unless the owner of the website reveals exactly how much traffic they’re getting, every other figure is a best guess. Most tools are surprisingly inaccurate when it comes to generating stats. They are good, however, for comparing yourself against others."

  • Sitka Gear